Publication Search

Penelitian ini mengkaji pertanggungjawaban hukum Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) dalam kasus pemalsuan dokumen jual beli tanah berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat Nomor 248/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt. Penelitian dilatarbelakangi oleh meningkatnya penyalahgunaan kewenangan oleh PPAT yang berpotensi merugikan pemegang hak atas tanah serta mengganggu kepastian hukum dan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap sistem pertanahan. Permasalahan penelitian meliputi: (1) kronologi dan konstruksi hukum kasus pemalsuan dokumen jual beli tanah; (2) pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam memutus perkara; dan (3) bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana PPAT dalam kasus tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi deskriptif-analitis melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, serta doktrin hukum yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tindakan PPAT yang membuat Akta Jual Beli berdasarkan surat kuasa palsu tanpa kehadiran dan persetujuan pemilik sah telah memenuhi unsur tindak pidana pemalsuan akta otentik sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 264 ayat (1) jo. Pasal 55 ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP. Pertimbangan hakim didasarkan pada asas legalitas, pembuktian, persamaan di hadapan hukum, serta keseimbangan antara kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan hukum. Putusan pidana penjara dan denda yang dijatuhkan mencerminkan akuntabilitas pejabat publik atas penyalahgunaan kewenangan jabatan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pertanggungjawaban PPAT mencakup aspek pidana, perdata, dan administratif. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan sistem pengawasan, penegakan kode etik profesi, serta peningkatan integritas dan profesionalitas PPAT guna mewujudkan tertib hukum dalam administrasi pertanahan.

This research is prompted by legal complications within civil procedural law, specifically regarding the failure of judges to identify formal defects in special powers of attorney during the preliminary stages of trial. The central focus of this study examines Decision Number 14/Pdt.G/2025/PN Kba, in which a lawsuit was declared inadmissible (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard) only after a seven-month litigation process that had already progressed through evidentiary hearings and local inspections. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of the dominus litis principle in empowering judges to provide procedural guidance for lawsuit amendments, while testing its alignment with the principles of simple, fast, and low-cost justice. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory and case-based approaches, the legal materials are analyzed qualitatively using the legal syllogism technique. The findings indicate that the application of the dominus litis principle in the a quo case remains ineffective due to the judges' passive and formalistic tendencies. Such an approach neglects the ex-officio authority mandated under Articles 119 and 132 of the HIR. This ineffectiveness results in significant judicial inefficiency, causing undue loss of time and financial resources for justice seekers. Consequently, this study recommends strengthening rigorous initial screening mechanisms by the panel of judges at the first hearing. This preventive measure is essential to curb the waste of judicial resources and ensure the realization of substantial justice for all disputing parties.

This study analyzes the juridical issues related to the implementation of criminal sanctions below the statutory minimum, as reflected in Cassation Decision Number 7853/K/Pid.Sus/2024. The focus of this research centers on the tension between the rigid provisions of Article 111 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics and the reality of judicial practice, which often deviates from these provisions. This phenomenon raises debates regarding the extent to which the principle of legality can be compromised in pursuit of justice without undermining the pillar of legal certainty within Indonesia’s criminal justice system. Using a normative legal research method with a statutory and case study approach, this study qualitatively analyzes judges’ considerations. The findings indicate that, although the policy of imposing sentences below the minimum carries the risk of creating legal uncertainty, the Supreme Court in this case reinterpreted the principle of legality. Judges tend to prioritize proportionality and substantive justice to avoid purely mechanical punishment. The study concludes that, while judicial discretion represents a concrete expression of judicial independence, such practice requires clearer normative parameters. Without explicit regulation, deviations from the statutory minimum risk widening disparities in judicial decisions. Therefore, standardized sentencing guidelines are necessary to preserve legal integrity while maintaining a sense of justice for defendants.

