Publication Search

This study aims to analyze the role of assessment in decision-making within guidance and counseling services. Assessment plays a crucial role in providing accurate, objective, and comprehensive data regarding students’ characteristics, needs, and problems. This research employs a qualitative approach using a literature review method by analyzing 25 relevant scholarly sources related to assessment, measurement, and counseling services. The findings indicate that measurement serves as the fundamental basis of assessment, which involves systematic processes to obtain quantitative data. The quality of assessment results is highly influenced by the reliability and validity of the instruments used. Reliable instruments ensure consistency, while valid instruments ensure accuracy in measuring intended variables. Furthermore, assessment functions as a basis for diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation of guidance and counseling services. The study also reveals that the application of assessment in schools is not yet optimal due to several factors, including limited counselor competence and lack of effective use of instruments. In addition, the integration of technology and the use of both test and non-test instruments have been shown to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of assessment. In conclusion, systematic and well-implemented assessment significantly enhances the quality of decision-making in guidance and counseling services. Therefore, improving counselors’ competencies and optimizing the use of assessment instruments are essential to support more effective counseling practices

The Community Partnership Program (PKM) aims to improve the capacity of teachers at Rara Elementary School in understanding and implementing the National Assessment as an educational evaluation tool. The problems faced by partners are limited understanding of the concept of National Assessment and technical skills in managing instruments, analyzing data, and following up on assessment results. The methods used in this activity are participatory-based socialization and technical training involving teachers as active participants. Activities are carried out through material delivery, interactive discussions, and hands-on practice using assessment tools. The results of the activity showed an increase in teachers' knowledge and skills in understanding the National Assessment indicators, developing learning strategies in line with the Pancasila learner profile, and optimizing the use of assessment results to improve the quality of learning in the classroom. Thus, this PKM activity contributed to improving the quality of learning at Rara Elementary School while supporting the achievement of national education standards.

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of narcotics rehabilitation for offenders who reoffend after undergoing rehabilitation, using a case study at the Bukittinggi Police Resort (Polresta Bukittinggi) and rehabilitation institutions. This research is motivated by the continued occurrence of narcotics offenders who relapse into criminal behavior despite having completed medical and social rehabilitation programs as mandated by Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. The research method used is empirical juridical with a qualitative approach through interviews, literature review, and case documentation. Primary data were obtained from investigators at Polresta Bukittinggi and rehabilitation institutions, while secondary data were obtained from laws and regulations as well as relevant literature. The results indicate that the investigation process leading to rehabilitation has been conducted in accordance with applicable procedures through assessment mechanisms by the Integrated Assessment Team (Tim Asesmen Terpadu). However, the effectiveness of rehabilitation in preventing recidivism remains suboptimal, as evidenced by offenders who return to narcotics abuse after completing rehabilitation programs. This suggests that rehabilitation programs require continuous supervision and more comprehensive approaches, including medical, psychological, and social aspects, to minimize the risk of relapse among former narcotics abusers.

This study aims to systematically analyze the implementation of formative and summative assessments in Grade IV Islamic Religious Education (PAI) at SDN 2 Konda within the framework of the Merdeka Curriculum. The research employs a qualitative approach with a case study design to obtain an in-depth and contextual understanding of classroom assessment practices. Data were collected through classroom observations, in-depth interviews with teachers, the principal, and parents, as well as an analysis of curriculum documents and various assessment instruments used throughout the learning process. The data were analyzed using thematic coding techniques supported by NVivo software, guided by the Formative Summative Continuum framework to examine the alignment and integration between both assessment types. The findings indicate that teachers have regularly implemented formative assessment through digital quizzes, direct observation, reflective discussions, and continuous feedback, which have increased student participation and strengthened competency mastery. Meanwhile, summative assessment was conducted at the end of the semester through written tests and project-based assignments; however, it still primarily emphasizes cognitive aspects and has not fully integrated formative assessment evidence. The study also identifies limitations in the use of multidimensional rubrics, continuous portfolio management, and meaningful parental involvement in the overall evaluation process.

The evaluation of Indonesian language instruction at the junior secondary level remains predominantly oriented toward lower-order thinking skills, thereby constraining the advancement of students’Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). This situation necessitates the development of comprehensive assessment tools that are coherently aligned with the Merdeka Curriculum. The present study introduces a model for constructing HOTS-oriented assessment instruments targeting procedural text writing in Phase D. The development process was systematically organized through several stages: translating learning outcomes into measurable indicators, preparing assessment blueprints, creating item cards, formulating scoring rubrics for attitudes, knowledge, and skills, and finally analyzing and interpreting the assessment data. These instruments were specifically designed to capture students’ analytical, evaluative, and creative abilities in producing procedural texts that are logical, coherent, and effective. Findings demonstrate that the instruments provide an objective and holistic representation of students’ competency attainment. In summary, the proposed HOTS-based assessment model for procedural text writing is practical, methodical, and contextually relevant, serving as a valuable framework for evaluating Indonesian language learning in accordance with the Merdeka Curriculum principles.

