In today’s era, the use of renewable energy is increasingly becoming a major focus in energy increasingly becoming carbon emissions. One of the applications of renewable energy in industrial life is the use of solar panels for street lighting systems, especially on toll road lights that  require continuous and efficient lighting. This study aims to analyze the basic theory of how solar panels work an their application to toll road lights, taking into account energy efficiency, power deviation, and stability of electricity supply. The analysis method is carried out through literature studies and mathematical calculation in the application of solar panels to toll road lights. The result of the analysis show that the solar panle system is able to meet the energy needs of toll road lights, especially in areas with high sunlight intensity. In addition, the use if lithium batteries as energy storage has proven effective in maintaining the stability of electricity supply at night or in cloudy weather

Psychological tests are widely used to reveal various aspects of the individual as needed, one type of psychological test that exists is a personality test. Personality tests can be divided into objective tests and projective tests. This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of objective and projective personality tests to reveal aspects of individual personality by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of each test. This research was conducted using a qualitative method in the form of a literature study by reading articles and journals that are linear with the research topic. The results of this research are: 1) Advantages and Disadvantages Between Objective and Projective Tests, 2) Ideal Time to Use One of the Two Types of Personality Tests, 3) Case Studies Regarding the Use of Objective and Projective Personality Tests.

Sengketa waris dalam hukum Islam sering kali menuntut adanya peran mujtahid, khususnya hakim, dalam menafsirkan dan menerapkan kaidah hukum untuk mencapai keadilan bagi para pihak. Tujuan penelitian ini ini menganalisis peran mujtahid dalam suatu kasus sengketa waris yang melibatkan status harta bersama, harta bawaan, serta keberadaan utang pewaris. Berdasarkan Pasal 35 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 yang telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019, serta Pasal 97 Kompilasi Hukum Islam, hakim harus memastikan bahwa pembagian harta dilakukan sesuai ketentuan hukum Islam. Dalam kasus ini, hakim sebagai mujtahid menilai bahwa harta yang disengketakan merupakan harta bersama yang belum dibagi, sehingga janda pewaris berhak atas setengah bagian sebelum pembagian warisan kepada ahli waris lainnya. Selain itu, dalam menentukan keberadaan utang pewaris, hakim menggunakan prinsip pembuktian dalam Pasal 163 HIR dan Pasal 174 HIR, di mana pengakuan tergugat di persidangan menjadi bukti sempurna terkait utang yang diakui. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif  dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peran mujtahid dalam kasus ini tidak hanya sebatas menerapkan hukum secara tekstual, tetapi juga mempertimbangkan aspek keadilan substantif dengan mengacu pada dalil-dalil hukum, fakta persidangan, dan prinsip keadilan dalam Islam. Dengan demikian, penerapan ijtihad oleh hakim dalam perkara ini memastikan bahwa pembagian warisan dilakukan secara sah, adil, dan sesuai dengan hukum yang berlaku. Dalam putusan nomor 596/Pdt.G/2023/PA.SKA dalam sengketa waris putusan tersebut hanya saja diselesaikan antara kedua belah pihak yang bersengketa sehingga menurut penulis perlu adanya keberadaan mujtahid dalam sengketa waris tersebut agar memberikan kepastian hukum jelas.

This community service aims to foster an entrepreneurial spirit through optimizing community creativity in processing pineapple into processed products. This community service uses a training method targeting PKK mothers in Belik Village, Belik District, Pemalang Regency. The training activity was carried out on June 30, 2024 at the Belik Village Hall. The PKK mothers were very enthusiastic about participating in the pineapple wingko making activity. This was proven by their attention to following the activity until it was finished. The result of this community service was that there was one MSME that succeeded in making pineapple wingko and marketing it in the village environment. Although it is still at the village level, this proves that an entrepreneurial spirit has been built so that it generates additional income. Pineapple is the main agricultural commodity in Belik District which can be developed through diversification of processed products that have high selling value and increase the selling value of pineapple. Pineapples, which are usually sold whole as fruit, are now being developed into pineapple wingko.

