Publication Search

The management of national border areas is a strategic issue in the modern international system, directly linked to sovereignty, national security, and regional stability. This study aims to examine the role of international law in border management through a qualitative literature-based approach. Findings indicate that core principles of international law, such as uti possidetis juris, state sovereignty, and non-intervention, serve as the normative foundation for boundary formation, recognition, and dispute resolution. Current challenges such as illegal immigration, infiltration, and territorial claims demand the strengthened implementation of international law within national policy. Local government involvement and economic diplomacy also play vital roles in building adaptive and responsive border governance. In Indonesia’s case, land and maritime border dynamics highlight the need for a comprehensive strategy that integrates legal, diplomatic, and regional development aspects. This study underscores the importance of synergy among state actors to safeguard territorial integrity and foster sustainable cross-border cooperation.

Resolving Islamic legal issues can be done through a legal and diplomatic approach. The legal approach refers to the formal legal system, such as religious courts and religious scholars' fatwas, which prioritize legal certainty based on the sources of Islamic law, namely the Qur'an, Sunnah, Ijma', and Qiyas. Meanwhile, the diplomatic approach emphasizes more on deliberation, mediation, and negotiation in order to achieve a peaceful solution that remains based on the principles of Islamic law. The combination of these two approaches can create a resolution mechanism that is more effective, fair, and in accordance with the needs of the Muslim community. The research method applied in writing this journal is a qualitative research method with a descriptive-analytical approach. This study describes how the resolution of Islamic law is carried out legally and diplomatically and analyzes the effectiveness of each method in practice. Research data were collected through a literature study of Islamic legal sources, religious court regulations, and cases of Islamic legal settlement. The results of the study indicate that the legal approach is more effective in providing legal certainty and protection of individual rights, while the diplomatic approach is more flexible in maintaining social harmony and avoiding prolonged conflict. Therefore, integration between these two approaches is very necessary in resolving Islamic legal issues more comprehensively and fairly.

Humanitarian intervention is often seen as an effort to protect civilians from human rights violations, but it often clashes with the principle of state sovereignty in international law. This research evaluates the alignment of humanitarian intervention with the values of Pancasila as an ethical and moral footing in international policy. The research uses a qualitative method with a case study approach; data is obtained from a literature study that includes academic documents, journals, reference books, and diplomatic reports, then analyzed descriptively-analytically to reveal the views of Pancasila in the practice of international law. The results show that although intervention has noble aims, its implementation often collides with the principle of non-intervention and the principle of state sovereignty. The values of Pancasila, especially fair and civilized humanity and social justice, can be used as a moral foundation to assess the legitimacy of intervention, but its application in international norms is still constrained by political interests and power imbalances between states. The conclusion of this study is that Pancasila offers a potential ethical framework for more just humanitarian interventions, but diplomacy and policy advocacy efforts are needed to strengthen the position of developing countries in formulating international norms that respect sovereignty while protecting human rights.

The Geopolitics 5.0 era has introduced a new paradigm in which artificial intelligence (AI), digital technology, and global power dynamics are reshaping traditional diplomatic practices. As a nation rooted in the Pancasila ideology, Indonesia faces complex challenges in upholding its principles of humanity, unity, and social justice amid increasingly competitive geopolitical shifts. This research aims to analyze the relevance of Pancasila as a strategic framework for Indonesia’s diplomatic efforts in responding to the challenges of Geopolitics 5.0, while formulating policy recommendations aligned with national values. The study employs a qualitative approach, analyzing content related to Indonesia’s foreign policy, government documents, and recent diplomatic case studies. Supporting data is drawn from academic literature, archives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and reports from global think tanks. The findings demonstrate that Pancasila serves as a critical foundation for shaping Indonesia’s adaptive diplomacy, particularly through: (1) soft power strategies rooted in cultural and creative economic assets, (2) digital diplomacy that prioritizes cyber sovereignty and freedom, and (3) leadership in multilateral forums. Pancasila’s values not only remain relevant but also provide Indonesia with a strategic advantage in building principle-driven diplomacy in the Geopolitics 5.0 era. Policy recommendations include strengthening digital human resource capacity, fostering collaborative technology research, and advancing public diplomacy initiatives.

Pancasila, as the foundation of the Indonesian state, embodies universal values that are relevant for resolving global conflicts. Indonesia, as a nation that upholds these values, has played a significant role as a mediator in various international conflicts, employing a diplomatic approach based on the principles of Pancasila. This article aims to examine the application of Pancasila values in Indonesia’s diplomacy, focusing on case studies of Indonesia’s role in mediating the Palestinian conflict, the Rohingya crisis, and tensions within ASEAN. This research adopts a qualitative approach with a case study methodology, enabling a deep understanding of Indonesia’s diplomatic dynamics in the context of these global conflicts. Additionally, the research analyzes official documents, academic journals, and Indonesia’s foreign policies to provide a comprehensive picture of the effectiveness of a Pancasila-based approach. The results of the analysis indicate that despite existing geopolitical challenges and the dominance of global power structures, the Pancasila-based approach can serve as an effective model for conflict resolution, emphasizing dialogue, social justice, and humanity as the foundation for solutions. Indonesia’s diplomacy, which prioritizes Pancasila values, has proven its relevance in fostering a more just and peaceful world order, while strengthening Indonesia’s position as a moral leader in international diplomacy.

