At the junior high school level (SMP), students begin to recognize the importance of values ??of togetherness in diversity. However, this understanding does not always run smoothly because of cultural and background differences that can affect the way students interact with each other. This study uses a descriptive approach. The purpose of this study is to analyze students' attitudes towards ethnic diversity in class VIII of a private junior high school. Data collected through questionnaires will be analyzed to obtain an overview of students' attitudes towards diversity related to the topic and objectives of the research applied. The results of the study showed that there were no significant differences in attitudes between students with different ethnic backgrounds. This means that positive attitudes towards ethnic diversity are evenly distributed among various ethnic backgrounds, indicating that ethnic factors are not a barrier to social interaction in the classroom, where most students have similar views on the importance of respecting differences and working together with friends from different ethnic groups.

Children are the future generation of the nation that must be protected, especially when dealing with the law. Law enforcement against perpetrators of drug abuse crimes committed by children has been effective. Drug abuse has a very bad impact on the continuity of a nation's generation. To anticipate this, cooperation is needed from all components of society, such as families, from school to university level, and the government must unite in efforts to prevent narcotics in the surrounding environment. Using the perspective of Law Number 35 of 2009, this study attempts to analyze how narcotics crimes committed by children are prosecuted legally. Drug abuse is a serious crime that can endanger the security and sovereignty of the state, as well as the growth and future of the state, according to a normative legal approach that includes analysis of laws and regulations and previous events. Illegal drug use is prohibited, according to Law Number 35 of 2009. Research findings show that, despite the need for legal action against children who use drugs, the juvenile criminal justice system uses Restorative Justice strategies along with the concept of diversion to protect children from stigma.

This study aims to analyze legal protection and compensation mechanisms for consumers who are victims of illegal MLM-based investments, referring to Law Number 8 of 1999, and to assess the role and effectiveness of the OJK in supervision and enforcement. This illegal investment phenomenon is relevant to study because it often utilizes manipulative tactics, including the use of misleading information to encourage potential consumers to allocate their funds. Although legal regulations related to consumer protection are available, effective implementation and supervision are often challenges in ensuring that victims receive fair compensation. The study uses a normative legal method by reviewing theories, concepts, legal principles, and related laws and regulations. The research findings show that victims of illegal MLM-based investments in Indonesia have legal protection under the Consumer Protection Law, with supervision carried out by the Financial Services Authority (OJK). Victims have the right to file for a refund or compensation through a class action lawsuit mechanism. However, the limited assets of the perpetrator company are a major obstacle in implementing compensation. Therefore, a new, more effective approach is needed in supervision and law enforcement, including improving regulations to mitigate similar risks in the future.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum dan mekanisme ganti rugi bagi konsumen korban investasi ilegal berbasis MLM, mengacu pada Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999, serta menilai peran dan efektivitas OJK dalam pengawasan dan penindakan. Fenomena investasi ilegal ini relevan untuk dikaji karena kerap memanfaatkan taktik manipulatif, termasuk penggunaan informasi yang menyesatkan untuk mendorong calon konsumen mengalokasikan dana mereka. Meskipun aturan hukum terkait perlindungan konsumen telah tersedia, implementasi dan pengawasan yang efektif sering kali menjadi tantangan dalam memastikan korban memperoleh ganti rugi yang adil. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan meninjau teori, konsep, asas hukum, dan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa korban investasi ilegal berbasis MLM di Indonesia memiliki perlindungan hukum di bawah Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen, dengan pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). Korban berhak mengajukan pengembalian dana atau kompensasi melalui mekanisme gugatan class action. Namun, keterbatasan aset perusahaan pelaku menjadi hambatan utama dalam pelaksanaan ganti rugi. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pendekatan baru yang lebih efektif dalam pengawasan dan penegakan hukum, termasuk perbaikan regulasi untuk memitigasi risiko serupa di masa mendatang.

This study aims to analyze the influence of information and communication technology and the impact of technology use in higher education institutions, with the Islamic University of Malang as the scope of respondents. Technology is a crucial issue to discuss today because all human activities require adequate technology, one of which is the field of education. The urgency of this research is that technology is one of the supports for the success of education at the Islamic University of Malang. However, on the other hand, technology can sometimes be detrimental to students who need to be aware of the law. These losses can potentially lead to criminal acts. The novelty of this research is that it specifically examines the effect of students' understanding of legal provisions related to information and technology in Indonesia and the importance of knowing the legal consequences if technology is not used appropriately by students so that this research becomes a new contribution. This writing uses empirical juridical research, primary and secondary data, and a questionnaire approach. The results showed that using technology and information provides a way to improve skills, economic welfare, economic science, and especially education. It is necessary to increase the legal understanding of information technology among students by providing training and education.

