<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>This study aims to look at the phenomenon of quite quiting that exists in workers after returning to work activities in the office. This phenomenon is viewed from the engagement and well being of workers in the workplace. Quite quiting itself is a phenomenon that describes the behavior of workers who choose to quit doing work that is not their main job at work, and become less psychologically invested in work. The approach in this study uses quantitative research methods. There were 377 research subjects spread across 21 provinces in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that employee engagement and well being owned by workers are high. This study illustrates that workers are able to psychologically invest both cognitive, emotional and behavioral in the work they do. Even workers feel psychologically prosperous in carrying out work. Based on these results, it appears that the workers in this study show committed behavior in carrying out their jobs.</em></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>Engagement, Quiet Quiting, Well Being, Worker</em></p>

<p><em>Domestic violence (DV) is one of the forms of violence that affects not only adults but also children. Experiencing or witnessing DV in childhood can have long-term psychological impacts, such as the development of an anxious personality in adulthood. As individuals grow, they need to fulfill specific needs to achieve self-actualization, including safety needs. Individuals with high anxiety are most likely to have a threatened sense of security. Thus, the anxiety is predicted to be related to self-actualization. This research aims to investigate the relationship between self-actualization and anxiety in adult women who were victims of DV during childhood, with a total of 240 early adult women. The data analysis method is quantitative correlational. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of -0.523 with a significance value of 0.000 (p &lt; 0.05), indicating a negative correlation between self-actualization and anxiety in early adult women who experienced DV during childhood.</em></p><p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>Anxiety, Self-Actualization, Domestic Violence</em></p>

The aim of this research is to compare the development of the establishment of Limited Liability Companies in Indonesia and the Netherlands along with the development of society. Regulations regarding Limited Liability Companies in Indonesia have undergone several changes, which are currently regulated in Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies and Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation which introduces a new form of Company, namely Individual Companies, changes to the law -The law intends to be more in line with current legal developments so that it can accommodate the needs of the community. This writing has an urgency, namely that along with developments over time, of course regulations will also change along with the needs of society. This research compares the consistency of the development and application of regulations in Indonesia and the Netherlands with the aim of learning and developing in the legal field. This research method uses normative juridical research methods. This research has a novelty, namely a discussion related to the comparison regarding the establishment of limited liability companies in Indonesia and in the Netherlands and comparing the consistency regarding changes that are still in accordance with legal principles. The results of this research are that in the Netherlands there are differences with Indonesia, namely related to the status of individual companies, in which case Indonesia has the status of a legal entity, whereas in the Netherlands individual companies are not legal entities. Another difference between the Netherlands and Indonesia that can be seen is the same regarding approval from the government to establish a company, in the Netherlands starting in 2011, the provisions for government approval have been removed and replaced with a system of strict supervision by the ministry. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah membandingkan mengenai perkembangan pendirian perseroan terbatas di Indonesia dengan Belanda seiring perkembangan masyarakat. Pengaturan mengenai perseroan terbatas di Indonesia sudah mengalami beberapa kali perubahan yang mana saat ini diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas dan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja yang mengenalkan suatu bentuk perseroan baru yakni perseroan perseorangan, perubahan undang-undang tersebut bermaksud agar lebih sesuai dengan perkembangan hukum saat ini sehingga dapat mengakomodir kebutuhan dari masyarakat. Penelitian ini memiliki urgensi yaitu seiring dengan perkembangan zaman, tentunya peraturan juga akan berubah seiring dengan kebutuhan masyarakat, penelitian ini membandingkan bagaimana konsistensi dari perkembangan dan penerapan peraturan di Indonesia dengan Belanda dengan tujuan sebagai pembelajaran dan pengembangan dalam bidang hukum. metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal. Penelitian ini mempunyai kebaruan yaitu pembahasan terkait perbandingan mengenai pendirian perseroan terbatas di Indonesia dan Belanda dan membandingkan bagaimana konsistensi terkait perubahan yang masih sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip hukum. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu di Belanda memiliki perbedaan dengan Indonesia, yaitu terkait dengan status perusahaan perseorangan yang mana dalam hal ini Indonesia memiliki status sebagai badan hukum, sementara di Belanda perusahaan perseorangan bukanlah badan hukum. Perbedaan lain antara Belanda dan Indonesia yang dapat dilihat dalam halnya terkait persetujuan dari pemerintah untuk mendirikan perseroan, di Belanda mulai pada tahun 2011 telah menghapus ketentuan persetujuan pemerintah dan menggantikannya dengan sistem pengawasan yang ketat oleh kementerian.  

