Publication Search

This research aims to examine the legal protection against employment termination (PHK) in Temanggung and the obstacles encountered in the process of providing such legal protection. The type of legal research used is empirical and descriptive in nature. The approach employed is qualitative. The types of data used in this research include primary data obtained through interviews with respondents, and secondary data in the form of documents, information, books, journal articles, and facts obtained from official documents and legislation. The results of the study show that legal protection against employment termination (PHK) is carried out by the Department of Industry and Manpower of Temanggung Regency through the development of industrial relations and resolution via mediation. The obstacles faced by the Department of Industry and Manpower of Temanggung Regency in providing legal protection against employment termination (PHK) include limited budget for official travel activities, challenges in implementing industrial relations development with companies, the absence of disputing parties, and the lack of knowledge regarding applicable legal provisions.

This study aims to examine the regulatory framework concerning Government Employees with Work Agreements (PPPK), particularly in Functional Expert Positions in Indonesia and to identify how the policy implementation of PPPK in Functional Expert Positions is carried out at the Constitutional Court. The research employs an empirical method with a qualitative approach. The types of data used include both primary and secondary data: primary data was obtained through field interviews, while secondary data consists of documents, information, books, and facts sourced from official records and legislation. The findings of this study indicate that the implementation of policies related to Functional Expert Positions at the Constitutional Court still faces regulatory inconsistencies, especially in the selection mechanism, which does not fully adhere to the established rules. Additionally, competency development for PPPK employees is not supported by systematic planning, which risks creating skill gaps. This situation may lead to uncertainty in career progression and reflects that the management of PPPK still encounters several fundamental challenges in its implementation.  

The video feature Berdaya, Berkarya, Bermakna bagi Disabilitas aims to highlight the potential and creative works of children with disabilities at the Our Dream Indonesia Foundation through a mise-en-scène approach that enhances both visual and emotional narratives. This writing is motivated by the urgency of promoting the economic and social empowerment of persons with disabilities and the need to challenge prevailing stigmas through mass media. The 11-minute video feature integrates cinematography, set design, costume and makeup, and lighting to construct an engaging and informative storytelling experience. The objective of this study is to explain the production process of creating a visual work using mise-en-scène elements, which includes three key stages: pre-production (research, field observation, storyline development, storyboard creation, and technical preparation), production (filming using cinematographic techniques), and post-production (editing and visual refinement). The findings indicate that the comprehensive application of mise-en-scène successfully reinforces the message of inclusivity. For example, the use of cinematographic techniques contributes to the visual aesthetics; the set design of Toko Amis Budi shows the works of children with disabilities; the makeup and costume choices reflect the personalities of the featured subjects; and the lighting enhances the emotional tone of each scene. In conclusion, this work affirms that mise-en-scène not only enriches the visual appeal but also deepens the emotional impact, transforming facts into inspiring stories and raising public awareness of the importance of expressive spaces for individuals with disabilities. This video serves as an effective medium to advocate for equal rights and the recognition of the abilities of persons with disabilities.

Corruption and the rule of law are two things that are not foreign in the order of national, state and social life. Corruption seems to be a vocabulary that is experiencing inflation because it is most often used in almost all news reports. However, in corruption cases, judges are often less observant in paying attention to the facts presented in the trial so that often defendants in corruption cases are not punished commensurate with their actions, some even end in acquittals. The research method used by the author is normative legal research, by reviewing or examining laws and court decisions related to the legal problems faced. The sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials which are then analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that The basis for the Supreme Court's consideration in rejecting the public prosecutor's cassation application regarding the acquittal in corruption (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision Number: 2205 K/Pid.Sus/2022) is by considering the legal and non-legal aspects. Regarding the effectiveness of the decision in providing a deterrent effect for perpetrators of corruption in the future, judges in considering a decision should pay close attention to the facts in the trial so that the defendant's actions can be subject to sanctions and in the future can provide a deterrent effect on perpetrators of corruption in the future. The judge's consideration in imposing a sentence after the examination process in court must pay maximum attention to the sense of justice of the actions that have been committed by the defendant so that the verdict can provide a deterrent effect for perpetrators of corruption in the future.

