This study aims to determine the application of Intellectual Property Rights in the franchise agreement on the Chemical Joss Clean Product Franchise contract and the legal consequences if there is a breach of contract on the Chemical Joss Clean Product Franchise. The innovative and environmentally friendly "Chemical Joss Clean" product is highly dependent on the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) such as copyright, trademarks, patents, and trade secrets. To prevent unauthorized use, this study highlights the importance of the franchise agreement as a legal protection tool for the parties involved, and can sue legally if there is a violation, thus providing a sense of security and legal certainty between PT. Muhandas Citra Cemerlang as the franchisor and Franchisee CV. Damar Luhur Abadi as the recipient of the Franchise regarding the implementation of the franchise agreement. The urgency of the research is to ensure the success and sustainability of the franchise business. The research method uses juridical law with qualitative data analysis. The results of this study are the Franchise Agreement between PT. Muhandas Citra Cemerlang and CV. Damar Luhur Abadi has fulfilled the elements contained in Article 1320 of the Civil Code so that the agreement that has been established will bind both parties and become law for both parties. Points concerning IPR are regulated in Article 12 of Intellectual Property Rights in the Joss Clean product business partner agreement letter. The supervision mechanism from the franchisor to ensure that franchisees comply with the provisions related to the IPR of Joss Clean products, both PT. Muhandas Citra Cemerlang and CV. Damar Luhur Abadi have committed to jointly maintaining and supervising the use of the Joss Clean brand in accordance with the applicable agreement.
 
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dalam perjanjian waralaba pada kontrak waralaba (Franchise) Produk Chemical Joss Clean dan akibat hukum apabila terjadi wanprestasi pada kontrak Franchise Produk Chemical Joss Clean. Produk "Chemical Joss Clean" yang inovatif dan ramah lingkungan sangat tergantung pada perlindungan hak kekayaan intelektual (HKI) seperti hak cipta, merek dagang, paten, dan rahasia dagang. Untuk mencegah penggunaan yang tidak sah, penelitian ini menyoroti pentingnya perjanjian franchise sebagai alat perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak yang terlibat, dan dapat menuntut secara hukum jika terjadi pelanggaran, sehingga memberikan rasa aman dan kepastian hukum antara PT. Muhandas Citra Cemerlang selaku franchisor dan Franchisee CV. Damar Luhur Abadi selaku penerima Franchise mengenai pelaksanaan perjanjian waralaba (Franchise). Urgensi penelitian untuk menjamin keberhasilan dan kelangsungan bisnis franchise. Metode penelitian menggunakan hukum yuridis dengan analisis data kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini adalah Perjanjian Waralaba antara PT. Muhandas Citra Cemerlang dan CV. Damar Luhur Abadi telah memenuhi unsur-unsur yang terdapat pada Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata sehingga kesepatakan yang telah terjalin akan mengikat kedua belah pihak dan menjadi hukum bagi kedua belah pihak. Poin-poin yang menyangkut HKI diatur dalam Pasal 12 Hak Kekayaan Intelektual pada surat perjanjian mitra bisnis produk Joss Clean. Mekanisme pengawasan dari pihak franchisor untuk memastikan penerima waralaba mematuhi ketentuan terkait HKI produk Joss Clean baik pihak PT. Muhandas Citra Cemerlang dan CV. Damar Luhur Abadi sudah berkomitmen untuk bersama-sama menjaga dan melakukan pengawasan penggunaan merek Joss Clean sesuai perjanjian yang berlakuCemerlang dan CV. Damar Luhur Abadi sudah berkomitmen untuk bersama-sama menjaga dan melakukan pengawasan penggunaan merek Joss Clean sesuai perjanjian yang berlaku.

This research aims to analyze the process of implementing a voluntary non-execution movable object auction at PT JBA Indonesia Semarang City Branch. As well as to analyze legal protection for winners of non-voluntary execution movable object auctions at PT JBA Indonesia Semarang City Branch. The urgency of this research is so that auction winners are not deceived by the condition of movable objects when they are declared to have won the auction. And so that the auction winner gets legal protection and understands the legal standing at the time of the auction. This writing is empirical juridical research with a statutory approach and a case approach. The research specifications used in this research are analytical descriptive. The data collection method used by the author is by examining primary data obtained through interviews with employees and assistants to the leadership of the private auction house PT JBA Indonesia, Semarang City Branch, which was conducted directly at the PT JBA Indonesia Semarang City Branch office and secondary data obtained from materials. References. The results of the research explain that the auction implementation at the private auction center PT JBA Indonesia uses a voluntary non-execution auction type, then the auction implementation is also divided into several categories, namely pre-auction, during the auction, and post-auction. There are several categories of legal protection for winners of auctions for non-voluntary movable objects, namely disclosure of information about auction winners, private auction houses daring to take responsibility for errors in auction implementation and special complaints regarding auction implementation.