This study aims to examine and analyze efforts to solve terrorism crimes using approaches outside criminal law. Through a non-penal approach, it is necessary to take alternative precautions for criminal acts of terrorism. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach, concepts, and comparisons. The results of the discussion of this study concluded that non-penal policies outside the criminal law in tackling terrorism among young people and students can be done by student participation in extra-campus organizations such as HMI. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis upaya penyelesaian perkara kejahatan terorisme dengan menggunakan pendekatan di luar hukum pidana. Penelitian ini urgen untuk mengatasi tindak pidana terorisme yang menjadi musuh dunia. Melalui pendekatan non penal, perlu ditempuh alternatif pencegahan tindak pidana terorisme. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konsep, dan perbandingan. Hasil pembahasan penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa kebijakan non penal di luar hukum pidana dalam menanggulangi terorisme di kalangan muda dan mahasiswa dapat dilakukan dengan keikutsertaan mahasiswa dalam organisasi ekstra kampus seperti HMI.    

This research aims to discover the legal consequences of making a marriage agreement deed by a notary who has yet to be registered at the Office of Religious Affairs. This research method is normative legal research examining the legal consequences of making a marriage agreement deed by a notary who has yet registered at the Office of Religious Affairs. The research method used includes research on legal principles, systematic law analysis, and legal synchronization study. This research is focused on case studies of the East Jakarta Religious Court Decision Number 4855/Pdt.G/2019/Pa. It is related to doing a marriage agreement deed by a notary without registration at the Office of Religious Affairs. The results of this study analyze the legal implications of non-recording, both from the perspective of the validity of the marriage agreement certificate and its legal impact on the parties concerned. The novelty of this research is that administrative inaccuracies in making a marriage agreement can affect its legal validity and related rights. This research also seeks to provide recommendations for increasing awareness and compliance with applicable legal procedures to avoid potential conflicts and disputes in the future related to the marriage agreement deed. 

The purpose of this research is to analyze the implementation of democracy and village autonomy in the process of village head elections. The election of a village head is one form of genuine and pure village autonomy and democracy. However, with the emergence of modern states, the independence and ability of rural communities to manage their affairs have diminished. This is closely related to the decentralization that occurs in unitary states such as Indonesia. In a unitary state, one of the central matters is legal affairs. Legal matters include regulating the election of village heads, as stipulated in Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 112 of 2014 concerning the Election of Village Heads. This research uses a normative juridical method. The research results explain that village head elections, based on rules from the central government cascaded down to the village level, become procedural in the implementation of village head elections. In fact, these rules lead to the phenomenon of husband and wife pairs running as village head candidates in the same village to avoid having a single candidate, thereby enabling the village head election to take place. Furthermore, violations of rules regarding village head elections are common, such as instances of money politics and the lack of neutrality among village officials, but there is no legal follow-up related to these violations. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis pelaksanaan demokrasi dan otonomi desa dalam proses pemilihan kepala desa. Pemilihan kepala desa merupakan salah satu bentuk dari otonomi dan demokrasi desa yang asli dan murni. Namun dengan munculnya negara modern, kemandirian dan kemampuan masyarakat desa untuk mengatur urusan desanya mulai berkurang. Hal tersebut tidak lepas dengan adanya desentralisasi yang terjadi di negara kesatuan seperti Indonesia. Dalam negara kesatuan salah satu urusan yang menjadi urusan pusat adalah soal hukum. Urusan hukum tersebut tidak lepas dari urusan untuk mengatur pemilihan kepala desa sebagaimana terdapat pada Permendagri No 112 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemilihan Kepala Desa. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa pemilihan kepala desa yang berdasarkan aturan-aturan dari pemerintah pusat yang diturunkan hingga tingkat desa menjadi prosedural dalam pelaksaan pemilihan kepala desa. Bahkan aturan tersebut menimbulkan adanya fenomena pasangan suami istri yang maju sebagai calon kepala desa di desa yang sama untuk menghindari calon tunggal sehingga pemilihan kepala desa dapat dilaksanakan. Selain itu ternyata aturan mengenai pemilihan kepala desa juga banyak terjadi pelanggaran namun tidak ada tindak lanjut hukum terkait pelanggaran tersebut. Pelanggaran tersebut antara lain adalah adanya money politics dan ketidaknetralan perangkat desa.      