Law enforcement in civil cases that have obtained permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde) often faces various complex challenges. For example, in land ownership cases that may be suspected of being linked to corruption crimes. Therefore, law enforcement officials must ensure that there is strong and sufficient evidence to process criminal elements without undermining the legal certainty of civil cases that have been decided. Good coordination between civil and criminal judicial institutions is also essential to ensure that justice can be comprehensively upheld. This research is qualitative in nature regarding concepts, relevant laws, and legal facts related to the issues being studied. The data obtained is subsequently analyzed using descriptive analysis, which is an analysis conducted by elaborating the obtained data. The research results show that: (1) The procedure executed by law enforcement officials aligns with the legal authority granted to them. However, the process may result in losses for parties legally proven not to have committed unlawful acts, as evidenced by the final and binding legal decision, with the case dependent on further evidentiary proceedings; (2) Obstacles in law enforcement processes stem from three primary factors: the law itself, law enforcement officials, and society, wherein socio-political interventions can provoke public opinion and conflicts between law enforcement and the community.

This study investigates the complexity of contextual meaning in political texts posted by public figures on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter). Grounded in Halliday and Hasan’s theory of situational context and Searle’s speech act theory, the research analyzes how political utterances function through locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts. The data, drawn from tweets during the 2024 Indonesian presidential election period, were collected using documentation and structured observation methods. The findings indicate that political texts on X are highly layered, combining explicit facts with implicit criticism, ideological stance, and persuasive strategies. Through representative, expressive, and directive speech acts, public figures construct meaning that influences public perception, evokes emotional responses, and fosters political alignment. This study contributes to the understanding of digital political discourse by highlighting how pragmatic strategies shape the interpretation of meaning in online political communication.

A hoax or fake news on social media refers to information that is spread with the intent to mislead or confuse people, often without valid factual basis. This phenomenon has become increasingly prevalent, especially on platforms like Facebook, where information can spread quickly. Therefore, the way to recognize and combat hoaxes on social media, particularly Facebook, is by carefully checking the source of information, verifying facts through trustworthy websites, and being cautious of sensational headlines and images that seem relevant. Additionally, checking the date and time of the information is crucial to avoid falling for outdated or manipulated content. In this context, verification plays a vital role in helping users be more discerning when filtering news and preventing the spread of hoaxes. If we fail to recognize or combat hoax dissemination, the impact can be highly detrimental to individuals and society, leading to confusion, panic, and both material and psychological harm. Therefore, raising awareness and media literacy among the public is essential to reduce the negative impact of hoaxes, encouraging people to be more critical and responsible in sharing information.

The purpose of this article is to explain how to teach Islamic religious education to young children through play tactics. Play describes a fun activity that can be done with or without tools. To strengthen the facts and information that underlie the discussion, this research uses a literature study approach, namely focusing on collecting, reviewing and evaluating various relevant literature sources. Various ways of using playing tactics and their significance in studying Islam will be discussed in this article. This is intended to help children understand religious concepts. According to research, children can learn Islamic teachings in a more interesting and enjoyable way if they use play techniques. Apart from that, play activities educate moral values, foster social relationships, and shape children's Islamic personalities.

This study aims to determine and analyze the role and effectiveness of the forestry police in overcoming illegal logging crimes. The type of research used is empirical juridical, by collecting data based on facts in the field and analyzed qualitatively descriptive. The role of the forestry police includes non-penal and penal efforts. Non-penal efforts are in the form of prevention such as providing appeals for environmental conservation, reforestation, supervision of forest utilization permits, mapping of vulnerable areas, and improving the quality and quantity of personnel. Penal efforts include arresting perpetrators, confiscating evidence, making minutes of examination, and coordinating with other law enforcement officials. Factors affecting the effectiveness of the forestry police include legal substance, legal structure, community culture, facilities and infrastructure, area compared to the number of personnel, population growth, and increasing modus operandi due to high demand for timber. Synchronization of regulations between sectors is needed to avoid overlapping rules. The government also needs to strengthen forestry police infrastructure and encourage active community involvement in preserving forests in North Gorontalo District.

