Publication Search

The growing demand for transparency, accountability, and measurable performance has transformed higher education institutions into complex public organizations required to deliver reliable and stakeholder-oriented services. Within this governance-driven environment, institutional governance plays a fundamental role in shaping service excellence and institutional legitimacy. Drawing on a public administration perspective, this study examines how governance dimensions influence academic service performance in higher education. This research employs a qualitative descriptive-analytical design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, document analysis, and institutional observations involving university leaders, academic administrators, faculty members, and students. The analysis focuses on governance dimensions—transparency, accountability, participation, effectiveness, and responsibility—and their integration into institutional systems such as performance management, quality assurance, and digital infrastructure. The findings reveal that governance frameworks are formally established through regulations and digital systems; however, their operational integration remains uneven. Transparency improves service reliability when supported by consistent information management, while accountability mechanisms tend to emphasize procedural compliance rather than performance-based evaluation. Stakeholder participation is institutionalized but largely consultative. The study concludes that service excellence in higher education is a governance-driven outcome that requires systemic alignment between governance principles, institutional capacity, and performance management processes. Strengthened governance integration enhances service reliability and institutional legitimacy.

The implementation of e-government is one of the local government's strategies in improving the quality of public services and realizing Good Governance. This study aims to analyze the implementation of e-government through the Tangerang LIVE Application as an effort to improve Good Governance in the Tangerang City Government. The research method used is a qualitative literature study approach through the search and analysis of various literature sources in the form of books, scientific journals, and official government documents related to e-government, the Tangerang LIVE Application, and the principles of Good Governance. This research analysis uses the Good Governance principles framework according to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), which includes transparency, participation, responsiveness, effectiveness and efficiency, and accountability. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of the Tangerang LIVE Application contributes positively to increasing public information disclosure, expanding public participation, accelerating government responses to public complaints, increasing the effectiveness and efficiency of public services, and strengthening the accountability of local government performance. However, there are several obstacles to achieving Good Governance through the Tangerang Live application and these obstacles become an evaluation of the Tangerang City government to innovate through e-government that supports the improvement of Good Governance in the Tangerang City Government. This study recommends strengthening digital literacy, improving institutional coordination, and sustainable system development to ensure optimal and inclusive e-government implementation.

This study aims to analyze the strengthening of higher education governance in realizing transparent and accountable academic services. In the context of the globalization of higher education and increasing public accountability demands, universities are required not only to excel academically but also to provide services that are open, responsive, and accountable. This research employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation studies involving university leaders, academic administrators, lecturers, and students. Data analysis was conducted interactively through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results indicate that the principle of transparency has been implemented through digital-based academic information systems; however, consistency in updating information still needs improvement. Accountability has been supported by standard operating procedures and service evaluations, although performance measurement based on indicators has not been fully integrated. Stakeholder participation has been facilitated through evaluation forums, but involvement in strategic decision-making remains limited. Overall, the dimensions of transparency, accountability, participation, effectiveness, and responsibility are interrelated in shaping the quality of academic services. This study emphasizes that strengthening governance must be systemically internalized within organizational culture and institutional operational systems to enhance trust and stakeholder satisfaction.

This qualitative study examines the Public Service Performance Gap at the Ponorogo Regency Transportation Agency (Dishub) in managing high-risk traffic assets, which stems from the failure to synergise Normative Governance with operational Public Asset Management (MAP). Utilising Edwards III's Policy Implementation Model and GG/NPS principles, the core finding indicates that synergy failure is mediated by a Reactive Bureaucratic Disposition. While Dishub adheres procedurally, asset maintenance is largely reactive—performed only after damage or public complaint—not preventive. This non-responsive attitude limits accountability to reporting outputs disconnected from physical service outcomes, leading to low service quality. The proposed substantive solution is to activate Community Involvement (NPS) as a key moderator, which is currently weak, by integrating Functional Participation into the agile MAP cycle. The research recommends an e-governance system with KPIs, where transparently integrated citizen reports automatically trigger work orders, creating external public accountability pressure that forces the reactive bureaucracy to act proactively.

