The aim of the research is to describe the management of new student admissions in increasing community enthusiasm in sending their children to early childhood education institutions. The research method is qualitative through a case study approach. Data collection techniques: interviews with 1 administrator, 2 teachers and 2 parents; documentation and observation. Data processing techniques: reduction, data presentation and drawing conclusions. Data validity techniques: triangulation of sources and techniques. Research results: (1) planning: formation of committee, objects/targets and collecting registration forms. (2) organizing: the committee is the person in charge, chief executive and secretary. (3) implementation: fill out the form and submit the files. (4). Evaluation: reviewing student numbers and assessing program performance.

The aim of the research is to describe classroom management and its impact on student learning motivation. The research method is qualitative through a case study approach. Data collection techniques using interviews, documentation, and observation. Data analysis techniques with reduction, data presentation, and conclusions. Data validity techniques using triangulation of sources and techniques. The research results show (1) classroom management: (a) planning: making semester plans, making motivational words, praying before learning, taking student attendance, and arranging seating. (b) organizing: forming a class structure and scheduling class cleaning pickets. (c) implementation: the learning process is going well. (d) controlling: asking and ensuring the learning process. (2) impact: students are happy, feel at home in class, don't joke around, and participate in learning well.

Lately, there has been an issue regarding the management of royalties by LMKN, which has led to songwriters leaving the LMK membership and opting to manage their royalties independently. The goal of this study is to examine the role of LMKN in royalty collection and the relevant legal provisions governing it. The research method employed is a literature review focusing on LMKN's role in royalty collection. The findings of the study indicate that concerning the regulations on royalty collection, the state has stipulated them in the Copyright Law, PP56/2021, and Permenhuham9/2022. These regulations serve as supportive factors for enhancing royalty management in the commercialization of copyrighted works in the music field, aiming to manifest protection and legal assurance for creators. Furthermore, these provisions explicitly state that LMKN is the entity responsible for managing the royalties of songwriters. Therefore, songwriters cannot independently manage their royalties.

This study have a purpose to review the validity of HGB as an object of mortgage rights and consequences of HGB as an object of mortgage rights without consent of holder of management rights. HGB is another type of land right, on top of the land management rights with the approval of the management rights holder, may be imposed with a mortgage. However, it is often found that HGB holders impose mortgage rights without the consent of management rights holders, so the legitimacy and legal consequences need to be questioned. Against this background it is important to carry out more analysis for the legality and legal consequences of HGB as an object of mortgage rights without the approval of holder of management rights. The applied research strategy uses a normative juridical with qualitative descriptive data analysis techniques and statute approach. The newness of this study is not only discuss how to imposition mortgage rights on HGB, but will also  discussion focused on validity and consequences if HGB as an object of mortgage rights is implemented out without consent of holder of management rights. The conclusion that can be cited from this discussion is that HGB as object of mortgage without consent of holder management rights does not have legal validity and as a result the imposition of mortgage rights can be requested for cancellation and can be null and void by law with a ruling from a court. Tujuan dilakukan penelitian adalah untuk menelaah mengenai keabsahan HGB sebagai objek hak tanggungan dan akibat hukum dari HGB sebagai objek hak tanggungan yang dilakukan tanpa adanya persetujuan pemegang hak pengelolaan. HGB merupakan salah satu hak atas tanah yang berdiri di atas tanah hak pengelolaan dan dapat dibebani hak tanggungan dengan persyaratan harus disetujui oleh pemegang hak pengelolaan. Namun, seringkali ditemukan pemegang HGB membebankan hak tanggungan tanpa persetujuan pemegang hak pengelolaan, sehingga keabsahan serta akibat hukumnya perlu dipertanyakan. Dengan latar belakang tersebut, penting adanya penelitian lebih lanjut mengenai keabsahan dan akibat hukum HGB sebagai objek hak tanggungan tanpa persetujuan pemegang hak pengelolaan. Metode penelitian bersifat yuridis normatif dengan teknik pendekatan yang menggunakan undang-undang dan metode analisa berupa deskriptif kualitatif. Kebaruan dari penelitian ini adalah pembahasan tidak hanya membahas mengenai bagaimana membebankan hak tanggungan terhadap HGB, namun akan difokuskan juga kepada keabsahan dan akibat hukum HGB sebagai objek hak tanggungan dilakukan tanpa persetujuan pemegang hak pengelolaan. Kesimpulan yang dapat dikutip dari pembahasan ini adalah HGB sebagai objek hak tanggungan tanpa persetujuan pemegang hak pengelolaan tidak memiliki keabsahan secara hukum dan akibatnya, pembebanan hak tanggungan tersebut dapat dimintakan pembatalan dan dapat batal demi hukum dengan putusan pengadilan.