This study aims to describe the application of SOLO Taxonomy-based early childhood development assessment instruments at Al-Huda Kindergarten in Gorontalo City. The research approach uses a descriptive qualitative method with data collection techniques in the form of observation, interviews, and documentation. The focus of the research includes teachers' understanding of the assessment instruments, the filling process, and the suitability of the instrument application with the principles of SOLO Taxonomy. The results show that the school has implemented four assessment instruments, namely anecdotal notes, checklists, work results, and serial photos as part of formative assessment. In general, the assessment implementation was in line with the children's development, but there was a discrepancy in the use of anecdotal notes, which should have been written one sheet per child but were used for several children at once, thereby reducing the accuracy of the children's development data. The SOLO Taxonomy helped teachers classify the level of complexity of children's understanding from pre-structural to extended abstract, making the assessment more meaningful. This study emphasizes the importance of applying appropriate and individualized assessment instruments so that information on child development is more accurate and can be used to design appropriate follow-up learning activities.

Early childhood development assessment is an important process in obtaining a comprehensive picture of a child's growth and development as a basis for planning learning that is appropriate to the child's needs and characteristics. One of the most relevant assessment techniques for early childhood characteristics is observation, because it is carried out naturally through play and learning activities without putting pressure on the child. This article aims to examine the use of observation instruments as a basis for assessing early childhood development and to provide guidance to early childhood educators in conducting appropriate, systematic, and accountable assessments. The method used in this article is a theoretical study that examines the concept of early childhood assessment, assessment principles, and the process of conducting assessments through observation. The observation instruments discussed include daily records, anecdotal records, and children's work records. The results of the study show that the optimal use of observation instruments can help teachers understand children's development holistically, detect children's special needs, and serve as a basis for decision-making in learning planning and curriculum development. Thus, observation instruments play a strategic role in supporting the assessment process of early childhood development to be more meaningful and oriented towards children's needs.

This study aims to analyze the forms of collaboration between teachers and parents in following up on the results of observational assessments of early childhood self-regulation development. The study employs a qualitative approach with a case study design in a non-formal early childhood education (PAUD) setting. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and analysis of assessment documents. The findings indicate that observational assessment serves as an initial foundation for identifying children’s abilities to manage emotions and behavior. The assessment results are then followed up through collaborative practices in the form of regular communication, exchange of information regarding children’s development, and agreements on guidance strategies between teachers and parents. The role of parents is evident in the consistent implementation of guidance strategies at home, aligned with the stimulation provided by teachers at school. This alignment of roles has been shown to strengthen children’s self-regulation development, particularly in impulse control, behavioral regulation, and the ability to follow rules. The study emphasizes that structured and continuous teacher–parent collaboration is a key factor in the effectiveness of follow-up actions based on observational assessment results in supporting early childhood social-emotional development.

This study aimed to examine the relationships among mindset, anxiety, and the achievement of the Assessment of Regional Education Standardization (ASPD) results among ninth-grade students in public junior high schools in Yogyakarta City. Using a quantitative survey approach, the study involved 871 students selected through stratified random sampling based on the TPM stage 1 test scores from schools categorized into high, medium, and low strata for the 2022/2023 academic year. Data were collected using a questionnaire instrument, validated by two expert validators, and construct validity was confirmed through standardized loading factors, showing all items to be valid. Reliability was measured using Cronbach's Alpha, yielding 0.508 for mindset and 0.724 for anxiety. Data analysis employed Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) in R Studio, with model fit assessed through RMSEA, GFI, AGFI, and CFI criteria. Results revealed that the mindset measurement model demonstrated an excellent fit, and the anxiety measurement model also fit the data well after minor modifications. Structural model testing confirmed a good overall fit. Findings indicated that anxiety directly influenced ASPD achievement, with higher anxiety associated with lower results. Mindset did not have a direct effect on ASPD outcomes but negatively influenced anxiety, meaning a stronger growth mindset led to lower anxiety levels. Furthermore, mindset indirectly affected ASPD achievement through its impact on anxiety, demonstrating that fostering a growth mindset can enhance students’ performance by reducing anxiety.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka pada mata pelajaran Pendidikan Kepercayaan Terhadap Tuhan Yang Maha Esa dan Budi Pekerti di Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) se-Kabupaten Semarang. Latar belakang penelitian ini didasarkan pada tantangan yang dihadapi dalam penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka, terutama dalam hal pemahaman guru Kepercayaan Terhadap Tuhan Yang Maha Esa terhadap Kurikulum Merdeka. Kurikulum Merdeka diharapkan dapat meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran yang lebih fleksibel dan berpusat pada peserta didik, namun implementasinya masih menghadapi berbagai kendala, terutama pada mata pelajaran Pendidikan Kepercayaan Terhadap Tuhan Yang Maha Esa dan Budi Pekerti. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan jenis deskriptif. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi di SMP Negeri 1 Ambarawa dan SMP Negeri 2 Sumowono. Teknik analisis data meliputi reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perencanaan Kurikulum Merdeka telah melibatkan berbagai pihak, namun masih terdapat kendala dalam penyusunan modul ajar yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan lokal. Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Merdeka telah menunjukkan upaya inklusivitas, tetapi metode pembelajaran masih didominasi oleh ceramah dan diskusi dengan minimnya penggunaan media pembelajaran yang variatif. Evaluasi pembelajaran telah mencakup asesmen formatif dan sumatif, namun evaluasi berbasis proyek belum sepenuhnya terstruktur.

