Traffic accidents are a very serious health problem in the world which causes death and is ranked 9th in the world. Indonesia is ranked 5th in the world as the country with the highest traffic accident rate. This research aims to determine the application of criminal sanctions by judges to perpetrators of criminal traffic accidents that result in death. The location for data collection in this research is at the Deli Serdang Police Traffic Unit Gakkum Unit which is located on Jl. Sudirman, No. 18. Lubuk Pakam, North Sumatra, Indonesia. The type of research used in this research is empirical research, namely legal research carried out by examining library materials or secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. These materials are arranged systematically, studied, then a conclusion is drawn in relation to the problem being studied. The data analysis technique used in this legal research uses qualitative analysis.  Based on the results of research conducted by Government Regulation no. 37 of 2017 also strengthens the importance of supervision and law enforcement in the field of traffic safety, underlining the need for traffic engineering and improved traffic management to prevent accidents. The research concludes that legal regulations are adequate, but their implementation in the field still requires strengthening, especially in consistently enforcing criminal sanctions. In decision 1271/Pid.Sus/2022/PN/Lbp, there are a number of important factors which are the judge's main considerations in imposing criminal sanctions on perpetrators of traffic accidents that cause death. First, the defendant's negligence factor is the main key in determining sanctions. The judge considered that the defendant's negligence, who was driving the vehicle while tired and sleepy, was the main cause of the accident. Crimes related to traffic accidents also refer to Articles 359 and 360 of the Criminal Code for cases involving death or injury due to negligence. Obligations for public transport companies involved in accidents are also regulated in the LLAJ Law, which includes the obligation to compensate passengers or goods owners. The implementation of this law shows that even though the rules have been stipulated in detail, the effectiveness of law enforcement is still influenced by law enforcement facilities and infrastructure as well as community behavior in complying with applicable rules. It can be concluded that the Criminal Code (KUHP) and Law no. 22 of 2009 concerning Road Traffic and Transportation has provided a clear legal basis. Article 359 of the Criminal Code regulates negligence that results in the death of another person with the threat of a prison sentence of up to five years. In decision 1271/Pid.Sus/2022/PN/Lbp, there are a number of important factors which are the judge's main considerations in imposing criminal sanctions on perpetrators of traffic accidents that cause death. In its application the judge imposed a lighter sentence compared to the maximum sentence regulated in Article 310 paragraph (4) of the Traffic Law, although he still took into account the serious consequences of the defendant's negligence which caused the fatal accident.

This study seeks to examine the legal vacuum surrounding regional head elections that feature only a single candidate, as well as the legal implications that arise from this scenario. In a democratic system, the principle of popular sovereignty necessitates a fair and free electoral process; however, the absence of clear regulations for regional head elections with a solitary candidate can jeopardize the integrity of this principle. Employing a normative legal methodology with both legislative and conceptual approaches, this study investigates various regulations that govern regional head elections and assesses how this legal vacuum impacts the electoral process and the constitutional rights of citizens. Additionally, the study identifies several strategies to address the legal vacuum, which include establishing clear legal provisions for the election process involving a single candidate, implementing a plebiscite mechanism, and enhancing transparency throughout the electoral process. The findings suggest that a more definitive and explicit legal framework is essential to uphold the principle of popular sovereignty in regional head elections featuring a single candidate. 

This study aims to find out and analyze the regulation of good governance principles in the Kupang City One-Stop Integrated Service and One-Stop Integrated Service reviewed from Law No. 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services. This type of research is normative legal research, namely legal research conducted by researching literature materials or secondary data, in this case laws and regulations, books and legal journals. The results presented in this study are (1) Regulation of Good Governance Principles where there are five functions carried out by the Kupang City Investment and One-Stop Integrated Services Office (2) Good Governance Principles in Ensuring Legal Certainty and Justice where there are 6 foundations or Governance Principles enforced in the Kupang City Investment and One-Stop Integrated Services Office (3)  Implications of the Principle of Good Governance in Public Services where the motto of the Kupang City Investment and One-Stop Integrated Service Office (DPMPTSP) in carrying out licensing service activities is "CEPAT" with explanations, namely meticulous, efficient, professional, accountable and transparent.

The rights of Fiduciary guarantees, in practice, are often violated by Fiduciary guarantee recipients. Even thuggery methods are used for this purpose. The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the legal norms formulated in Article 15 of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law and the conflicting norms of Article 15 paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law with the original intense formulation of Article 28G paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia . The research method uses a normative juridical approach. Legal norms which are the legal substance of the formulation of the Fiduciary Guarantee provisions are analyzed through a concept and law approach. Fiduciary towards the 1945 Constitution, caused by the phrase "executive power" and the phrase "the same as a court decision that has permanent legal force" which is contrary to the principles of legal certainty and fairness of the parties to the agreement. The legal argument is the subjectivity of creditors (Fiduciary Recipients) in assessing and determine the circumstances of default (default) of the debtor (Fiduciary Provider).
 




 

Health BPJS program aims to provide assurance of social protection and welfare for all Indonesian people. One of the problems that patients who use BPJS often face is the problem of Health BPJS services in the field, namely cases of refusal of patients participating in Health BPJS to get an examination room by the hospital. The need for legal protection in obtaining health services, which aims to ensure legal certainty obtained by patients that patients avoid losses when receiving health services that should be provided properly and optimally by health workers. This study aimed to identify and analyze the legal protection of patients who used Health BPJS in hospitals. This study used a normative juridical approach. The result showed that there were two kinds of legal protection for Health BPJS participants in health services, namely preventive and repressive legal protection.