Penelitian ini berfokus pada “Pendapatan Produk Roti Barokah Sebelum Dan Sesudah Memiliki Logo Halal Pada Toko Kelontong Yang Menjadi Tempat Penitipan”. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah Untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaruh label halal terhadap penjualan roti di Barokah Bakery dan apakah penyebab penurunan pendapatan penjualan roti di Barokah Bakery. Jenis penelitian ini jika di tinjau dari rencana penelitian maka dapat digolongkan ke dalam penelitian kualitatif, yaitu menekankan pada pengamatan fenomena dan meneliti ke subtansi makna dari fenomena yang diteliti,  labelisasi halal tidak berpengaruh terhadap penjualan roti barokah yang di titipkan disini hal tersebut terjadi karena konsumen yang belanja di sini kurang memperdulikan tentang label halal yang terpenting hanya rasa enak, ukuran besar, dan harga yang murah dan banyaknya pesaing dari merek laindan terjadinya covid 19 yang melanda Indonesia pada tahun 2020 kemarin. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: 1. labelisasi halal tidak berpengaruh terhadap penjualan roti barokah. 2. Penyebab terjadinya penurunan penjualan disebabkan oleh persaingan pasar dengan menjual produk yang sama. Dan penurunan jumlah konsumen yang disebabkan oleh fenomena covid 19.

Home, which should be the safest and most comfortable place, is actually a place where most women and children face suffering. The position of women and children as victims is very vulnerable because of gender differences that cause injustice, such as one of the murder cases handled by DP3A related to children who were victims of domestic violence, making it interesting to study in terms of victimology. The formulation of the problem in this study is the Implementation of legal protection for children who are victims of domestic violence at the Semarang City Women's Empowerment and Child Protection Service and Analysis of victimology for children who are victims of domestic violence at the Semarang City Women's Empowerment and Child Protection Service. The type of research used is sociological juridical, with analytical descriptive research specifications. The sampling method uses non-random sampling at the Semarang City Women's Empowerment and Child Protection Service with a qualitative analysis method. The results of this study are that the implementation of protection for child victims of domestic violence is not optimal, because there is no supervision related to the implementation of protection from the Semarang City Women's Empowerment and Child Protection Service, and based on the analysis of victimology for child victims of domestic violence, the rights needed by child victims can be identified so that they can help fulfill the rights of child victims of domestic violence.AbstrakRumah yang seharusnya menjadi tempat paling aman dan nyaman, justru bagi sebagian besar perempuan dan anak rumah menjadi tempat mereka menghadapi penderitaan. Posisi perempuan dan anak sebagai korban sangatlah rentan karena perbedaan gender yang menimbulkan ketidakadilan seperti adanya salah satu kasus pembunuhan yang ditangani DP3A berkaitan dengan anak korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga sehingga menarik untuk dikaji dalam aspek Viktimologi. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah Implementasi perlindungan hukum terhadap anak korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga di Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Kota Semarang dan Analisis viktimologi terhadap anak korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga di Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Kota Semarang. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan yuridis sosiologis, dengan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analitis. Metode penentuan sampel menggunakan nonrandom sampling di Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak dengan metode analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini adalah implementasi perlindungan terhadap anak korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga belum optimal, dikarenakan tidak ada pengawasan terkait pelaksanaan perlindungan dari Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Kota Semarang, serta berdasarkan analisis Viktimologi terhadap anak korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga dapat diidentifikasi hak-hak yang dibutuhkan oleh anak korban sehingga dapat membantu pemenuhan hak anak korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga.

This research aims to analyze the process of implementing a voluntary non-execution movable object auction at PT JBA Indonesia Semarang City Branch. As well as to analyze legal protection for winners of non-voluntary execution movable object auctions at PT JBA Indonesia Semarang City Branch. The urgency of this research is so that auction winners are not deceived by the condition of movable objects when they are declared to have won the auction. And so that the auction winner gets legal protection and understands the legal standing at the time of the auction. This writing is empirical juridical research with a statutory approach and a case approach. The research specifications used in this research are analytical descriptive. The data collection method used by the author is by examining primary data obtained through interviews with employees and assistants to the leadership of the private auction house PT JBA Indonesia, Semarang City Branch, which was conducted directly at the PT JBA Indonesia Semarang City Branch office and secondary data obtained from materials. References. The results of the research explain that the auction implementation at the private auction center PT JBA Indonesia uses a voluntary non-execution auction type, then the auction implementation is also divided into several categories, namely pre-auction, during the auction, and post-auction. There are several categories of legal protection for winners of auctions for non-voluntary movable objects, namely disclosure of information about auction winners, private auction houses daring to take responsibility for errors in auction implementation and special complaints regarding auction implementation.