The purpose of this research is to provide justification that the campaign requirements for state officials as stipulated in Article 281 of the Election Law do not conflict with the principle of non-discrimination with the urgency of research that has the potential to produce injustice in the implementation of elections, namely the restriction of campaign participation by state officials so that it can affect the integrity of the electoral process or the political rights of citizens. The first requirement is not to use state facilities except security facilities and the second requirement is to leave outside state dependence.  These requirements only apply to state officials. This seems to show that the political rights possessed by every citizen are different. The nature of the campaign as a form of realization of citizens' political rights in participating in government should be owned by every citizen with the same opportunity. The research method used is a research with a legal approach, conceptual approach, case approach, and comparative approach. The novelty of this research is that it is the first time to review the norms of campaign requirements for state officials that are relevant to the principle of non-discrimination. The results show that the campaign requirements for state officials do not violate the non-discriminatory principle.  Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memberikan justifikasi bahwa persyaratan kampanye bagi pejabat negara sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 281 UU Pemilu tidak bertentangan dengan prinsip non-diskriminatif dengan urgensi penelitian yang berpotensi menghasilkan ketidakadilan penyelenggaraan pemilu yaitu adanya pembatasan keikutsertaan kampanye oleh pejabat negara sehingga dapat mempengaruhi integritas proses pemilu atau hak-hak politik warga negara. Syarat pertama adalah tidak menggunakan fasilitas negara kecuali fasilitas pengamanan dan syarat kedua adalah cuti di luar tanggungan negara.  Persyaratan-persyaratan tersebut hanya diberlakukan bagi pejabat negara. Hal ini seolah menunjukkan bahwa hak politik yang dimiliki oleh setiap warga negara berbeda. Hakikat kampanye sebagai salah satu bentuk perwujudan hak politik warga negara dalam berpartisipasi dalam pemerintahan hendaknya dimiliki oleh setiap warga negara dengan kesempatan yang sama. Metode penelitian yang digunakan merupakan penelitian dengan pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan komparatif. Kebaharuan penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pertama kali yang meninjau norma persyaratan kampanye bagi pejabat negara yang direlevansikan dengan prinsip non-diskriminatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persyaratan kampanye bagi pejabat negara tidak melanggar prinsip non-diskriminatif. 

This research aims to determine the determination of the status of the Rohingya ethnic group according to the Refugee Convention and the application of the principle of non-refoulement in handling Rohingya refugees in Indonesia in relation to the principle of sovereignty, and then whether the application of the principle of non-refoulement is absolute or not applied in Indonesia. Due to the large number of Rohingya ethnic groups entering Indonesian territory and causing social problems, security can even threaten sovereignty. The research method is normative legal research, relying on secondary data. The research results show that Indonesia is not a country that has ratified the 1951 convention, as a result, it is difficult for asylum seekers to obtain protection regarding their certainty, and considering the ongoing security situation in Myanmar, of course, the only hope for asylum seekers to achieve a long-term solution is through resettlement in third countries and even though Indonesia has not ratified the 1951 convention, Indonesia still needs to comply with the principle of non-refoulement even though there are no penalties imposed on Indonesia if Indonesia violates the 1951 convention and forces refugees to leave Indonesia considering that the convention does not explain in writing what The consequences that non-convention countries will face if they reject asylum seekers and refugees and force them to leave Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penentuan status etnis Rohingya Menurut Konvensi Pengungsi dan penerapan prinsip non refoulement dalam penanganan pengungsi Rohingya di Indonesia dikaitkan dengan prinsip sovereignty, dan kemudian apakah penerapan prinsip non refoulement ini mutlak atau tidak diterapkan di Indonesia. Di karenakan banyaknya etnis Rohingya yang masuk ke wilayah Indonesia dan menimbulkan masalah-masalah sosial, keamanan bahkan dapat mengancam kedaulatan. Metode penelitiannya adalah penelitian hukum normatif, bertumpu pada data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Indonesia bukan merupakan negara yang meratifikasi konvensi 1951, akibatnya pencari suaka kesulitan untuk mendapatkan perlindungan terkait kepastian mereka dan mengingat situasi keamanan yang sedang berlangsung di Myanmar maka tentu saja, maka satu-satunya harapan para pencari suaka untuk mencapai solusi jangka panjang adalah melalui pemukiman kembali di negara ketiga dan walaupun Indonesia tidak meratifikasi konvensi 1951, Indonesia tetap perlu untuk mematuhi prinsip non refoulement sekalipun tidak ada hukuman yang dijatuhkan ke Indonesia apabila Indonesia melanggar konvensi 1951 dan memaksa pengungsi meninggalkan negara Indonesia mengingat di dalam konvensi tidak menjelaskan secara tertulis apa konsekuensi yang akan dihadapi negara-negara non konvensi jika mereka menolak pencari suaka dan pengungsi serta memaksa mereka meninggalkan negara Indonesia. 

