This study aims to determine the criminal responsibility of intellectual disabilities in the legal system in Indonesia and examine how the accountability of drug dealers by people with intellectual disabilities in Decision Number 290 / Pid.Sus / 2019 / PN.Tng which decided the defendant to release and Decision Number 1364k / Pid.Sus / 2017 which decided the defendant to be imprisoned, whether the judge's consideration in deciding the two cases was in accordance with Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics and Article 44 of the Criminal Code. This research is a type of normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied. This legal writing uses a statutory approach and a case approach. The technique of collecting legal materials carried out is by literature study.

This article is to test the effectiveness of Law Number 24 of 2011 concerning Social Security Administering Bodies in PT Companies. LM and sanctions given to companies if they do not carry out the mandate of the Manpower Law. This research method uses an empirical method, namely a process that aims to interpret research data. The results of this research are that the implementation of Law Number 24 of 2011 concerning BPJS related to employment in furniture companies has not been effective. Sanctions imposed on companies that do not carry out the statutory mandate to provide their employees with social security are sanctions in the form of written warnings and fines. 

This research aims to find out and analyze whether the judge's dissenting opinion in case No.0687/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Gtlo regarding the cancellation of this grant provides justice for the parties. The method used in this research is normative juridical with a statutory approach (statute aproach) and a case approach (case aoprouch). The results of this research show that dissenting opinions provide justice for the parties because having a dissenting opinion provides something that is really needed by the parties where the parties feel that their arguments are heard and considered and not set aside by the panel of judges.

This study aims to find out about how the efforts to fulfill the right of alimony from children to parents who are entrusted in  nursing home Griya Lansia “Jannati”. The method used in this study is empirical with qualitative descriptive data analysis that describes and outlines the data and facts of the field. The results of this study showed that the effort to fulfill the right of alimony for the elderly in the nursing home Griya Lansia “Jannati” is not optimal, this is because children do not carry out their obligations in fulfilling the rights of alimony that should be obtained by parents who are in the nursing home Griya Lasia “Jannati”. The child fulfills only a small part of the alimony rights that parents should have. For example, children only provide a living when visiting Within 2 months, and children only visit their parents regularly so that parents feel lonely and abandoned.

Firearms are a big problem when their use can be regulated for civil society, because simply a freedom with big risks will cause other big problems. Providing a sense of security and personal protection by giving rise to abuse will certainly create confusion both for those who regulate it and those who will clearly feel the dangerous impact. This research aims to determine the factors, efforts and obstacles in tackling the crime of possessing firearms without a permit. The research method used in this research uses a normative juridical research approach with a problem approach using a statutory approach. The findings in this research are that a person's internal and external factors greatly influence the efforts that can be made to prevent and overcome criminal acts of possession of firearms and from all forms of efforts made, various obstacles are also found that are present, from the government's quick response in dealing with it to low awareness. the community has an important role in overcoming these legal issues.

this study aims to find out about how the legal liability of football competition organizers in the case of unlawful acts in the tragedy of Kanjuruhan Malang in 2022 based on the Civil Code. The method used in this study is normative with legislation and case approach. Legal materials are collected through library studies, then analyzed prescriptively. The results of the study show that the Kanjuruhan tragedy at the Kanjuruhan Stadium in Malang in 2022 has brought losses to many victims so that there is a need for a form of legal accountability regarding unlawful acts committed by the defendant. For this reason, in civil law, the form of liability is in the form of compensation for damages in unlawful acts under Articles 1365, 1367, 1370 and 1371 of the Civil Code committed by the defendant to the victim.

This research explains the procedure for implementing electronic mortgage registration and discusses legal protection for creditors in mortgage registration through SKMHT in the event of the principal's death. This normative legal research utilizes a prescriptive approach based on legislation, cases, and conceptual analysis Primary data sources include relevant laws and regulations related to mortgages, supplemented by interviews with Notaries and PPAT, as well as secondary legal materials such as books, legal research papers, and previous studies in the form of journals, theses, and dissertations related to the research. Data collection techniques are carried out through interviews, observations, and literature studies Meanwhile, the analysis technique used by the author is qualitative model. The research results indicate that electronic registration of Mortgage Rights is carried out by interested parties through the website https://mitra.atr.bpn.go.id. However, in practice, there are still shortcomings in electronic Mortgage Rights registration, particularly when it is registered using SKMHT (Power of Attorney to Burden Mortgage Rights), and then the certificate owner passes away, the registration of Mortgage Rights cannot be continued. The solution to this problem is to add an optional refinement formulation in the Electronic Mortgage Rights System that allows for the replacement of the Identity Card Number (NIK) of the grantor with the NIK of the recipient if the Mortgage Rights are registered first with a SKMHT.

