In carrying out its obligations to issue marketable securities, sometimes there are some mistakes that are actually unintentional by the issuer, such as in writing the nominal amount, date, etc. where the issuer realizes that his mistakes after the issuance of the marketable securities can certainly harm the issuer, then the issuer can make rebuttal. This study aims to find out how the role of countermeasures or countermeasures in protecting mistakes made by marketable securities. Based on the research results, it is known that countermeasures or rebuttal can be a special right of the issuer of marketable securities because it can protect the issuer of securities from not paying for the marketable securities issued.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the imposition of penalties under the minimum criminal threat against perpetrators of corruption extortion by civil servants (PNS) at the Class III port of Larantuka, East Nusa Tenggara (Case study: Kupang District Court Decision Number 17/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2017/Pn.Kpg). This research is a normative juridical research which means that the author does not use samples and data collection is carried out by the library method, with the object of study. After the data is obtained, the author will analyze juridically normative data obtained on the object of study. The corruption case of I Wayan Adisucipto SN was proven to have violated Article 12 letter e Jo Article 12 A of Law No. 31 of 1999 jo Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption, which states a maximum of 20 years in prison or life imprisonment and a minimum of 4 years, but in reality the judge imposed a prison sentence of only 5 months, the decision imposed by the judge that is not considered according to / based on the law will be null and void. The imposition of a 5-month sentence for the defendant by the judge in Number: 17/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2017/Pn.Kpg is not in accordance with the punishment system. From this research, the author can conclude that the Judge's consideration is not based on the provisions of the legislation, namely Article 12 letter e jo Article 12 A Paragraph (2) of Law No. 31 of 1999 Jo Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption which is a minimum imprisonment of at least 4 (four) years and a maximum of 20 (twenty) years so that it is contrary to the applicable law.   

pewaris, ahli waris , dan sistem pewarisan yang digunakan oleh suku adat tertentu. Dalam suatu konteks pewarisan adat disini ditujukan untuk melakukan suatu penerusan harta warisan baik itu berupa harta yang berwujud fisik atau materiil atau harta warisan yang tidak berwujud fisik atau immaterial. Sistem pewarisan yang diterapkan oleh suku Jawa disini adalah sistem kekerabatan parental dan sistem  pewarisan secara individualis, dimana terdapat suatu keterkaitan dalam kedua unsur pewarisan tersebut. Dalam pewarisan yang telah diterapkan oleh suku Jawa disini telah memberikan ruang terhadap para ahli waris untuk memiliki kedudukan yang sama dalam pewarisan. Sistem individualis yang diterapkan dalam sistem pewarisan suku jawa juga memberikan bahwasanya dalam pewarisan tersebut harta benda akan menjadi hak milik dari ahli waris. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan studi pustaka, dimana dengan penerapan metode tersebut akan memberikan penjelasan yang lebih detail terhadap sistem pewarisan yang terjadi dalam suku Jawa dengan sistem kekerabatan parental dan penerapan sistem pewarisan individualis.
Kata Kunci:  Suku Jawa, Parental, Individualis, Waris

Tujuan yang ingin dicapai oleh penulis dalam artikel ini yaitu untuk mengetahui dan memahami apakah kasus ini masuk ke dalam kasus tindak pidana turut serta atau masuk ke dalam ruang lingkup keperdataan dan bentuk ganti rugi korban (Bank BRI) pada kasus tersebut seperti apa. Penulisan jurnal ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normative, yaitu dengan menemukan suatu aturan hukum, prinsip-prinsip hukum, maupun doktrin - doktrin hukum guna menjawab isu hukum yang dihadapi. Hasil dari penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa dilihat dari Sudut Pandang Keperdataan, kasus ini masuk ke dalam Wanprestasi dengan mengacu pada permasalahan Surat Perjanjian Kredit jenis Cashcolleteral antara BRI Cabang Pekayon dengan Terdakwa. Tetapi pihak korban mengajukan tuntutan pidana karena ia merasa dirugikan oleh terdakwa karena melakukan pembukaan blokir dan menggunakan uang hasil kejahatan tersebut sehingga kasus ini masuk kedalam Tindak Pidana Turut Serta. Akibatnya, pihak Bank BRI belum mendapatkan ganti rugi yang seharusnya didapat karena Jaksa Penuntut Umum tidak Pemodal sebagai Tersangka dalam proses penyidikan dan tidak melakukan penyitaan terhadap barang bukti hasil pembukaan blokir di Bank BRI sedangkan alat bukti sudah ada berupa bukti transfer uang. Pernyataan diatas membuktikan bahwa Jaksa Penuntut Umum kurang teliti dalam melakukan proses penyidikan sehingga barang bukti sebagai ganti rugi Bank BRI tidak ikut disita sedangkan alat buktinya ada.

