Online Gender-Based Violence (OGBV) is an escalating phenomenon in Indonesia, driven by the advancement of digital technology, which enables perpetrators to commit various forms of gender-based violence through online platforms. Data from the National Commission on Violence Against Women (Komnas Perempuan) indicate a sharp rise in OGBV cases, from 1,200 cases in 2018 to 8,500 cases in 2023, suggesting that existing regulations remain insufficient in providing adequate protection for victims. This study aims to analyze the challenges in the criminalization of OGBV in Indonesia and to evaluate the effectiveness of existing regulations, particularly the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) and the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP). A juridical approach with qualitative analysis is employed, incorporating an examination of current regulations, case studies of court rulings, and interviews with victims and law enforcement officials. The findings reveal that sanctions imposed on perpetrators remain relatively lenient, with only 18% of reported cases being processed by law enforcement, and less than 6% resulting in convictions. Furthermore, existing regulations do not comprehensively address the various forms of OGBV, making it challenging for victims to seek justice. This study underscores the necessity for a more specific and gender-sensitive revision of criminal law to enhance victim protection. The findings are expected to serve as a foundation for policymakers in formulating more effective regulations to combat OGBV in Indonesia.

The supervision and enforcement of the advocate code of ethics in Indonesia continue to face various challenges, impacting the effectiveness of the existing regulatory framework. The number of ethical violations committed by advocates has been increasing, from 120 cases in 2018 to 345 cases in 2023, with the most prevalent infractions including conflicts of interest, abuse of authority, and gratification. One of the primary factors contributing to the weak enforcement of the code of ethics is the limited oversight system, which remains confined to advocate organizations without the involvement of independent institutions. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the advocate supervision system in Indonesia, compare it with best practices in other countries, and identify measures that can be implemented to enhance accountability and transparency within the profession. The research employs a normative legal method with a comparative law approach and empirical studies. The analysis is conducted on existing regulations, case reports on violations, and interviews with key stakeholders, including advocates, clients, and legal observers. The findings reveal that only 40% of reported violations result in strict sanctions, while merely 10% of advocates found guilty of ethical misconduct face license revocation. Additionally, a survey of 500 respondents indicates that only 35% of the public is aware of the complaint procedures against advocates who breach ethical standards, highlighting the low level of transparency in the supervision system. This study contributes to the discourse by recommending the establishment of an independent institution to oversee advocates' compliance with ethical standards, as well as the increased utilization of digital technology in the supervision system. With more transparent and accountable oversight reforms, it is expected that ethical violations within the legal profession can be minimized, thereby strengthening public trust in Indonesia’s legal system

The increasing number of juveniles encountering the legal system in Indonesia underscores the need for a more effective approach within the juvenile criminal justice system (SPPA). Restorative Justice (RJ) has been adopted as an alternative to the conventional punitive-oriented judicial system. However, the implementation of RJ in Indonesia continues to face several challenges, including a lack of understanding among law enforcement officers, limited rehabilitation facilities, and minimal victim participation in the resolution process. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of RJ in resolving juvenile criminal offenses in Indonesia while identifying the challenges and strategies for improving its implementation. The research employs a normative and empirical legal approach, utilizing case studies of juvenile offenses resolved through RJ. Data is collected through interviews with law enforcement officials, victims, and offenders, as well as an analysis of relevant regulations, such as Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Findings reveal that over the past five years, the average success rate of RJ in resolving juvenile cases in Indonesia has reached 60%, with a 45% reduction in recidivism rates compared to the formal judicial system. However, obstacles such as inadequate legal training for law enforcement personnel and limited rehabilitation facilities remain significant challenges in RJ implementation. This study contributes to policy reform discussions on juvenile justice in Indonesia by recommending capacity-building initiatives for legal practitioners and strengthening victim engagement mechanisms in the RJ process. Additionally, it highlights the need for increased investment in rehabilitation infrastructure and further research into the application of RJ in addressing the rising cases of cyber-related offenses among juveniles

