Narcotics abuse is a serious problem that threatens the security and welfare of society. This thesis aims to carry out a juridical analysis of the decision of the Mojokerto District Court Number 509/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mjk, which handles narcotics abuse cases, with a focus on the Narcotics Law. This thesis examines how the decision provides justice to victims of narcotics abuse in Mojokerto. The analysis involves legal interpretation, legal considerations, and the impact of applying the article on the victim. Apart from that, this thesis also discusses the extent to which this decision can contribute to efforts to prevent narcotics abuse in society.The research method used is an empirical method with document analysis, which includes a study of Mojokerto District Court decisions, laws and related literature. The results of an in-depth analysis of the decision show an understanding of the rights and legal protection for victims of narcotics abuse, especially by detailing aspects related to Articles 112 and 114 of the Narcotics Law.The results of this research are as follows (1). The basis for the judge's decision is case Number 509/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Mjk which is articles 112 and 114 of the Narcotics Law. Where the judge decided on a criminal sentence of 9 years (2). The decision given by the judge was correct, based on articles 112 and 114 of the Narcotics Law. Namely a prison sentence of 9 years.  Articles 112 and 114 regulate criminal sanctions for narcotics abusers.

The global COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the health sector, forcing countries to transform their health. In Indonesia, the response to this crisis was the issuance of a new health law, namely Law No. 17 of 2023. One of the updates is the provision that provides legal protection for medical personnel, namely in the process of criminal investigations against medical personnel, investigators must first request a recommendation from the authorized panel in disciplinary examinations, in this case, referring to the previous law, the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council (MKDKI). The recommendation determines whether the investigation can be continued or not based on the implementation of the professional practice of medical personnel, whether or not it is in accordance with professional standards, service standards, and standard operating procedures. The request for a recommendation from the panel must be received by the investigator no later than 14 days, and if it is more than that, the panel is considered to have approved the investigation of medical personnel. This is a polemic because for crucial decisions, namely assessing whether or not there is a violation of standards, only 14 days are given, while in reality the examination takes months. Finally, the research is presented to measure the legal certainty of the complaint examination procedure within the MKDKI, the legal certainty of the panel's recommendations regarding the continuation of the investigation process, and to reformulate provisions that are not yet fair in the process.

Sikap pemerintah yang otoriter pada masa orde baru menimbulkan berbagai pelanggaran HAM berat. Setelah dimulainya era reformasi penegakan keadilan transisional (transitional justice) mulai mendapat perhatian pemerintah. Lembaga penegak HAM seperti Pengadilan Ham (2000) dan KKR (2004) menjadi jawaban atas keadilan transisional tersebut. Namun melalui putusan MK No. 006/PUU-IV/2006 meniadakan lembaga KKR tersebut, dikarenakan tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan UUD 1945. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan Undang-undang dan konseptual. MK sebagai salah satu lembaga kehakiman mengakui eksistensi penegakan HAM melalui putusan-putusan MK lainnya yang diduga adanya pelanggaran HAM dan isi muatan peraturan perundang-undangan yang tidak sesuai dengan UUD 1945 sebagai dasar konstitusional. constitutional complaint bisa menjadi salah satu sarana bagi korban dalam mencari keadilan.

The purpose of this study is to find out about the legalization of underage engagement from the perspective of civil law in Indonesia. The type of research used in compiling this study is normative legal research by taking an approach that includes community legal norms and forms of legal norms contained in laws and court decisions. Furthermore, by conducting a hierarchical analysis of the synchronization between one rule and another. The results of the study indicate that the legalization of underage engagement from the perspective of civil law in Indonesia where during the engagement period the two prospective brides and grooms are not yet allowed to have a relationship as a relationship between a husband and wife, the prospective bride and groom in principle still have the same relationship with the law of their relationship between people who are not mahram who are not yet bound by marriage. Therefore, all the prohibitions that apply to the relationship between men and women also apply to them, only the prospective bride during the engagement period may not be proposed to by someone else, because she is in the engagement of her prospective husband. That the legal consequences of underage engagement will have an impact on the cancellation of the engagement itself. Talking about cancellation, cancellation means fasakh or ending the validity of something that happened previously. In addition, it will affect gender.

