Publication Search

This study aims to analyze the implementation of differentiated science learning on spring energy material in elementary schools. This qualitative research with a case study design involved one class IV consisting of 28 students (14 males, 14 females) with a distribution of learning styles: 8 visual students (28.57%), 7 auditory students (25%), and 9 kinesthetic students (32.14%). Data collection was carried out through learning observations, in-depth interviews with 6 students representing the three learning styles, and analysis of learning documentation. The results showed that the level of learning implementation reached 90% conformity with the developed teaching module. The achievement of learning outcomes showed consistency, with an average score of 85 for each learning style group. Interviews revealed positive student responses to learning that was fun and made it easier to understand the material. The success of the implementation was supported by thorough teacher preparation and the availability of diverse learning media. However, there were challenges in terms of limited preparation time and the complexity of classroom management. This study proves the effectiveness of differentiated science learning in accommodating the diversity of elementary school students' learning styles.

The research was conducted based on the problem of students in class XI TITL 2 SMK N 5 Surabaya This research aims to improve student learning outcomes by using differentiated learning based on student learning styles with differentiated content aspects. This research uses the PTK (Classroom Action Research) method with a quantitative approach and data collection techniques using diagnostic assessments (prestest) and summative assessments (posttest). The results of research using differentiated learning based on students' learning styles with differentiated content aspects show that there is an increase in learning outcomes which can be seen from pre-cycle activities with the percentage of learning completeness increasing from 18% to 43% in cycle I, then increasing to 78% in cycle II. From these results it can be concluded that research using differentiated learning based on students' learning styles based on differentiated content aspects has succeeded in improving the learning outcomes of class XI TITL 2 SMK N 5 Surabaya in mathematics lessons simple linear regression analysis material.    

Differentiated learning is an effort to provide facilities to students, apart from that providing these facilities provides a lot of new understanding for teachers to see students' needs. This research uses the PTK research method (classroom action research) which is carried out in grade 4 elementary schools with the aim of improving learning outcomes on norms and customs material for students. The results of this research are that it can improve student learning outcomes with the KKN targets set by the school in the material on norms and customs in grade 4 elementary school. Apart from that, the application of differentiated learning is the first application in this class using 3 different results according to the students' abilities.

The research was carried out on the problem of the ability to understand mathematical material in the students of classes VII-H of the State 3 Surabaya High School. There are students who have the ability to understand material low, medium, and high. There are also students' learning needs that are not fulfilled so that they affect the learning outcomes of students. The aim of this study is to improve the learning outcomes of students through differential learning. The research uses the Class Action Research (PTK) method with a quantitative approach and data collection techniques using the results of individual student tasks. The results of the study using differential learning showed that the increased learning outcomes seen from pre-cycle activities were 18% up to 41% in the first cycle, then in the second cycle showed an increase with a percentage of 82%. From these results it can be concluded that the research using the differentiation learning was successful in improving the learning outcome of students of classes VII-H of the 3rd State Sub-secondary School of Surabaya at the point of mathematics lessons Data Presentation.

In the process of learning Indonesian, it is often found that each student has a different level of understanding and ability. In addition, factors such as different learning styles can also affect student learning outcomes. Differentiated learning can be influential in improving student learning outcomes. This study aims to find the effect of differentiated learning on students' grades in Indonesian language courses. This research uses quasi-experimental method. Differentiated learning has an effect on improving student learning outcomes in Indonesian language courses seen from a significant level of 0.05 the value of Fstatistic = 0.0758 and FKritis = 0.4401 which means FKritis> Fstatistic (0.4401>0.0758), so differentiated learning can affect the improvement of nursing student learning outcomes in Indonesian language courses.

This study aims to describe the implementation of differentiation learning as an effort to strengthen the Pancasila Student Profile in the independent curriculum. This research is qualitative description research using library research methods. Using data analysis techniques in the form of reading and recording techniques. The results of this study show that the differentiated approach consists of three aspects, namely content differentiation, process differentiation, and product differentiation. 1) Content differentiation includes what students learn. In this regard, teachers modify the curriculum and teaching materials based on the learning styles and disability proceedings possessed by students. The content of the curriculum is adjusted to the circumstances and abilities of the students. 2) Process differentiation is the way students process and process ideas and information. How students interact with the material and how that interaction becomes a part that then determines student learning choices. Due to the many learning styles and differences in learning style choices presented by students, the class must be modified to accommodate different learning needs. 3) Product differentiation is how students demonstrate what they have learned. Learning products allow teachers to assess what material has been mastered by students and then present the next material. Student learning styles can also determine what student learning outcomes will be shown to the teacher.