The purpose of this research was to analyze the application of piercing the corporate veil principle regarding forced delising issue. which caused losses to investors. The importance of the responsibility of directors in the management of a company can be illustrated in the Principle of piercing the corporate veil, as in the event of a violation or deviation from the duties and obligations of a director which causes losses in the company will be responsible up to his personal assets. This research uses normative juridical legal research methods.. The problem approach used in this research is the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The novelty of this research lies in an in-depth analysis of the application of piercing the corporate veil principle regarding  forced delisting cases, thus providing a comprehensive understanding of whether or not modern corporate principles can be applied in forced delisting cases. So it is hoped that this research can provide more insight about the abuse of authority as directors for personal gain which causes losses is an act that deserves to be accounted for by the directors by referring to the application of the principle of piercing the corporate veil. In this case the directors of the company cannot be held responsible for investor losses caused by the Indonesian Stock Exchange's policy in the form of forced delisting. However, this concept does not apply absolutely because in certain condition it is possible that the Board of Directors cannot be responsible for the loss as long as the Board of Directors can provide opposite otherwise.  Tujuan penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis penerapan dari prinsip piercing the corporate veil pada permasalahan forced delisting  yang menyebabkan kerugian bagi investornya. Pentingnya pertanggungjawaban direksi dalam suatu pengurusan perseroan dapat digambarkan dalam Prinsip piercing the corporate veil, seperti pada hal terjadinya sebuah pelanggaran atau penyimpangan dari tugas dan kewajiban seorang direksi yang menyebabkan kerugian dalam perusahaan akan menjadi tanggung jawab hingga pada harta pribadinya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif. Pendekatan masalah yang digunakan pada penelitian ini yaitu statuary approach dan conceptual approach. Novelty penelitian ini terletak pada analisis mandalam mengenai penerapan prinsip piercing the corporate veil dalam kasus forced delisting sehingga memberikan pemahaman komperehensif tentang dapat tidaknya suatu prinsip modern perseroan diterapkan dalam kasus forced delisting. Sehingga penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan wawasan lebih mengenai penyalahgunaan wewenang selaku direksi untuk kepentingan pribadi sehingga menimbulkan kerugian yang mana perbuatan tersebut patut untuk dipertanggungjawabkan oleh direksi dengan mengacu pada penerapan prinsip piercing the corporate veil. Dalam  permasalahan ini direksi perseroan tidak dapat bertanggung jawab atas kerugian investor yang disebabkan oleh kebijakan Bursa Efek Indonesia yaitu berupa force delisting. Tetapi, konsep tersebut tidak berlaku mutlak sebab pada kondisi tertentu dimungkinkan direksi tidak dapat bertanggung jawab atas kerugian tersebut sepanjang direksi bisa memberikan bukti sebaliknya.      