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the performance of the Travel Document Section at Tanjung Perak Immigration Office within the framework of Public Administration. Employing a qualitative, case-study approach, the research investigates the efficiency, effectiveness, and quality of immigration services, emphasising the application of New Public Management (NPM) principles and Good Governance practices. The findings reveal that while technological innovations such as digital systems (M-Passport and SIMKIM) have successfully improved operational efficiency and reduced physical queues, challenges persist regarding procedural transparency, accountability, and system reliability. Human errors and inconsistent discretion in handling complex documents highlight the need for enhanced capacity building and resource allocation. Moreover, issues of bureaucratic transparency and integrity undermine public trust, underscoring the importance of strengthening internal controls and communication strategies. The study also underscores that service quality is multidimensional, encompassing physical facilities, interpersonal professionalism, and procedural clarity, all of which influence public satisfaction. Despite improvements, the gap between technological efficiency and service effectiveness suggests that further efforts are needed to integrate digital innovations with robust procedural protocols. The research concludes that sustainable performance improvement requires a balanced focus on technological, human, and systemic factors, fostering a culture of transparency, accountability, and continuous development. These insights offer valuable policy recommendations to enhance the robustness and responsiveness of immigration services, ultimately strengthening the legitimacy and trust of government institutions in delivering public services.

This research aims to analyse the implementation of digital innovation in passport services at the Class I Immigration Office Tanjung Perak as part of bureaucratic reform and Good Governance initiatives. The study employed a qualitative case study approach, involving in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis, to assess the successes and challenges of digital systems such as SIMKIM and M-Paspor. The findings reveal that digital innovation has successfully improved operational efficiency and generally provided transparency into costs and application status, whilst reducing queuing times and increasing service speed, thereby enhancing public satisfaction and trust in immigration services. However, the innovation has not fully addressed structural and cultural bureaucratic barriers, as field officers tend to become passive when systems experience errors or delays, struggling to provide detailed explanations about issues, which results in information ambiguity and potentially undermines procedural transparency and performance accountability principles. The study concludes that bureaucratic reform in the immigration sector requires internal cultural updates and enhanced human resource competencies to support comprehensive transparency and accountability. Digital infrastructure instability and officers' discretionary authority significantly influence the effectiveness of digital innovation. Whilst digital innovation offers substantial benefits in efficiency and transparency, its success depends heavily on strengthening systems, improving human resource skills, and fostering organisational cultural change, with continuous efforts essential for achieving effective, transparent, and accountable public service.

This study aims to analyze and explain in greater detail the influence of service quality in managing the Business Identification Number (NIB) through the Online Single Submission (OSS) system on public satisfaction at the Investment and One-Stop Integrated Service Office (DPMPTSP) of Gresik Regency. A quantitative research method was employed, using a structured survey design and distributing questionnaires to 105 respondents who had directly utilized and experienced the OSS service. Service quality was measured using the SERVQUAL dimensions tangible, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy while public satisfaction was assessed based on indicators derived from the Regulation of the Minister of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform No. 14 of 2017. The collected data were analyzed using simple linear regression to identify the extent of the relationship between variables. The results indicate that service quality has a positive and significant effect on public satisfaction. This means that better, more consistent service quality will increase user satisfaction. The findings confirm that strengthening service quality is essential for improving overall public service performance, especially in digital-based licensing systems.

This study analyzes performance measurement frameworks and accountability mechanisms in public service delivery through a comprehensive literature review of studies published between 2015 and 2025. Although models such as the 3E (economy, efficiency, effectiveness) and IOO (input–output–outcome) frameworks are widely used in public administration, evidence indicates that their implementation often falls short due to data limitations, bureaucratic resistance, and limited utilization of performance results in decision-making. The literature also highlights a persistent gap between theoretical performance frameworks and actual public service practices, particularly in capturing service quality and meaningful outcomes for citizens. Recent studies emphasize that citizen satisfaction and public perception are essential indicators that must be integrated into contemporary performance measurement systems. This study concludes that performance measurement and accountability are interdependent mechanisms that require strengthened organizational capacity, relevant indicators, and a culture of evidence-based improvement to enhance public service quality.

