Publication Search

This study investigates the application of David B. Resnik's ethical principles—honesty, objectivity, integrity, carefulness, and openness—in academic writing and research among students. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, surveys and student paper analyses were conducted to measure awareness, adherence, and challenges. The results indicate that 95% of students are aware of general ethical principles in academic writing, yet only 70% are familiar with Resnik’s specific framework, leaving 30% unaware of these detailed concepts. Regarding practice, 100% of respondents consistently cited sources correctly, but 66% admitted to paraphrasing without proper attribution, showing gaps between ethical knowledge and application. Challenges identified include maintaining honesty (51%), avoiding plagiarism (29%), ensuring openness (11%), and minimizing bias (9%), often influenced by external pressures and resource limitations. To address these issues, students suggested practical solutions such as workshops, seminars, and digital guides to enhance understanding and compliance with ethical standards. This study emphasizes the importance of ethics education, institutional policy enhancements, and accessible resources to strengthen the implementation of academic integrity, bridging the gap between awareness and consistent ethical practice.

The purpose of this research is to analyze the use of Indonesian spelling (EBI) in the papers of students of the Program of Social Sciences Studies of the Islamic State University of North Sumatra. In addition, this article is intended to identify and characterize errors made in the application of EBI in student papers. The aim of this study was to analyze the mistakes students made when using EBI in their papers. This research uses a qualitative descriptive approach. Data collection is done using observation, documentation, and written recording with intralingual and condalingual techniques. The findings indicate that the paper contains many weaknesses in the implementation of the EBI, including spelling errors, improper use of large letters, misuse of prefixes, and misused use of bending letters.

The purpose of this research is to analyze the use of Indonesian spelling (EBI) in the papers of students of the Program of Social Sciences Studies of the Islamic State University of North Sumatra. In addition, this article is intended to identify and characterize errors made in the application of EBI in student papers. The aim of this study was to analyze the mistakes students made when using EBI in their papers. This research uses a qualitative descriptive approach. Data collection is done using observation, documentation, and written recording with intralingual and condalingual techniques. The findings indicate that the paper contains many weaknesses in the implementation of the EBI, including spelling errors, improper use of large letters, misuse of prefixes, and misused use of bending letters.

This article discusses the analysis of language errors in students' papers in the Economic Education Study Program, Faculty of Economics, Medan State University. This research uses a descriptive qualitative method by analyzing and describing the types of language errors found in 10 student papers of the Economics education study program, Faculty of Economics, Medan State University. By collecting data in the form of student papers as samples, identifying and classifying the types of language errors , as well as describing and interpreting the findings. The research results identified four main categories of errors, namely errors in writing letters, words, punctuation marks, and absorption elements. In-depth analysis is carried out by classifying each error category into more specific types along with examples and corrections. These findings show the importance of understanding and mastering good and correct Indonesian language rules in writing scientific papers, especially for students. It is hoped that this research can provide valuable information for teachers and related institutions to improve students' language skills in writing quality scientific papers.

This article discusses the analysis of language errors in students' papers in the Economic Education Study Program, Faculty of Economics, Medan State University. This research uses a descriptive qualitative method by analyzing and describing the types of language errors found in 10 student papers of the Economics education study program, Faculty of Economics, Medan State University. By collecting data in the form of student papers as samples, identifying and classifying the types of language errors , as well as describing and interpreting the findings. The research results identified four main categories of errors, namely errors in writing letters, words, punctuation marks, and absorption elements. In-depth analysis is carried out by classifying each error category into more specific types along with examples and corrections. These findings show the importance of understanding and mastering good and correct Indonesian language rules in writing scientific papers, especially for students. It is hoped that this research can provide valuable information for teachers and related institutions to improve students' language skills in writing quality scientific papers.

Papers are one of the daily tasks for students. There are still many student papers that are not in accordance with the EYD or vocabulary in the KBBI. This research focuses on how the form of errors in writing capital letters, writing hyphens, punctuation marks, and standard language in scientific papers (papers) of students, especially the IAIN Takengon KPI Study Program. This study aims for KPI (Islamic Broadcasting Communication) undergraduate students to be trained in good and correct writing skills in accordance with spelling rules. The approach used in this research is qualitative with descriptive method. The results of the research conducted, the researcher found spelling errors in the contents of the paper, namely: (1) there were 15 capital letter writing errors, (2) there were 20 mistakes in the location of conjunctions, (3) there were 10 non-standard language errors, (4) writing errors there are 20 punctuation marks (colons, commas, quotation marks, punctuation marks).