This study aims to analyze the performance of Police Sector intelligence as a detection base in supporting the maintenance of security and public order and analyze the efforts to improve the performance of Police Intelligence as a detection base in supporting the maintenance of security and public order in the Batang Police Department. The research method used is a sociological juridical. The analysis of research results shows that early detection efforts carried out by the Sector Police Unit of the Batang Resort Police security intelligence unit really need to be carried out so that they are able to detect, search and collect and dig up information from the community, then an identification process is carried out to sort, calculate and determine alternatives and consider and reading the signs of the facts from the detection results, the results are expressed in intelligence administration in the form of products that guarantee confidentiality, speed, accuracy and predictability. The discipline of the Batang Police Sector personnel in understanding the regulations and policies of leaders who are obliged to work is still lacking, as evidenced by the finding that the implementation of the Sector Police as a Detection Base has not run optimally, both operationally in the field and administratively.

Legal protection for deceased home ownership credit debtors based on insurance guarantees and Article 1100 of the Civil Code has not been clearly explained. The debtor's heirs do not yet know for sure about the risks. The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of legal protection for deceased home ownership credit debtors based on insurance guarantees and Article 1100 of the Civil Code. The research method uses empirical juridical using analytical descriptive. The results of this study are that the implementation of legal protection for deceased home ownership credit debtors does not only involve the debtor and creditor, but also the heirs if the debtor dies. This home ownership credit agreement is regulated in Articles 1320 and 1138 of the Civil Code. The agreement between the debtor and creditor also uses an offering letter as a credit agreement. The transfer of the debtor's heirs is regulated in Article 1100 of the Civil Code which states that heirs who receive an inheritance are required to share in the payment of debts, bequests, and other burdens. This is also related to the legal theory of Gustav Radbruch and Plato which regulates law. The principle related to this is the principle of consensualism related to article 1320 of the Criminal Code, namely freedom of contract. In the future, it is hoped that the heirs of the debtor will be more aware of the credit system so that they can avoid bad credit.


Perlindungan Hukum debitur kredit pemilikan rumah yang meninggal dunia berdasarkan jaminan asuransi dan pasal 1100 KUHPerdata belum secara jelas dijelaskan. Ahli waris dari debitur belum mengetahui secata pasti mengenai resikonya. Tujuan penelitian untuk menganalisis pelaksanaan perlindungan hukum debitur kredit pemilikan rumah yang meninggal dunia berdasarkan jaminan asuransi dan pasal 1100 KUHPerdata. Metode penelitian menggunakan yuridis empiris dengan menggunakan deskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pelaksanaan perlindungan hukum debitur kredit pemilikan rumah yang meninggal dunia tidak hanya melibatkan antara debitur dan kreditur, tetapi juga ahli waris apabila debitur meninggal dunia. Perjanjian kredit pemilikan rumah ini diatur dalam pasal 1320 dan 1138 KUHP. Perjanjian antara debitur dan kreditur ini juga menggunakan offering letter sebagai perjanjian kredit. Pengalihan ahli waris debitur diatur dalam pasal 1100 KUHP yang menyatakan bahwa ahli waris yang menerima warisan diwajibkan untuk ikut memikul pembayaran utang, hibah wasiat, dan beban-beban lain. Hal ini juga berkaitan dengan teori hukum Gustav Radbruch dan Plato yang mengatur hukum. Asas yang berhubungan dengan hal ini adalah asas konsesualisme yang berkaitan dengan pasal 1320 KUHP yaitu kebebasan berkontrak. Kedepannya diharapkan agar ahli waris debitur agar lebih mengetahui tentang sistem kredit sehingga terhindar dari kredit macet.

This research aims to analyze the use of the right of inquiry by the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) in Indonesia's state governance, particularly in overseeing infrastructure development in Sleman Regency. The urgency of this research lies in the need to strengthen the supervisory function of the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) to ensure the effectiveness and transparency of regional development. The novelty of this research focuses on optimizing the role of the DPRD through a normative juridical approach and an in-depth analysis of the implementation of oversight functions involving the right of inquiry. This research uses a normative juridical method by examining legislation, literature, and empirical data related to the implementation of the DPRD's supervisory function. The research results show that the DPRD's oversight of infrastructure development in Sleman Regency has been effective, supported by adequate regulations, the commitment of DPRD members, as well as budgetary support, and the enhancement of human resource capacity through training. In addition, the harmonious relationship between the DPRD and the executive, as well as community participation, also strengthens the oversight. This research concludes that the optimization of the DPRD's supervisory function can be achieved through preventive and repressive oversight, both directly and indirectly, as well as across sectors. With effective oversight, it is hoped that development in Sleman Regency can proceed more transparently, accountably, and in accordance with the needs of the community without deviations that harm the state.




Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penggunaan hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (DPRD) dalam tata kelola negara Indonesia, khususnya dalam pengawasan pembangunan infrastruktur di Kabupaten Sleman. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada perlunya memperkuat fungsi pengawasan DPRD untuk memastikan efektivitas dan transparansi pembangunan daerah. Kebaruan penelitian ini terfokus pada optimalisasi peran DPRD melalui pendekatan yuridis normatif dan analisis mendalam terhadap implementasi fungsi pengawasan yang melibatkan hak angket. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur, dan data empiris terkait pelaksanaan fungsi pengawasan DPRD. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengawasan DPRD terhadap pembangunan infrastruktur di Kabupaten Sleman telah berjalan baik, didukung oleh regulasi yang memadai, komitmen anggota DPRD, serta dukungan anggaran dan peningkatan kapasitas sumber daya manusia melalui pelatihan. Selain itu, hubungan harmonis antara DPRD dan eksekutif serta partisipasi masyarakat turut memperkuat pengawasan.Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa optimalisasi fungsi pengawasan DPRD dapat dicapai melalui pengawasan preventif dan represif, baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung, serta lintas sektor. Dengan pengawasan yang efektif, diharapkan pembangunan di Kabupaten Sleman dapat berjalan lebih transparan, akuntabel, dan sesuai dengan kebutuhan masyarakat tanpa penyimpangan yang merugikan negara.

This research aims to understand and analyze the forms of work agreements implemented by micro and small enterprises, as well as the implications of the forms of work agreements for legal protection for workers in micro and small enterprises. Every citizen has the right to have work and a decent life. To obtain work, workers need to have an employment relationship with the employer. This employment relationship occurs based on a work agreement made by the employer and the employee which can be made in writing or verbally. The work agreement contains the rights and obligations of both parties, therefore the work agreement is very important as a form of legal protection. It's just that in reality there are still many employment relationships that are not based on employment agreements, such as employment relationships in micro and small enterprises. The absence of a work agreement means that workers' rights and obligations are not fulfilled, and legal protection for them is not strong. The research method used is an empirical juridical method. The research results show that employers/employers make work agreements with their workers in verbal form for an indefinite period of time and do not make appointment letters for their workers. This has implications for legal protection for workers which becomes weak because there is no written proof of the agreement made. The use of verbal employment agreements in micro and small enterprises weakens legal protection for workers, thus policies are needed to encourage the implementation of written employment agreements to enhance legal certainty.



Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami dan menganalisis bentuk perjanjian kerja yang diterapkan oleh usaha mikro dan kecil, serta implikasi bentuk perjanjian kerja terhadap perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja pada usaha mikro dan kecil. Setiap warga negara berhak untuk memiliki pekerja dan kehidupan yang layak. Untuk memperoleh pekerjaan, pekerja perlu menjalani hubungan kerja dengan pemberi kerja. Hubungan kerja tersebut terjadi atas perjanjian kerja yang dilakukan oleh pemberi kerja dengan pekerja yang dapat dibuat secara tertulis atau lisan. Di dalam perjanjian kerja termuat hak dan kewajiban kedua belah pihak, oleh karena itu perjanjian kerja sangat penting sebagai suatu bentuk perlindungan hukum. Hanya saja pada kenyataannya masih banyak hubungan kerja yang tidak didasarkan pada perjanjian kerja, seperti pada hubungan kerja di usaha mikro dan kecil. Ketiadaan perjanjian kerja itu memungkinkan adanya hak dan kewajiban pekerja yang tidak terpenuhi, serta perlindungan hukum bagi mereka tidak kuat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pengusaha/pemberi kerja membuat perjanjian kerja dengan pekerjanya dalam bentuk lisan untuk waktu tidak tertentu dan tidak membuat surat pengangkatan untuk pekerjanya. Hal ini berimplikasi terhadap perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja yang menjadi lemah karena tidak ada bukti tertulis dari kesepakatan yang dibuat. Penggunaan perjanjian kerja lisan pada UMK melemahkan perlindungan hukum bagi pekerja, sehingga diperlukan kebijakan yang mendorong penerapan perjanjian kerja tertulis untuk meningkatkan kepastian hukum.

