This article aims to analyze the legal protection for victims of domestic abandonment through restitution fulfillment. It is because imprisonment in the case of domestic abandonment basically cannot accommodate the economic losses suffered by the victims. Legal protection for victims should also focus on restoring the economic losses incurred during the abandonment. Therefore, the urgency of this article is the attempt to fulfill restitution for victims as the manifestation of the victim’s right. This article is normative legal research. The novelty of this article is about the attempt to fulfill restitution, which is studied based on positive law in Indonesia and the problems were analyzed using Gustav Radburch's legal theory on the principle of priority in three legal objectives. The research results indicate that one of the challenges of restitution fulfillment in the current legal system is when the victims are not submitting the restitution request before or even after a court verdict. Hence, the judges in their verdict cannot accommodate this restitution for the victims and they cannot receive their rights of restitution. Because of that it is expected that the attempt of restitution fulfillment will accommodate the economic losses suffered by victims during abandonment.

This article aims to analyze the legal protection for victims of domestic violence through the Restraining Order mechanism. In addition, this article also aims to provide recommendations for legal improvements so that the use of the Restraining Order mechanism can be more effective. In Indonesia, the mechanism of Restraining Order has not been regulated in detail in the law. Law No. 23/2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence has mentioned the existence of a protection order against victims that can be given by the police or the court, but this protection order is not well implemented. Therefore, the urgency of this article is to provide definitive protection to victims of domestic violence through the mechanism of Detention Orders. This article is a normative legal research. The novelty of this article is about analyzing the use of Restraining Order punishment in Common Law countries, as well as providing suggestions regarding the clarity of Restraining Order Implementation in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that the Restraining Order mechanism used by Common Law countries is more effective in providing protection to victims of domestic violence because basically the legal protection of victims of domestic violence in Indonesia only relies on Law Number 23 Year 2004 which the contents of the Law are still not fully effective in protecting victims of domestic violence.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji mengenai legalitas aborsi yang dilakukan oleh anak korban perkosaan inses. Merujuk pada catatan Komnas Perempuan tahun 2021 telah terjadi kasus perkosaan inses terhadap perempuan sebanyak 215 kasus dimana 15 kasus terjadi pada anak. Dari perkosaan inses tidak menutup kemungkinan terjadi kehamilan pada anak dan ketidaksiapan fisik maupun psikis membuat seorang anak memilih jalan untuk aborsi. Sehingga patut dipertanyakan tentang legalitas aborsi sebagaimana Pasal 75 Ayat 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan jika yang melakukan aborsi adalah anak korban perkosaan inses. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis normatif yang dilakukan dengan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa aborsi dengan indikasi perkosaan adalah legal karena adanya trauma psikologis yang diderita oleh korban dan dimungkinkan adanya indikasi kedaruratan medis akibat perkosaan inses. Aborsi dapat dilakukan pada saat usia kehamilan tidak lebih dari 6 minggu dihitung dari awal pertama haid, namun tidak menutup kemungkinan aborsi dilakukan ketika usia kandungan melebihi batas tersebut. Sehingga penegak hukum harus dapat memastikan bahwa aborsi akibat perkosaan inses tidak dapat dituntut pidana karena telah dilindungi oleh hukum. Kepastian hukum yang ada harus dapat ditegakan agar tercipta keadilan dan kemanfaatan yang menjadi tujuan dari hukum. Selain itu, diperlukan adanya suatu edukasi mengenai kesehatan reproduksi oleh ahli kesehatan agar kasus aborsi dapat diminimalisir.