The enforcement of civil court judgments in Indonesia frequently encounters obstacles due to parties’ bad faith conduct, such as covert asset transfers or groundless resistance to execution. Although the principle of good faith is a foundational tenet in civil law, its application in the enforcement phase remains inconsistent. This study examines the concept and legal status of the good faith principle in Indonesian positive law concerning civil judgment enforcement and analyzes the legal consequences of its violation. A normative juridical method is employed, utilizing library-based research on primary and secondary legal sources. The findings reveal that while good faith is recognized in substantive civil law, it has not been explicitly incorporated into civil procedural law. Consequently, bad faith actions during enforcement rarely incur clear procedural sanctions. Theoretically, this underscores the need to integrate ethical principles into civil procedure doctrine; practically, it calls for regulatory reforms to embed good faith as a binding procedural obligation in judgment enforcement.

Penelitian ini membahas akibat hukum dari penggunaan kuasa jual yang dipalsukan dalam proses balik nama sertipikat hak atas tanah oleh pihak ketiga yang bekerja sama dengan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT), sebagaimana tercermin dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat Nomor 249/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt. Permasalahan utama yang dikaji adalah bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku pemalsuan kuasa jual, kedudukan hukum sertipikat yang telah dibalik nama berdasarkan kuasa palsu, serta perlindungan hukum bagi pemilik tanah yang dirugikan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, dan studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemalsuan kuasa jual untuk balik nama sertipikat merupakan tindak pidana yang menimbulkan konsekuensi hukum tidak hanya bagi pelaku utama, tetapi juga bagi PPAT yang lalai dalam menjalankan kewenangan jabatannya. Sertipikat yang telah dibalik nama berdasarkan akta palsu dapat dibatalkan demi hukum karena cacat administratif dan bertentangan dengan asas kepastian hukum. Pemilik berhak memperoleh perlindungan hukum berupa pemulihan hak atas tanah maupun ganti kerugian. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah pentingnya pengawasan terhadap pelaksanaan kewenangan PPAT serta kehati-hatian dalam proses balik nama sertipikat untuk menjamin kepastian dan perlindungan hukum dalam bidang pertanahan.

This study has two main objectives: first, to analyze the application of the principle of ultra petitum partium in talaq divorce cases based on the Decision of the Sleman Religious Court Number 1086/Pdt.G/2024/PA. Smn; Second, to examine the basis of judges' legal considerations in determining matters that are not explicitly requested, especially from the perspective of the protection of the rights of the wife. This study uses a normative juridical method with a case approach and a statute approach. The results of the study show that the provision of iddah maintenance by the judge based on the mediation agreement of the parties does not violate the principle of ultra petitum partium. However, the determination of mut'ah in the absence of an explicit request in the petitum has the potential to be contrary to this principle. However, the judge's actions can be justified through ex officio authority in order to protect the rights of the wife, in accordance with Article 158 of the Compilation of Islamic Law. These findings highlight the tension between procedural legal certainty and substantive justice in the religious justice system. This study recommends that judges explicitly state legal grounds when exercising ex officio authority, to ensure transparency and accountability in decisions.

Receivable disputes may be resolved through bankruptcy mechanisms that culminate in a bankruptcy ruling. However, legal issues may still arise post-verdict, such as in Commercial Court Decision Number 18/Pdt.Sus-Renvoi/2023/PN Niaga Mdn, where the receivable claim filed by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry was rejected due to late submission. In resolving the case, the judge considered two legal principles: erga omnes and promulgatie. This paper aims to examine the position of these principles in bankruptcy cases and analyze the judge’s legal reasoning regarding the late submission of receivables under Indonesian bankruptcy law. This study uses a normative juridical approach, with the research specification being analytical-descriptive in nature. The data are secondary in form and are collected through literature review. The method of data analysis employed is qualitative normative analysis. The findings of this study show that the erga omnes and promulgatie principles hold a significant position within Indonesian bankruptcy law. These principles are implicitly reflected in Article 15 paragraph (4) and Article 24 paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Law (UUKPKPU). These principles apply insofar as there are no specific provisions limiting their application. In this case, the judge's legal reasoning in deciding the renvoi procedure is deemed inaccurate because there is a specific provision that governs the late submission of receivable claims. Therefore, the application of the erga omnes and promulgatie principles should have been subject to such limitation.