This research seeks to examine the management of transparent and accountable civil service transfers and promotions in the Formation and Mutation Division of Pasuruan City's Civil Service Agency (BKD). The study is based on the significance of the merit system in upholding bureaucratic professionalism, since the procedures for transfer and promotion frequently influence equity and organizational effectiveness. Employing a qualitative case study method, data were gathered via in-depth interviews, participatory observations, and document examination. The results show that the transfer and promotion systems in BKD Pasuruan have progressed towards transparency via data-driven management, yet obstacles persist in communicating policies and involving employees in performance evaluations. Accountability has been enhanced via performance-driven assessments incorporated with the e-performance system and job analysis. The conversation emphasizes that the effectiveness of governance practices is affected by organizational flexibility, engaged leadership, and the public service motivation of civil servants. This research determines that the interplay of data-based policies, performance assessment frameworks, and a transparent bureaucratic environment establishes the basis for creating a just, efficient, and sustainable civil service governance model.

Efficient and integrated public transportation services are a strategic need in sustainable urban development. The Surabaya City Government through the Transportation Department initiated the Wira-Wiri Feeder service on the Bratang-Pasar Turi route (FD07) as a feeder mode that connects densely active areas in the east and west of the city. This study aims to evaluate the implementation and performance of FD07 services using the public policy evaluation framework of William N. Dunn (2003) which includes the dimensions of effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, justice, responsiveness, and policy accuracy. The research uses a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection techniques through field observations, in-depth interviews, and documentation studies. The results of the study show that the implementation of FD07 services has been running according to operational procedures with an average of 651 passengers per day, supported by field supervision and the Surabaya Integrated Urban Transport System (SIUTS) digital system. However, there are still obstacles in the form of limited fleet numbers, non-professional drivers, limitations of senior mechanics, and inadequate system development budgets. Dunn's six-dimensional evaluation shows that the effectiveness and efficiency of the service are in the medium category, with the main challenges being the accuracy of schedules and the accessibility of bus stop facilities for people with disabilities. This study concludes that improving the quality of human resources, adding fleets, strengthening digital systems, and massive public socialization are strategic steps to realize effective, inclusive, and sustainable feeder services in the city of Surabaya.

This study examines the influence of internal communication and leadership style on employee work motivation at Public Relation Agency XYZ. The research focuses on understanding how these two organizational factors shape the motivation levels of employees, particularly freelance experts who contribute significantly to the agency’s performance and service quality. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected through a structured survey designed to capture employees’ perceptions of communication effectiveness, leadership characteristics, and motivational conditions within the agency. The collected data were then analyzed using SmartPLS to test the proposed relationships. The findings indicate that both internal communication and leadership style exert a significant and positive influence on work motivation, highlighting the crucial role of clear information flow and supportive leadership behavior. Moreover, the results suggest that enhancing communication practices and applying a more transformational leadership style can substantially improve employee motivation. This study offers practical recommendations for strengthening internal communication systems and leadership development initiatives to foster higher engagement, productivity, and overall motivation among employees at Public Relation Agency XYZ.

Bureaucratic reform is an essential step in realizing a clean, accountable, professional, and transparent government. The 2020–2024 Bureaucratic Reform Road Map has emphasized the Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform’s (Kementerian PANRB) efforts to establish a healthy bureaucracy through the strengthening of the merit system, performance management, and service digitalization. As providers of public services, Civil Servants (ASN) play a crucial role in ensuring professional public service delivery; therefore, an organized performance management system is required to achieve optimal bureaucratic reform. However, in practice, the performance management implemented by the Ministry still faces challenges, particularly concerning non-ASN personnel. This study aims to analyze the implementation of performance management in the process of structuring non-ASN personnel by the Ministry of PANRB as part of the national bureaucratic reform agenda. The research employs a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis based on literature review, legislation, and secondary data from official sources. The findings indicate that the policy of structuring non-ASN personnel, grounded in the principles of the merit system and performance management, has brought significant changes to human resource governance within government institutions. Nevertheless, its implementation still encounters challenges such as limited budget allocation, lack of integrated performance data, and uncertainty regarding the employment status and welfare of non-ASN employees. The digitalization efforts through the e-Kinerja system and national personnel data collection serve as strategic steps to enhance transparency and accountability in performance assessment. Thus, comprehensive performance management is expected to promote professionalism among public servants, improve organizational effectiveness, and realize an adaptive and integrity-based bureaucracy.