Justice collaborators have an important role because they have a key role in uncovering criminal acts that are difficult to uncover, providing information to law enforcement officials and provide witness statements in the judicial process. One case of a justice collaborator is in decision number 789/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt Sel, in that decision RE was designated as a justice collaborator and the defendant was declared legally proven to have committed a criminal act of participating in premeditated murder. A person who becomes a justice collaborator has the right to receive legal protection. The focus of the problem in this research is how justice collaborators are regulated in the criminal justice system in Indonesia and what is the legal protection for justice collaborators in decision number 789/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt Sel. The aim of this research is to analyze the regulation of justice collaborators in the criminal justice system in Indonesia and analyze the legal protection for justice collaborators in decision number 789/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt Sel. The type of research used is normative juridical research using a case approach. The research specifications used are analytical descriptive and data collection methods using library research. Next, the data was analyzed qualitatively. The regulation of justice collaborators in the criminal justice system in Indonesia has been regulated in the ratification of laws originating from international documents and national laws which provide regulations regarding the existence of justice collaborators. RE defendants receive a form of legal protection in the form of physical and psychological protection, special treatment in the form of separate places of detention, separate filings, giving testimony in front of the trial without dealing directly with other defendants, while awards are given in the form of reduced sentences, conditional release, and additional remissions. AbstrakJuctice collaborator memiliki peranan yang penting karena mempunyai peran kunci dalam mengungkap suatu tindak pidana yang sulit untuk diungkap, memberikan informasi kepada aparat penegak hukum dan memberikan keterangan saksi di dalam proses peradilan. Salah satu kasus adanya justice collaborator yaitu dalam putusan nomor 789/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt Sel, dalam putusan tersebut RE ditetapkan sebagai jusctice collaborator dan terdakwa dinyatakan terbukti secara sah melakukan tindak pidana turut serta melakukan pembunuhan berencana. Seseorang yang menjadi justice collaborator berhak untuk mendapatkan perlindungan hukum. Fokus permasalahan dalam penelitian ini yaitu bagaimana pengaturan justice collaborator dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia dan bagaimana perlindungan hukum bagi justice collaborator dalam putusan nomor 789/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt Sel. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis pengaturan justice collaborator dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia dan menganalisis perlindungan hukum bagi justice collaborator dalam putusan nomor 789/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt Sel. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan kasus. Spesifikasi penelitian yang digunakan yaitu deskriptif analitis dan metode pengumpulan data dengan studi pustaka. Selanjutnya data dianalisis dengan kualitatif. Pengaturan justice collaborator dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia telah diatur dalam ratifikasi undang-undang yang berasal dari dokumen internasional dan undang-undang nasional yang memberikan pengaturan terkait keberadaan justice collaborator. Terdakwa RE mendapatkan bentuk perlindungan hukum berupa perlindungan fisik dan psikis, penanganan secara khusus berupa pemisahan tempat penahanan, pemisahan pemberkasan, memberikan kesaksian di depan persidangan tanpa berhadapan langsung dengan terdakwa lain, sedangkan pemberian penghargaan berupa keringanan penjatuhan pidana, pembebasan bersyarat, remisi tambahan.