Sertifikat tanah berfungsi sebagai alat bukti yang sah. Sertifikat memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak, dengan syarat data fisik dan data yuridis tercantum di dalamnya. Terutama dalam jual beli dengan penjual yang tidak diketahui keberadaanya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi deskriptif analitis. Penelitian ini mengenai perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli untuk balik nama sertifikat yang penjualnya tidak diketahui keberadaannya dan dasar pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam memberikan putusan terkait perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli serta akibat hukumnya dinyatakan dalam putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tarakan No.57/Pdt.G/2022/PN Tar. Perlindungan hukum dilakukan melalui peradilan sebagai upaya menuntut hak. Majelis Hakim mempertimbangkan dengan adanya bukti surat dan saksi yang dihadirkan. Akibat hukum tergugat terbukti melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum Pasal 1365-1367 KUHPerdata, yang merugikan penggugat dengan menghalangi haknya sebagai pemilik. Kesimpulan 1)pembeli dapat menggunakan sertifikat sebagai alat bukti hak atas tanah meski tanpa bukti lengkap. Serta, pihak dirugikan dapat mengajukan eksekusi rill Pasal 1241 KUHPerdata. 2)majelis hakim mempertimbangkan jual beli sah berdasarkan bukti dan keterangan saksi. 3)Majelis hakim menetapkan tergugat melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum Pasal 1365-1367 KUHPerdata. Tindakan tergugat melanggar hak subjektif, kewajiban hukum, serta asas kepatutan. Saran 1)masyarakat perlu memahami prosedur legal kelengkapan dokumen dalam transaksi tanah untuk mencegah masalah dikemudian hari. 2)majelis hakim harus mencerminkan keadilan, kemanfaatan, dan kepastian hukum melalui pertimbangan serta pengembangan peraturan yang relevan. 3)majelis hakim harus mengutamakan keadilan, kepastian hukum serta mempertimbangkan aspek sosial dan kepentingan umum dalam perkara hal ini peralihan hak atas tanah.

The Constitutional Court's decision not only affects individuals or certain groups, but also has significant consequences for the public and the country as a whole. The Constitutional Court's decision provides legal certainty for society and the government by determining the implementation or cancellation of a policy that can help create a stable and predictable legal environment. This research is a normative research by studying and basing it on secondary data. Then analyzed using qualitative analysis. The results of this study indicate that the interests recognized by law in Indonesia regarding legal standing still revolve around proving real losses as a form of interest recognized by the Constitution. The principle of erga omnes has an important meaning in the Constitutional Court's decision. An appropriate alternative is needed to ensure that the decision that then has an impact on everyone does not result in new constitutional losses for parties who are not in dispute. the implementation of the Constitutional Court's decision still faces serious challenges, ranging from delays in implementation to ignoring the decision by related institution.

The purpose of this study is to determine the judge's considerations in issuing a decision stating that the certificate of ownership does not have binding legal force and the legal consequences of the decision stating that the certificate of ownership does not have binding legal force based on the initial survey conducted by the researcher, it was found that the lawsuit was filed after 5 years had passed. This study uses normative legal research with a case study (case approach). Data collection uses literature studies. Data collection and processing procedures are carried out using qualitative legal analysis. The results of the study indicate that the requirements for a certificate of ownership that does not have legal force that are often violated are the lack of good faith in obtaining the land. Meanwhile, violations of the requirements for land that is not directly or indirectly controlled by the owner, although related to other requirements, do not mean that the Certificate of Ownership has strong legal force. This is because of the requirements of Article 32 paragraph 2 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning land registration. There are several legal consequences. These legal consequences can be divided into two types, namely legal consequences that apply retroactively or backward and legal consequences that apply forward. As well as the legal consequences and in substance, these legal consequences are in line with the form of achievement in contract law as regulated in Article 1234 of the Civil Code.