The purpose of this study is to find out cases of violations of genocide crimes against humanity committed by China against ethnic Uighurs and how the law enforcement of the 1998 Rome Statute against China as a non-state party. Human rights are inherently inseparable from the history of human life. Crimes against humanity committed by the state occurred in the Xinjiang region due to China's strike hard campaign policy against the ethnic Uighur community. However, China is not a ratifying country of the 1998 Rome Statute, which causes the International Criminal Court (ICC) to be unable to assert its jurisdiction. This research uses a normative juridical approach with an element of novelty in the form of an analysis of the application of the jurisdiction of the ICC to non-state parties. The result of the research is that there are other rules in the 1998 Rome Statute that allow the ICC  to have jurisdiction over non-state parties. The real challenge lies in law enforcement because China is a member of the UNSC which has the power to use the veto right which can cancel decisions, provisions, draft regulations and laws or resolutions. It is necessary to review the rules because it does not rule out the possibility that UNSC countries can commit similar crimes in the future. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui kasus pelanggaran kejahatan kemanusiaan genosida yang dilakukan oleh Tiongkok terhadap etnis Uighur dan bagaimana penegakan hukum dari Statuta Roma 1998 terhadap Tiongkok sebagai negara non-state parties. Hak asasi manusia memiliki sifat inherent tidak dapat dipisahkan dari sejarah kehidupan manusia. Peristiwa kejahatan kemanusiaan yang dilakukan oleh negara terjadi di wilayah Xinjiang dari adanya kebijakan strike hard campaign yang dilakukan Tiongkok terhadap masyarakat etnis Uighur. Namun Tiongkok tidak termasuk negara peratifikasi Statuta Roma 1998 yang menyebabkan International Criminal Court (ICC) tidak dapat menyatakan yuridiksi nya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan unsur kebaharuan berupa analisa dari penerapan yuridiksi International criminal court (ICC) terhadap non-statets parties. Hasil dari penelitian terdapat aturan lain didalam Statuta Roma 1998 yang memungkinkan ICC memiliki yuridiksi terhadap non-state parties. Tantangan sesungguhnya terletak didalam penegakan hukum dikarenakan Tiongkok merupakan anggota DK-PBB yang memiliki power dalam penggunaan hak veto yang dapat membatalkan keputusan, ketetapan, rancangan peraturan dan undang-undang atau resolusi. Perlu adanya peninjauan kembali aturan tersebut karena tidak menutup kemungkinan negara DK-PBB dapat melakukan kejahatan serupa dikemudian hari.Kata kunci: Hak Asasi Manusia; Statuta Roma 1998; Tiongkok Abstract  Keywords: 

The purpose of this research is to examine the implementation of the death penalty and the commutation of death sentences for premeditated murder cases. The urgency of this research lies in how the application of the death penalty in proven premeditated murder cases may fail to ensure legal justice for the victims. This type of research adopts a socio-legal research approach. The legal framework for the application of the death penalty in Indonesia is governed by Article 10 and Article 11 of the Criminal Code (KUH Pidana). In the case of premeditated murder of S and her child MF, the defendant D was ultimately sentenced to life imprisonment. Defendant D was charged under Article 340 of the KUHP (Criminal Code), Article 80 in conjunction with 76c of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning child protection in Indonesia. The imposition of the death penalty for premeditated murder cases is rarely decided by judges. In their judgments, judges often opt for life imprisonment or a 20-year prison sentence. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengkaji pengaturan pelaksanaan hukuman mati dan pemutusan hukuman mati terhadap pembunuhan berencana. Urgensi penelitian ini adalah bagaimana penerapan hukuman mati pada kasus pembunuhan berencana terbukti kurang mampu menjamin keadilan hukum bagi korban. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis sosiologis. Kerangka hukum penerapan hukuman mati di Indonesia diatur dalam Pasal 10 dan Pasal 11 KUH Pidana. Untuk kasus pembunuhan berencana terhadap S dan anaknya MF pada akhirnya terdakwa D dijatuhi hukumam pidana seumur hidup. Terdakwa D dikenai Pasal 340 KUHP, Pasal 80 juncto 76c UU RI Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang perlindungan anak. Penerapan hukuman mati pada tindak pidana pembunuhan berencana jarang diputuskan oleh hakim. Dalam putusannya Hakim menggunakan pidana seumur hidup atau hukuman penjara 20 tahun.    

