This study aims to analyze and find out the analysis of the process of determining polygamous marriage at the Larantuka Religious Court, East Flores Regency. This type of research is an empirical research that uses primary, secondary and tertiary data collected using interview techniques and literature studies and analyzed in a qualitative descriptive manner. The results of the study show that (1) The process of determining polygamous marriage consists of information services, case acceptance and trial activities (2) Factors that affect people not to apply for the determination of polygamy in religious courts, namely lack of knowledge, related to customs and complicated management.
 
 

The collaboration between DPC PERADI Surabaya and the Surabaya City Government in providing free legal assistance is an interesting example of synergy between the public and private sectors. This research analyzes the collaboration model that was built, the obstacles faced, and its impact on government governance and fulfilling the rights of underprivileged citizens. The research results show that this collaboration model is effective in increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of legal services. However, a stronger coordination mechanism is needed to ensure program sustainability.

This study aims to find out and analyze law enforcement against money politics crimes by legislative candidates in the 2024 general election in East Nusa Tenggara Province. This research is a normative judicial legal research sourced from primary legal materials and secondary legal materials with  a case approach and a legislative approach. Data collection in this study uses interviews and documentation Furthermore, the legal materials that have been collected are described in a qualitative descriptive manner in order to obtain a picture that can be understood clearly and directed to answer the problem. The results of the study show that (1) Money politics actors have not been fully held criminally accountable for what they have done. Law enforcers must provide criminal penalties to perpetrators who have fulfilled the elements of criminal responsibility fairly so that they can have a deterrent effect so that it is hoped that in the future money politics cases will be minimized. (2)  The role of the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Gakkumdu) in handling cases of violations of the 2024 simultaneous elections in East Nusa Tenggara Province is to resolve violations of election crimes.

This study aims to find out and analyze the legality of foreign investment registration in the online single submission risk based approach (Oss-RBA) system in Indonesia. This research is a normative research using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials collected by tracing or searching and documentation studies, the legal materials that have been collected are processed and analyzed in several stages, namely inventory, identification, classification and systematization. The results of the study show that (1) Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning investment has been in compliance with TRIMs. (2) Foreign investment business licenses in the Oss-RBA system are not considered to violate TRIM's because they are not regulated in the illustration of the violation of the TRIM's agreement. 
 
 

This study is motivated by the government's efforts to realize ideal national defense management by means of transparent supervision and control by a relevant government institution. Because, in the government environment, maladministration, and violations of laws and regulations are still found. The purpose of this research is to comprehensively understand external supervision in the national defense system, the formation of effective supervisory mechanism regulations, internal supervision in the national defense system, and reform of national defense institutions. The research method used is a descriptive analysis approach through literature study. Based on the results of the discussion, it is found that in organizing a good defense system, it is necessary to optimize the control mechanism by conducting effective supervision. This supervision is carried out by government agencies, both the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia, the Inspectorate General within the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Indonesia and the Indonesian National Army.

The aim of this research is to find out the effectiveness of law enforcement against online gambling crimes, considering that eradicating online gambling is quite complicated because it is technology-based. Often, efforts to eradicate it have often been carried out, such as blocking online gambling sites. However, in reality this is still not optimal because until now online gambling can still be accessed. The research method used in this research is the normative juridical research method, which is a research method that focuses on the analysis of statutory regulations, legal documents and legal concepts related to a legal problem. The approach applied in this research is a conceptual approach, a type of approach that emphasizes the analytical perspective of problem solving. This approach involves understanding aspects of legal concepts that are the basis or background of the problem, and also considering the values contained in the norming of a regulation, related to the concepts used. In this research, an effort was found that can be made in terms of the effectiveness of law enforcement against criminal acts of online gambling, namely through: 1. Legal Regulation; 2. Law Enforcement; 3. International Cooperation; 4. Technology; 5. Prevention and Education; 6. Efficient Courts; and 7. Community Support. Overall, the effectiveness of law enforcement against online gambling crimes involves a series of strategies that include at least the seven points above (Legal Regulation, Law Enforcement, International Cooperation, Technology, Prevention and Education, Efficient Courts, and Community Support). Successful law enforcement efforts require a holistic approach that integrates these various elements to address the complex challenges that arise in the digital environment.