Harmony in the family is a dream for everyone, but in reality, acts of domestic violence, in this case neglect in the household, are rampant in Indonesian society. The same goes for TNI members, as citizens who undergo special education and are given special authority by the state, they may not be appropriate to commit such crimes because it can tarnish the good name of their institution. One case of neglect in the household by TNI members is the Decision of the Military Court II-10 Semarang Number 1-K/PM II-10/AD/I/2022. This study aims to determine the judge’s consideration in imposing criminal sanctions against TNI members who commit crimes of neglect in the household in decision number 1-K/PM II-10/AD/I/2022 and to find out the sentencing of TNI members who commit crimes of neglect in the household in decision number 1-K/PM II-10/AD/I/2022. This research uses a type of normative juridical research that emphasizes research on applicable regulations or based on secondary data. The results of the study show that the judge’s consideration plays an important role in the imposition of criminal sanctions for the perpetrator, the judge has paid attention to the facts collected in the trial based on juridical and n”n-juridical considerations. This study also shows the sentencing of perpetrators of crimes of neglect in the household, the panel of judges stated that the Defendant AB was legally and convincingly guilty of committing crimes of neglect in the household in accordance with the provisions of Article 49 letter a jo Article 9 paragraph (1) Law Number 23 Year 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence, the perpetrator was sentenced to prison for 6 (six) months with a probation period of 8 (eight) months. AbstrakKeharmonisan dalam keluarga merupakan dambaan bagi semua orang, namun pada kenyataannya tindakan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga dalam hal ini penelantaran dalam rumah tangga marak terjadi dalam masyarakat Indonesia. Sama halnya dengan anggota TNI, sebagai warga negara yang menempuh pendidikan khusus dan diberikan wewenang khusus oleh negara, mungkin tidak sepantasnya melakukan tindak pidana tersebut karena dapat mencoreng nama baik institusinya. Salah satu kasus penelantaran dalam rumah tangga oleh anggota TNI yaitu Putusan Pengadilan Militer II-10 Semarang Nomor 1-K/PM II-10/AD/I/2022. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana terhadap anggota TNI pelaku tindak pidana penelantaran dalam rumah tangga dalam putusan nomor 1-K/PM II-10/AD/I/2022 dan untuk mengetahui pemidanaan terhadap anggota TNI pelaku tindak pidana penelantaran dalam rumah tangga dalam putusan nomor 1-K/PM II-10/AD/I/2022. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif yaitu menekankan penelitian pada peraturan-peraturan yang berlaku atau berdasarkan pada data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pertimbangan hakim berperan penting terhadap penjatuhan sanksi pidana bagi pelaku, hakim telah memperhatikan fakta-fakta yang terkumpul didalam persidangan berdasarkan pada pertimbangan yuridis dan nonyuridis. Penelitian ini juga menunjukan pemidanaan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penelantaran dalam rumah tangga, Majelis hakim menyatakan bahwa Terdakwa AB terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan bersalah melakukan tindak pidana penelantaran dalam rumah tangga sesuai ketentuan Pasal 49 huruf a jo Pasal 9 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga, pelaku dijatuhi pidana penjara selama 6 (enam) bulan dengan masa percobaan 8 (delapan) bulan.

This research aims to analyze the forms of legal protection for land rights holders and legal actions in cases of double certificates. The urgency of this research is to analyze the forms of legal protection for land rights holders in cases of double certificates, which often threaten legal certainty and cause social conflicts due to administrative negligence and land mafia practices, thus requiring strict legal efforts and comprehensive solutions. The type of research used is normative juridical with qualitative data processing. The data sources used in the research are primary data in the form of interviews and secondary data. The results of this study explain that the PTUN decision on the double certificate dispute case Number: 35/G/2021/PTUN.SMG dated September 2, 2021, which has permanent legal force, is 1). The appellant's request was fully granted because, based on the judge's consideration and through the administrative examination mechanism, it was proven that the appellant is the actual landowner with the legal basis of Building Use Rights Certificate (SHGB) Number 1385/Village of Sambirejo in the name of Elisa Mariani Wijaya and Ownership Rights Certificate (SHM) Number 2709/Village of Sambirejo in the name of Hartono Widjaja, which were issued in 1995; 2). In that case, the legal action taken by the BPN was the mediation effort in accordance with Article 43 of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2020 concerning the Handling and Settlement of Land Cases.




Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak atas tanah dan tindakan hukum dalam sertifikat ganda. Urgensi penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak atas tanah dalam kasus sertifikat ganda, yang sering kali mengancam kepastian hukum dan menimbulkan konflik sosial akibat kelalaian administratif dan praktik mafia tanah, sehingga diperlukan upaya hukum yang tegas dan solusi yang komprehensif. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pengolahan data secara kualitatif, Sumber data yang digunakan dalam penelitian adalaha data primer berupa wawancar dan data sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa putusan PTUN sengketa kasus sertifikat ganda Nomor: 35/G/2021/PTUN.SMG tanggal 2 September 2021 dan telah berkekuatan hukum tetap adalah 1). Permohonan Penggunggat dikabulkan seluruhnya dikarenakan dengan pertimbangan hakim dan melalui mekanisme uji administrasi membuktikan bahwa Penggunggat adalah pemilik tanah yang sebenarnya dengan alas hak Sertifikat Hak Guna Bangunan (SHGB) Nomor 1385/Kelurahan Sambirejo atas nama Elisa Mariani Wijaya dan Sertifikat Hak Milik (SHM) Nomor 2709/Kelurahan Sambirejo atas nama Hartono Widjaja, yang diterbitkan pada Tahun 1995; 2). Pada kasus tersebut tindakan hukum yang dilakukan oleh BPN adalah dilakukannya upaya mediasi yang sesuai dengan Pasal 43 Peraturan Menteri Agraria Dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2020 tentang Penanganan Dan Penyelesaian Kasus Pertanahan.

