Publication Search

Corruption is one of the biggest problems that hinders Indonesia's progress, even though this country uses Pancasila as the basis of the state. Pancasila should be a moral guideline in every aspect of national and state life, including in preventing corruption. This study aims to analyze the causes of corruption in Indonesia in various professions, as well as to examine the relationship between the application of Pancasila values and corrupt practices in this country. The study uses a library method by analyzing 47 articles and journals from 2020-2024. The research findings show that the main causes of corruption in Indonesia include weak law enforcement, a deep-rooted culture of corruption, inability to manage power, and socio-economic disparities.  

This study examines the role of social media in monitoring and preventing corruption in Indonesia, an issue that has become a primary concern among the public and government. With the increasing number of social media users in the country, these platforms are expected to serve as effective tools in enhancing public participation in overseeing corrupt practices. The research explores various aspects, including how social media enables the community to report corruption cases, share information, and build collective awareness about the impact of corruption. Additionally, this study highlights the challenges faced in utilizing social media, such as unequal access, negative responses from authorities, and the phenomenon of information fragmentation that can hinder constructive dialogue among the public. Through a literature review approach, this research analyzes various relevant sources to provide in-depth insights into the impact and effectiveness of social media in preventing corruption. The findings of this study are expected to offer recommendations for maximizing the potential of social media as a tool to support transparency and public accountability in Indonesia. With a better understanding of the role of social media, it is hoped that both the public and government can collaborate more effectively in the fight against corruption, thereby creating a cleaner and more accountable environment for future generations.    

The condition of corruption in Indonesia seems to require serious efforts starting from schools. Basic education, especially anti-corruption education, must be strengthened in schools. Students of MTS Al-Muttaqin must be educated about anti-corruption literacy through this community service. Three stages of the implementation plan were carried out. The preparation stage includes licensing, coordination, and socialization at MTS Al-Muttaqin. The second stage is implementation, which includes socialization and counseling. The third stage is evaluation and preparation of the MTS Al-Muttaqin report. The results of the community service show that students are able to prevent corruption by studying anti-corruption.

The condition of corruption in Indonesia seems to require serious efforts starting from schools. Basic education, especially anti-corruption education, must be strengthened in schools. Students of MTS Al-Muttaqin must be educated about anti-corruption literacy through this community service. Three stages of the implementation plan were carried out. The preparation stage includes licensing, coordination, and socialization at MTS Al-Muttaqin. The second stage is implementation, which includes socialization and counseling. The third stage is evaluation and preparation of the MTS Al-Muttaqin report. The results of the community service show that students are able to prevent corruption by studying anti-corruption.

Corruption remains a significant concern in Indonesia, exemplified by the case of former Supreme Court Judge Zarof Ricar, suspected of acting as a case broker. This case began with the arrest of three Surabaya district court judges on October 20, 2024, for allegedly accepting bribes to free Ronald Tannur. Misconceptions that winning court cases requires significant costs have created opportunities for fraud, with individuals claiming they can guarantee favorable outcomes. The Zarof Ricar case highlights the declining integrity of government institutions and the lack of synergy among law enforcement, contributing to the prevalence of corruption. This situation underscores the urgent need for comprehensive legal reform. Strengthened regulations, stricter internal supervision, and harsh penalties for corrupt practices are essential to restoring public trust in the legal system and improving institutional integrity. This study aims to provide insights by employing juridical-normative and empirical methods, utilizing literature, legal documents, observations, and interviews.

This abstract discusses the importance of preventing corruption through effective implementation of the law, especially in relation to stakeholders. Corruption is a serious threat to public trust and the stability of government and private institutions. Strict and fair application of the law is very necessary to create a transparent and accountable environment. By implementing clear rules and heavy sanctions, acts of corruption can be minimized. Active participation of stakeholders, including government, civil society and the private sector, is also very necessary in monitoring and supporting efforts to prevent corruption. This will create good governance and strengthen public trust in institutions.

With this service, students of SMP 4 Muhammadiyah Pekanbaru are educated about anti- corruption literacy. Corruption is an act carried out to gain profit in a bad way, such as bribing, extortion, gratification, and others. The implementation plan is carried out in three stages. In the preparation stage, SMP 4 Muhammadiyah Pekanbaru carries out licensing, coordination, and socialization. The second stage is implementation, which includes socialization and counseling. The third stage is evaluation and preparation of reports. The results of the service show that students of SMP 4 Muhammadiyah Pekanbaru have the ability to avoid corruption after learning about anti-corruption.