The Constitutional Court of Indonesia is a judicial institution with the authority to review laws against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, resolve disputes between state institutions, decide on the dissolution of political parties, and adjudicate election result disputes. In exercising its authority, the Constitutional Court functions not only as the guardian of the constitution but also as a protector of human rights. This article aims to analyze how the procedural law of the Constitutional Court, as regulated under Law Number 24 of 2003 and its amendments, serves as a crucial instrument to ensure fair, transparent, and accountable proceedings in cases involving constitutional rights. This study adopts a normative juridical approach by examining legislation, legal doctrines, and Constitutional Court decisions that have had a significant impact on the protection of human rights. The analysis reveals that several rulings of the Court have expanded interpretations of human rights, although challenges remain regarding the consistency of procedural application and the effectiveness of decision enforcement. Therefore, strengthening the procedural law of the Constitutional Court is essential for ensuring the substantive and sustainable protection of human rights in Indonesia.  

The in dubio pro reo principle is a fundamental principle in criminal law that states that if there is doubt in the proof of a case, then the decision must be taken in favor of the defendant. The application of this principle is particularly crucial in rape and murder cases, where the legal consequences faced by the accused are severe. However, the use of this principle often causes debate because it can have an impact on the sense of justice for victims and society. This research uses a normative qualitative method with a normative juridical approach to analyze laws and regulations, legal doctrines, and court decisions related to the application of the in dubio pro reo principle. Data was collected through literature study by analyzing relevant court decisions. The results showed that the application of this principle is based on the negatief wettelijk evidentiary system, which requires a minimum of two valid pieces of evidence and the judge's conviction to impose a sentence. However, in practice, the difficulty of proof in rape and murder cases can lead to the defendant being acquitted despite indications of guilt. Therefore, the balance between the protection of the defendant's rights and justice for the victim must be considered in the application of this principle.

This study aims to examine the legal aspects of the restoration of political rights of former convicts in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 4/PUU/VII/2009, with a focus on the protection of human rights in the constitution. The decision is important in the context of changes in the law governing political rights for former convicts in Indonesia, which were previously limited by the existing legal system. In this decision, the Constitutional Court ruled that restrictions on political rights for former convicts were not in line with the principles of human rights guaranteed in the 1945 Constitution. This study uses a normative approach by analyzing laws and regulations, Constitutional Court decisions, and legal doctrines related to human rights and political rights. The results of the study indicate that the restoration of political rights for former convicts is an important step in ensuring the protection of human rights, as well as creating a more rehabilitative and inclusive criminal justice system. In addition, the decision also has important implications for efforts to improve the legal system in Indonesia, which should pay more attention to the rehabilitation of convicts and the restoration of their social status after serving their sentence.

On February 17, 2012, the Constitutional Court granted the lawsuit filed by Hj. Aisyah Mochtar who filed a judicial review of Article 34 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. This lawsuit arose from her marriage to Moerdiono in accordance with Islam which was not officially registered, which gave birth to a son, Iqbal Ramadhan. The Constitutional Court's decision changed the status of illegitimate children, who previously only had a civil relationship with the mother, now also have a civil relationship with the father and the father's family. This decision applies not only to children born from unregistered marriages, but also to children from relationships between men and women without the bonds of marriage which can be proven through technology such as DNA testing. These children are entitled to civil rights protection, such as maintenance and education, but are not related to guardianship issues. In its considerations, the Constitutional Court emphasized that the law must provide fair protection and legal certainty for the status of children, including those born even though their marriage is still disputed. Eliminating discrimination against illegitimate children aims to provide positive value for the future of children. The obligation of alimony that was previously only borne by the mother, is now shared with the father who can be proven to have a blood relationship with the child. If the father neglects to fulfill his obligations, he can be sued in court. The next question is how the Constitutional Court Decision will be implemented regarding the recognition of the lineage of children born outside of legal marriage.