The term “comparison” in the context of Public Administration Science refers to an activity of aligning, analyzing, and identifying similarities and differences between various phenomena or objects under study. Meanwhile, administration is understood as a social phenomenon in which groups of people or citizens work together in an organized and purposeful manner to achieve certain collective goals.This research, entitled “A Comparative Study of Public Administration in Indonesia and South Korea in Achieving Effective and Accountable Governance,” aims to analyze both the similarities and differences between the two countries in terms of bureaucratic structure, public administration systems, and the effectiveness and accountability of governance. Indonesia and South Korea, as Asian nations with distinct historical backgrounds, governmental systems, and development trajectories, share a common vision of establishing a clean, transparent, and responsive system of governance.The study employs a qualitative descriptive approach using the literature review method, by examining various relevant academic and official sources. The main focus of the comparison lies in the bureaucratic and administrative systems of Indonesia and South Korea. The analysis also takes into account cultural characteristics and governmental structures, including the presidential system, legal framework, financial administration, and local government mechanisms.The findings of this research are expected to provide a comprehensive understanding of how differences in administrative structures and bureaucratic performance in both countries influence the effectiveness and accountability of their governments. Furthermore, the study aims to offer valuable insights for Indonesia in strengthening good governance and improving the quality of public service delivery.

This research seeks to examine the innovative governance of police logistics to enhance the operational service efficiency at the Logistics Bureau of East Java Regional Police. The research context arises from the need to reform police logistics management to meet technological innovations and demands for public accountability. This research utilized a qualitative method featuring a case study approach, incorporating extensive interviews with logistics officers, operational personnel, and third-party providers, along with firsthand observations of digital logistics management systems. The results indicate that the adoption of the Integrated Logistic Management System (ILMS) and barcode tracking has improved transparency, distribution speed, and efficiency in operational budgets. Nonetheless, difficulties persist in human resource capability and interdepartmental collaboration. The dialogue suggests that these advancements correspond with adaptive governance theory, stressing bureaucratic adaptability in response to organizational shifts, and public service motivation, which underscores the importance of motivation and professionalism in enhancing the quality of public services. The research finds that digital innovation and performance-oriented assessment enhance the efficiency of police operational services. It suggests enhancing human resource capabilities, performance assessment systems, and collaboration among units to attain transparent, effective, and sustainable logistics management.

This research seeks to examine the approach to managing civil servant training to enhance public service efficiency at the Regional Civil Service Agency (BKD) of Pasuruan City. This research is rooted in the bureaucratic difficulties encountered by local governments, especially the disparity between organizational demands and the presence of qualified staff. This situation results in delays in service, reduced productivity, and ineffective management of human resources. The study utilizes a qualitative descriptive method, gathering data via comprehensive interviews, firsthand observations, and analysis of policy documents. The results indicate that the state civil servants formation management approach at BKD Pasuruan emphasizes three main elements: workforce planning based on competencies, employee redistribution according to performance, and strengthening evaluation systems oriented towards results. These tactics have enhanced bureaucratic effectiveness and expedited public service operations. The research additionally reveals that effective execution relies on adaptive leadership, a cooperative work environment, and a dedication to service innovation. In summary, an effectively designed, flexible, and results-oriented state civil servants formation management approach can act as a template for enhancing local administrative capabilities to deliver efficient, professional, and enduring public services.

This study aims to determine and analyze employee performance in improving services at the Population and Civil Registration Office of Gorontalo City. Viewed from the following aspects: (1) Performance Quality, (2) Punctuality, (3) Initiative, (4) Ability, and (5) Communication. This research method uses a Qualitative Approach with a Descriptive type. Data collection techniques used in this study are observation, interviews, and documentation. The results of the study indicate that employee performance is generally good, as seen from the existence of friendly, clear service, and the use of technology to support the administrative process. However, there are still several obstacles, especially related to limited service infrastructure and network disruptions that hinder the speed of service. From the aspect of performance quality, employees have attempted to provide services according to standards, although document errors are still found due to the lack of accuracy from the public in completing files. The timeliness of service is relatively optimal, supported by the implementation of a maximum service standard of 24 hours. From the initiative side, employees have been quite responsive to public complaints. Employees' ability to operate service applications is good. Meanwhile, the communication aspect has been running effectively through the delivery of information that is easy to understand, a persuasive attitude, and the use of supporting media such as pamphlets and banners.