This community service program focuses on training teachers at SMKN 1 Malingping in developing formative assessment instruments using the Quizizz and Wordwall platforms. The main objective is to enhance teachers’ competencies in integrating technology into classroom assessment practices, thereby improving the quality of teaching and learning. Formative assessment plays a crucial role in the learning process as it allows teachers to continuously monitor student progress, identify learning gaps, and provide timely feedback that supports both remediation and enrichment. By mastering digital tools such as Quizizz and Wordwall, teachers can design engaging, interactive, and effective assessment activities that align with curriculum objectives while also increasing student motivation and participation. The training was conducted through a workshop model, combining theoretical sessions on formative assessment principles with hands-on practice in creating and implementing online quizzes, interactive games, and customized learning activities. Teachers were guided step-by-step in account creation, content development, and analyzing assessment results for instructional decision-making. Feedback sessions were also integrated to address challenges and share best practices. The results of the training indicated a significant improvement in teachers’ skills and confidence in utilizing Quizizz and Wordwall for formative assessment. Participants demonstrated the ability to design varied assessment formats, adapt content to students’ needs, and effectively interpret assessment data to inform teaching strategies. Moreover, teachers reported increased student engagement when these platforms were implemented in classroom settings. This program highlights the importance of equipping educators with digital literacy skills that are relevant to 21st-century learning demands. The integration of Quizizz and Wordwall not only streamlines the assessment process but also fosters a more dynamic and student-centered learning environment. The experience from SMKN 1 Malingping suggests that similar training initiatives can be replicated in other schools to promote effective, technology-based formative assessment practices.

Assessment practices in Indonesian schools remain largely dominated by conventional summative evaluation, which inadequately represents reflective learning processes and mastery of 21st-century competencies. This gap highlights the suboptimal implementation of formative and authentic assessments in educational practice, as well as the lack of conceptual models capable of systematically integrating both approaches. This article aims to examine and develop an integrative assessment model that combines three key approaches: formative assessment, authentic assessment, and Evidence-Centered Design (ECD), as a strategic framework to strengthen assessment practices for 21st-century learning. This study is based on a conceptual synthesis of more than 20 national and international sources. A narrative review approach is employed, focusing on the three main approaches: formative assessment, authentic assessment, and ECD. The results of the review produce an integrative assessment model articulated in the Claim–Task–Evidence–Feedback syntax, which merges competency mapping (claim), real-world task design (task), student performance evidence collection (evidence), and continuous formative feedback (feedback). This model not only unifies the strengths of the three approaches but also offers practical solutions to the challenges of assessment implementation in Indonesia through practice-based training, integration into instructional planning, and support from technical policy frameworks. The article contributes to the advancement of assessment design that is pedagogically valid, contextually relevant, and instrumental in driving learning transformation.

Integrated assessment is a multidisciplinary approach used in the judicial system to evaluate the psychological, social and medical conditions of legal subjects, particularly in cases involving children, victims of violence, persons with mental disabilities or defendants with psychological disorders. This study aims to examine the evidentiary strength of integrated assessment from juridical and psychological perspectives using a normative juridical approach. The findings reveal that although integrated assessments are recognized in legal practice, their status as admissible evidence is not yet explicitly regulated in criminal procedural law. From a psychological perspective, such assessments possess high scientific value and can provide an objective overview of the subject’s condition. However, limited understanding among legal practitioners regarding the interpretation of assessment results remains a major challenge. Therefore, regulatory harmonization and cross-sectoral capacity building are needed to optimize the function of integrated assessments in court proceedings.