The purpose of writing this article is to analyze and understand how the law protects against software copyright infringement so that later we can find out how the law enforcement process works according to positive law in Indonesia. This research uses normative research methods as a reference in analyzing problems based on a statutory approach. The results obtained from this research are that software is a work that is protected by law so that anyone who violates these provisions can be subject to sanctions. Law enforcement proceedings can be filed based on civil proceedings or criminal proceedings and can be carried out in three ways of resolution, namely through alternative settlements, arbitration mediation bodies, or with commercial courts through Intellectual Property Rights.

Property business is the activity of buying and selling a plot of land or house involving 2 (two) parties between the seller (business actor) and the buyer (consumer), in its implementation gives birth to legal relationships carried out through agreements. Quality in running a property business, business actors selling their plot of land to consumers are inseparable from the fact that the business actor gets the land previously from the landowner to then sell it to consumers. The method used in this study is Normative Juridical. The legal protection of agreements made by business actors and consumers in the property business is guided by articles 1320 and 1338 of the Civil Code. Breach of promise not to carry out the agreed is a form of default committed by one of the parties to the agreement as regulated by article 1234 of the Civil Code which can be resolved with a "win and win solution" through negotiations so that business actors and consumers are protected. Consumer protection in property business agreements starts from the beginning of the purchase, making the agreement, payment to the sale and purchase deed agreement. Consumers who have signed the agreement means that they have agreed to all the terms and conditions that have been set. All of these agreements, both oral, written, and deed are not authentic. Authentic deeds that are carried out legally, as long as consumers have fulfilled their achievements by making payments in full, not negligently, in accordance with their rights and obligations in Law no. 8 of 1999, consumers are obliged to get legal protection.

Legislation function owned by DPD is still limited, it shows the weak position and role (position and function) of DPD when compared with DPR. DPD does not have the authority to form laws together with DPR and the President and has no authority in setting the state budget. The formulation of the problem in this study are: (1) How is the legislative function of the House of Regional Representatives in the formation of the Act? (2) What is the ratio of the legislative function of the House of Regional Representatives that is different from the House of Representatives? This research is a normative juridical research which can be interpreted as a library legal research conducted based on literature or secondary data. In other words, this research is library research (library reseach), meaning that this research is conducted by reading works related to the issues to be studied and then containing a study of the research. The results of research and discussion show that: (1) The legislative function of DPD has a major role in the formation of the Act at the stage of discussion and ratification. At the discussion stage, although its participation is limited to level 1, DPD provides input and consideration of the bill relating to regional autonomy, central-regional relations, and management of economic and natural resources. Furthermore, at the stage of ratification, a joint agreement between DPR and the President strengthens the status of the bill into law. Although DPD can provide input and consideration of some bills, the final decision remains in the hands of DPR. This confirms that the main role of DPD is more as an advisory body in the legislative process. DPR has greater power than DPD in the formation of the Act, with the authority to take the final decision. Thus, although DPD has an important role in certain aspects of the formation of the Act, the main power and final decision remains with DPR. (2) Comparison of legis ratio between DPD and DPR has different representation. DPD represents the interests of the region directly, while DPR represents the interests of the people through political parties. DPD is present to accommodate regional aspirations that are not always represented by DPR. This reflects that the legislative role of DPD has significant limitations. DPD should function as a mechanism of checks and balances in Indonesia's bicameral system. However, due to its limited authority, the implementation of this function has not been optimally realized. Thus, although DPD has an important role in representing regional aspirations, the differences in authority and rights between DPD and DPR cause their position to be unbalanced in the legislative process.

The police are currently a topic of conversation due to several problems caused by irresponsible members, resulting in a negative view of the police. To overcome this, a Quick Wins Presisi program was implemented, such as "Friday Confide." This program is a response to problems in daily interactions between the police and the community, such as dissatisfaction with services, lack of communication, and transparency of police actions. "Friday Confide" is an initiative that aims to increase interaction between the community and the police by providing a platform for the community to convey complaints, aspirations and input directly. This research evaluates the effectiveness of the program and how the community responds and participates, especially in the Greater Mojokerto Police. The methodology used includes a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection through in-depth interviews, direct observation and related documentation. Using the Diffusion of Innovation theory, research shows that the "Friday Confide" program was well received by the people of Mojokerto as an effective place to convey aspirations and obtain information about police activities. However, researchers identified challenges such as limited time that hinders comprehensive communication and handling of issues, as well as the need for increased direct community involvement. This program has succeeded in improving relations and transparency between the police and the community, but requires adjustments such as extending time and strengthening follow-up. The research recommends ongoing evaluation of strategic adjustments to ensure programs continue to meet community needs and expectations.