The 2024 data breach incident at Indonesia's National Data Center (PDN) marked a major crisis in the governance of national cybersecurity. This study examines the causes, threats, proposed solutions, and the roles of both the government and the public in responding to such breaches. The research employs a literature review and media framing analysis, focusing on news coverage and government policy responses. Findings indicate that systemic vulnerabilities, inadequate infrastructure readiness, and human factors are the primary causes of the breach. The resulting threats include economic and social losses, a decline in public trust, and the risk of data misuse. Proposed solutions involve strengthening regulations, enhancing technical capacity, and increasing public awareness through education. The active participation of civil society and swift government response are critical to restoring trust and preventing similar incidents in the future.

This study examines the comparative supervision systems of notarial professions in Indonesia and the Netherlands using a normative and comparative legal approach. In Indonesia, notary supervision is centralized under the Ministry of Law and Human Rights through supervisory councils, yet remains weak in terms of independence and transparency. In contrast, the Netherlands adopts a decentralized and independent model through institutions such as the KNB, the Notarial Disciplinary Board, and the BFT, which ensure accountability and public oversight. The findings reveal that the Dutch system is more effective in enforcing professional ethics and preventing conflicts of interest through mandatory reporting and peer evaluations. The study suggests reforming Indonesia’s supervisory framework by strengthening institutional independence, enhancing the role of professional associations, and ensuring greater transparency. This research aims to contribute to the development of a more accountable and integrity-based notarial supervision system in civil law jurisdictions.
 
 

The study was intended to anlyze evaluations regarding the quality related to online registration of population administration at the Population and Civil Registration of Gresik Regency. The method used in the study is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. This descriptive research method was chosen to present data systematically, factually, and accurately regarding the facts in the field. This research model uses an approach to the implementation of service quality at the Population and Civil Registration Service of Gresik Regency. The results of this study are statutory regulations (Law Of The Republic Of Indonesia Number 25 Of 2009) where publics services is a primary obligation of all government officials to organize activities or a series of activities in order to fulfill service needs in accordance with statutory regulations for every citizen and resident for goods and services provided by public service providers. And from this study we can see together that the supporting factors of the analysis of the quality of online registration service of Gresik Regency.

Inheritance law in Indonesia has three directions, namely customary law, civil law and Islamic law. This journal article discusses one of the inheritance laws, namely customary inheritance law. The writing of this journal article aims to examine how the protection and process of obtaining inheritance rights for women in Balinese Hindu customary society, which adheres to the patrilineal system. The research method used is a normative legal research method with two approaches, namely a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Data collection uses doctrinal which is by examining, analyzing and identifying knowledge contained in reading sources in the form of reference books, journals or previous research as research support. Based on the results of the study, it shows that under customary inheritance law, women are generally not entitled to inherit property, but only enjoy the inheritance of parents or husbands. However, they can obtain inheritance rights through grants, marital gifts (jiwa dana), or changing their status to male (sentana rajeg).

State sovereignty is a prerogative right that must be maintained as a priority, especially in Indonesia is archipelagic geography. This presents a significant challenge in maintaining sovereignty over the Natuna Islands and Lingga Islands in Riau Islands Province, Indonesia. This area has been the subject of international conflict, particularly concerning China's claim under the Nine-Dash Line, which the Chinese government justifies with historical arguments and past governmental decisions. However, this claim lacks a valid legal basis under international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982, which defines international maritime boundaries. The conflict began to escalate in 2016 following the arrest of three Chinese fishermen involved in large-scale illegal fishing, an act supported by the Chinese government. In response, the Indonesian government took measures to assert its sovereignty by strengthening military security, engaging in diplomatic efforts with ASEAN member states, and conducting best practice studies to potentially bring the Natuna Sea sovereignty dispute before the International Court of Justice. Indonesia's sovereignty over the Natuna Sea is firmly supported by the Djuanda Declaration and the 1982 UNCLOS Agreement. This study aims to analyze the Natuna conflict using a Normative Law and Military approach as the primary strategies to resolve disputes over the Natuna Sea.

Natuna waters are the most vulnerable area to illegal fishing because there is abundant potential for fishery resources. It was recorded that from May to December 2016, there were 280 foreign vessels in Natuna waters, which resulted in economic losses of 2.98 trillion Rupiah. This study aims to examine and assess the policies and actions that the Indonesian government has implemented in overcoming illegal fishing activities in the area. The results of this study are that the Natuna Waters Area is part of the Indonesian Archipelago Sea Lane (ALKI) and functions as a global waterway. The Natuna Waters Area borders with neighboring countries and is connected to open waters, making it vulnerable to illegal fishing activities. The Indonesian government's strategy in dealing with cases of unlawful fishing in Natuna waters effectively increases the protection of state sovereignty and marine resources through policies such as sinking ships and maritime diplomacy. However, this implementation policy overcomes obstacles in the form of intimidation from other countries, such as China, and weaknesses in supervision and coordination between domestic institutions, which can affect microorganisms in fisheries management and maritime security in the area.

This abstract discusses the importance of preventing corruption through effective implementation of the law, especially in relation to stakeholders. Corruption is a serious threat to public trust and the stability of government and private institutions. Strict and fair application of the law is very necessary to create a transparent and accountable environment. By implementing clear rules and heavy sanctions, acts of corruption can be minimized. Active participation of stakeholders, including government, civil society and the private sector, is also very necessary in monitoring and supporting efforts to prevent corruption. This will create good governance and strengthen public trust in institutions.

This study discusses the effectiveness of implementing administrative sanctions to overcome fraud practices by health facilities against National Health Insurance (JKN) participants in Indonesia. Fraud practices involving claim manipulation, bill inflation, and falsification of diagnoses result in losses for JKN participants and reduce the quality of health services. This study identifies challenges in supervision, regulatory weaknesses, and obstacles in law enforcement that affect the effectiveness of the administrative sanctions imposed. Based on the analysis, this study recommends regulatory reforms that include the implementation of stricter sanctions, strengthening supervision with information technology, and increasing outreach programs to raise awareness of the impacts of fraud. It is expected that with this reform, the JKN system can run more effectively and reduce fraud practices that are detrimental to all parties.

This study analyzes the ambiguity regarding the obligation to mediate in resolving patent disputes according to the Patent Law, and its implications for the efficiency of the dispute resolution process. Although Article 153 and Article 154 of the Patent Law open up opportunities for dispute resolution through alternative mechanisms, the ambiguity regarding the obligation to mediate creates legal uncertainty that can hinder efficiency and increase dispute costs. Based on the Economic Analysis of Law approach, this study shows that the obligation to mediate can reduce social costs, accelerate the dispute resolution process, and increase overall economic efficiency. Mediation as an obligation can reduce the burden on the judicial system, minimize transaction costs, and create better legal and business stability. Therefore, this study encourages the implementation of the obligation to mediate in patent disputes to create a more efficient, fair, and profitable dispute resolution system for all parties involved.
 
 

This research is about the implementation of Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 9 of 2017 in an effort to protect the position of notaries regarding TKM reporting. Reporting Suspicious Financial Transactions (TKM) is a new task that must be carried out by Notaries in accordance with the issuance of Permenkumham No. 9 of 2017 and the inclusion of Notaries as reporting parties in PP No. 43 of 2015. This Permenkumham was issued to support government programs in terms of preventing money laundering crimes. . This type of research is normative juridical with a statutory approach as well as an analytical approach. This research explains, However, this regulation does not explain further about what protections Notaries receive after reporting suspicious financial transactions themselves, as well as the obstacles experienced by Notaries in implementing Permenkumham No. 9 of 2017 in terms of reporting TKM.