Publication Search

The development of the digital era has significantly transformed government administration, particularly in technology-based public services. This transformation requires strengthening the principles of good governance, which include transparency, accountability, public participation, effectiveness, efficiency, and legal certainty. State Administrative Law plays a strategic role in ensuring that bureaucratic digitalization remains within the correct legal framework and does not deviate from good governance principles. This study employs a normative juridical approach with a literature review method to analyze the role of State Administrative Law in strengthening good governance in the digital era. The findings show that State Administrative Law functions as an instrument of legality, discretionary control, data protection, improved accountability, and enhanced public service efficiency. Thus, State Administrative Law is not only regulatory but also adaptive to technological developments in achieving good governance in the digital era.

This study investigates the role of the Civil and State Administration (Datun) of the Central Kalimantan High Court in providing legal services free of charge to residents of Palangkaraya City. The purpose of this study was to determine how the legal services are carried out, the perceived advantages and challenges faced by the prosecutor's office when carrying out their duties. Based on Law No. 16 of 2004 concerning the prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, which has been amended by Law No. 11 of 2021, the Datun Division has the authority to provide assistance, consideration, and legal services both inside and outside the court. Research shows that legal services and consultations and through the Halo JPN online platform provide legal services easily and directly to the community. In addition to raising legal awareness, this activity also strengthens the role of the prosecutor's office as a law enforcement agency focused on public service. However, legal services still face several challenges such as low public awareness of the law, lack of human resources, and inter-agency bureaucratic problems.

The Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia (Kejaksaan RI) is currently undergoing a significant paradigmatic shift following the enactment of Law No. 11 of 2021. While historically viewed primarily as a prosecution agency (Dominus Litis) in criminal matters, the current legal landscape demands a stronger role in Civil and State Administrative Law (Datun). However, the institutionalization of the Attorney General as the "Supreme Legal Advisor" to the government remains suboptimal, often overshadowed by its repressive functions. This normative ambiguity hinders the state's ability to receive unified and binding legal opinions. This study aims to analyze the normative basis for this transformation and proposes an institutional framework to establish the Attorney General as the sole authority for state legal counsel. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and comparative approaches, analyzing the new Prosecutor's Law and comparing it with the Solliciteur-Generaal concept in other jurisdictions. The study finds that the 2021 amendment provides the necessary legal standing for this transformation, but it requires a competency upgrade for prosecutors to handle complex non-litigation issues. Strengthening the Attorney General's role as the Supreme Legal Advisor is essential to ensure legal certainty in government policies and prevent state financial losses.

Study Interest State Administrative Law, Implementation of Business Licensing for Laundry Services Activities in Barong Tongkok District, West Kutai Regency, under the guidance of Dr. Siti Kotijah S.H., M.H and Agustina Wati S.H., M.H. Business licensing is an important aspect in the implementation of business activities, including laundry service businesses that are increasingly growing in urban communities. Laundry businesses require official permits from the local government as a form of compliance with regulations governing economic activities and environmental protection. With licensing, the government can supervise business activities and ensure that business actors comply with operational standards, including in the management of domestic waste generated from the washing process. Laundry business licensing is also an instrument to ensure consumer safety and comfort. Business permits include technical and administrative requirements, such as location permits, environmental permits (UKL-UPL/SPPL), and operational permits from related agencies such as the Investment and One-Stop Integrated Services Agency (DPMPTSP). Without complete permits, business actors can be subject to administrative sanctions to criminal penalties, as regulated in various laws and regulations such as Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management. Research on laundry business permits is important to provide a comprehensive picture of the processes, obstacles, and legal and environmental implications that may arise if business actors do not comply with applicable licensing provisions. Social legal research, with field studies at the Investment and One-Stop Integrated Service Office of West Kutai Regency, Barong Tongkok District and Laundry businesses in Barong Tongkok, West Kutai. Laundry businesses that have permits are 7, while there are still many laundry businesses that do not have laundry business permits. Business actors do not have business permits, because the reason is that their business is small, and the permit process is very difficult, and business actors avoid paying local taxes.

This study aims to analyze the policy of digitizing public services at the sub-district level in the perspective of state administrative law. Digital transformation in the public bureaucracy in the modern era is an important step in creating effective, efficient, and accountable services. However, the implementation of digitalization is often not accompanied by an adequate legal framework, resulting in the potential for administrative irregularities and violations of the principles of good governance. Using a normative research approach, this study examines the compatibility of digitization policies with the principles of state administrative law, such as the principles of legality, legal certainty, proportionality, professionalism, openness, and accountability. The results of this study show that the digitization of public services at the sub-district level requires strengthening technical regulations, increasing the capacity of the apparatus, and integrating digital service systems and standards based on legal principles. This research not only focuses on technological innovation, but is also supported by a strong legal foundation to ensure the protection of public rights and the legitimacy of public services.

