Publication Search

Corruption remains a systemic challenge in Indonesia, particularly in the administration of government grant funding, undermining public trust, institutional integrity, and sustainable development. Despite the establishment of the Corruption Eradication Commission (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, KPK) and other specialized bodies, law enforcement continues to face institutional, political, and cultural barriers. This study explores how Islamic criminal law can strengthen anti-corruption strategies by integrating empirical legal practices with normative religious principles. Using a normative-empirical socio-legal approach, the research combines case studies of KPK’s enforcement processes with doctrinal analysis of fiqh jināyah. Data were collected through legal document analysis, policy reviews, and qualitative evaluations of institutional reports and court rulings. Findings indicate that Islamic legal concepts such as khiyānah (breach of trust), ghulūl (misappropriation of public assets), amānah (trustworthiness), ʿadl (justice), and maṣlaḥah (public interest) provide a strong ethical foundation that complements positive law enforcement. While KPK has demonstrated effectiveness in investigation, prosecution, and prevention, its performance is constrained by political pressure, regulatory gaps, and limited resources. The study concludes that embedding Islamic ethical principles into governance, legal education, and public administration can enhance institutional accountability, reinforce preventive measures, and cultivate a culture of integrity. This normative convergence advances socio-legal pluralism and offers practical insights for value-based anti-corruption policy in Indonesia.

The position of the prosecutor's office in the Indonesian constitutional system is a law enforcement agency whose role is as a prosecutor in the justice system, which is also related to the legal system. However, this is not stated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The position of the Corruption Commission (KPK) in the Indonesian constitutional system is often discussed, the Constitutional Court decided differently on several occasions in its (KPK) decisions regarding the position of the Indonesian constitutional system in that system. The Constitutional Court once considered that the Corruption Eradication Committee (KPK) is an independent state institution that is not included in the executive powers of parliament and the judiciary.

Non-penal efforts are one of the efforts to tackle crime, including corruption crimes. The purpose of this study is to explain the KPK's non-penal efforts to tackle corruption. The method used is literature study with primary and secondary law materials. The result is that KPK's non-penal efforts are prevention efforts that complement efforts to eradicate corruption. The form of using the mass media to form public opinion about the consequences of corruption and criminal sanctions. In addition, it also encourages the formation of national mental health in state and government institutions, community organizations, political parties, the involvement of community organizations and universities in tackling corruption crimes.   Keywords: Non-penal efforts, KPK, Corruption.

State institutions have an important role in eradicating corruption. There are several state agencies that have a major role in eradicating corruption, one of which is the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). The KPK is an independent institution, namely the agency responsible for eradicating corruption. The existence of the KPK in fighting corruption is very important. However, it is necessary to improve the performance of these institutions so that the eradication of corruption can run more smoothly. Political support, good coordination, and adequate resource allocation must be a priority in efforts to eradicate corruption. In this article we will discuss the duties and powers of the KPK state institution in eradicating corruption, the challenges encountered in eradicating corruption in Indonesia, the strengths between state institutions and the KPK, efforts to strengthen the credibility of the KPK in eradicating corruption in Indonesia and, the impact of corruption eradication efforts by the agency. the state towards increasing the integrity and public trust in the government and state institutions in Indonesia. This article is an article using library research methods (library research).

Saat ini, tindak pidana korupsi diklasifikasikan sebagai extra ordinary crime atau kejahatan luar biasa dengan dampak sistematis.  Salah satu upaya penanggulangannya yaitu dengan pembentukan lembaga Negara KPK, maka korupsi di indonesia di tangani tidak hanya kepolisian dan kejaksaaan saja, tetapi juga di lakukan oleh KPK. Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui syarat-syarat yang harus di penuhi komisi pemberantasan korupsi untuk dapat menggunakan kewenangannya mengeluarkan surat perintah penghentian penyidikan (SP3) pada perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Metode penelitian yang gunakan adalah merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan tiga pendekatan, yaitu pendekatan Undang-Undang, pendekatan konsep dan pendekatan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian mengenai KPK tidak memiliki kewenangan dalam mengeluarkan Surat Perintah Penghentian Penyidikan (SP3). Namun, pasca perubahan atau revisi Undang-Undang KPK dalam Melakukan Penyidikan diberikan kewenangan baru berupa penghentian penyidikan atau biasa disebut SP3 sebagaimana di atur dalam pasal 40 Undang-Undang No.19 Tahun 2019 yang mana KPK dapat menghentikan penyidikan yang tidak selesai dalam jangka waktu paling lama 2 (dua) tahun. Sedangkan syarat-syarat dikeluarkannya (SP3) oleh KPK yaitu:1. perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang penyidikan dan penuntutannya tidak selesai dalam jangka waktu paling lama 2 (dua) tahun; 2.  Tidak terdapat cukup bukti; 3. Peristiwa yang terjadi bukan tindak pidana.