This study examines the legal responsibility of producers for the circulation of hazardous food products through a strict liability approach, with a case study on the Okko Bread product which was proven to contain sodium dehydroacetate (NDA)—a substance prohibited for use in bread based on BPOM regulations. The research method used is normative empirical, namely combining analysis of laws and regulations, especially Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, with empirical facts from the findings of the Food and Drug Supervisory Agency (BPOM) and the responses of producers. The results of the study show that producers do not fully carry out their legal obligations, both in terms of information transparency and responsibility for consumer losses. The application of the strict liability principle still faces obstacles in implementation, mainly due to weak supervision, low legal awareness of producers, and minimal consumer literacy. These findings indicate the need to strengthen regulations, increase legal sanctions, and educate the public so that the principle of absolute liability truly provides fair protection for consumers. This study emphasizes the importance of integration between law enforcement, business ethics, and the active role of society in creating an effective and sustainable consumer protection system.

The Self-Help Housing Stimulant Assistance Program (BSPS) emerged as a response to the housing and settlement problems faced by the Indonesian people, especially related to the low quality of life due to slums (Sitompul, 2022). This program aims to provide livable houses for low-income people (MBR) through stimulant government assistance (Seri Mughni Sulubara, 2024). The research method used is a qualitative descriptive research method. This method aims to make descriptions of data systematically, factually, and accurately about existing facts. Descriptive research that is carried out continuously on the object of research is called a continuous descriptive method. The results of activities or findings from the implementation of the Self-Help Housing Stimulant Assistance Program (BSPS) in reducing the quantity and quality of Uninhabitable Homes (RTLH) show that this program has a positive impact on the beneficiary community. The BSPS program succeeded in improving the quality of the beneficiaries' houses. Houses that were built or renovated have a solid structure, adequate area, and a livable level of safety (Seri Mughni Sulubara, Amrizal Amrizal, et al., 2024). By making home improvements, BSPS contributes to reducing the number of uninhabitable houses and creating a more decent environment (B & Sadriah, 2020).  

This study examines the dynamics of speech acts in the H. POD Channel podcast that presents LGBT couples as speakers. The background of the research is based on the role of pragmatics in understanding the meaning of speech and the function of podcasts as a dialogic medium for sensitive issues. The purpose of this study is to identify the types of speech acts that appear and analyze the language strategies of the LGBT community in identity negotiation. The method used is descriptive qualitative with a case study approach; primary data in the form of podcast episode transcripts are analyzed using Austin and Searle's speech act theory, as well as secondary data from pragmatics literature. The results of the study show that assertive speech acts are most dominant, followed by expressive, directive, and commissive, which reflect the conveyance of facts, expression of feelings, invitation, and commitment. Language use also displays identity negotiation and responses to heteronormative norms. This study concludes that the pragmatics approach is effective in revealing the dynamics of communication and identity construction in digital public spaces.

This research was conducted to look at team components starting from the strengths and weaknesses of the team so that it can be used as evaluation material to make better improvements to the team to face the next match. This research also aims to confirm the findings of video analysis in the final match of the East Java Floorball men's team at the 2024 Aceh-Sumut PON XXI exhibition. This research methodology uses quantitative descriptive, which uses match video analysis data to paint a picture or reveal information about the facts. facts about the final field for the men's floorball team in East Java. The sample from this research was the East Java Floorball men's team who were the core players or who only played in the final round. The researcher's data sheet on video match analysis served as a tool. The quantitative descriptive data analysis method was applied using figures obtained from video study findings and evaluation results. From the results of video analysis of the final match of the East Java Floorball men's team, when compared with other strategies, it was found that the tactics of passing and controlling the ball gave the best results. Players gain an advantage when the opposing team has the ball as a result of frequently using this method and developing their game. The East Java Floorball men's team has better ball control than its opponents because their passing technique and ball control are superior.

