Publication Search

The ipurpose iof ithis istudy iwas ito idetermine ithe ieffect iof icompensation, iwork istress iand ileadership ion iemployee iretention idue ito ia idecrease iin iturnover iintention iat iPT. iApparel iOne iIndonesia iSewing iSection. iThe itype iof iresearch ithat iwill ibe iused iis iassociative iwith ia iquantitative iapproach. iThe ipopulation iin ithis istudy iwere iemployees iof ithe isewing isection iof iPT. iApparel iOne iIndonesia, itotaling i478 ipeople, iwhile ithe isample iused iin ithis istudy iwas i100 irespondents iusing ia inon-probability isampling itechnique iwith ipurposive isampling itype. iThe imethod iof idata icollection iis ithrough ithe idistribution iof iquestionnaires iwhile ithe ianalysis iused iin ithis istudy iis imultiple ilinear iregressio The iresults ishowed ithat ithe ivariable iinfluence iof icompensation, ijob istress iand ileadership ihad ia ipositive iand isignificant ieffect ion iturnover iintention iand ithe iresult iof ithe iadjusted iR isquare ivalue iin ithe iregression imodel iwas iobtained iat i0.785, iwhich imeans ithat i78.5 ipercent iof ithe ivariable iturnover iintention ican ibe iexplained iby ithe ivariables iof icompensation, iwork istress iand ileadership. iwhile ithe iremaining i21.5 ipercent iis iexplained iby iother ivariables ioutside iof ithis istudy.

Many companies require good employee performance in order to achieve company goals, business competition is a trigger for companies to improve the performance of their employees. The variables used to determine the effect of the company's employee performance are discipline, compensation, work environment and training. This research was conducted on employees of PT. XYZ involved 60 respondents. This study uses a saturated sampling technique and uses a Likert scale. The analysis used was multiple linear analysis, with the regression equation Y = 16.349 + 0.068X1 + 0.001X2 + 0.159X3 + 0.287X4. The conclusions of this study are, (1) employee performance is not significantly affected by discipline, (2) employee performance is not significantly affected by compensation, (3) employee performance is not significantly affected by the work environment, (4) employee performance is significantly influenced by training, (5) Employee performance is influenced simultaneously by discipline, compensation, work environment and training.

This research was conducted at PT Fajar Indah Anindya Medan. The level of work discipline that can be seen from the delay and absence of employees. Job promotion systems that are still based on seniority are not based on work performance and employee discipline. Punishment that has not been resolute to employees. The population and sample in this study were 42 employees. The sampling technique used is saturated samples Data collection techniques are pembainigain kueisoner, interviews and documentation studies. Data analysis uses validity and reliability test, classic assumption test, multiple linear regression analysis, determinant coefficient and hypothesis testing.Conclusions in the study that simultaneous job promotion and punishment affect the work discipline of employees of PT Fajar Indah Anindya Medan. Partially, job promotion influences the work discipline of PT Fajar Indah Anindya Medan employees. Partially punishment affects the work discipline of PT Fajar Indah Anindya Medan employees. The magnitude of the determination coefficient that the adjusted R Square value is 0.502 means that promotion and punishment can explain employee discipline at 50.2% and the remaining 49.8% (100-50.2) influenced by other variables outside of this study such as: compensation, leadership and supervision of work and so on

The desired objective of this research activity is to examine and analyze the effect of compensation, motivation and job satisfaction on the work productivity of employees at PT. Nusantara Plantation IX Ngobo Ungaran Plantation. The population in this study were all production employees at PT. Nusantara Plantation IX Ngobo Ungaran Plantation, totaling 50 people. In this study, samples/respondents were taken from the entire population of 50 respondents, using saturated sampling techniques. Based on the discussion, the following conclusions can be drawn: Testing the compensation hypothesis on employee work productivity shows that the value of t count = 2.805 > t table = 1.684 with a significance number = 0.007 <α = 0.05 (significant). Thus, the hypothesis (H1) that compensation has a positive effect on employee work productivity is proven. Testing the hypothesis of motivation on employee productivity shows that the value of t count = 3.972 > t table = 1.684 with a significance number = 0.000 < α = 0.05 (significant). Thus, the hypothesis (H2) that motivation has a positive effect on employee work productivity is proven.

This study aims to determine: (1) The influence of Work Environment on Employee Loyalty; (2) Effect of Compensation on Employee Loyalty; (3) The Effect of Work Environment and Compensation Against Employee Loyalty in PT. Nawakara Arta Kencana. Data collection methods in this study using questionnaires spread with the number of respondents 45 employees. Data analysis technique in this research using normality test, multicolinearity test, heteroscedasticity test, partial test (t test), and simultaneous test (f test). The results of this study indicate that: (1) Working Environment variables have an effect on significant to employee loyalty variable with t value> t table (2,972> 2,016); (2) Compensation variable significantly influence Employee Loyalty variable with t value> t table (5,500> 2,016); and (3) Work Environment Variables and Compensation Variables together affect Employee Loyalty variable in test result showing that the value of f arithmetic> f table (20,343> 3,21) and value of determination coefficient (R2) equal to 0, 492 or equal to 49 , 2%, it means that Work Environment variable and Compensation variable simultaneously influence Employee Loyalty variable as much 49,2%.