This study aims to measure the acceptance level of the warehouse module within the ERP system implemented at CV Kalingga Keling Jati, utilizing the extended UTAUT model. The analyzed variables include performance expectancy, effort expectancy, hedonic motivation, trust, behavioral intention, use behavior, and one moderator variable, education. The results indicate that effort expectancy, hedonic motivation, trust, and behavioral intention significantly influence users' intention and behavior in utilizing the warehouse module. However, performance expectancy and the moderator variable education do not show significant influence. This research also highlights the importance of effective warehouse management systems to minimize errors in inventory management and enhance operational efficiency within the company. With the implementation of an ERP system integrated with IoT, CV Kalingga Keling Jati aims to improve user satisfaction and reduce resistance to new technologies. The findings provide insights for other companies considering similar technology adoptions in their warehouse management.Furthermore, the study emphasizes the need for continuous evaluation and adaptation of technology to align with user needs and organizational goals. By understanding user acceptance, organizations can better tailor their systems to enhance productivity and foster a positive technological environment. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the factors influencing technology acceptance in the business context, particularly in the manufacturing sector, and offers a foundation for future system improvements.
 

SMK Multistudi High School Batam is one of 895 SMKs in Indonesia selected by the government in 2021 to implement the SMK Center of Excellence program. This program hopes to help teachers solve every learning problem to prepare graduates ready to compete in the world of work. This quantitative study uses a sample of 45 teachers at SMK Multistudi High School Batam. This study aims to analyze the correlation between pedagogic competence and teacher confidence in the success of the SMK Center of Excellence program. The result of the study shows that there is a positive and significant correlation between pedagogical competence and the success of the Center for Excellence Vovatiobal High School program, with the result of the t-test showing t count 5.379 >ttable 1.679 ans sig.0.000< ? 0.05. It turns out that teacher self-confidence is not correlated with the success of the Center for Excellence Vocational High School program, where the t-score shows a t-score of 0.097 < t-table of 1.679 and sig.0.454 > ? 0.05. The study's results show a partially positive and significant correlation between pedagogical competence and teacher confidence in the success of the Center of Excellence in Vocational High School program, with the F test results showing a significance value of less than 0.05 (0.000<0.05). 

This study is intended to analyze the effect of leadership style and work motivation on teacher performance at the Charitas educational foundation. The variables studied were leadership style (X1), work motivation (X2), and performance (Y). The method used in this research is a quantitative approach with a correlational design. Sampling using stratified random sampling as many as 53 respondents. Data collection techniques using questionnaires, interviews, and documentation. The analysis technique uses descriptive statistics, and inferential statistics with multiple linear regression. From the results of multiple regression analysis, the performance equation (Y) = 35.003 – 0.060X1 + 0.674X2 +?. From the results of multiple regression analysis, it can be seen that the work motivation variable has a greater value in influencing employee performance. From the results of the F test, Fcount > Ftable is 15.492 > 2.77. It can be concluded that the variables of leadership style, and work motivation, simultaneously and significantly affect the performance of teachers at the Charitas Education Foundation. From the results of the t test, it can be concluded that the work motivation variable has a significant effect on performance with a significant level of 0.05, while leadership style has no effect on performance. The results of the analysis of the coefficient of determination of 0.362 or 36.2% of the leadership style variable, and work motivation can explain the variation of the performance variable, while the remaining 63.8% is explained by other variables outside of this study.