Openness of public information is an important principle in transparent and accountable government. Openness of information also allows citizens to understand the problems faced by the government and how proposed policies may affect their lives. This research describes the resolution of public information disclosure disputes starting from the Information Commission up to the Cassation level at the PTUN. The approach method used in this research is normative juridical research. This research explains the procedures for resolving public information disputes at the PTUN using the litigation adjudication process regulated by Law Number 14 of 2008 concerning Openness of Public Information and PERMA RI Number 2 of 2011 concerning Procedures for Resolving Public Information Disputes in Court.

Land ownership disputes are a common issue in Indonesia, particularly considering that land is a highly valuable asset for the community. Conflicts related to land ownership not only impact individuals but can also trigger disputes involving communities and families. The Certificate of Ownership Rights (SHM) serves as legal proof of land ownership and plays a crucial role in resolving disputes. This study aims to analyze the evidentiary strength of SHM in resolving land disputes in Bondowoso Regency. By using normative legal research methods, this study explores the role of SHM within the context of Indonesia's positive law and how this certificate is applied in dispute cases. The findings indicate that SHM possesses strong evidentiary power in resolving land disputes, provided its validity is recognized and supported by effective law enforcement.

Marriage is a sacred relationship that occurs between a man and a woman with the aim of building a prosperous family. However, in reality, family life can face various situations that cause unhappiness and lead to the dissolution of a marriage. One example of divorce is when a husband disappears without a trace, leaving his wife behind. This research aims to explain and examine the supernatural divorce case based on decision number 1301/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Sby and analyze the judge's considerations in making decisions regarding the case. This research uses normative legal methods, with data collection techniques through literature review. The judge's reasons in cases of unseen divorce include the absence of the defendant whose whereabouts have not been identified or who have been declared missing, as well as the existence of documents from the sub-district explaining the ignorance of the position of the party concerned. The trial can be terminated in verstek if the defendant, having been legally summoned by the court, is still absent for no apparent reason..
 

This research aims to analyze the concept and implications of nusyuz's actions in divorce cases in the Religious Courts. Nusyuz is defined as a wife's defiance of her obligations to her husband. Nusyuz is also often the basis for filing divorce lawsuits, especially divorce petitions for divorce by the husband. This study examines how nusyuz actions are taken into consideration by Religious Court judges in deciding divorce cases, as well as their impact on the wife's rights, such as those related to iddah liaving, mut'ah living, and child custody. By using normative juridical methods based on analysis of direct trials and court decisions, this research finds that nusyuz actions have significant legal consequences for wives, especially in terms of living and other rights after divorce. However, there are also variations in the judge's assessment of the evidence of nusyuz's actions, which has implications for the final outcome of the divorce case.

The purpose of this article is to identify the factors that influence public compliance with traffic regulations and to find solutions for improving compliance. The data collection techniques used in this research include conducting surveys and field interviews, as well as gathering findings from various sources such as books, journals, and existing studies. As a country governed by the rule of law, Indonesia requires its citizens to abide by the laws in force, which is a fundamental principle in the context of law enforcement. The principle of the rule of law forms the foundation of Indonesia’s legal system, applying to all citizens and institutions, including the government. Compliance with the law is essential for maintaining order and harmony in society. Legal awareness is necessary for the comprehensive enforcement of regulations. Both the public and the government are responsible for understanding and complying with applicable laws, as well as fostering legal awareness in the community and future generations. The research findings reveal that the level of public compliance with traffic regulations in Surakarta is indeed influenced by several social factors such as education, honesty, and law enforcement. Based on these factors, solutions for improving public compliance with traffic regulations include strengthening law enforcement and enhancing the quality of education.

The defendant Haris Yasin Limpo, who is the Main Director of the Regional Drinking Water Company (PDAM) of Makassar City, together with Irawan Abadi, committed the crime of corruption by distributing bonuses and company bonuses/services based on Ujung Pandang Level II Regional Regulation Number 6 of 1974 from 2017-2019 should be based on Government Regulation Number 54 of 2017 concerning Regional-Owned Enterprises, the Defendant also paid dual-purpose insurance premiums for the positions of Mayor and Deputy Mayor of Makassar in 2016-2018 even though it is in the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 2 of 2007 concerning Organs and Regional Drinking Water Company personnel who must be included are only Directors and Employees. The imposition of Article 3 of the Corruption Law on the defendant is inappropriate as per Corruption Court Decision Number 59/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2023/PN Mks because the defendant does not fulfill the elements of abusing authority. The panel of judges should apply Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Corruption Law because its elements are more appropriate to the actions committed by the Defendant.