The purpose of this study is to analyze the restorative justice approach as an alternative to solving corruption by returning state financial losses which are efforts to recover from perpetrators of corruption. The restorative justice approach is a popular approach in recent years, it is possible that this approach can be implemented in corruption crimes. This study uses a normative juridical method with descriptive analytical research specifications. The results of this study indicate that the indicator of restorative justice here is the return of state financial losses. Meanwhile, Article 4 of the PTPK Law regulates the recovery of these losses does not eliminate the punishment of perpetrators of corruption which can be interpreted that Article 4 does not provide loopholes in the application of restorative justice. The application of restorative justice is interpreted not to erase the punishment of the perpetrator but rather to return state finances so that it does not conflict with Article 4, because it will be considered by the judge in imposing a sentence as a mitigating factor. Based on the research results, it is possible to have a restorative justice approach to solve corruption crimes based on SEJA. However, there are several requirements that have been regulated in the SEJA with the criteria of considering small losses, a sense of public awareness that returns state financial losses, and not being continuous. Restorative justice aims at recovering state finances so that the judicial process can stop and can also be followed up. Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu untuk menganalisis pendekatan keadilan restoratif sebagai alternatif penyelesaian tindak pidana korupsi dengan mengembalikan kerugian keuangan negara yang merupakan upaya pemulihan dari pelaku tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa indikator adanya keadilan restoratif disini adalah pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara. Sedangkan, Pasal 4 UU PTPK mengatur pengembalian kerugian tersebut tidak menghapuskan dipidananya pelaku tindak pidana korupsi yang dapat diartikan bahwa Pasal 4 tidak memberikan celah dalam penerapan keadilan restoratif. Penerapan keadilan restoratif dimaknai tidak menghapus dipidananya pelaku tetapi lebih kepada pengembalian keuangan negara sehingga tidak bertentangan dengan Pasal 4, karena akan menjadi pertimbangan hakim dalam penjatuhan hukuman sebagai faktor yang meringankan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dimungkinkan adanya pendekatan keadilan restoratif untuk menyelesaiakan tindak pidana korupsi yang didasarkan pada SEJA. Namun terdapat beberapa persyaratan yang telah diatur dalam SEJA tersebut dengan kriteria yaitu mempertimbangkan kerugian kecil, adanya rasa kesadaran masyarakat yang mengembalikan kerugian keuangan negara, dan tidak bersifat terus menerus. Keadilan restoratif bertujuan sebagai pemulihan keuangan negara sehingga proses peradilan dapat berhenti dan dapat pula ditindaklanjuti. 

The purpose of this research is to learn about the revocation of bankruptcy judgments in the event that bankruptcy assets are not sufficient to pay bankruptcy costs. If, in the management of bankruptcy assets, the curator considers that the bankruptcy assets are insufficient to pay the bankruptcy costs, the curator may apply for revocation of the bankruptcy statement submitted to the supervisory judge. Based on the proposal of the supervisory judge to revoke the debtor's bankruptcy statement, the commercial court may decide to revoke the debtor's bankruptcy statement. The problems that occur over the revocation and the problems and solutions to the revocation of the bankruptcy judgment in the event that the bankruptcy assets are not enough to pay the bankruptcy costs. The research method used is a legal research method that prioritizes how to research library materials and laws and regulations. The results of this study indicate that the revocation of the bankruptcy decision prioritizes legal certainty for debtors but does not provide certainty of payment of creditors' bills. Second, the revocation of the bankruptcy declaration decision by the Commercial Court has caused problems where the bankruptcy assets are only used to pay bankruptcy costs; the bankruptcy revocation decision is not accompanied by an order for the receivership to liquidate the company's debtors; and actio pauliana in bankruptcy is only valid while the bankruptcy process is still running. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji tentang pencabutan putusan pailit jika harta pailit tidak cukup untuk membayar biaya kepailitan. Jika kurator dalam pengurusan harta pailit percaya bahwa harta pailit tidak mencukupi untuk membayar biaya kepailitan, kurator dapat mengajukan permohonan pencabutan pernyataan pailit yang disampaikan kepada Hakim Pengawas. Jika Hakim Pengawas merekomendasikan untuk mencabut pernyataan pailit debitur, maka Pengadilan Niaga dapat memutuskan untuk mencabut pernyataan pailit debitur. Permasalahan yang terjadi atas pencabutan serta problematika dan solusi pencabutan putusan pailit dalam hal harta pailit tidak cukup untuk membayar biaya kepailitan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penetian yuridis normatif yang mengutamakan cara meneliti bahan pustaka dan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan adalah pencabutan putusan pailit lebih mengutamakan kepastian hukum bagi debitur namum tidak memberikan kepastian pembayaran atas tagihan kreditur. Kedua, pencabutan putusan pernyataan pailit oleh Pengadilan Niaga telah menimbulkan problematika dimana harta pailit hanya dipergunakan untuk membayar biaya kepailitan, putusan pencabutan pailit tidak disertai dengan perintah bagi kurator untuk melakukan likudasi terhadap debitur perseroan, actio pauliana dalam kepailitan hanya berlaku selama proses kepailitan masih berjalan.