Corruption is one of the criminal acts that most damages the social, economic and political order of a country. Corruption has become a crucial problem that hampers national development, affects public trust in government institutions, and reduces the quality of public services. In this context, legal analysis regarding criminal acts of corruption is very important to understand the challenges faced in law enforcement as well as preventive measures that can be implemented. Although there have been various efforts by the government and law enforcement agencies to eradicate corruption, the challenges that arise are often complex and multidimensional. With a holistic approach, various strategic solutions can be explored, including legal reform, strengthening supervisory systems, public education, economic empowerment, and the application of modern technology such as blockchain. Apart from that, the importance of collaboration between government, society, anti-corruption institutions and the private sector is also emphasized to create a transparent and accountable environment. In conclusion, eradicating corruption requires a joint commitment from all elements of society to achieve sustainable and equitable development goals.  

Corruption has become a serious problem that hinders the development of various sectors, including traffic law enforcement. Corrupt practices in this sector not only harm the state, but also threaten the safety and comfort of society. Achieving transparency and accountability in traffic law enforcement is very important. This strategy must not only involve changes to regulations, but also requires increasing the capacity and integrity of law enforcement officials, as well as active involvement of the community in supervision. Preventing corruption in traffic law enforcement requires implementing these solutions in an integrated manner, so that it is hoped that traffic law enforcement in Indonesia can become more transparent, accountable and free from corruption. These efforts will not only improve the quality of law enforcement, but also increase public trust in law enforcement institutions, which will ultimately contribute to public safety and welfare.    

Granting Justice Collaborator (JC) status to perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption is one of the law enforcement strategies aimed at uncovering a wider network of corruption crimes. However, its implementation raises various problems, both in terms of law, morals and justice. This research aims to analyze the regulations underlying the granting of JC status, the criteria for its application, and the challenges that arise in practice. This study uses a juridical-normative method with an analytical approach to statutory regulations, court decisions and legal literature. The research results show that the granting of JC status is often not transparent, giving rise to controversy regarding the integrity of its implementation. Apart from that, there is a discrepancy between the ideal JC criteria as regulated in the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 4 of 2011 and the practice of granting JC status. This has an impact on public trust in the criminal justice system. For this reason, it is necessary to strengthen regulations and tighter supervision so that granting JC status is in accordance with the principles of justice, transparency and accountability.  

Currently, corruption is a very worrying problem. The rampant acts of corruption not only affect adults, but also students. Apart from curative action, in the form of providing sanctions, both criminal and administrative, to perpetrators of corruption. It is also important to take preventive action against acts of corruption. This preventive action is taken to prevent corruption in the future. Preventive measures can be taken for adults and students. Providing education on anti-corruption values among students is one of these preventive steps. Starting from this, the authors who are members of the Project Based Learning (PjBL) group organized anti-corruption values education for students at SMA Negeri 109 Jakarta. Through this education, the author also conducted research on the effectiveness of corruption education in terms of preventive measures for corruption. This research uses qualitative methods by collecting data through questionnaires and interviews. This research involved 80 respondents from students at SMA Negeri 109 Jakarta. The majority of respondents expressed the effectiveness of the education that the author held.

The role of State Attorneys (Jaksa Pengacara Negara, JPN) is vital in recovering state assets lost due to corruption, aligning with the principles of Indonesia’s legal state (Rechtsstaat). This study examines JPN's authority under Law No. 31 of 1999, emphasizing its dual role in civil and administrative litigation. Using a normative juridical approach, the research analyzes legal frameworks and conceptual perspectives on JPN’s functions. The findings indicate JPN’s strategic position in representing the state, not only in civil lawsuits but also in non-litigation processes for recovering state financial losses. Challenges such as limited human resources, inter-agency coordination, and protracted case resolutions hinder optimal performance. The research suggests reinforcing the institutional capacity of JPN through targeted training and promoting synergy with related agencies, such as the KPK and police. Enhancing legal competence and procedural efficiency are critical to meeting public expectations for justice and transparency in handling corruption cases.

This research aims to analyze the application of ethical values ​​and Pancasila in creating an anti-corruption life among generation Z. The method used is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) which involves collecting 30 articles from Google Scholar between 2019 and 2024, which focus on the application of vethical values ​​and Pancasila in creating an anti-corruption culture, especially among generation Z. The results of this research recommend the application of these values ​​to form an anti-corruption generation Z. This research emphasizes the importance of ethical values ​​and Pancasila in the lives of students, especially generation Z in the era of globalization.

The anti-corruption literacy socialization held by Muhammadiyah University of Riau (UMRI) students at SMA Negeri 5 Pekanbaru is a form of community service which aims to instill integrity and anti-corruption values in the younger generation. This activity was carried out in response to the big challenge in eradicating corruption which requires awareness and active participation from all levels of society, including students. Through seminars, discussions and campaigns involving various media, UMRI students strive to provide an understanding of the negative impacts of corruption and educate students about the importance of transparency and accountability. The results of this service show that the outreach activities succeeded in building students' critical awareness of their role in eradicating corruption and strengthening their commitment to maintaining integrity in everyday life. Thus, this service makes an important contribution in creating a young generation who is ready to become agents of change in fighting corruption in Indonesia.