The purpose of this research is to analyze the modus operandi of motorcycle theft crime in Kupang City and its prevention pattern (case study of Kelapa Lima Police Station). This research is an empirical legal research that directly observes the research location to find out the facts that occur in the field. The research data sources are primary data and secondary data which are then analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results showed that the modus operandi of overcoming the crime of theft of motorized vehicles in the jurisdiction of the Kelapa Lima Police was iron scissors, using kunji t, using fake contact kunji, using leasing services (debtcolletor). Of all the cases of crime modus operandi of motorcycle theft above has 40 cases of different types of modes. Countermeasures carried out by law enforcement or police officers include pre-emtif efforts, which are initial efforts made by the police to prevent crime by instilling good values and norms so that these norms are internalized in each person. Preventive, These preventive efforts are a follow-up to pre-emtif efforts which are still in the prevention stage before the crime occurs. Preventive efforts that are emphasized are eliminating opportunities to commit crimes. Repressive, The countermeasures taken are by taking action against the perpetrators of crime in accordance with their actions and correcting them so that they realize that their actions are unlawful and detrimental to society.

Handaka Vijjananda's Buddhist comic "Aṅgulimāla: True Repentance" depicts the repentance of a ruthless murderer who undergoes spiritual transformation after meeting Gautama Buddha. This story not only conveys Buddhist moral teachings but also reflects the social, cultural, and religious dynamics of ancient Indian society. This study aims to analyze the intrinsic and genetic structures of the Buddhist comic "Aṅgulimāla" using Lucien Goldmann's genetic structuralism approach. The method used is qualitative descriptive, with the primary data source being the comic "Aṅgulimāla." Data collection techniques were conducted through intensive reading and note-taking, while data analysis was conducted by linking the intrinsic elements of the literary work with the socio-historical context and the author's worldview. The results show that the intrinsic structure of the comic "Aṅgulimāla" includes themes of repentance, karma, loving-kindness (metta), and wisdom; strong characters and characterizations; a progressive plot; internal and external conflicts; and a time, place, and social setting that reflect 6th-century BCE Indian society. Meanwhile, its genetic structure reveals human facts such as the caste system, power relations, and social morality, as well as the author's worldview, which emphasizes Buddhist values such as compassion, self-transformation, and hope for human moral change. Thus, genetic structuralism analysis confirms that the comic Aṅgulimāla is a literary work that is not only narrative in nature but also reflects social realities and humanitarian messages relevant to modern life.

This study uses a qualitative approach that describes the object studied through the process of exploring facts and data on objects in the field as they are, to achieve these objectives, data is needed that is excavated from an in-depth observation process with the principal, vice principal, head of the welding and metal fabrication engineering expertise program and teachers of productive subjects. Data collection techniques using in-depth interviews with, participant observation, and documentation. Data analysis techniques using data reduction, data presentation and drawing conclusions or verification. Checking the validity of the data using triangulation methods. The results of the study indicate that the suitability of students' technical and non-technical competencies with industry needs greatly determines the success rate of graduates in the workforce. Relevant competencies, such as mastery of modern welding technology and soft skills such as communication and teamwork, are key factors. In addition, it was found that aligning the curriculum with industry standards and the active involvement of industry partners through internship programs contributed significantly to improving the quality of graduates. This study recommends strengthening cooperation between vocational schools and the industrial world and developing training programs based on labor market needs.