This writing is intended to find out the prohibition on the use of alternative payment methods made by Google for users of digital services in Indonesia. Against the background of the KPPU investigation against Google for alleged conditional sales practices, which was followed by a change in settings on Google Support Android Developer that allowed alternative payment methods. Therefore, an assessment to further analyze this paper is essential because there is no research on monopolistic practices in digital market share in Indonesia so this research can be a renewal of existing laws for Indonesia. This writing is included in normative with the approach methods used in this writing are statute, comparative, and case. The results of the analysis also found that Google has eliminated the practice of conditional sales through changes in settings by allowing the use of alternative payment methods and compliance with the fulfillment of the responsibility and role of KPPU as a business supervisory authority in Indonesia based on the Business Competition Law. Penulisan ini ditujukan untuk mengetahui adanya larangan penggunaan metode pembayaran alternatif yang dilakukan oleh Google terhadap konsumen atau pengguna layanan digital di Indonesia. Dilatar belakangi adanya penyelidikan KPPU terhadap Google atas dugaan praktik penjualan bersyarat, yang kemudian disusul dengan dilakukannya perubahan pengaturan pada Google Support Android Developer atas diperbolehkannya penggunaan metode pembayaran alternatif selain Google Pay Billing. Maka, pengkajian untuk menganalisis lebih lanjut atas penulisan ini menjadi penting dikarenakan belum adanya penelitian terkait praktik monopoli di dalam ranah pangsa pasar digital di Indonesia sehingga penelitian ini dapat menjadi suatu pembaharuan hukum bagi Indonesia. Adapun penulisan ini termasuk ke dalam penulisan normatif dengan metode pendekatan yang digunakan adalah statute approach (pendekatan perundang-undang), comparative approach (pendekatan komparasi), dan case approach (pendekatan kasus). Hasil analisisnya pun didapati bahwa Google telah menghapus adanya praktik penjualan bersyarat melalui perubahan pengaturan dengan memperbolehkan penggunaan metode pembayaran alternatif serta kesesuaian atas pemenuhan tanggung jawab dan peran KPPU sebagai lembaga pengawas persaingan usaha di Indonesia sudah berdasar pada UU Persaingan Usaha.  

 The purpose of this study is to examine the system of recovering state financial losses in the criminal justice system for corruption in Indonesia and the reconstruction of state financial losses as an alternative to imprisonment. This research is included in non-doctrinal research, using normative-empirical research methods. The results of the research describe, the recovery of state financial losses carried out by the Prosecutor's Office through asset tracing and the implementation of Judge's decisions, does not indicate the existence of an optimal law enforcement system for efforts to save state assets. Only an average of 12.3%. It is necessary to reconstruct the recovery of state financial losses by reconstructing Article 4 Jo Article 18 Paragraph (1) letter b of Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 31 of 1991 and the reconstruction of Article 5 paragraph (1) letter b Regulation of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia No. 15 of 2020, namely the return of state finances can be realized in the settlement of cases through a restorative justice approach at the High Court as an alternative to imprisonment. Tujuan penelitian ini ialah untuk mengkaji mengenai sistem pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara dalam sistem pemidanaan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia dan rekonstruksi pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara sebagai alternatif pengganti pidana penjara. Penelitian ini masuk dalam penelitian non-doktrinal, dengan menggunakan metode penelitian normatif-empiris, Hasil penelitian menjabarkan, pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara yang dilaksanakan oleh Kejaksaan melalui aset tracing dan pelaksanaan putusan Hakim, tidak menunjukan adanya suatu sistem penegakan hukum yang optimal terhadap upaya penyelamatan kekayaan negara. Hanya rata-rata sebesar 12,3%. Perlu adanya rekonstruksi pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara dengan melakukan rekonstruksi Pasal 4 Jo Pasal 18 Ayat (1) huruf b UU No. 20 tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1991 dan rekonstruksi Pasal 5 ayat (1) huruf b Peraturan Jaksa Agung RI No. 15 Tahun 2020, yakni pengembalian keuangan negara dapat diwujudkan dalam penyelesaian perkara melalui pendekatan restorative justice di Kejaksaan Tinggi sebagai alternatif pengganti pidana penjara. 