This research aims to (1) obtain information regarding teacher creativity in implementing the independent curriculum, (2) determine the obstacles that arise in achieving creative teachers. This research is descriptive qualitative research using interviews and observation techniques, then the data is processed using Miles and Huberman data analysis. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that creativity in preparing teaching modules and teaching materials is grouped into four dimensions, namely personal dimensions, process dimensions, product dimensions and press dimensions. The personal dimension of creativity in preparing teaching modules can be seen from the application of differentiated learning, the application of learning methods, and the elements of teaching modules. The dimensions of the creativity process in preparing teaching modules can be seen from the survey of student needs and understanding of learning outcomes, learning objectives and the flow of learning objectives. The product dimension of creativity in preparing teaching modules can be seen from the appearance of the teaching module and the content of the teaching module. In the press dimension, creativity in preparing teaching modules can be seen from the recognition and responses of other people. Meanwhile, the personal dimension of creativity in preparing teaching materials can be seen from the diversity of teaching materials and learning media as well as the depth of materials and assessments. The dimensions of the creativity process in preparing teaching materials can be seen from understanding the teaching materials. In the product dimension, creativity in preparing teaching materials can be seen from the resulting teaching materials. In the press dimension, creativity in preparing teaching materials can be seen from the recognition and responses of other people. Barriers that are often experienced include self-motivation, time management, and mastery of information technology.    

This research aims to discuss the influence of the Think Pair Share (TPS) learning model based on differentiation learning on students' high-level thinking abilities in the material of classification of living creatures at SMP N 4 Dumoga. This research design uses an experiment with a Posttest-Only Control Group Design research design. The research was carried out in class VII with a total of 50 students divided into two groups, namely VII A as the experimental class and class VIIB as the control class. Test high-level thinking skills in the form of analysis, evaluation, and creation questions. The results of hypothesis testing using the t-test obtained tcount = 4.306 > ttable = 2.010 at α = 0.05, which means H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. The conclusion is that there is a significant influence of the Think Pair and Share (TPS) learning model based on Differentiated Learning on Higher Level Thinking Abilities. Students think at a higher level at SMP N 4 Dumoga.

This study aims to describe the implementation of differentiation learning as an effort to strengthen the Pancasila Student Profile in the independent curriculum. This research is qualitative description research using library research methods. Using data analysis techniques in the form of reading and recording techniques. The results of this study show that the differentiated approach consists of three aspects, namely content differentiation, process differentiation, and product differentiation. 1) Content differentiation includes what students learn. In this regard, teachers modify the curriculum and teaching materials based on the learning styles and disability proceedings possessed by students. The content of the curriculum is adjusted to the circumstances and abilities of the students. 2) Process differentiation is the way students process and process ideas and information. How students interact with the material and how that interaction becomes a part that then determines student learning choices. Due to the many learning styles and differences in learning style choices presented by students, the class must be modified to accommodate different learning needs. 3) Product differentiation is how students demonstrate what they have learned. Learning products allow teachers to assess what material has been mastered by students and then present the next material. Student learning styles can also determine what student learning outcomes will be shown to the teacher.

This study aims to improve student learning outcomes in Pancasila Education subjects through the application of the Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL) approach in class X-1 of SMA Negeri 1 Rantau Selatan. The background of this study is the low learning outcomes of students caused by differences in learning abilities that have not been accommodated in the learning process. TaRL is an approach that adjusts learning to the level of ability of each student, not only based on class level. This study uses the Classroom Action Research (CAR) method which is carried out in two cycles, each consisting of the planning, action, observation, and reflection stages. Learning begins with a diagnostic assessment to determine students' initial abilities, which then become the basis for dividing study groups. The results of the study showed a significant increase in learning outcomes, indicated by an increase in the average score from 73 in the pre-cycle to 89 in the second cycle. In addition, student activity and involvement in the learning process also increased. These findings indicate that the TaRL approach is able to answer students' learning needs more specifically and has a positive impact on the learning process and outcomes. This approach is recommended as an alternative strategy in differentiated learning.