Land grabbing is the act of taking rights or property arbitrarily or without paying attention to laws and regulations, such as occupying someone else's land or house to which they do not have rights. The act of illegally grabbing land is an act that is against the law, which can be classified as a criminal act. In connection with this case, this is the reason for the author to discuss the factors causing the crime of land grabbing in the Tulang Bawang area as well as efforts to overcome the crime of land grabbing. in the Tulang Bawang area. This research uses a normative juridical approach and is supported by an empirical juridical approach. Data collection was carried out using literature studies and field studies by conducting interviews with Tulang Bawang Sector Police officers, perpetrators and lecturers in the criminal law department at Lampung University, then the data was analyzed qualitatively. The results of the research and discussion show that the causes of land grabbing crimes in Tulang Bawang include environmental factors, weak self-control factors, family factors, and economic factors. Apart from that, efforts to overcome group fights are carried out through 2 (two) means, namely penal and non-penal. Penal measures are carried out only up to the point of reporting to the authorities. Meanwhile, non-penal efforts are carried out through mediation.
 
 

There are provisions regarding trademarks that cannot be registered in Law No. 20 Year 2016, one of which is in Article 20 letter f which states that "Trademarks cannot be registered if they are common names and/or symbols of public property." However, even though there is already a regulation regarding the invalidity of registration of the use of common words in trademarks, there are still many uses of common words as trademarks in Indonesia. This shows that there is still a lack of clarity regarding the parameters of acceptable use of generic words in trademark registration. One of the famous trademark infringement cases using a common word in Indonesia is the case between PT Unilever Indonesia, Tbk. against Hardwood Private Limited with the alleged use of the "STRONG" Trademark with the Supreme Court Decision Number 332 K/Pdt.Sus- IPR/2021. This research aims to discuss the legal action in the settlement of infringement of well-known trademarks that use the word general and the judge's consideration of infringement of well-known trademarks that use the word general based on Indonesian positive law. Based on the research results, the word "STRONG" is an English word that has a strong meaning. Then the word STRONG is a general or generic word that when referring to the explanation in Article 20 of Law No. 20 Year 2016, the word "STRONG" should not be registered as a trademark because it is a common word

Schools, as educational facilities, have a crucial role in improving the quality and standards of national education to make it more advanced. In line with the introduction to PERMENDIKBUD No. 18 of 2019, the government provides compensation in the form of School Operational Assistance Funds (BOS) with the aim of helping fund school operational and non-personnel costs. Implementing school operational assistance is part of the state's responsibility to provide financing to the entire community and is an implementation of the mandate of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia to make the nation's life intelligent. Therefore, the author is interested in analyzing it in research entitled "Legal Responsibilities for Management of School Operational Assistance Funds at SD Negeri 1 Kunjeng, Gubug District" with the problem of what is the legal basis for managing School Operational Assistance Funds (BOS) at SD Negeri 1 Kunjeng and how? Legal responsibility for managing social assistance funds at SD N 1 Kunjeng, Gubug District. This research uses normative juridical which focuses on secondary data supported by the results of interviews and observations and analyzed qualitatively. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that the legal basis for managing BOS funds at SD Negeri 1 Kunjeng is rooted in the 1945 Constitution, specifically Article 31B paragraphs (2) and (3), which requires the state to organize an equitable and high-quality national education system. UUSPN No. 20 of 2003 also becomes the legal basis with Article 50 paragraph (2) which requires the government to provide financial assistance for basic education. Technical instructions from PERMENDIKBUD No. 2 of 2022 provides detailed regulations regarding the management of BOS funds according to the needs of educational units, supporting the government's efforts to create equal and quality access to education. Legal responsibility for managing BOS funds at SD Negeri 1 Kunjeng is centered on the principal and the entire school. The 1945 Constitution requires the state to provide free basic education through a 9-year compulsory education program. BOS funds, as a state financial tool, are channeled directly to schools with the principles of flexibility and transparency