Publication Search

Pros and cons about the position and jurisdiction of military courts still often occur in legal discourse in Indonesia. On the one hand, there is a group that states that the military court is only authorized to try military crimes and is not authorized to try general crimes committed by TNI soldiers, but another group states that the military court still has the authority to try both general crimes and military crimes. This article will photograph the discourse that has existed so far. This article will also explain the Position and Jurisdiction of the Military Court in Indonesia after being under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the impact of the submission of TNI soldiers to the General Court on military principles. The method used was an in-depth interview with a number of sources, especially to see the growing opinion if TNI soldiers were tried in the general court. The conclusion of this article is that psychologically and culturally, TNI soldiers are not appropriate to be tried in the general court. Thus, the issue of subjugating TNI soldiers to the general court is not only juridical but also psychological and cultural. In addition, if TNI Soldiers are subject to the general judiciary, it will result in the destruction of military joints or principles that are the backbone of law enforcement and discipline of Soldiers.  

The authority of the Government in collecting taxes and levies from the community and renovating it is not only owned by the Central Government but also falls under the authority of the City Government and Provincial Governments. This is in accordance with the principles of decentralization and the implementation of regional autonomy based on Law Number 32 of 2004 concerning Regional Government, Law Number 33 of 2004 concerning Financial Balance Between Central and Regional Governments, and Law Number 28 of 2009 concerning Regional Taxes and Retribution Regions, Semarang City Regulation Number 9 of 2013 concerning Traditional Market Settings. In the context of managing the market environment in the form of legal services to the community in the market environment, especially traders, the Semarang City Government has issued Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2004 concerning Market Levies. This study raises the problems, namely: 1) How is the management of regional levies by the Semarang City government, 2) What is the Semarang City policy towards the renovation of the Peterongan Market, 3) What is the Semarang City policy towards the regulation of the Semarang City Peterongan market trader after renovation. The purpose of writing this thesis is 1) To know and explain the management of local levies by the Semarang City Government, 2) To find out and explain Semarang City policies towards the renovation of Peterongan Market, 3) To find out and explain the arrangements for the Peterongan market traders in Semarang City after renovation. This research is a qualitative study with a normative juridical approach to determine the realization of the implementation of Semarang City Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2004 concerning Market Levies and Semarang City Regional Regulation Number 9 of 2013 concerning Traditional Market Regulations for market traders. This research was conducted in Peterongan Market, Semarang City, located on Jalan MT. Haryono. The results showed that the Semarang City Government towards market traders was in accordance with the Semarang City Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2004 concerning Market Charges and Semarang City Regional Regulation Number 9 of 2013 concerning Traditional Market Regulations, with several things that are still a note to the Semarang City government for pay more attention to sustainability for the welfare of traditional market traders, physical conditions and market environment.   Keywords : Policy, Traditional Market Management

The need for land continues to increase so that it often causes very complex problems. To deal with these land issues, the government issued Law no. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles which later became known as the UUPA, the birth of the UUPA was a new milestone for this nation in land law. In line with that, the government then issued government regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning land registration which reaffirmed the importance of the community registering their land, land registration functions to find out the status of the land parcels, who owns it, what rights are it, how much area, what is it used for. The importance of systematic, good and correct land registration through adjudication aims to reduce problems that arise with regard to land. The research method used by the writer is a juridical empirical approach with the intention of proving or testing to ensure the truth and rationalizing it through the results of research and experiences that have been found in everyday life. The results of the research found that more people register their land in a sporadic manner, because the community considers that systematic land registration does not necessarily occur every year, even though it is expensive for the community to register their land in order to obtain the rights to the land they own.   Keywords: PP No. 24 of 1997, land registration, adjudication

Communities with lower levels of well-being tend to disregard the norms or rules of the applicable law. Seeing these conditions to meet the needs of a tendency to use all means so that these needs can be met. Of the ways used there is a violation and does not violate the norms hukum.Salah a form of crime that often occurs in the community is a criminal offense committed by a robber. Robber or in legal terms is theft with violence. The term phenomenon begal legislation criminal penalties stipulated in Article 365 CriminalCode.             The problem according to the author in this study is how countermeasures against the crime of theft by weighting (nozzle) conducted by the robber in the jurisdiction Polrestabes Semarang and obstacles faced by the police in combating the criminal acts of theft by weighting (nozzle) conducted by begal in Semarang Polrestabes jurisdictions as well as efforts to overcome the problems.             The method used in this research is sociological juridical is an approach that uses the principles and legal principles derived from the rules written, sociological is an approach that aims to clarify the real situation in society towards the issues examined in other words give meaning important on the steps of observation. The use of sociological juridical methods conducted by the researchers is not only based on laws and legal provisions relating to countermeasures against acts pidanapencurian by weighting (nozzle) conducted by the robber in the area of ​​Law Polrestabes Semarang.             The results showed that the prevention of the crime of theft by weighting (nozzle) conducted by the robber in the area of ​​Law Polrestabes Semarang, namely by attempts non penal or preventive such as by making banners that contain extension or an appeal to the people to always remember safety self-owned assets, and outreach to the community. Efforts penal or repressive efforts undertaken by performing operations that continuously patrol Eagle Team Anti robber, Razia vehicle at night, arrest the perpetrators, and take action-action firmly against the perpetrators under criminal law. The obstacles faced by the police in response to acts of pidanapencurian by weighting (nozzle) conducted by the robber in the area of ​​Law Polrestabes Semarang. Barriers that are internal police investigators is the lack of personnel, so that the number of police investigators are not proportional to the number of population in a large area. Furthermore, the operational funds are extremely limited. Barriers that are external, namely a less litigious society, people with low education, people are less concerned with environmental safety.

Abstract: The principles of legal certainty very dominating in the law enforcement inIndonesia. The principle of legal certainty that comes from century XVII/XVIIIin Europe is a great idea from tangible in writing, made by competentauthorities. The term of analytical jurisprudence indicates that the law shoulbe removed from the study of metaphysics. Doctrine analytical jurisprudenceannnot be implemented just after about two centuries introduction by theoriginators. It is doe to changes and development of society so rapidly. Forthose in law enforcement must look spirit and the time made law. Don’t justlook at the text but the context of the law with the purpose of the law.Key word: law enforcement, Analytical Jurisprudence,religion models of reinforcement.

Abstract :as one the elements of democracy, kaw should be the foundation of transparent, accountable and responsive governance, establishment of an honest and fair, general election system, protection of human rights and the existence of a democratic and contident society. Law should be able as well to guarantee  that the state administrators transparently do obey the rule of law in exercising their tasks. Law enforcement within a state should correspondent to the ideal of law of nation concerned. It means that the law enforcement should be in accordance with the philosophy, way of life, norms  and principles followed by the society concerned. Key word : Democracy. Law enforcement.