The gig economy has experienced rapid growth in Indonesia, with a rising number of platform-based workers engaged through digital platforms such as Gojek, Grab, Shopee, and Tokopedia. However, the legal status of gig workers remains unclear, leading to weak labor protections, particularly in terms of access to social security and compliance with minimum wage standards. This study aims to analyze the legal protection available for gig workers in Indonesia and identify regulatory reforms necessary to improve their welfare. Using a normative juridical and empirical approach, the research examines existing labor regulations and conducts a survey involving 300 gig workers in the transportation, logistics, and digital service sectors. The findings reveal that 60% of gig workers lack social security coverage, 70% do not receive wages that meet minimum standards, and only 20% have formal employment contracts. Furthermore, 72% of workers report income instability, while 85% express the need for clearer regulations to safeguard their rights. The study highlights that the ambiguous legal status of gig workers in Indonesia contributes to high job insecurity and significant disparities in labor protection compared to formal sector employees. Therefore, more adaptive regulatory reforms are needed to ensure that gig workers receive legal protection equivalent to that of workers in the formal sector. The findings of this study are expected to serve as a foundation for policymakers in designing more inclusive and responsive labor regulations that address the evolving dynamics of employment in the digital era.

Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) present significant opportunities for the creative industry in digitizing and monetizing artistic works. However, a major challenge arises in copyright protection, particularly in Indonesia, which has yet to establish specific regulations addressing NFTs within its intellectual property (IP) law framework. Currently, legal protection relies on Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright, which does not fully accommodate the characteristics of blockchain technology. This study aims to analyze copyright protection in Indonesia's NFT ecosystem, compare it with regulatory frameworks in the United States and the European Union, and provide policy recommendations that are more adaptive to the advancement of digital technology. The research adopts a normative juridical approach, incorporating comparative legal analysis and empirical studies through interviews with 15 key stakeholders, including digital artists and legal practitioners. The findings indicate that 78% of respondents perceive Indonesia’s current regulatory framework as ineffective in protecting NFT copyrights, whereas regulatory developments in the United States and the European Union have successfully reduced NFT copyright disputes by 40% over the past five years. Additionally, an analysis of 30 NFT-related disputes on OpenSea and Rarible reveals that 65% of cases involve copyright claims that cannot be effectively resolved through national legal mechanisms. This study recommends implementing a takedown notice mechanism, integrating smart contracts for creator royalties, and strengthening digital arbitration frameworks within Indonesia’s legal system. With clearer regulations, Indonesia’s NFT ecosystem is expected to develop with stronger legal protections for digital content creators

The advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has brought significant transformations across various sectors, including the judicial system. Countries such as China and the United States have adopted AI in legal decision-making, whereas Indonesia remains in the early stages of implementing this technology. While AI has the potential to enhance judicial efficiency, challenges related to regulation, transparency, and algorithmic bias raise concerns regarding the accuracy and fairness of legal rulings. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the effectiveness of AI utilization in Indonesia’s judicial system, identify key challenges, and propose policy recommendations. This research employs both normative and empirical approaches by examining AI-related regulations and conducting interviews with judges and technology experts in Indonesia. The findings indicate that 65% of judges in Indonesia remain skeptical about AI's role in legal decision-making. In contrast, in countries like China, AI adoption in the judiciary has improved case resolution efficiency by 30–40%. Additionally, a public survey reveals that while 55% of respondents believe AI can enhance the objectivity of legal rulings, 45% remain concerned about potential algorithmic bias. Furthermore, the study highlights that Indonesia lacks specific regulations governing AI in the legal system, which may hinder the widespread adoption of this technology. This research contributes to understanding the readiness of Indonesia’s judicial system in integrating AI and emphasizes the necessity of clear regulations and robust oversight mechanisms to ensure transparency and accountability. The findings are expected to serve as a foundation for policymakers in formulating comprehensive regulations to optimize AI implementation in the Indonesian judicial system