This research in-depth investigates agrarian law conflicts that arise in connection with toll road construction in the West Sumatra Province. The main focus of this research is on exploring the position of Minangkabau community customary land in the context of inheritance law. An in-depth analysis was carried out on the role of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Principles (UUPA) in regulating the revocation of rights to customary land for the public interest. This research also explores comparisons with other regions in Indonesia to reveal variations in legal approaches in dealing with similar conflicts. Thus, this research aims to understand the complexity of conflicts that arise along with these infrastructure projects. The results of this research provide an illustration that the agrarian law conflict in West Sumatra is not only limited to the revocation of rights to customary land, but also involves aspects of inheritance law which significantly influence the position of the Minangkabau people. The implications of these findings will be explained comprehensively to provide in-depth insight into the dynamics of agrarian law conflicts in the context of infrastructure development in Indonesia.

Tessa Pritama Eda, Nim: 1011419034, with the title Analysis of Court Decisions in Deciding Cases Number: 0017/Pdt. G/2013/Pa.Lwb Regarding Legalization of Siri Marriage. Advisor I Mr. Dr. Weni Almoravid Dungga, S.H., M.H and Advisor II Mr. Dolot Alhasni Bakung, S.H., M.H. The purpose of this study is to find out the legal protection for unregistered marriages and secondly to find out the court's decision in deciding case number: 0017/Pdt.G/2013/Pa.Lwb regarding the legalization of unregistered marriages. The method used in this research is normative. The result of legal protection for unregistered marriages is that unregistered marriages obtain legality from the State if they fulfill predetermined conditions, such as marrying according to religion, then obtain the consent of the first wife as evidenced by a permit, and also for reasons of paperwork. child. But here on the other hand, betel marriage can also be entered into a criminal offense.The decision of the supreme court granted the respondent's request to obtain a marriage certificate, on the grounds that it was in their administrative interests and that of the children, also because the marriage had been carried out in an Islamic manner and had fulfilled all the requirements, and the most important reason was that the marriage had been approved by the first wife.
 

The development of communication media has led to the presence of applications to order online motorcycle taxi transportation services. The application can be easily downloaded via PlayStore or similar applications. Therefore, the purpose of this discussion is to find out how business competition is between conventional ojek and online ojek business actors. In Indonesia there are several online motorcycle taxi service providers such as Grab, Gojek, and Maxim. The services provided are not only in the form of online motorcycle taxi services, but also in the form of food delivery services (grabfood), online shopping services (grabmart), package delivery (grabexpress) and other services. It is known that there are problems between online motorcycle taxis and conventional motorcycle taxis that have occurred, such as the beating by a conventional motorcycle taxi driver against a Gojek driver in Bojongsoang, Bandung. In this study, the authors used a qualitative type of research because it discussed business competition between business actors. Meanwhile, the nature of the research used is descriptive research. The research approach used by the author in this journal is included in the type of statutory approach and the Case Approach.

This research aims to analyze the application of diversion and restorative justice in criminal cases committed by minors. The application of diversion is examined in more depth about the obligation of every law enforcer to carry out a series of diversion processes in the police, prosecutor's office and up to the court. The implementation of diversion is something that must be done without exception in accordance with the provisions of Law No. 11/2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The application of restorative justice seeks a benchmark for the extent to which it can be implemented by taking into account the authority possessed by the public prosecutor when the diversion process is not achieved and when the criminal case has entered the criminal justice process. The application of the termination of prosecution must be based on the applicable provisions and conditions contained in the Attorney General's Decree No. 15 of 2020. After conducting research on diversion and restorative justice, the only legal benefit of juvenile criminal cases is through the provision of punishment for a child who is a perpetrator of a criminal offense in accordance with the provisions of the laws and regulations concerning the juvenile criminal justice system.

This research aims to find out what forms of child exploitation occur in the city of Gorontalo and how legal sanctions are applied to perpetrators of child exploitation from the perspective of criminal law and jinayah jurisprudence. This research is field research, namely field observations of the objects being studied in order to obtain relevant data about matters related to the problem being studied and which focuses on the results of data collection from predetermined informants. This field research is outlined in a design that provides a clear and accurate picture of the materials and phenomena being studied. The data obtained in this research is still expressed in qualitative form, which has a richer meaning than numbers and frequencies. The results of this research show that (In Human Rights instruments there are five forms of criminal acts of sexual exploitation of children, namely: child prostitution; child pornography; trafficking in children for sexual purposes; child sex tourism and child marriage. Currently there are the newest forms of crime from this act. criminal exploitation of children, namely the application of legal sanctions against perpetrators of child exploitation from the perspective of criminal law and fiqh jinayah, namely the application of legal sanctions against perpetrators of child exploitation from the perspective of criminal law and the application of legal sanctions against perpetrators of child exploitation from the perspective of fiqh Jinayah.

This article examines and discusses the Supreme Court judge's decision regarding the results of the Individual Candidate Dispute in the 2020 Ketapang Regent and Deputy Regent General Election at the Regency Level during the Improvement Period. viewed from the perspective of State Administrative Law. seen from the case and the way the judge assesses the case and the judge's decision. In this article we use qualitative research methods, which focus on observation and in-depth research. pay attention to human behavior and what aspects influence it. This is realized by looking at what aspects make the plaintiff object and what aspects influence the judge to make a decision