The Senkaku Islands dispute involves Japan, China, and Taiwan on the basis of historical claims, international law, and strategic and economic interests. The strategic value of this region increases along with the potential of natural resources and the importance of maritime routes in the East China Sea. The main problems in this research are, first, how is the chronology of the Senkaku Islands dispute, and second, how is the analysis of international law on the sovereignty claims of each party. This research uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical method, which is based on a literature study of international legal documents, scientific journals, and various related official sources. The results show that Japan controls the Senkaku Islands de facto and strengthens its claim based on the principle of effectiveness. In contrast, China and Taiwan make claims based on the history of the Ming and Qing Dynasties but have no actual control over the territory. The dispute is further complicated by the United States' security support for Japan, as well as increased maritime and military patrol activities around the disputed area. Efforts to resolve the dispute through the International Court of Justice have been stymied by Japan's refusal to recognize the dispute and China's caution in taking the case to international law. Overall, the dispute has not only a legal dimension, but also reflects the sharp geopolitical competition in the East Asian region. Resolving this dispute requires a flexible diplomatic approach, given that formal legal channels are difficult to pursue. Multilateral dialog is the key to preventing conflict escalation that could threaten regional stability.

Human trafficking is a complex crime against humanity that involves the exploitation of vulnerable individuals, including Indonesian citizens who have become victims of online scams in Cambodia. This study aims to analyze the implementation of legal protection for victims of human trafficking in Cambodia and to identify the challenges and obstacles faced in efforts to combat this crime. The research method used is a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis, gathering data from various secondary sources, including legislation, legal documents, and relevant academic literature. The findings indicate that although the Indonesian government has made efforts to rescue and rehabilitate victims through diplomatic roles and international cooperation, there are still significant challenges, such as differences in legal systems, limited resources, and the increasing complexity of trafficking modus operandi. Therefore, a comprehensive approach is needed, encompassing the strengthening of bilateral cooperation, enhancing the capacity of law enforcement officers, and public education to prevent human trafficking. This study emphasizes the importance of collaboration between governments, society, and the international community in protecting human rights and the dignity of individuals from exploitation.

The geopolitical relations between China and Afghanistan have undergone significant transformations in recent years, shaped by regional dynamics, security imperatives, economic cooperation, and strategic interests. As a neighboring country with extensive global influence, China has adopted a pragmatic approach toward Afghanistan, seeking to balance its economic investments with security considerations. This study explores the historical trajectory of Sino-Afghan relations, identifies the key factors influencing their bilateral interactions, and examines Afghanistan’s strategic importance within the broader regional ambitions of China—particularly in relation to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). It also briefly investigates China's role in Afghanistan’s political landscape following 2001 and analyzes its evolving stance after the Taliban's return to power in 2021. Furthermore, the research highlights the economic, security, and diplomatic dimensions of the two countries’ relationship and evaluates how Beijing’s strategic calculations in Afghanistan align with its broader regional objectives—especially concerning security stability (counterterrorism) and economic expansion. From a geopolitical standpoint, this paper offers insights into the long-term implications of China’s engagement with Afghanistan and its broader impact on the regional power dynamics, using a descriptive-analytical methodology.

This research examines the conflict between Indonesia and Malaysia over the claim to batik as a cultural heritage. Batik, a traditional art form from Indonesia, has long been an important cultural symbol. However, Malaysia’s claim to batik has sparked significant controversy and tension between the two countries. The study emphasizes the importance of understanding cultural heritage disputes in the context of international relations, as they not only involve cultural pride but also economic and diplomatic factors. Using a literature review method, this study analyzes secondary data from books, articles, and scholarly journals to understand the background, developments, and resolutions of this conflict. The key findings highlight Indonesia's successful effort in registering batik as part of UNESCO’s Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity in 2009, which provided international recognition and protection for batik. Additionally, the study explores the legal frameworks, including both soft and hard law, that help protect cultural heritage from such claims. The resolution process demonstrates the role of international diplomacy and legal measures in addressing disputes over cultural heritage. The research concludes that while cultural similarities between Indonesia and Malaysia complicate matters, a diplomatic approach supported by international law and UNESCO’s mediation has helped safeguard Indonesia's cultural identity. This study underscores the importance of cooperation in preserving cultural heritage and the essential role of international organizations in managing such conflicts.

The ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict has become one of the most complex issues in global geopolitics, with far-reaching impacts on world security, economy and stability. This research aims to analyze the root causes of conflict, resolution efforts that have been made, as well as the effectiveness of conflict management based on historical and academic approaches. This research uses a qualitative method with a literature study approach to explore information from various credible sources. The research results show that this conflict was triggered by the long history of relations between the two countries, especially since the collapse of the Soviet Union, followed by the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and military invasion in 2022. Even though various diplomatic efforts and economic sanctions have been implemented, tensions still continue due to the incompatibility of geopolitical interests between Russia and Western countries. This study highlights the need for a multilateral approach based on international mediation to create sustainable peace. It is hoped that this article can contribute to academic understanding regarding international conflicts and strategies for resolving them.

This study examines the stance of Abd al-Rahman al-Dakhil towards the Christian kingdoms in Al-Andalus during his rule. Following the collapse of the Umayyad Caliphate in the Levant, Abd al-Rahman I successfully established an independent emirate in Al-Andalus, navigating both internal and external challenges. A significant aspect of his governance was his strategic response to the Christian kingdoms in northern Spain, which continuously sought to reclaim lost territories and challenge Muslim rule. The study explores his military campaigns, diplomatic efforts, and policies aimed at securing the stability of the Umayyad state. Despite initial successes in repelling Christian advances and imposing tributary agreements, internal strife within Al-Andalus weakened its ability to maintain long-term control over contested regions. The research underscores the pivotal role of political unity in sustaining territorial dominance and highlights how Abd al-Rahman al-Dakhil’s leadership shaped the early Islamic state in Iberia.

Genocide is one of the most serious crimes in international law, regulated by various legal instruments such as the 1948 Genocide Convention and the 1998 Rome Statute. This crime involves the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a group based on race, ethnicity, religion, or nationality. This study aims to analyze the role of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in enforcing genocide law and identify the obstacles in applying individual criminal responsibility. Additionally, mechanisms for resolving genocide disputes through peaceful and legal means in international law are discussed. The research employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical method, analyzing international legal documents and case studies. The results show that although the ICC has jurisdiction to try genocide cases, law enforcement processes often face political challenges, particularly the UN Security Council veto power and state sovereignty. In conclusion, international efforts to address genocide require stronger cross-country cooperation and enhanced legal mechanisms to overcome political and diplomatic challenges.

This study examines the complex challenges surrounding criminal acts perpetrated against Indonesian migrant workers and evaluates the effectiveness of current law enforcement mechanisms and legal protection frameworks. The research analyzes both domestic and international legal instruments designed to protect migrant workers, with particular focus on their implementation and practical outcomes. Through a comprehensive assessment of case studies, legal documents, and enforcement data, this study reveals significant gaps between established legal protections and their actual enforcement. Key findings indicate that Indonesian migrant workers frequently face various forms of criminal exploitation, including physical abuse, fraud, human trafficking, and unlawful confinement, while working abroad. The study identifies several systemic barriers to effective legal protection, including jurisdictional complexities, limited access to legal resources, inadequate bilateral agreements, and weak enforcement mechanisms in both sending and receiving countries. Furthermore, the research highlights the critical role of government agencies, diplomatic missions, and non-governmental organizations in providing legal assistance to victimized workers. The study concludes by proposing concrete recommendations for strengthening the legal protection framework, enhancing international cooperation in law enforcement, improving access to justice for migrant workers, and developing more robust preventive measures against criminal exploitation.

State sovereignty is a prerogative right that must be maintained as a priority, especially in Indonesia is archipelagic geography. This presents a significant challenge in maintaining sovereignty over the Natuna Islands and Lingga Islands in Riau Islands Province, Indonesia. This area has been the subject of international conflict, particularly concerning China's claim under the Nine-Dash Line, which the Chinese government justifies with historical arguments and past governmental decisions. However, this claim lacks a valid legal basis under international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982, which defines international maritime boundaries. The conflict began to escalate in 2016 following the arrest of three Chinese fishermen involved in large-scale illegal fishing, an act supported by the Chinese government. In response, the Indonesian government took measures to assert its sovereignty by strengthening military security, engaging in diplomatic efforts with ASEAN member states, and conducting best practice studies to potentially bring the Natuna Sea sovereignty dispute before the International Court of Justice. Indonesia's sovereignty over the Natuna Sea is firmly supported by the Djuanda Declaration and the 1982 UNCLOS Agreement. This study aims to analyze the Natuna conflict using a Normative Law and Military approach as the primary strategies to resolve disputes over the Natuna Sea.