This research aims to analyze the legal vacuum in the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (UU ITE) related to the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) in Indonesia in the context of deepfake. This research is motivated by the existence of several regulations on AI, these regulations are not sufficient to regulate thoroughly, especially regarding the technical aspects, implementation, and supervision of AI. So, the study to further analyze the urgency of reformulating the ITE Law due to the absence of specific regulations that are able to close the legal vacuum related to deepfake. The reformulation of the ITE Law is an urgent need to address the threat of deepfake, an AI-based content manipulation technology that is increasingly prevalent in Indonesia, deepfake creates manipulative content without the victim's consent, causing psychological harm, social stigma, and serious challenges in privacy and security. This research is included in normative juridical writing using a statutory approach through analysis of laws and derivative regulations and a comparative approach through analysis of the EU AI Act and China's regulations to provide reformulation suggestions. The results show that there is a legal vacuum that has not specifically regulated AI, which risks the misuse of technology and hampers legal certainty. Comparing the EU and China AI Acts, key findings include the need to adopt the basic principles of the EU AI Act, such as transparency, security, and fairness, as well as risk classification for AI systems. The current AI Act does not regulate important aspects such as labeling, reporting mechanisms, and supervision of high risks in AI systems, and it is recommended to establish a supervisory body responsible for AI risk management.



Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk menganalisis kekosongan hukum dalam Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) terkait regulasi kecerdasan buatan (AI) di Indonesia dalam konteks deepfake. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi dengan adanya beberapa aturan tentang AI, regulasi ini belum cukup mengatur secara menyeluruh, terutama terkait aspek teknis, pelaksanaan, dan pengawasan AI. Maka, pengkajian untuk menganalsis lebih lanjut atas urgensi reformulasi UU ITE dikarenakan belum adanya peraturan spesifik yang mampu menutup kekosongan hukum terkait deepfake. Reformulasi UU ITE menjadi kebutuhan mendesak untuk mengatasi ancaman deepfake, teknologi manipulasi konten berbasis AI yang semakin marak di Indonesia, deepfake menciptakan konten manipulatif tanpa persetujuan korban, sehingga menimbulkan kerugian psikologis, stigma sosial, dan tantangan serius dalam privasi serta keamanan. Adapun penelitian ini termasuk ke dalam penulisan yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan pendekatan perundang-undangan melalui analisis undang-undang dan peraturan turunannya dan pendekatan komparasi melalui analisis pengaturan EU AI Act dan China untuk memberikan saran reformulasi. Hasilnya menunjukkan adanya kekosongan hukum yang belum mengatur AI secara spesifik, yang berisiko pada penyalahgunaan teknologi dan menghambat kepastian hukum. Maka dengan membandingkan pengaturan EU dan China AI Act, temuan utama mencakup kebutuhan untuk mengadopsi prinsip-prinsip dasar dari EU AI Act, seperti transparansi, keamanan, dan keadilan, serta klasifikasi risiko untuk sistem AI. UU ITE saat ini belum mengatur aspek-aspek penting seperti labelling, mekanisme pelaporan, dan pengawasan terhadap risiko tinggi dalam sistem AI, serta disarankan untuk membentuk badan pengawas yang bertanggung jawab atas pengelolaan risiko AI.

This study explores the legal protections against online sexual exploitation of children and online gender-based violence (OGBV) in Southeast Asia, focusing on Indonesia, the Philippines, and Thailand. Using a systematic literature review (SLR) methodology, this research identifies and evaluates legal frameworks, implementation challenges, and the role of digital platforms in addressing these issues. Key regulations such as the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law in Indonesia, the Cybercrime Prevention Act in the Philippines, and the Computer Crime Act in Thailand were analyzed alongside institutional reports and academic studies. The results reveal that while these countries have made significant progress through the establishment of legal frameworks, implementation remains hindered by limited technical capacity, a lack of digital forensic expertise, and low public digital literacy. Furthermore, weak enforcement and insufficient oversight of digital platforms exacerbate the problem, as many platforms fail to respond promptly to reports of illegal content. Despite progressive laws such as Indonesia's Sexual Violence Prevention Law and the Philippines' international collaborations, slow law enforcement processes and economic vulnerabilities contribute to the persistence of these issues. The study concludes that Southeast Asian countries need to enhance technical capabilities, expand public education, strengthen international collaboration, and ensure greater accountability from digital platforms. These measures are essential to addressing gaps in enforcement and creating a safer digital environment for women and children in the region.

The 2024 Indonesian Presidential Election marked the fifth general election in the country, aimed at electing a new President and Vice President for the 2024–2029 term. Candidates competed to succeed the outgoing president, who had served two constitutional terms. A key aspect of this election was the candidate debates, where each candidate presented their vision, allowing the public to assess their policies. These debates were broadcast on platforms like YouTube, giving the public a space to comment. However, analyzing YouTube comments presents challenges due to the volume of data, language diversity, and informal expressions. Sentiment analysis, crucial for understanding public opinion, uses algorithms such as Naïve Bayes, which is based on Bayes' Theorem and assumes feature independence. Naïve Bayes is widely used in text analysis for its speed and simplicity. When applied to YouTube comments from the 2024 debates, the algorithm demonstrated its effectiveness, especially with a balanced dataset through random oversampling. It achieved 85.155% accuracy, high precision, recall, and an AUC of 96.8% on an 80:20 data split. Its fast classification time (0.000998 seconds) makes it suitable for real-time sentiment analysis, validating its use for political events. Future applications may incorporate advanced techniques like BERT for more sophisticated analysis.