This article aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of legislation in the management and protection of peatlands in Tanjung Jabung Timur Regency, as well as to identify the main obstacles and legal strategies that can be applied to overcome them. The background of the issue highlights that peatlands have significant ecological functions, particularly in maintaining environmental balance and mitigating climate change. Their existence faces serious threats due to land conversion, fires, and uncontrolled exploitation. The urgency of this research lies in the need to review the effectiveness of the regulations that have been implemented to ensure the sustainability of the peatland ecosystem functions, as well as the balance between utilization and environmental conservation. This research adopts a normative juridical approach with a descriptive-analytical method. The data used consists of secondary data obtained through a literature study of legislation, court decisions, scientific journals, and relevant policy documents. The novelty of this study lies in its specific focus on examining the implementation of legal regulations in peatland management in Tanjung Jabung Timur Regency, differing from previous studies that have been more general at the national level. The research findings indicate that the main obstacles in the implementation of peatland management laws include weak law enforcement, regulatory overlaps, conflicts of interest, and low public legal awareness. To address these challenges, optimal strategies are required, including strengthening coordination among state institutions, harmonizing regulations, enforcing strict sanctions, and utilizing technology for monitoring and law enforcement. With these strategies, it is expected that a balance between the utilization and protection of peatlands can be achieved in accordance with the principles of sustainable development.
 
Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas implementasi peraturan perundang-undangan dalam pengelolaan dan perlindungan lahan gambut di Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur serta mengidentifikasi hambatan utama dan strategi hukum yang dapat diterapkan guna mengatasinya. Latar belakang permasalahan menunjukkan bahwa lahan gambut memiliki fungsi ekologis yang signifikan, terutama dalam menjaga keseimbangan lingkungan dan mitigasi perubahan iklim. Keberadaannya menghadapi ancaman serius akibat konversi lahan, kebakaran, serta eksploitasi yang tidak terkendali. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada perlunya peninjauan efektivitas regulasi yang telah diterapkan untuk memastikan keberlanjutan fungsi ekosistem gambut serta keseimbangan antara pemanfaatan dan konservasi lingkungan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan metode deskriptif-analitis.  Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada fokusnya yang secara spesifik menelaah implementasi hukum dalam pengelolaan lahan gambut di Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur, berbeda dari kajian sebelumnya yang lebih bersifat umum pada tingkat nasional. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kendala utama dalam implementasi hukum pengelolaan lahan gambut meliputi lemahnya penegakan hukum, tumpang tindih regulasi, konflik kepentingan, serta minimnya kesadaran hukum masyarakat. Untuk mengatasi hambatan tersebut, diperlukan strategi optimal berupa penguatan koordinasi antar lembaga negara, harmonisasi regulasi, penerapan sanksi tegas, serta pemanfaatan teknologi dalam pengawasan dan penegakan hukum. Dengan strategi ini, diharapkan keseimbangan antara pemanfaatan dan perlindungan lahan gambut dapat terwujud sesuai dengan prinsip pembangunan berkelanjutan.

This research aims to analyse the preventive legal role of the Ministry of Communication and Digital (Komdigi) in combating child pornography content on social media through a normative legal framework. The rise of content containing pornographic elements is increasing in this era of development. Therefore, Komdigi as a government institution has an essential role in handling and preventing pornographic content on social media accounts. This research approach uses the normative method by using written laws and regulations and other legal materials as references. This study concludes that there is a legal basis that regulates child pornography, but there are still shortcomings in the existing legal instruments. Furthermore, in making preventive legal efforts, Komdigi blocks pornographic content through the crawling method and collaborates with other agencies to present child-friendly content. However, in the process, there are still some obstacles. Komdigi carries out a strategic role through the crawling method to block harmful content and cooperates with other agencies to present child-friendly content. The novelty of this study lies in emphasising the institutional-based prevention dimension that supports the implementation of Pancasila values in digital space governance. This study contributes by highlighting Komdigi's strategic prevention function in grounding Pancasila values through digital content governance, an aspect that is not widely discussed in previous legal studies