The phenomenon of nikah sirri (unregistered marriage) in Indonesia presents critical challenges in family law, particularly concerning the legal status of children born from such unions. This study examines judicial determinations of child origin by the Religious Courts as a legal mechanism to grant civil legitimacy to children from nikah sirri. Using a normative qualitative approach and analyzing two court decisions (No. 0648/Pdt.P/2018/PA.Lmj and No. 1731/Pdt.P/2022/PA.Jr), the research explores how judges consider the principles of justice, legal certainty, and legal utility through the lens of Gustav Radbruch’s legal philosophy. Findings reveal that judicial reasoning in these cases transcends procedural formalism, reflecting an ethical commitment to the holistic protection of children’s rights. The study applies the Maqasid al-Shari’ah framework to evaluate how such rulings align with the five fundamental objectives of Islamic law (protection of life, lineage, property, intellect, and religion). The legal recognition of a child’s nasab and entitlements is shown to fulfill both statutory requirements and Islamic ethical standards of justice. Thus, this research underscores the need to strengthen the synergy between state law and Islamic moral values, positioning the court not merely as a formal legal apparatus, but as a transformative institution in achieving substantive justice in society.

Electronic Fund Transfer is a fund transfer method that is often used because it saves time and costs. However, along with the development of Information and Communication Technology, this method is becoming increasingly vulnerable to cybercrime due to its implementation using electronic systems. In 2021, Oleksandr Chuiko, Maryna Kahalnytska, and Andrei Turskiy stole electronic information from Bank BRI ATM cards and transferred the data to World Elite ATM cards. This action violated Article 81 of the Transfer of Funds Act and Article 35 of the Electronic Information and Transactions Act. The main charge in this case, Article 81 of the Transfer of Funds Act, has sparked debate due to the defendants use of computer technology regulated by the Electronic Information and Transactions Law.

This research aims to analyze the judge's considerations regarding the circumstances of mitigating the sentence in the Supreme Court decision Number 813k/Pid/2023 based on the principle of proportionality of punishment. The principle of proportionality of punishment is a principle of criminal law which demands that the punishment given must be proportional to the error committed by the convict. The research method used is a literature study by collecting and analyzing data from relevant Supreme Court decisions as well as theoretical reviews related to the principle of proportionality of punishment. The research results show that the judge's consideration of Inspector General Ferdy Sambo's service as a member of the National Police as a mitigating circumstance was appropriate. Although theoretically, a person's service should not be used as a reason to mitigate punishment, in practice, the service of a defendant is often considered in court decisions in Indonesia. However, the judge's consideration of merit as a reason for mitigating punishment in this case was not sufficient to reduce the reproach attached to the defendant, especially with his state apparatus status. Therefore, the decision of the panel of judges to change the sentence to life imprisonment was wrong and not in accordance with the principle of proportionality

In legislative negotiations, the position of the constitutional court is quite high. The constitutional court can change laws that conflict with the constitution by declaring that the law does not have binding legal force. And also the decision of the Constitutional Court is final and binding. So any decision of the constitutional court cannot be contested, even by the MKMK because the decision that has been determined is a permanent decision. So this journal was created to focus on the Constitutional Court decision No.90/PUU-XXI/2023 in the context of Protection of Citizens' Constitutional Rights and Human Rights. This research method is focused on the literature case study method and analysis of previous documents related to the title of this research. Because the Constitutional Court Decision No.90/PUU-XXI/2023 is a quite complex problem for people who do not agree with the decision and question whether the decision can be an effort to protect the constitutional rights of citizenship and human rights.