This research aims to analyze the obstacles and supporting factors in the application of legal sanctions against inmates who violate the order related to the granting of rights in Class II A Penitentiaries Semarang. This is important to study considering that there are still violations of inmates' rights in some prisons in Indonesia. This research is a normative-empirical legal research, with a statutory approach. The novelty of this research is that there are changes in the statutory regulations and in the research location there is an increase in the number of offenders. The results of the study show that the limited capacity and density of prisons make implementing regulations more difficult. Discomfort and poor detention conditions create tensions and violations of inmates' rights. Meanwhile, the imposition of strict sanctions sometimes violates the rights of inmates which is also a problem for prison officers, referring to a comparison of data on the number of disciplinary offenders from the previous year at Semarang Class II Prison has not experienced significant changes. This means that the number of offenders continues to increase and there are still inmates who repeat their crimes. The obstacles in the application of legal sanctions against inmates who violate the statutory regulations in Semarang Class IIA Penitentiary include limited resources, density or overcapacity, resistance or resistance from inmates, and lack of external supervision. While the solutions are preventive efforts and repressive efforts.


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kendala dan faktor pendukung dalam penerapan sanksi hukum terhadap narapidana yang melanggar tata tertib terkait pemberian hak di Lapas Kelas II A Semarang. Hal ini menjadi penting untuk diteliti mengingat masih terdapat pelanggaran terhadap hak-hak narapidana di beberapa Lapas di Indonesia. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif-empiris, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Kebaruan dari penelitian ini adalah terdapat dari sisi perubahan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pada tempat penelitian yang terdapat peningkatan jumlah pelanggar. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terbatasnya kapasitas dan kepadatan penjara membuat peraturan pelaksanaan menjadi lebih sulit. Ketidaknyamanan dan kondisi penahanan yang buruk menciptakan ketegangan dan pelanggaran hak-hak narapidana. Sementara itu, pemberian sanksi yang tegas terkadang melanggar hak-hak narapidana yang juga menjadi permasalahan bagi petugas pemasyarakatan, mengacu pada perbandingan data jumlah pelanggar disiplin dari tahun sebelumnya di Lapas Kelas II Semarang tidak mengalami perubahan signifikan. Artinya, jumlah pelanggar masih terus bertambah dan masih terdapat narapidana yang mengulangi kejahatannya. Kendala dalam penerapan sanksi hukum terhadap narapidana yang melanggar peraturan perundang-undangan di Lapas Kelas II A Semarang antara lain adalah keterbatasan sumber daya, kepadatan atau kelebihan kapasitas, resistensi atau perlawanan dari narapidana dan kurangnya pengawasan dari luar. Sedangkan solusi yang dilakukan adalah upaya preventif dan upaya represif.

This research aims to analyze the judge's considerations when deciding industrial relations court cases with separate filings and the legal consequences of differences in rulings from industrial relations court cases with separate filings (splitting). The urgency of this research is that currently, courts consider factors beyond the literal interpretation of the law when making decisions, therefore legal professionals, including judges, must have empathy for individuals which is reflected in their decisions. This type of research is normative juridical. The research results show that splitting in the resolution of industrial relations cases refers to the separation of interest disputes and employment termination (PHK) disputes in decisions. However, this separation creates legal uncertainty and a damaged sense of justice. This separation of cases also has the impact of separating settlements and decisions, resulting in two different decisions for each type of dispute, with different legal consequences. The Civil Procedure Law (HIR) and Field Room (RBg) systems are used in industrial relations courts, but high costs, especially for workers, are the main obstacle. Apart from that, differences in decisions between judges also give rise to injustice.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hakim pada saat memutuskan perkara pengadilan hubungan industrial dengan pemberkasan yang terpisah dan akibat hukum dari perbedaan amar putusan dari perkara pengadilan hubungan industrial dengan pemberkasan yang terpisah (splitsing). Urgensi penelitian ini yaitu saat ini, pengadilan mempertimbangkan faktor-faktor di luar penafsiran hukum secara harafiah ketika mengambil keputusan, oleh karena itu para profesional hukum, termasuk hakim, harus memiliki empati terhadap individu yang tercermin dalam putusannya. Jenis penelitian ini yaitu yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa splitsing dalam penyelesaian perkara hubungan industrial mengacu pada pemisahan perselisihan kepentingan dan perselisihan pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) dalam putusan. Namun, pemisahan ini menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dan rasa keadilan yang tercederai. Pemisahan perkara ini juga berdampak pada pemisahan penyelesaian dan putusan, menghasilkan dua amar putusan yang berbeda untuk setiap jenis perselisihan, dengan konsekuensi hukum yang berbeda pula. Sistem Hukum Acara Perdata (HIR) dan Ruang Bidang (RBg) digunakan dalam pengadilan hubungan industrial, namun biaya tinggi, terutama bagi pekerja, menjadi kendala utama. Selain itu, perbedaan putusan antara hakim juga menimbulkan ketidakadilan.