The purpose of this research focuses on analyzing the practice of "walimatul ursyi" within the community of Jangka Subdistrict, Bireuen Regency, which is influenced by local cultural values and the development of modern culture, as well as its relevance to the development of Islamic law. The urgency of this research lies in understanding the interaction between tradition and local culture with Islamic teachings, especially in the context of the "walimatul ursyi" practice. The research method employs a qualitative approach with a case study research design. This study combines literature research and field research. Thus the data sources obtained include field data and library sources. The research findings indicate that the "walimatul ursyi" practice in Bireuen Regency reflects a harmonious blend of local cultural values and Islamic Sharia. Although some aspects need adjustment to align with Islamic lawfully, the essence of this practice still retains the traditions and local wisdom of the Bireuen community. The novelty of the research lies in its in-depth exploration of how the local traditions, particularly the "walimatul ursyi" practice, interact and integrate with Islamic Sharia, as well as how the adaptation and modification of these traditions are confronted with the challenges of modern culture and the need to remain in line with the principles of Sharia law. Therefore, this research has the potential to serve as a reference for further studies related to the implementation of Islamic law within specific socio-cultural contexts, especially in the context of marriage in Islamic society. Tujuan penelitian ini berfokus pada menganalisis praktik walimatul ursyi di masyarakat Kecamatan Jangka Kabupaten Bireuen yang terpengaruh oleh nilai-nilai budaya lokal dan perkembangan budaya modern serta relevansinya dengan perkembangan hukum Islam. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada kebutuhan untuk memahami interaksi antara tradisi dan budaya lokal dengan ajaran syariat Islam, khususnya dalam konteks praktik walimahtul ursyi di Kabupaten Bireuen. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian study kasus. Penelitian ini merupakan perpaduan penelitian kepustakaan dan penelitian lapangan, sehingga sumber data yang diperoleh dalam penelitian ini terdapat dari sumber data lapangan (data primer) dan sumber data kepustakaan (data skunder). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan praktik walimatul ursyi di Kabupaten Bireuen mencerminkan perpaduan harmonis antara nilai-nilai budaya lokal dan syariat Islam. Meskipun ada beberapa aspek yang perlu disesuaikan agar sepenuhnya sesuai dengan syariat Islam, namun esensi dari praktik ini tetap mempertahankan tradisi dan kearifan lokal masyarakat Bireuen. Novelty penelitian ini yaitu eksplorasi mendalam mengenai bagaimana tradisi lokal masyarakat Kabupaten Bireuen, khususnya praktik walimatul ursyi, berinteraksi dan berintegrasi dengan syariat Islam, serta bagaimana adaptasi dan modifikasi tradisi tersebut dihadapkan dengan tantangan budaya modern dan kebutuhan untuk tetap sejalan dengan prinsip-prinsip hukum syari’at. Sehingga penelitian ini berpotensi untuk menjadi acuan dalam penelitian lebih lanjut yang berkaitan dengan implementasi hukum Islam dalam konteks sosial budaya tertentu, khususnya dalam konteks pernikahan dalam masyarakat Islam.

