This study explores the effectiveness of digital mediation in resolving civil disputes within Indonesia’s judiciary system, particularly in the era of rapid technological advancement. The growing backlog of cases and the high costs of litigation have emphasized the need for more efficient and accessible dispute resolution methods. Digital mediation emerges as a promising alternative, leveraging technology to bridge geographical barriers and reduce procedural delays. The study aims to analyze the factors influencing the success of digital mediation and identify challenges that hinder its implementation. Using a qualitative approach, this research collected primary data through in-depth interviews with mediators, disputing parties, and judicial policymakers. Secondary data were gathered from official court reports and relevant literature. The analysis involved thematic coding and interpretation of data to uncover patterns and insights. Case studies from urban, semi-urban, and rural courts provided a comprehensive understanding of the varying success rates of digital mediation. The findings reveal that mediator training in technology significantly enhances the success rate of digital mediation, particularly in urban areas with better digital infrastructure. However, rural areas face challenges such as limited internet access and low digital literacy, which impede the effectiveness of the mediation process. The study also highlights the importance of integrating judicial systems with digital mediation platforms and revising regulatory frameworks to ensure consistent implementation. This research contributes to the theoretical understanding of digital mediation and offers practical implications for policymakers. It underscores the need for targeted training programs for mediators and investments in digital infrastructure to promote equitable access. The findings provide a roadmap for improving digital mediation practices and suggest further exploration of user experiences and longitudinal impacts. By addressing existing challenges, digital mediation can become a cornerstone of Indonesia’s civil dispute resolution in the digital age.

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis kendala penerapan kurikulum mandiri di MTs Miftahush Shibyan dan mengidentifikasi alternatif solusi  untuk mengatasinya. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif  dengan menggunakan metode wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi. Temuan tersebut mengungkapkan tiga hambatan utama: terbatasnya pemahaman guru terhadap kurikulum mandiri, kurangnya kesempatan belajar yang tepat, dan rendahnya motivasi siswa untuk belajar mandiri. Solusi yang diusulkan mencakup pelatihan intensif bagi guru, perbaikan infrastruktur sekolah, dukungan khusus bagi siswa, serta penilaian dan pemantauan berkelanjutan. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi referensi untuk mengoptimalkan kurikulum mandiri di lembaga pendidikan lainnya.

The death penalty remains one of the most contentious policies in addressing narcotics crimes in Indonesia. While implemented as a stringent measure to combat drug trafficking, the policy often sparks debates regarding its effectiveness and implications for human rights. This study aims to analyze public perceptions of the death penalty policy for narcotics-related offenses, focusing on how demographic factors such as age, education, and residence influence public support. Using a quantitative approach, this research employed a nationwide survey involving 1,500 respondents selected through stratified random sampling. Data collection combined online and offline methods to ensure broad representation. The findings reveal significant demographic variations in support for the death penalty. Younger and middle-aged respondents (25–40 years old) showed the highest levels of support (70%), particularly in urban areas (70%) compared to rural areas (55%). Educational attainment also influenced perspectives, with higher education levels correlating with increased support for the policy. The study concludes that public perceptions of the death penalty are shaped significantly by demographic and socio-cultural factors. These findings underscore the need for targeted communication strategies to address varying public concerns, particularly in rural areas where access to information may be limited. The research contributes to policy discussions by providing empirical insights into public opinion on this controversial issue. It recommends integrating public education campaigns and alternative rehabilitative measures to enhance public understanding and acceptance of narcotics policies. By grounding policy development in evidence-based research, this study aims to support more equitable and effective approaches to addressing drug-related crimes in Indonesia

The digital era has significantly increased the complexity of cross-border crimes, particularly cybercrime, which poses substantial challenges for countries, including Indonesia. With a reported rise in cross-border cybercrime incidents of over 50% in the last five years, Indonesia faces critical legal and technical hurdles in combating such threats. This study explores the rights and obligations of states in addressing cross-border cybercrime, focusing on comparing Indonesia's legal framework with international standards, specifically the Budapest Convention. Employing a normative analytical method, this research examines international and national legal documents to identify gaps and evaluate the alignment of Indonesia's cybercrime regulations with global standards. Key findings reveal that Indonesia's cybercrime policies lack mandatory international cooperation mechanisms and are limited to national jurisdiction, which restricts the country’s ability to effectively address cybercrimes involving foreign perpetrators. In contrast, the Budapest Convention emphasizes structured international collaboration, robust privacy protections, and flexible jurisdictional arrangements, providing a comprehensive framework for managing transnational cyber threats. The study concludes that harmonizing Indonesia’s regulations with international standards, such as the Budapest Convention, is essential for improving the nation's capacity to combat cross-border cybercrime. Recommendations include enhancing legal frameworks to mandate international cooperation, establishing specialized units within law enforcement agencies equipped with advanced digital forensic tools, and strengthening privacy protections to align with global norms. This research contributes to the discourse on international cybercrime management by offering practical strategies to bridge regulatory gaps and bolster Indonesia’s position in global cybersecurity collaborations. The findings underscore the urgency for policy reform to address the evolving challenges of digital threats in an interconnected world.

The implementation of Islamic accounting in the business world has gained increasing attention as awareness grows regarding the financial and operational principles outlined by Islamic law. Islamic accounting, which adheres to the principles of Shariah, aims to ensure that a company's transactions and financial reports comply with Islamic guidelines. This paper aims to analyze the impact of the implementation of Islamic accounting on firm value, with a focus on examining the contemporary Islamic accounting framework, which includes structures and methodologies for more transparent reporting. This research also identifies factors that can strengthen or hinder the adoption of Islamic accounting in improving a company’s financial performance, as well as its impact on investor perceptions. The analysis results indicate that companies consistently applying Islamic accounting principles can enhance investor trust, thereby improving the company's value. Thus, the implementation of Islamic accounting can be an effective strategy to enhance the credibility and competitiveness of a company in a market increasingly focused on ethical and transparent financial practices.