This study analyzes the juridical validity of amendments to articles of association that lead to share dilution and their implications for minority shareholders in Indonesian corporate law. The urgency arises from the growing number of corporate actions that, while procedurally legal, result in substantive disadvantages for minority shareholders, creating governance imbalances. Using a normative juridical method, the research examines relevant laws, doctrines, and legal principles governing shareholder protection in share dilution cases. The findings reveal that amendments to articles of association often result in a loss of ownership percentage and voting power for minority shareholders due to inadequate safeguards such as pre-emptive rights. The study highlights the gap between formal legal compliance and substantive fairness, identifying weaknesses in both enforcement and regulatory oversight. The novelty of this research lies in its focus on the intersection between corporate governance and minority rights in the context of articles of association amendments, an area that remains underexplored in Indonesian legal scholarship. The study concludes that current protections are insufficient and recommends legal reforms, including enhanced minority veto rights, stronger enforcement mechanisms, and the institutionalization of accessible dispute resolution avenues.

This research aims to examine the legal limitations in the application of excessive self-defense (noodweerexces) and its implications for criminal liability in the Indonesian criminal law system. The urgency of this study stems from inconsistencies in judicial practice regarding the interpretation of reasonable limits in self-defense cases, creating legal uncertainty and potential injustice. This research employs a normative juridical method examining legal regulations, theories, principles, and court decisions related to justification and pardon in Indonesian criminal law. The findings indicate that the application of excessive self-defense requires particular attention to avoid violating fundamental principles of justice, with both objective and subjective evaluations necessary to ensure fair law enforcement. The study reveals that variations in judicial decisions necessitate clearer guidelines to ensure legal certainty, while psychological factors of perpetrators significantly influence considerations in noodweerexces assessments. This research contributes new insights by specifically integrating the analysis of objective legal standards with subjective psychological states in criminal liability determination, filling the gap left by previous studies that examined these aspects separately. The study recommends the development of standardized judicial guidelines through Supreme Court circular letters (SEMA) and mandatory training for judges on psychological assessment in self-defense cases, as well as the incorporation of forensic psychology experts in the judicial process for noodweerexces cases.

This study aims to analyze defaults in cooperation agreements and examine the rights and obligations of the parties in dispute resolution. The urgency of this research arises from the increasing occurrence of defaults in cooperation agreements, which have significant legal and economic consequences for business relationships and economic stability. Using a normative juridical approach, the research examines provisions of the Indonesian Civil Code and relevant legal doctrines, focusing on dispute resolution mechanisms through litigation and alternative methods. Primary legal sources include the Civil Code (KUHPerdata), Law No. 30/1999 on Arbitration, and Supreme Court regulations, while secondary sources comprise legal journals and court decisions. The findings show that default in cooperation agreements results in legal consequences such as compensation, agreement termination, and performance enforcement. Several procedural conditions must be met, including the seriousness of the breach and timely legal action. The study provides a novel contribution by combining normative legal analysis with practical considerations in resolving contractual disputes within the Indonesian legal framework. It concludes that cooperation agreements must clearly define mutual obligations and dispute resolution procedures to ensure legal certainty and fairness. The research recommends that parties include specific clauses addressing default and adopt alternative dispute resolution mechanisms to reduce litigation and maintain business relationships.

This research examines the prevention and protection measures that can be taken by notaries in their dual role as controllers and processors of personal data. This research is motivated by the limited awareness of some notaries regarding their legal obligations to protect the personal data of witnesses, as mandated by the Personal Data Protection Law (UUPDP). This research contributes new insights by framing notaries as Controllers and Processors under the UUPDP, an aspect that has rarely been emphasized in previous legal literature. The novelty of this study lies in its specific focus on notaries’ dual capacity as both Controllers and Processors of personal data under Indonesian law, particularly in the context of witness data handling an area that has not been thoroughly examined in existing scholarship. Using normative juridical methods with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study found that notaries have dual responsibilities in managing witness data and must proactively comply with the UUPDP to prevent legal risks. These responsibilities include obtaining approvals, establishing internal data protection policies, and implementing secure technologies such as encryption and regular audits. Strengthening the role of notaries in personal data protection will foster greater legal certainty and public trust in the notary profession. The integration of these findings with practical recommendations emphasizes the need for regulatory guidance and professional capacity building to support compliance with personal data protection standards.