Publication Search

73,099 articles from 684 journals · 2,111 citations tracked

Showing 1-3 of 3

Analytics

Ade Messy Indriani; Suryani Suryani; Sugiarti Sugiarti

Students' understanding of the linguistic principles that govern procedural texts, lack of teacher interest, and ineffective implementation of learning strategies were the impetus for conducting this research. The aim of this research is to provide an overview to class This research uses a quantitative research approach, more specifically a pre-test posttest control group design. Pre-test and post-test evaluations were carried out on both groups. The research sample consisted of 62 students, consisting of 30 class XI.B students as the experimental group and 32 class XI.C students as the control group. This research uses various data acquisition methods, such as documentation, written assessment, and observation. The t-test with paired sample significance levels was implemented in the SPSS version 22 computer program as part of the data analysis method. The results of the t-test carried out at a significance level of 0.05 show that the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted and the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected. Regarding procedure texts, the Student Facilitator and Explain methodology has a big influence on the writing ability of MA Subullusalam Sriwangi class XI students.

Rizka Mulyanah; Farid Rizqi Maulana; Deni Wardana

Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Pendidikan 2024 Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia

This research investigates wheter integrating the demonstration method with a TPACK (Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) approach in classroom learning can improve students ability to write procedure texts. A quasi experimental pre-test post-test control group design was employed to examine this effect. The target population for this study included all fourth grade students at SDN Kedaung Wetan 2. A sample of 40 students was selected, with 20 students from class 4A assigned to the control gorup and 20 students from class 4B assigned to the experimental group. The instrument used in this study was a written test. Data analysis was performed using the SPSS 27 program. Both the Paired Sample T-Test (Sig. (2-tailed) = 0.001) and the Independent Samples T-Test (Sig. (2-tailed) = 0.075) yielded statistically significant results (p = 0.05), indicating that the null hypothesis (Ho) can be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis (Ha). This suggest a significant difference between the learning outcomes of students receiving traditional instruction. Furthermore, the N-Gain Score analysis revealed an average improvement of 56% in the learning outcomes. This finding supports the notion that the TPACK integrated method has a positive inflluence on students ability to write procedure texts.  

Mayang Putri; Abdurahman Adisaputera

Dinamika Pembelajaran : Jurnal Pendidikan dan bahasa 2024 Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

The location where the research was carried out was SMA Negeri 8 Medan, which is on Jl. Pandau Hulu II, Sampali No. 23 Medan City District, Medan Area, North Sumatra, 20233 This study was carried out in June 2024. Through descriptive research, this study examines students' writing abilities in procedure text material. 34 SMA Negeri 8 Medan class XI students participated in this research. According to the findings of this study, the procedure text's content received an average score of 26.32 out of 100, placing it in the Good category at 75.21 percent. The number then was 825 for the procedural text structure aspect, with an excellent percentage of 80.88 percent and an average score of 24.26. The number is 1001 for the semantic part of procedural texts with a typical score of 29.44 and an excellent level of 84.12%. 2. According to KKM 75, the ability to write procedural texts is demonstrated by the fact that 27 students (79.41 percent) have completed the Indonesian Language KKM and 7 students (20.59 percent) have not completed the Indonesian Language KKM. 3. In view of the examination of achievement rates, the capacity to compose methodology texts of 16 understudies (47.06%) was in the excellent class, trailed by 15 understudies (44.12%) in the great class, 3 individuals (8.82%) in the great class. moderate, 0 understudies (0%), and 0 understudies (0%) in the unfortunate class.