This study aims to describe the implementation of good governance principles in public services at the Penataran Village Office, Nglegok District, Blitar Regency. The research uses a descriptive qualitative method with data collection techniques including interviews, observations, and documentation. The results show that good governance principles such as transparency, accountability, participation, effectiveness, efficiency, and the rule of law have been well implemented at the village office. However, there are some obstacles in the implementation, such as limited technology, unequal participation, and administrative constraints that affect public service performance. To overcome these challenges, the village government conducts training for village officials, utilizes conventional media to improve communication with the community, and strengthens coordination and mediation between stakeholders. The findings highlight the importance of an adaptive and collaborative approach in building responsive village governance that is oriented toward the needs of the community. Thus, the application of good governance principles in Penataran Village is expected to improve the quality of public services and encourage the realization of a better and more transparent government.

This research looks into the transparency and accountability in the promotion process for civil servants at the Regional Civil Service Agency (BKD) of Sidoarjo Regency as a component of the continual bureaucratic reform aimed at achieving clean and professional governance. Overall, the promotion process has embraced the digital-based Sidoarjo Smart ASN system and adheres to the merit principle, although obstacles persist in achieving completely transparent and accountable practices. The study centers on four key areas: transparency of public information, responsibility in decision-making, the validity of the merit system, and the efficiency of internal oversight and citizen engagement. A qualitative descriptive method utilizing a case study approach was employed, incorporating in-depth interviews, direct observations, and the analysis of official documents. The results indicate that transparency continues to be administrative in character, accountability is focused vertically instead of being horizontally accountable to the public, and the merit system encounters challenges linked to bureaucratic culture and the integration of competency data. Additionally, internal oversight does not have enough community engagement in assessing promotion procedures. The research suggests improving transparency via interactive publishing, establishing accountability systems based on performance, boosting independent evaluation capabilities, and incorporating digital oversight tools with public engagement. These results are anticipated to provide a basis for creating a civil service management model at the regional government level that is more transparent, accountable, and grounded in integrity.

Effective, efficient, and accountable public services are one of the fundamental pillars of good governance. At the village level, the success of these services is highly dependent on the performance of government officials, particularly in administrative services that directly address the community’s basic needs. This study aims to analyze employee performance in administrative services at the Maliran Village Head Office, Ponggok Subdistrict, Blitar Regency, and to identify obstacles faced during the service process. A descriptive qualitative research method was employed, with data collected through observation, interviews, and documentation. The findings indicate that employee performance can be categorized as fairly good based on ten performance indicators: work quality, work quantity, timeliness, effectiveness, independence, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, and tangible evidence. These aspects reflect that village officials are generally able to carry out their duties in meeting the administrative needs of the community. However, several obstacles remain, including reliance on digital technology that is not supported by adequate infrastructure, particularly the frequent occurrence of power outages which disrupts the continuity of services. The study highlights the importance of strengthening digital infrastructure, enhancing technical training for village officials, and ensuring the availability of backup systems to anticipate service interruptions. These efforts are essential to improve service delivery, strengthen public trust, and support the realization of good governance at the village level.

This study aims to examine and analyze the performance of employees at the Village Office of Bottopenno, Majauleng District, Wajo Regency. The research employed a descriptive analysis method with a total population and sample of 27 employees, all of whom were designated as respondents. Data collection techniques included observation, documentation, and questionnaires distributed to the employees. The collected data were then analyzed using quantitative descriptive analysis to provide a clear picture of employee performance conditions. The findings indicate that employees at the Bottopenno Village Office are able to position and apply their abilities effectively in carrying out the tasks assigned by their superiors. Employees not only complete tasks according to instructions but also demonstrate a high sense of responsibility in handling every duty. This is reflected in the alignment between the work targets set and the outcomes achieved. The performance of employees also meets expectations in terms of discipline, timeliness, and the quality of public services provided. Overall, the performance of the Bottopenno Village Office employees can be categorized as very good. Their work results are in line with the expectations of their superiors and with established regulations, thereby fostering a conducive work environment and ensuring optimal public services. Consequently, the performance of village officials has been running effectively and is expected to continue improving to support the achievement of sustainable village governance goals.