Marriage certainly has legal consequences, and if the religion is different, various problems will certainly arise. These problems affect the relationship between husband and wife and their children if they have children. In terms of juridical legal regulations regarding interfaith marriages, formally and legally, have not been clearly and firmly regulated in Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Article 2 paragraph 1 of the Marriage Law only states that the validity of a marriage must be carried out according to the laws of each religion and its beliefs. Legal certainty in regulating interfaith marriages in Indonesia still does not have normative legal certainty in legal texts related to marriage. This has clearly given rise to multiple interpretations of the law on interfaith marriages, whereas the unity of meaning in the legal text in a Law is absolute, there should be no double meaning in the legal text or Law, because legal certainty refers to the implementation of clear, permanent, consistent and consequential laws whose implementation cannot be influenced by subjective circumstances.

The East Java Provincial Government established the East Java Super Corridor (EJSC) in five regions, including Bojonegoro Regency, to provide coworking spaces for the public. EJSC Bakorwil Bojonegoro is the only coworking space in the area, making it essential to offer high-quality services. This study aims to describe the service quality of the coworking space at EJSC Bakorwil Bojonegoro using a descriptive qualitative method. This research focuses on the five service quality indicators proposed by Kotler and Keller (2016): reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, and tangibles. Data were collected through interviews, observations, documentation, and literature studies, with data analysis involving collection, reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that the service quality of the coworking space at EJSC Bakorwil Bojonegoro is generally satisfactory. Reliability is reflected in the provision of free facilities that support user productivity. However, responsiveness still faces challenges in terms of timely responses to complaints and the flexibility of operating hours. Assurance has been established through effective communication, although staff professionalism needs improvement. Empathy is demonstrated through warm and responsive interactions between management and users. Tangibles indicate that the available facilities are adequate, but some shortcomings remain, such as limited parking space and suboptimal workspace arrangement.

Judicial reviews on the presidential and vice-presidential nomination threshold in Article 222 of Law No. 7/2017 on General Elections have been repeatedly rejected by the Constitutional Court. It has become a public debate and is seen as contrary to academic reasoning because it is not in line with the logic of democracy. Rules that are considered detrimental to the community and political parties in the election of the head of state. Accordingly, the study of fiqh siyasah clarifies the prerequisites for the election system and the selection of the imam (caliph). The purpose of this study is to find out how the legal considerations by the Constitutional Court rejected the judicial review in Article 222 and to find out what the views of Islamic jurisprudence are on the presidential and vice-presidential nomination threshold rules in general elections. The author of this work employs normative legal research methodologies in addressing relevant research, drawing on legislation, journal articles, books, and other sources. This study concludes by using 4 decisions that were rejected by the constitutional court, namely in decisions 53/puu-xv/2017, 49/puu-xvi/2018, 54/puu-xvi/2018 and decision number 73/puu-xx/2022. The considerations of the court stated that the decision related to the presidential threshold was constitutional and still applicable. That the article being tested is considered contrary to the constitution, especially Article 6A of the 1945 Constitution with the argument that the petitioners cannot change the Constitutional Court's stance on all decisions.  Meanwhile, in the view of fiqh siyasah does not recognize how the provisions of the vote threshold for the election of an imam.
 
 

The effectiveness of the E-Court system in resolving civil cases at the Madiun Regency District Court is still not effective because there are several stages of the E-Court that have not been implemented optimally, for example related to the medition stage, evidence stage and decision stage. The problem with the E-Court system for registrants is dealing with the system or human error. Based on these obstacles, efforts have been made to overcome them, namely collaborating with the IT staff of the Madiun Regency District Court, establishing good communication, preparing everything and increasing human resources both by socializing the E-Court internally and externally. Therefore, the aim of this research is to determine the effectiveness of the E-Court system in resolving civil cases at the Madiun Regency District Court and the role of the Madiun Regency District Court in dealing with