Land acquisition for public interest often gives rise to various legal issues, including disputes between the government, landowners, and other interested parties. These disputes typically revolve around compensation, the acquisition process, and legal certainty. This article aims to analyze the examination mechanism for specific disputes arising from land acquisition for public purposes, by reviewing relevant laws and regulations. The research employs a normative juridical approach to examine statutes, regulations, and court decisions related to land dispute resolution. The findings indicate that although regulations governing dispute resolution mechanisms exist, their implementation often faces challenges, such as unclear compensation values and lack of transparency in the land acquisition process. Therefore, regulatory reforms and increased oversight are necessary to ensure justice and legal certainty for all involved parties.
 

In accordance with Indonesia's Trade Secret Law, the proprietor of any technological or business information that is both uncommon and of economic value is obliged to maintain its confidentiality. It is incumbent upon companies to enter into specific agreements with employees who are privy to this information, with the objective of preventing leaks. The case studies of PT AIA Financial and PT 3D Garmentech illustrate the significance of legal protection and dispute resolution in the context of corporate data leaks. This research employs a qualitative analysis of the issue, utilizing both secondary and primary data and normative legal methods. This research concludes that the owner of a trade secret is entitled to exclusive use and licensing of the trade secret, and may prohibit other parties from using or disclosing such information for commercial purposes, in accordance with Article 4 of the UURD. In the event of a leak, disputes can be resolved through non-litigation channels or, in the event that these prove ineffective, through closed-door courts. A variety of legal protections are available to owners of trade secrets, including the use of confidentiality agreements with employees and the initiation of civil suits for compensation. Additionally, criminal law offers protection, as delineated in Articles 16 and 17 of the UURD. The drafters of the UURD vested the state with the authority to enforce compliance with trade secret legislation.

Electronic credit facilities represent a significant banking innovation, employing technology in a manner that diverges from the established procedures associated with conventional credit. A credit deed that is not in accordance with the formal legal requirements is nevertheless considered to have legal force if the signature is recognized by the relevant parties. This thesis addresses the legal force and position of underhand credit agreements in commercial banks, as well as their suitability with the legal requirements of agreements according to the Civil Code and ITE Law, particularly in instances where the debtor subsequently rejects the signature. This thesis employs normative legal research methods to procure secondary data pertinent to the subject matter. The secondary data comprises primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which are then subjected to qualitative analysis. The research demonstrates that the legal certainty of electronic credit agreements in commercial banks is regulated by the Civil Code Law Number 19 of 2016 on Electronic Information and Transactions, Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 on the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions, and OJK Regulation Number 38/POJK.03/2016 on the Application of Risk Management in the Use of Information Technology by Commercial Banks. In the event of a dispute over the rejection of an electronic signature in an agreement, the matter may be resolved through litigation after all other avenues of non-litigation have been exhausted. In electronic credit agreements, electronic signatures are recognized as valid evidence, thereby affording legal protection to creditors.

Indonesia possesses vast forest areas with great potential. On the other hand, before the establishment of the Indonesian state, indigenous communities already exercised control over forests in the Indonesian territory based on customary rights. Therefore, the existence and customary rights of indigenous communities over forests are recognized in the Constitution. However, in reality, there are still many indigenous communities that their rights to the forests they have managed for generations have not been fully acknowledged, one of them is Cireundeu indigenous community. The lack of recognition causes these communities to face issues related to their customary rights over the forests.In fact, the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia actually guarantees the rights of indigenous peoples regarding their forest. One way to realize that rights is by declarating customary forests for the indigenous communities of Cireundeu. This research examines the importance of the declaration of customary forests for the Cireundeu Indigenous Community in light of the rights of indigenous communities guaranteed by the Constitution. This research is a normative legal study. The approaches used are the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The results of this research indicate that the declaration of customary forests for the indigenous communities of Cireundeu is crucial to ensure their constitutional rights to be recognized and respected, along with their traditional rights, to achieve well-being, particularly in terms of food security, to protect their cultural identity, and to safeguard a healthy and sustainable environment.