Law Number 37 of 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, PKPU is an effort to reach an Agreement or Mutual Agreement between the debtor and creditor which is carried out with the intention of submitting a peace plan in the form of an offer of payment of either part or all of the debt that has matured to the creditor regarding the settlement of debts. Furthermore, in the results of the analysis of Decision PKPU Number 188 K/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2013, the Debtor has violated the provisions of Article 222 paragraph (2) of the Law, it is explained that for debtors who have more than one creditor and the debtor does not pay at least one debt that has matured and can be collected, he is declared bankrupt by a court decision, either at the request of the debtor himself or at the request of one or more of his creditors, Legal Implications of Decision No. 08/PKPU/2012/PN.Niaga.Mks Debtor PT.Kopi Jaya Comrpora as the debtor, seeing from the trial facts, the author agrees with the decision of the panel of judges.

This study aims to analyze the Public Relations (PR) communication strategy used by PT Gamelan Tour in building the company's positive image. This research applies the Two-Way Symmetric Communication theory developed by James E. Grunig and Todd Hunt, which emphasizes the importance of reciprocal communication between the company and the public. Through this approach, PT Gamelan Tour aims to listen to customer complaints, provide clear explanations,and resolve issues in a transparent and effective manner. Additionally, this study discusses various relevant communicationmanagementmodels,including thetwo-way symmetric model, which helps the company maintain mutually beneficial relationships with its customers. The research methodology uses a qualitative approach, collecting data through in-depth interviews with key stakeholders at PT Gamelan Tour, including Vania Nefrela Regar (Public Relations), Reva Agustina (Ticketing &Hotel), and the company's customers. This study adopts four steps of Public Relations strategy, which include: (1) defining the problem/facts to identify existing issues, (2) planning and programming to formulate effective communication strategies, (3) taking action and communicating to implement the planned strategies, and (4) evaluating the program to assess the success of its implementation and its impact on the company's image. The research findingsindicate that effective communication strategies, whether in the form of feedback, direct communication, or mutual understanding, can improve the company's image and strengthen relationships with customers.This studyalsohighlightstheimportanceofthoroughcommunication planning and consistent implementation to achieve the company's goals in building positive relationships with the public.

This study aims to analyze the legal review of illegal firearms and ammunition ownership in Indonesia. The research method used in this study is the normative legal research method. The main data source in this study is secondary legal sources, consisting of Emergency Law No. 12 of 1951 and Law No. 8 of 1948 concerning the registration and granting of firearms ownership permits. The results of the study concluded that law enforcement against illegal firearms and ammunition ownership in Indonesia has been carried out in accordance with existing laws and regulations related to illegal firearms ownership, conducting investigations and law enforcement according to the facts in court and factors inhibiting law enforcement against illegal firearms and ammunition ownership in Indonesia in the form of legal factors, law enforcement, society, facilities and infrastructure, culture. The suggestion in this study is that there should be no difference in decision making and witnesses in law enforcement because of considering status, position, and economy so that law enforcement can be more optimal, and so that there are no obstacles to law enforcement, law enforcement officers need to increase supervision of the circulation of illegal firearms and ammunition through cooperation with community leaders, traditional leaders, law enforcement officers, and the media.

This research discusses the problem where in a trial facts that cannot be taken into consideration by the panel of judges in deciding a civil case in decision Number 28/Pdt.G/2022/ PN Wates. The research was conducted to find out the reasons why the judge did not consider the evidence that had been submitted by the parties. The normative juridical research method with a conceptual approach and case approach was used to analyze the decision Number 28/Pdt.G/2022/ PN Wates as the primary data of the research and secondary data through literature study and for the process of analyzing data based on qualitative descriptive methods. The results showed that the evidence submitted by the litigants in the decision was not considered by the judge because the strength of the evidence was weak. In article 1866 of the Civil Code, evidence that can be submitted to strengthen the arguments in the lawsuit is in the form of written evidence and witness evidence. This study also states that there is a judex factie where the judge examines the facts of the trial, so that the judge can consider it in the decision. Based on this analysis, the judge has responsibility for all evidence submitted by the plaintiff to be considered in making a decision. Evidence is so important in civil trials, because it can affect the judge's confidence in making a consideration to decide a case.