Village officials are government employees in the field of public services who have duties and obligations towards services to the community who work and support the Village Head in carrying out his duties. In the relationship between the government and the community, various concepts are known such as state administrative law which studies the actions in organizing a country, including in villages. Public services are very necessary in fulfilling the desires and needs of the community in the village government.This research was conducted using a normative legal research method. The data collection methods used by the author were interviews and literature studies. Interviews are data collection techniques conducted through face-to-face and direct question and answer between researchers and informants, while literature studies are data processing conducted by systematically analyzing written legal materials with a statutory approach and a case study approach.The results of this study indicate that the performance of village officials in Pasar V Kebun Kelapa Village has not fully implemented good public service performance in terms of understanding of duties and functions, innovation, work speed, work accuracy and work between employees to realize excellent service.

This article explores the mechanisms of supervision and legal protection within state administration. Ensuring legal protection for citizens is a vital aspect of governance in democratic nations. Laws serve as tools to regulate rights, obligations, and legal entities, enabling them to fulfill their duties and receive fair treatment. Additionally, the law functions as a protective framework for legal subjects. The legal relationship between the state and its citizens can be governed either by state administrative law or civil law, depending on the state's role and position in upholding the law. The government may act as a civil legal entity or a public official, subjecting its legal actions to either the Civil Code or state administrative law. Mechanisms for supervision and legal protection in state administration include embedded supervision, functional supervision, and external supervision. Furthermore, citizens are afforded legal protection through administrative law mechanisms such as administrative law provisions, administrative appeals, and administrative courts.

This article examines and discusses the Supreme Court judge's decision regarding the results of the Individual Candidate Dispute in the 2020 Ketapang Regent and Deputy Regent General Election at the Regency Level during the Improvement Period. viewed from the perspective of State Administrative Law. seen from the case and the way the judge assesses the case and the judge's decision. In this article we use qualitative research methods, which focus on observation and in-depth research. pay attention to human behavior and what aspects influence it. This is realized by looking at what aspects make the plaintiff object and what aspects influence the judge to make a decision

State Administrative Law is a legal regulation regarding administration in a country, where the relationship between citizens and their government can run well and safely. In forest management, the need for permits is based on absolute legal provisions which have aspects that must be fulfilled beforehand and regarding the boundaries of each activity in managing forests, the government agrees to supervise them based on Law no. 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry Article 31 paragraph (1) To ensure the principles of justice, equity and sustainability, forest utilization business permits are limited by considering forest sustainability aspects and business certainty aspects. The aim of the research is to determine aspects of forest management. The research method used in this research is literature study by collecting data through articles, the web, books and other sources. The results of the discussion of this research are that forest utilization business permits are limited by considering forest sustainability aspects and business certainty aspects, where these aspects are determinants in managing forests which have been considered previously. The meaning of forest sustainability aspects and business certainty is contained in Article 31 Paragraph (1). What is meant by forest sustainability aspects includes: a. environmental sustainability, b. production sustainability, and c. implementation of social and cultural functions that are fair, even and transparent.  What is meant by aspects of business certainty include: a. area certainty, b. certainty of business time, and c. certainty of business legal guarantees.

The case of dishonorable dismissal for committing a criminal act of office crime shows a significant problem in government governance. This case developed from the Plaintiff being a level III civil servant based on the governor's decree, and then being appointed Secretary of the District DPKD. Based on the regent's decision, Sijunjung was placed in the BPKD functional position. Then the plaintiff was dishonorably dismissed because he was involved in a corruption case and was also deemed to have violated Pancasila and the 1945 Republic of Indonesia Constitution. has permanent legal force. In this case, several functions of state administrative law in creating good governance are really needed, including normative functions, instrumental functions and legal guarantee functions, all three of which are part of the application to create a clean government, in accordance with the principles of the rule of law.    

The application of postmodernism theory in the practice of state administrative law supervision in the case study of the Ombudsman institution uses library research. This activity is related to library data collection methods. Postmodernism theory can help the Ombudsman understand that reality is not objective or measurable. The influence of postmodernism theory on the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia can influence their approach in conducting oversight of the government. However, they must consider the challenges and find the right balance between an inclusive approach and objective standards to ensure fairness and truth in their oversight.

Corruption is an act of misappropriation or abuse that can harm the state for personal gain. Corruption is the enemy of society because it is carried out by people who are irresponsible and this robs people of their rights. This research discusses how the government authority over corrupt practices in state administrative law and the role of state administrative law in efforts to prevent corrupt practices in government. The type of this research is normative jurdicial research with a descriptive approach. The secondary data sources in this research are observations in books, articles, journals, and other documents. Validation of this data using source triangulation techniques, and analyzed with inductive qualitative techniques. This research concludes that government authority is closely related to state administrative law because this law plays an important role in realizing good and clean governance, especially from corruption. The government can create an authority by implementing a closed system policy. To prevent the entry of outsiders and help strengthen government regulation. The role of state administrative law in corruption practices can be in the form of optimizing leadership, improving administration, increasing the integrity and synergy of the bureaucracy, as well as strengthening legal awareness regarding corruption in the community.