Accurate and transparent financial reporting is crucial in building investor trust and ensuring the confidence of other stakeholders. However, earnings management remains a key concern in accounting and finance as it affects the quality of financial information and economic decision-making. This study aims to analyze the influence of Capital Intensity, Managerial Ownership, and Profitability on Earnings Management, with Firm Size as a moderating variable. Using a quantitative approach with the deducto hypothetico verifikatif method, this study empirically tests hypotheses through inferential statistical analysis. The results show that Capital Intensity and Managerial Ownership have a negative effect on Earnings Management, while Profitability has a positive effect. Furthermore, Firm Size does not moderate the effect of Capital Intensity on Earnings Management but weakens the influence of Managerial Ownership and strengthens the effect of Profitability on Earnings Management. This study is expected to provide insights for investors, managers, and regulators in understanding the factors influencing earnings management practices and their implications for financial reporting quality.

Sedimentasi menjadi salah satu permasalahan pada Sungai Klagison, pencucian pasir menghasilkan limbah air yang mengandung padatan terlarut dan padatan yang tidak terlarut. etika endapan lumpur terakumulasi dan berlebihan maka dapat mengakibatkan pendangkalan pada sungai dan menyebabkan terjadinya luapan air sungai, terutama ketika musim hujan. Namun selain dampak negatif akibat sedimentasi di DAS Klagison, Yang mana matereial ini bisa dimanfaatkan untuk banyak hal, salah satunya adalah paving block. Pada penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimental, dengan menguji 2 jenis material  sedimentasi, yang mana material tersebut merupakan sedimentasi tanpa di oleh dan sedimen yang telah di olah, dengan melakukan 2 pengujian yaitu pengujian kadar lumpur dan uji kuat tekan terhadap paving block yang telah di buat dengan 1 komposisi perbandingan yaitu 1:3. Untuk selanjutnya dibandingkan hasil kuat tekan dari kedua sampel yang di uji. Dari hasil pengujian didapatkan karakteristik penggunaan sedimen yang sudah diolah lebih baik dibandingkan dengan sedimen yang belum diolah. yang mana nilai kuat tekan mengalami peningkatan dari 9,59 Mpa ke 14,96 Mpa. Dan untuk klasifikasi mutu paving yang diperoleh setelah diolah adalah mutu C dan B yang digunakan untuk perlatan parkir dan pejalan kaki.

This study aims to analyze the performance of Police Sector intelligence as a detection base in supporting the maintenance of security and public order and analyze the efforts to improve the performance of Police Intelligence as a detection base in supporting the maintenance of security and public order in the Batang Police Department. The research method used is a sociological juridical. The analysis of research results shows that early detection efforts carried out by the Sector Police Unit of the Batang Resort Police security intelligence unit really need to be carried out so that they are able to detect, search and collect and dig up information from the community, then an identification process is carried out to sort, calculate and determine alternatives and consider and reading the signs of the facts from the detection results, the results are expressed in intelligence administration in the form of products that guarantee confidentiality, speed, accuracy and predictability. The discipline of the Batang Police Sector personnel in understanding the regulations and policies of leaders who are obliged to work is still lacking, as evidenced by the finding that the implementation of the Sector Police as a Detection Base has not run optimally, both operationally in the field and administratively.

Crimes occur in many ways, one of them in the context of elections in Indonesia. The potential crimes perpetrated by political party supporters in various areas of Indonesia whose law enforcement is not working to the maximum is one of the problems. The problem in this study is first, how do legal provisions relate to law enforcement against electoral crimes in Indonesia? Secondly, the problem of law enforcement against electoral crimes in Indonesia? Third, reconstruction of law enforcement against electoral crimes in Indonesia? The aim of this research is to determine the regulation and legal analysis of the forms of crime black campaigns in accordance with the law. This research uses normative law research with secondary data and processes data from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the first study are that the legal provisions for electoral offences in Indonesia are regulated in the Law Number 7 of 2017, Criminal Law, and the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions. (ITE). Second, that the Law Enforcement Problems Against Electoral Crimes in Indonesia, i.e. the inadequate application of criminal law in elections, constitutes an obstacle to the increase in the incidence of electoral crimes that have violated the Election Law Number 7 of 2017 and the Penal Code as well as the Information and Electronic Transaction Law. (ITE). Thirdly, it is expected that Indonesia will have a specialized agency that will strictly prosecute electoral criminals. Therefore, it can be concluded that electoral crimes are not maximized due to weak enforcement of electoral law.