The aim of this research is to analyze the implications of the implementation of police investigative authority in the criminal justice system and to determine the obstacles that occur as well as coercive efforts made in investigations and prosecutions by authorized institutions so that they can be controlled through the system pretrials. This research discusses the implications and authority of police investigators in the criminal justice system and the role of pre-trial as one of the legal measures for the protection and rights of suspects in examinations at the investigative level, as well as what factors can create obstacles to the protection of suspects' rights. Pre-trial arrangements are regulated in Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code, namely examining the validity or not of coercive efforts to arrest and detain as well as checking whether or not the termination of investigation or prosecution, compensation, and rehabilitation is valid. The method used is normative empirical, which is the addition of data or empirical elements from field studies to obtain data by holding questions and answers with police institutions. The result of this study is to find out about the implications of investigator authority in criminal justice and the reasons for pretrial efforts made by suspects rejected or granted by the local district court.




Tujuan dari penelitian ini guna menganalisa implikasi terhadap pelaksanaan kewenangan penyidik kepolisian dalam sistem peradilan pidana dan untuk mengetahui kendala yang terjadi serta upaya paksa yang dilakukan dalam penyidikan maupun penuntutan oleh lembaga yang berwenang, sehingga dapat dikontrol melalui sistem praperadilan. Penelitian ini membahas bagaimana implikasi serta kewenangan penyidik kepolisian dalam sistem peradilan pidana dan bagaimana peranan praperadilan sebagai salah satu upaya hukum terhadap perlindungan dan hak-hak tersangka dalam pemeriksaan pada tingkat penyidikan, serta faktor apa sajakah yang dapat menjadikan hambatan tentang perlindungan hak-hak tersangka. Pengaturan praperadilan diatur dalam pasal 77 KUHAP yaitu memeriksa sah atau tidaknya upaya paksa pada penangkapan dan penahanan serta memeriksa sah atau tidaknya penghentian penyidikan atau penghentian penuntutan, ganti rugi dan rehabilitasi. Metode yang digunakan adalah normatif empiris , studi lapangan untuk memperoleh data-data dengan mengadakan tanya jawab dengan institusi kepolisian. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah dapat mengetahui implikasi kewenangan penyidik dalam peradilan pidana dan sebab upaya praperadilan yang dilakukan oleh tersangka ditolak atau dikabulkan oleh pengadilan negeri setempat.

This research aims to analyze the legal implications of providing severance pay to employees who are absent without valid reasons and are not regulated in the employment contract. After the 1998 reform, labor law in Indonesia underwent significant changes aimed at creating a harmonious and fair industrial relationship. One important aspect is the regulation of termination of employment (layoffs) and the provision of compensation to workers, including severance pay. However, not all conditions of layoffs and compensation are specifically regulated in collective labor agreements or company regulations. The research method used is normative juridical with a case approach. The research findings indicate that the ambiguity of regulations regarding severance pay can lead to disputes between workers and employers, as well as legal uncertainty. The novelty of this research lies in the analysis of court decisions and applicable regulations regarding compensation for absent workers, which have not been regulated in employment agreements. This research suggests the need for clearer regulations to avoid legal conflicts in the future.



Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum pemberian uang pisah kepada pekerja yang mangkir tanpa keterangan yang sah dan tidak diatur dalam perjanjian kerja. Setelah reformasi tahun 1998, hukum ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia mengalami perubahan signifikan dengan tujuan menciptakan hubungan industrial yang harmonis dan adil. Salah satu aspek penting adalah pengaturan pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) dan pemberian kompensasi kepada pekerja, termasuk uang pisah. Namun, tidak semua kondisi PHK dan pemberian kompensasi diatur secara spesifik dalam perjanjian kerja bersama atau peraturan perusahaan.. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketidakjelasan aturan mengenai uang pisah dapat menimbulkan perselisihan antara pekerja dan pengusaha, serta ketidakpastian hukum. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis putusan pengadilan dan peraturan yang berlaku terkait kompensasi bagi pekerja mangkir, yang belum diatur dalam perjanjian kerja. Penelitian ini menyarankan adanya regulasi yang lebih jelas untuk menghindari konflik hukum di masa depan.