Corruption remains a major challenge in Indonesia. Education plays a crucial role in instilling anti-corruption values from an early age to shape individuals with integrity. One of the core values in anti-corruption education is hard work, which contributes to developing children’s character, fostering independence, discipline, and perseverance. This study aims to analyze how instilling anti-corruption values through hard work can shape children's character in elementary schools. This socialization activities employs a direct socialization method involving students at SDN 023 Samarinda Utara through various activities, such as counseling, simulations, and educational games. The findings indicate that students experience an increased understanding of the importance of integrity and hard work in daily life. Participants demonstrated positive changes in attitude and behavior, such as increased motivation to complete school assignments honestly and responsibly. Thus, instilling anti-corruption values through hard work proves effective in shaping children’s character with integrity. Therefore, the continuation of anti-corruption education programs in schools is essential, involving teachers, parents, and the educational community to create a corruption-free generation.

The application of main and additional criminal witnesses in the PTPK Law has become firm with the existence of legal norms for the return of state financial losses that do not eliminate the criminalization of the perpetrators of criminal acts but only factors that alleviate punishment. This is important so that there is no disparity in punishment. And likewise punish paying restitution if the act is committed jointly, so that a sense of justice occurs,The research method used is normative juridical. Which type of data used is primair legal material obtained from all publications on law, literature that is not an official document. Publications about the law include, among others, the internet, textbooks, law journals, articles, comments, court regulations and other sources; The types of criminal sanctions in the PTPK Law, namely in the form of principal punishment and additional punishment in the form of restitution, are closely related. Aspects of the amount of state financial losses, aspects of the perpetrator's guilt, aspects of the benefits obtained by the perpetrator, the impact caused by the perpetrator and the return of losses made by the perpetrator. Such is the case in imposing additional punishment in the form of paying restitution. In the PTPK Law, the amount of restitution is interpreted as “not merely assessing state financial losses, but assessing how much money is actually received by the perpetrator”, so that the imposition of restitution is in accordance with objective and proportional principles. Likewise, the imposition of restitution in the case of corruption crimes committed jointly and tried simultaneously, the additional restitution cannot be imposed jointly.

The rapid development of technology has facilitated daily human activities, one of which is the existence of digital financial systems for transactions and investments, with Bitcoin being one of the products of digital currency. The purpose of this research is to carefully examine and analyze the role of digital forensics in efforts to trace the proceeds of corruption crimes that have been converted into Bitcoin. The legal research method used is a normative juridical approach, conducting research on library materials and utilizing the Statute Approach and Case Approach. The results of the research conclude that digital forensics is an important process in legal investigations involving the identification, collection, analysis, and preservation of digital evidence from electronic devices.

This research analyzes the role of Pancasila in criminal law reform in Indonesia, particularly in relation to corruption and terrorism. Using a normative juridical approach and qualitative analysis of regulations, court decisions, and scientific literature, this research also applies the case study method. Data was collected through official documents and interviews with legal experts and law enforcement. The results revealed a gap between Pancasila values and existing legal practices, with challenges especially in fair law enforcement. The research highlights the need for community participation and strengthening the integrity of public officials for successful reform, as well as the importance of a holistic approach that includes legal education and continuous policy evaluation.

Enforcement of criminal law against criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia requires an approach that is not only based on positive legal provisions but also reflects the values ​​of Pancasila as the basis of the state. Pancasila, with five principles covering aspects of Divinity, Humanity, Unity, Democracy and Social Justice, provides the moral and ethical framework that underlies legal principles in Indonesia. This research aims to explore how Pancasila values ​​are applied in enforcing criminal law against corruption, as well as the challenges and obstacles faced in the implementation process. By using an analytical approach to legal literature and current case studies, this research finds that the application of Pancasila values ​​can increase integrity, transparency and justice in the legal system. Nonetheless, issues such as a widespread culture of corruption, deficiencies in the legal system, and a lack of collaboration among agencies present major challenges. This study suggests overhauling the legal system, enhancing education and training for law enforcement personnel, and promoting community engagement to better implement Pancasila values in the enforcement of criminal laws against acts of corruption. 

Abstract. Pancasila has an important role in various aspects of life, including in efforts to prevent and eradicate corruption. This research aims to examine the role of Pancasila's contribution in the context of constitutional law, especially in terms of integrity and public ethics. Using qualitative research methods and descriptive analysis, this study investigates how Pancasila values such as social justice, fair and civilized humanity, and unity can be integrated into the legal system and state administration to prevent and eradicate corruption. The results of this study show that the use of Pancasila principles in laws and public policies has significant potential to improve transparency and accountability. The study also identifies challenges and barriers to the implementation of Pancasila values and provides recommendations to improve the effectiveness of corruption prevention and eradication in Indonesia. The findings support the argument that Pancasila serves not only as an ideological basis, but also as a practical foundation in building a legal system with integrity.