Assessment of early childhood social-emotional development plays a crucial role in preparing children for the next stage of education. However, many early childhood institutions still rely on simple and unsystematic assessment methods. This study aims to implement a rating scale as an assessment tool for the social-emotional development of children aged 5–6 years in the context of a transportation-themed play activity. A descriptive quantitative approach was used, involving 9 children assessed with a validated observation instrument. The results indicate that most children exhibited very good social-emotional development. For the indicator of willingness to join group play, 6 children were in the Very Well Developed (BSB) category. For the ability to play cooperatively, 7 children were rated BSB. Regarding the expression of joy when sharing experiences, 6 children were also categorized as BSB. The rating scale proved effective in systematically and objectively documenting children's social-emotional behaviors and served as a foundation for designing follow-up learning strategies. This study recommends integrating social-emotional assessments into daily practice and fostering collaboration between teachers and parents to optimize children's development.

Assessment is a systematic process to collect and analyze information about child development, which is an important basis for planning, monitoring, and evaluating learning activities in early childhood education. Cognitive development includes children's ability to think, understand the environment, solve problems, and process information. This study aims to describe the results of cognitive development assessments of children aged 5–6 years using an assessment scale compiled based on cognitive development indicators. This study uses a quantitative method that aims to describe the results of cognitive development assessments using an assessment scale. The results of the assessment showed that all children were in the categories of Developing Well Towards Expectations (BSH) and Developing Very Good (BSB) in the four indicators of cognitive development observed. There are no children in the Not Developing (BB) or Starting to Develop (MB) categories.

Learning assessment in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (MI) has tended to focus on cognitive or academic aspects, while strengthening students' character has received less attention. In fact, character education is very important to shape children's personalities from an early age. This study aims to develop a learning assessment model that not only assesses aspects of knowledge, but also measures the development of students' character, such as honesty, responsibility, cooperation, and discipline. The method used is research and development with stages of needs analysis, instrument design, trials, and revisions. The results of the study show that character-based assessments can be integrated into teaching and learning activities effectively, and receive positive responses from teachers and students. The development of this assessment is expected to be a solution to support the overall goal of character education in MI.

Psychological assessment in guidance and counseling (GC) plays a vital role in understanding students holistically. However, its implementation in schools often faces ethical and legal challenges, particularly concerning the authority and competence of school counselors. This article examines the ethical representation of psychological assessments conducted by GC teachers through a literature review. Findings reveal that many practices exceed legal boundaries and highlight the need for professional collaboration, assessment training, and ethical literacy. Ethical assessment is not merely procedural compliance, but a form of professional responsibility to protect students’ rights and ensure accurate and safe services.  

Psychological assessment plays a crucial role in guidance and counseling by providing a deeper understanding of an individual’s psychological state however, it must be conducted in accordance with professional ethical standardsto protect the rights and dignity of clients. This article explores core ethical principles in psychological asseeement-such as informed consent, confindentiality, profesional competence, and the appropriate use of valid instruments. Based on recent literature, this paper highlights thataderece to ethical assessmens the counselor-client relationship and enhances psychological intervention outcomes.

Psychological assessment is an important component of guidance and counseling services as it supports counselors' understanding of learners' psychological conditions, potentials, and problems. This article aims to explain the role of assessment in understanding clients, identify the types of assessments commonly used, and emphasize the importance of understanding assessment as a counselor's professional competence. This study uses a qualitative approach based on literature studies from relevant journals. The results of the discussion show that assessments, both test and non-test, can provide comprehensive information that assists counselors in designing effective interventions. Understanding assessment also encourages counselors to act professionally and ethically in the service process. Thus, assessment is not just a measuring tool, but an important foundation in holistic and strategic counseling practice.

Psychological assessment is an important part of guidance and counseling services because it helps counselors understand the conditions and needs of their clients more accurately. However, its implementation must adhere to ethical principles, such as maintaining confidentiality and being objective in assessment. This article aims to discuss the importance of ethics in the psychological assessment process, particularly in the context of guidance and counseling services in schools. Using a literature review method, this article examines various literature related to ethical codes, assessment principles, and challenges frequently faced by counselors. The findings indicate that counselors must understand the boundaries of their authority in using assessment tools, maintain the confidentiality of clients' data, and continuously develop their professional competencies. By applying appropriate ethics, assessments can be conducted fairly, accurately, and maintain clients' trust in counseling services.