Masalah hak asuh anak di luar nikah merupakan isu hukum yang rumit di Indonesia, baik dari sudut pandang hukum positif maupun hukum Islam. Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak memberikan landasan hukum untuk melindungi hak-hak anak, termasuk mereka yang lahir di luar pernikahan sah. Sementara itu, dalam hukum Islam, hak asuh anak (hadanah) berlandaskan prinsip perlindungan dan kesejahteraan anak, dengan mempertimbangkan kebutuhan fisik dan psikologisnya. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji hak asuh anak di luar nikah menurut pandangan hukum Islam dan kaitannya dengan ketentuan dalam Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kajian Pustaka dengan mengumpulkan data terkait pengaturan hak asuh anak di luar nikah dalam kedua sistem hukum tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam hukum Islam, anak yang lahir di luar nikah berhak atas perlindungan dan pengasuhan, dengan prioritas hak asuh diberikan kepada ibu hingga usia tertentu, sedangkan ayah berkewajiban memberikan nafkah. Di sisi lain, Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak menjamin hak setara bagi semua anak tanpa memandang status pernikahan orang tua mereka, meliputi hak asuh, pendidikan, dan perlindungan dari kekerasan. Meskipun terdapat perbedaan dalam pembagian kewajiban dan hak asuh antara ibu dan ayah, kedua sistem hukum ini memiliki keselarasan dalam menjunjung kepentingan terbaik anak. Oleh sebab itu, diperlukan sinergi antara hukum Islam dan hukum positif untuk memastikan perlindungan hak anak di luar nikah, terutama dalam hal pengasuhan yang berfokus pada kesejahteraan anak.

Penelitian ini berjudul "Analisis Tindak Tutur Direktif pada Akun TikTok @KS dalam Menyelesaikan Isu Wanita Berhijab." Fokus utama dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis bagaimana tindak tutur direktif digunakan dalam konten TikTok yang berkaitan dengan isu perempuan berhijab. Dengan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami fenomena komunikasi yang terjadi di platform media sosial, khususnya dalam konteks interaksi antara kreator konten dan audiens. Melalui analisis video dan komentar, ditemukan bahwa tindak tutur direktif berfungsi untuk menyampaikan pesan-pesan ajakan, perintah, serta nasihat kepada audiens. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konten yang diunggah oleh @KS tidak hanya mengandung informasi, tetapi juga berperan dalam membentuk pandangan masyarakat terhadap hijab dan stigma yang menyertainya. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan wawasan lebih dalam mengenai penggunaan bahasa dalam konteks sosial media serta dampaknya terhadap persepsi masyarakat mengenai isu sensitif seperti jilbab.

Konsep keluarga dalam era modern mengalami tantangan besar akibat dinamika sosial, ekonomi, dan budaya yang terus berubah. Artikel ini membahas perbandingan pemikiran Ismail Raji Al-Faruqi dan Emile Durkheim mengenai keluarga. Al-Faruqi, seorang intelektual Muslim, melihat keluarga sebagai unit teologis yang berfungsi untuk menanamkan nilai-nilai tauhid, keimanan, dan moralitas dalam masyarakat Islam. Sebaliknya, Durkheim, sosiolog fungsionalis, menempatkan keluarga sebagai institusi sosial yang menjaga kohesi sosial dan mengatur perilaku individu melalui norma dan nilai kolektif. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian kepustakaan dengan pendekatan filosofis dan komparatif. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa kedua tokoh memiliki pandangan yang berbeda terkait struktur keluarga, peran gender, dan fungsi utama keluarga, meskipun keduanya sepakat tentang pentingnya keluarga dalam membangun masyarakat yang harmonis. Artikel ini memberikan wawasan tentang bagaimana agama dan sekularisme membentuk konsep keluarga, serta relevansinya di era globalisasi yang penuh tantangan. Dengan memahami kedua perspektif ini, diharapkan dapat diidentifikasi strategi untuk memperkuat institusi keluarga sebagai pilar utama kehidupan sosial.

This research aims to determine the influence of the Problem Based Learning Model on Students' Critical Thinking Ability on Ecosystem Material for Class X Students of State High School 2 Gowa. This type of research uses a quasi-experimental type of research or also called quasi-experiment with a "random pretest posttest control group" design model. There are two data collection techniques in this research, namely, test and non-test, then the data collected is analyzed using descriptive analysis and inferential test analysis. The research results show that the average critical thinking ability students in the experimental class who were taught using the Problem Based Learning learning model were in the very good category with an average score of 78.52 and students' critical thinking abilities, while in the control class who were taught using the lecture method were adequate with an average score 52.55. Inferential analysis in hypothesis testing shows significant results with a sig value of 0.000 > 0.05 so that there is an influence of the Problem Based Learning learning model on students' critical thinking abilities in ecosystem material. This is also reinforced by the results of observations regarding student activity increasing.

This study aims to evaluate the level of user satisfaction with the website of SMAN 1 Wangon by applying the End User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) method. This method assesses user satisfaction based on five main dimensions: system quality, information quality, service quality, end user, and individual benefits. Data collection was conducted through questionnaires distributed to students, teachers, and administrative staff. The results of the analysis show that overall user satisfaction is in a good category, although there are some aspects that need to be improved, especially in terms of information and service quality. This research is expected to provide suggestions for further development of the school website, in order to improve user experience and support the learning process.