Sebelum tahun 1960, di Indonesia berlaku dualisme hukum pertanahan yaitu berlaku hukum-hukum tanah kolonial Belanda, tanah yang tunduk dan diatur hukum Perdata barat yang sering disebut tanah barat atau tanah Eropa. Didalam hukum perdata barat diatur mengenai hak barat, yang mana hak barat merupakan hak atas tanah bagi orang asing yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang. Hak atas tanah tersebut dibagi menjadi 4 (empat) macam yaitu hak Eigendom, hak Opstal, hak Erfpacht dan hak Gebruik. Setelah berlakunya Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPAhak tersebut dikonversi menjadi hak milik, hak guna bagunan, hak pakai, hak guna usaha. Dalam prakteknya terdapat masih adanya tumpang tindih Sertifikat Hak Milik (SHM), seperti hasil pada kasus Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 321/Pdt/G/2018/PN dimana terdapat dua Sertifikat Hak Milik (SHM) untuk satu obyek yang sama. Dengan adanya kasus tersebut, tujuan dari karya tulis ini untuk dapat melihat bagaimana penyelesaian terhadap sengketa kepemilikan pemegang hak atas tanah Eigendom Verponding setelah berlakunya hukum Agraria Nasional, Apa pertimbangan Hakim tentang sengketa kepemilikan pemegang  hak atas tanah barat Eigendom Verponding setelah berlakunya Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria tanah yang tanda bukti haknya tumpang tindih, dan bagaimana status kepemilikan bidang tanah barat Eigendom Verponding yang tanda bukti haknya setelah konversi menurut Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif yang menekankan pendekatan hukum dengan melihat peraturan perundang-undangan, baik bahan hukum primer maupun sekunder, atau dengan melihat peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku untuk memecahkan masalah. Dari hasil penelitin ini diketahui jika penyelesaian sengketa berdasarkan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Semarang Nomor 321/Pdt/G./2018/PN adalah dengan memenangkan penggugat dikarenakan penggugat memiliki asal usul SHM yang berasal dari SHGB tahun 1984. Pertimbangan hakim Pengadilan Negeri Semarang atas putusan Nomor 321/Pdt/G./2018/PN adalah SHGB merupakan alas hak untuk dapat dilakukan peningkatan hak menjadi Sertifikat Hak Milik (SHM). Sehinga pemilik obyek yang mempunyai SHM dengan asal usul Sertifikat Hak Guna Bangunan(SHGB)  adalah pemilik yang sah.

Pendaftaran peralihan hak atas tanah yang dianut di Indonesia menggunakan sistem publikasi negatif yang mengandung unsur positif. Pendaftaran peralihan hak atas tanah melalui jual beli pada dasarnya untuk menjalankan asas publisitas untuk memberikan kepastian dan perlindungan hukum terhadap pembeli. Akan tetapi masih ada masyarakat yang tidak melakukan pendaftaran peralihan hak atas tanah tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisa perlindungan hukum terhadap pembeli hak atas tanah melalui Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Sementara yang tidak didaftarkan, pertimbangan hakim didalam memutus perkara berkaitan dengan perlindungan hukum terhadap pembeli hak atas tanah melalui Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Sementara yang tidak didaftarkan dalam Putusan Nomor 17/Pdt.G/2021/ PN.Wat, dan akibat hukum terhadap pembeli hak atas tanah melalui Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Sementara yang tidak didaftarkan. Metode pendekatan yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif, spesifikasi penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif analitis, dengan menggunakan sumber data sekunder, yang diperoleh dari penelitian kepustakaan (library research), setelah data terkumpul akan dianalisis dan disistematisasikan secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa (1) Pembeli tidak mendapatkan perlindungan hukum terhadap jual beli hak atas tanah melalui Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Sementara yang tidak didaftarkan karena pembeli tidak mendapatkan surat tanda bukti kuat yang dikeluarkan oleh pemerintah berupa sertifikat tanah. Pembeli dapat memperjuangkan terhadap perlindungan dan kepastian hukum dengan mengajukan gugatan di Pengadilan (2) hakim memberikan pertimbangan hukum dengan melihat peristiwa hukum yang telah terjadi dengan dasar adanya Akta Jual Beli Nomor 62/2001 yang dibuat oleh Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Sementara dan juga bukti-bukti yang diajukan para pihak dalam perkara tersebut. (3) Akibat hukum terhadap Pembeli yang tidak melakukan pendaftaran peralihan hak atas tanah yaitu pembeli tidak mendapatkan sertifikat tanah sebagai alat pembuktian yang kuat kepemilikan tanah.