 The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration in terms of guaranteeing legal certainty and protection to holders of land rights. This study aims to test the effectiveness of the implementation of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997, especially the application of Article 32 paragraph (2) in the event of cancellation of the transfer of rights. This type of research is normative juridical with a case approach, descriptive analytical research specifications. The results of the study show that the provisions of Article 32 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 are not effective enough to provide legal protection for land buyers, because the sale and purchase that occurs later by a court decision of the seller is declared bankrupt. The provisions of Article 32 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 were not considered by the Panel of Judges examining case Number 3/Pdt.Sus–Other Claims/2018/PN.Smg jo. Number 16/Pdt.Sus–Bankrupt/2017/PN Niaga Smg jo. Number 1/Pdt.Sus–PKPU/2017/PN Smg dated 5 September 2018 jo. Number 2 K/PDT.Sus–Bankrupt/2019 February 21 2019, because in the Paulina action case the Panel of Judges provided legal considerations based on the provisions of Article 41, 42 Law Number 37 of 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, sale and purchase object of dispute as referred to the Deed of Sale and Purchase Number 340 of 2017 dated August 16 2017, while the seller was declared bankrupt on December 18 2017, the sale and purchase was carried out only 4 (four) months before the bankruptcy decision was pronounced, then the sale and purchase of Property Rights Certificate Number 4086/ The Salatiga sub-district must be cancelled. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis implementasi Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah dalam  kaitan jaminan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan kepada pemegang hak atas tanah. Penelitian ini hendak menguji efektifitas Implementasi Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 khususnya penerapan Pasal 32 ayat (2) dalam hal terjadinya pembatalan peralihan hak. Jenis penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kasus, spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketentuan Pasal 32 ayat (2) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tidak cukup efektif memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli tanah, karena jual beli yang terjadi kemudian oleh putusan pengadilan penjual dinyatakan pailit. Ketentuan Pasal 32 ayat (2) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tidak dipertimbangkan oleh Majelis Hakim Pemeriksan perkara Nomor 3/Pdt.Sus–Gugatan Lain-lain/2018/PN.Smg jo. Nomor 16/Pdt.Sus–Pailit/2017/PN Niaga Smg jo. Nomor 1/Pdt.Sus–PKPU/2017/PN Smg tanggal 5 September 2018 jo. Nomor 2 K/PDT.Sus–Pailit/2019 21 Februari 2019, karena di dalam perkara action paulina Majelis Hakim memberikan pertimbangan hukum dengan berpedoman pada ketentuan Pasal 41, 42 Undang Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, jual beli objek sengketa sebagaimana  Akta Jual Beli Nomor 340 Tahun 2017 tanggal 16 Agustus 2017, sedangkan penjual dinyatakan pailit pada tanggal 18 Desember 2017 maka jual beli tersebut dilakukan hanya 4 (empat) bulan sebelum putusan pailit diucapkan, maka jual beli atas Sertifikat Hak Milik Nomor 4086/Kelurahan Salatiga tersebut harus dibatalkan.    

This study is conducted with the purpose to find out the legal protection of child perpetrators who participate in the criminal persecution and the determination of the role of participation in the criminal persecution by AG (case study of persecution by child of employee in Directorate General of Taxes). This study is based on the legal protection of child in conflict with the law that is not well implemented. This study uses a juridicial normative legal method. The novelty in this study is to explain the legal protection of child as a participant in the criminal persecution. The findings produced in this study are that the SPPA Law regulates the legal protection of child, namely in Article 3, Article 79 paragraph (2), and Article 81 paragraph (6) of the SPPA Law. Based on these regulations, child who participate in the criminal persecution can be treated specially in the procedural law, receive different criminal penalties compared to adults, and get the fulfillment of child rights. In the case of persecution by child of employee in Directorate General of Taxes, the role of AG as a child who participated in the criminal persecution was correct, but the decision decided by the Judge was not appropriate. AG should be subject to the lex specialis principle of Article 76 C jo Article 80 paragraph (2) of the Child Protection Law.  Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum terhadap anak pelaku turut serta tindak pidana penganiayaan dan penentuan peran turut serta tindak pidana penganiayaan oleh AG (studi kasus penganiayaan oleh anak pegawai Direktorat Jenderal Pajak). Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh perlindungan hukum terhadap anak berkonflik dengan hukum yang belum terimplementasi dengan baik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum yuridis normatif. Kebaharuan dalam penelitian ini adalah menjelaskan mengenai perlindungan hukum terhadap anak sebagai pelaku turut serta tindak pidana penganiayaan. Temuan dalam penelitian ini adalah UU SPPA mengatur mengenai perlindungan hukum terhadap anak, yaitu pada Pasal 3, Pasal 79 ayat (2), dan Pasal 81 ayat (6) UU SPPA. Berdasarkan ketentuan tersebut, maka anak pelaku turut serta tindak pidana penganiayaan dalam menjalankan proses hukum dapat diperlakukan secara khusus pada hukum acara, menerima ancaman pidana yang berbeda apabila dibandingkan dengan orang dewasa, dan mendapatkan pemenuhan hak anak. Pada kasus penganiayaan oleh anak pegawai Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, peran AG sebagai anak pelaku turut serta tindak pidana penganiayaan sudah tepat, tetapi putusan yang diputuskan oleh Hakim dirasa kurang tepat. Seharusnya AG dapat dikenakan asas lex specialis Pasal 76 C jo Pasal 80 ayat (2) UU Perlindungan Anak.