The oversight and enforcement of the advocate code of ethics in Indonesia continue to face various challenges, affecting the effectiveness of existing regulations. The number of ethical violations among advocates has increased significantly, rising from 120 cases in 2018 to 345 cases in 2023. The most common infractions include conflicts of interest, abuse of authority, and gratuities. One of the primary factors contributing to weak ethical enforcement is the current oversight system, which remains limited to advocate organizations without the involvement of an independent regulatory body. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of advocate oversight mechanisms in Indonesia, compare them with best practices in other jurisdictions, and identify measures to enhance accountability and transparency in the legal profession. The research employs a normative legal method with a comparative law approach and empirical studies. The analysis includes an examination of existing regulations, case reports on ethical violations, and interviews with key stakeholders, including advocates, clients, and legal analysts. The findings indicate that only 40% of reported violations result in strict sanctions, while only 10% of advocates found guilty of ethical breaches face license revocation. Additionally, a survey of 500 respondents reveals that only 35% of the public is aware of the procedures for filing complaints against unethical advocates, highlighting a lack of transparency in the oversight system. This study contributes to the discourse by recommending the establishment of an independent regulatory body to monitor advocate compliance with ethical standards and the enhanced utilization of digital technology in the oversight system. With more transparent and accountable regulatory reforms, ethical violations within the legal profession can be minimized, ultimately strengthening public trust in Indonesia’s legal system.

The community service report regarding education on soil reinforcement using stone gabions in Walantaka District, Kalodran Village, Serang City, aims to increase public understanding of soil reinforcement, educate on techniques for making and installing stone gabions, and encourage community participation in protecting the environment. This activity includes outreach, training and field practice that actively involves the community. The results of this activity show an increase in community knowledge about soil strengthening, the success of installing stone gabions in areas prone to erosion, and high community participation. It is hoped that this activity can continue and become an example for other regions, with recommendations for continuing educational programs on a regular basis, inviting related parties to support similar activities, and encouraging innovation in environmentally friendly soil strengthening techniques. Thank you to all parties who contributed, especially the people of Kalodran Village, I hope this activity will be beneficial for the environment and society.

One of the needs of every person is physical fitness. A good physical fitness condition is able to strengthen the physique that can support effectively and efficiently and reduce excessive fatigue. The purpose of this study is to examine the level of physical fitness of badminton players PB Ganesha Batu City. Data was collected through a survey design with descriptive quantitative. The subjects used were PB Ganesha badminton players Batu City. The instruments applied were the Indonesian Physical Fitness Test (TKJI) 10-12 years and observation as a non-test instrument. Data analysis applied descriptive statistics. The results of the analysis of the physical fitness level of badminton players aged 10-12 years PB Ganesha Kota Batu, namely a total of 20 badminton players, there are 9 players in the good category with a percentage of 45% and 11 badminton players in the medium category with a percentage of 55%. In conclusion, the level of physical fitness of badminton players PB Ganesha Batu City at the age of 10-12 years is categorized as moderate, so the advice given is that badminton players are more motivated to improve physical fitness.

been resolved in Indonesia. This research aims to determine the influence of Port Services, Loading and Unloading Performance, Loading and Unloading Equipment and Natural Factors on Idle Time at the Koja Container Terminal, Tanjung Priok Port, Jakarta. The population in this study were operational employees and ship crew from the deck department division. The sample used in this research was 80 respondents. And using a disproportionate stratified random sampling technique, then the data was analyzed using multiple linear regression with the help of (software) Statistical Package For Social Science (SPSS) Version 25. Based on the research results and data analysis, the regression equation was produced: Y= -1.176+ 0.334X1+ 0.181X2 + 0.318X3 + 0.302X4+ ?. From the equation it is known that the dominant variable influencing Idle Time is the Port Services variable with a regression coefficient of 0.334. The R2 (R square) test obtained a result of (67%), which means that Idle Time at the Koja Container Terminal, Tanjung Priok Port, Jakarta, is influenced by the variables Port Service, Loading and Unloading Performance, Loading and Unloading Equipment and Natural Factors, namely 67%. The conclusion  is  that the independent  variables  (port  services,  loading  and unloading performance, loading and unloading equipment, and natural factors) have a negative and significant effect on the dependent variable Idle Time. This is because the results of the multiple linear regression equation show that t count > t table.