This study examines the impact of differentiated learning models in inclusive educational settings, focusing on their effect on student participation, motivation, and academic performance. Differentiated instruction (DI) adapts content, teaching methods, and assessments to meet the diverse learning styles, interests, and abilities of students. Using a mixed methods approach, the research combines quantitative and qualitative data to explore how DI influences engagement and academic outcomes in diverse classrooms. The findings show that DI significantly increased student participation, as lessons tailored to individual strengths encouraged more active involvement. Motivation also improved, with students displaying higher intrinsic motivation when engaging with relevant material at their own pace. Additionally, academic performance improved, especially for students who had struggled with traditional teaching methods. These results suggest that DI is an effective strategy for inclusive education, particularly for students with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). The study emphasizes the importance of teacher training and ongoing professional development for successful DI implementation. The implications are significant for global educational settings, where classrooms are becoming more diverse. By adopting differentiated strategies, educators can create more equitable and inclusive learning experiences. Future research should explore the long-term effects of DI in various cultural and educational contexts.

This study investigates the challenges faced by educators teaching English as a Second Language (ESL) in multilingual classrooms. By analyzing classroom dynamics, language barriers, and teaching strategies, the research identifies key issues such as student motivation, varying proficiency levels, and cultural diversity. The article proposes several strategies, including differentiated instruction, collaborative learning, and the integration of technology, to address these challenges and enhance ESL learning outcomes.

This study aims to explore the effect of applying differentiated learning model with Discover Learning model on learning outcomes of Pancasila and Civics Education (PPKn) in class XII MIPA IV SMA Negeri 1 Maros Regency. The research method used was classroom action research (PTK) with a double cycle design. The research participants consisted of 36 students of class XII MIPA IV SMA Negeri 1  Maros.  consisting of various ability levels. Learning outcome data were collected through tests and observations. The results showed that the application of differentiated learning model with Discover Learning model can improve Civics learning outcomes in students of class XII MIPA IV SMA Negeri 1 Maros. There were significant improvements in concept understanding, critical thinking skills, and learning motivation of learners after the application of this learning model. This finding shows that the use of differentiated learning model with Discover Learning model can be an effective alternative in improving Civics learning outcomes in students of class XII MIPA IV SMA Negeri 1 Maros.

This study aims to explore the effect of applying differentiated learning model with Discover Learning model on learning outcomes of Pancasila and Civics Education (PPKn) in class X.3 SMA Negeri 6 Maros Regency. The research method used was classroom action research (PTK) with a double cycle design. The research participants consisted of 28 students of class X.3 SMA Negeri 6 Maros Regency consisting of various ability levels. Learning outcome data were collected through tests and observations. The results showed that the application of differentiated learning model with Discover Learning model can improve Civics learning outcomes in students of class X.3 SMA Negeri 6 Maros Regency. There were significant improvements in concept understanding, critical thinking skills, and learning motivation of learners after the application of this learning model. This finding shows that the use of differentiated learning model with Discover Learning model can be an effective alternative in improving Civics learning outcomes in students of class X.3 SMA Negeri 6 Maros Regency.  

Children with special needs are children who have unique characteristics compared to (regular) children. To facilitate learning progress, teachers can apply a differentiated learning model. Differentiated learning is one of the learning models where teachers use a variety of different learning methods according to the characteristics, interests, learning styles, and abilities of students. The purpose of this study is to find out more about differentiated learning and how it is implemented in Class VIII Special Schools. This research uses descriptive qualitative method. The data collection methods used were observation, interview, and note-taking. The data subjects in this research are teachers and students of class VIII of SMPLB Insan Mulia Tangerang Regency. The research location is in Pisangan Jaya village, Tangerang Regency. The result of the learning that has been implemented is the discovery of 3 strategies in differentiated learning, Content Differentiation. Content refers to the curriculum and learning materials; 2. Process Differentiation. How students process ideas and information; 3. Product Differentiation. How students demonstrate what they have learned; 4. Differentiation of Learning environment. Differentiated learning has a positive impact on student engagement and learning outcomes, so students do not struggle with learning.