The maritime conflict between Indonesia and China in the South China Sea arises from overlapping claims, particularly concerning Indonesia’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) near the Natuna Islands. China’s assertion of sovereignty through its Nine-Dash Line, which Indonesia does not recognize under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), has fueled tensions. These have been exacerbated by aggressive actions, including Chinese vessels' incursions and illegal fishing within Indonesia’s EEZ. Despite these conflicts, both nations emphasize maritime cooperation to enhance bilateral ties.This study examines the dynamics of Indonesia-China maritime cooperation and conflicts in the South China Sea and their implications for regional stability. Employing a literature-based methodology, it investigates challenges and potential resolutions, including diplomacy and third-party mediation through bodies like the International Court of Justice. The findings highlight that resolving disputes effectively requires a legal framework and multilateral collaboration through ASEAN. The study concludes with recommendations for bolstering diplomatic engagement and sustainably managing maritime resources to ensure stability across the Indo-Pacific region.

Social media has emerged as a transformative platform for youth skill development, particularly in diplomatic literacy. This qualitative study investigates how university students leverage social media to enhance their soft skills, focusing on communication, critical thinking, and cultural sensitivity. Through interviews and focus group discussions with 30 university students, the research explores the mechanisms by which digital platforms facilitate skill development. Findings reveal that social media provides unique opportunities for global interaction, information evaluation, and cross-cultural understanding. Students reported significant improvements in communication skills, critical thinking abilities, and cultural awareness through engaged social media use.

This study explores the political impacts of citizenship policy changes on Indonesia’s diplomatic relationships, particularly in the context of globalization and the movement of its diaspora. Indonesia currently maintains a single citizenship policy, preventing its citizens from holding dual nationality. This restriction often complicates the legal and emotional connections of Indonesians living abroad with their home country, while also limiting their economic contributions through remittances and investments. Conversely, many nations have adopted dual citizenship policies to maintain stronger connections with their diaspora and enhance their diplomatic influence. Using a qualitative approach with case studies focusing on countries with large Indonesian diasporas, such as Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, and the United States, this research highlights the potential benefits of dual citizenship. The findings indicate that allowing dual citizenship could strengthen Indonesia’s diplomatic ties and increase economic contributions from overseas Indonesians. However, there are challenges to implementation, including concerns over divided loyalty and complexities in legal enforcement. This paper suggests that Indonesia consider a carefully controlled introduction of dual citizenship, taking into account legal protections, economic benefits, and the role of the diaspora in promoting Indonesia’s interests abroad.

The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict from 2020 to 2022 highlights the significant role of the Armenian diaspora in supporting Armenia across various dimensions. The research aims to determine the extent to which the Armenian diaspora's support influences the Armenian government's capacity to handle the conflict. The study utilizes theories of public diplomacy and diaspora engagement, employing a mixed-methods approach that includes qualitative data from secondary data processing such as journals and written results containing data about Armenian Diaspora, official website of the Armenian government, and quantitative data from financial contributions and diplomatic records. Findings indicate that the Armenian diaspora's political lobbying and advocacy efforts have secured significant diplomatic support, while economically providing substantial remittances, investments, and humanitarian aid. Socially, the diaspora has shaped international public opinion through campaigns and cultural activities, and intellectually, it has offered strategic insights enhancing the government's approach to the conflict. Additionally, the mobilization of human resources by the diaspora has provided direct assistance in Armenia. This research offers a comprehensive understanding of the dynamics between the Armenian diaspora and the Armenian government, demonstrating the substantial impact of multidimensional diaspora support on the government's capacity to manage the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

This article examines the strategic role of sustainable economic diplomacy in achieving the vision of Golden Indonesia 2045. Sustainable economic diplomacy is defined as diplomatic efforts aimed at promoting environmentally friendly and inclusive economic growth through strong international relations, trade agreements, economic cooperation, and foreign direct investment (FDI). The analysis shows that through economic diplomacy, Indonesia can gain access to international markets, attract FDI, foster innovation and technology transfer, and strengthen regional and multilateral cooperation. These strategies support inclusive and environmentally sustainable economic growth, helping Indonesia to overcome global challenges and achieve long-term development goals. Recommendations include strengthening the capacity of economic diplomacy, effective inter-agency coordination, and inclusive policies.    

.  An analysis of China’s negotiating strategy toward Saudi Arabia and Iran’s efforts to normalize relations highlights China’s important role as a mediator in resolving the long-standing and complex rivalry between the two countries. Geopolitical, economic, and diplomatic factors underpin China’s strategy to minimize conflict and promote regional stability. Through its multilateral approach, economic cooperation, balancing interests, and focus on energy, China has played a key role in facilitating dialogue and reaching an agreement between Saudi Arabia and Iran. By maintaining its position as a neutral and respected mediator, China has the potential to strengthen economic and diplomatic ties in the region and promote peace and stability in the Middle East.