The circulation of alcoholic beverages is often unlicensed, particularly traditional alcoholic beverages, which are frequently distributed without a license due to being considered cultural heritage or customs specific to certain regions in Indonesia. This situation raises concerns regarding both legal compliance and public health. This research examines the licensing process for the sale and purchase of traditional alcoholic beverages in Indonesia, focusing on the Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 74 of 2013 concerning the Control and Supervision of Alcoholic Beverages as an analytical framework. The study aims to explore the regulatory environment surrounding the distribution of these beverages and evaluate the challenges and opportunities for obtaining proper licenses. The research further discusses the role of the Online Single Submission Risk Based Approach (OSS-RBA) system, a digital platform designed to simplify the licensing process for businesses. This study is expected to serve as a valuable reference and knowledge resource for the public, providing clarity on the licensing process for alcoholic beverages. It also aims to raise awareness of the legal framework and facilitate smoother and more transparent processes for distributing alcoholic beverages in Indonesia.

Pancasila as a grundnorm plays an important role in the legal political paradigm in Indonesia as the basis for the formation of the legal system. All laws in Indonesia must be based on Pancasila as the source of all legal sources. The main issue studied is the extent to which Pancasila influences the legislative process and legal policies to realize a fair judicial system, as well as how its values can reform the judicial system and improve the quality of law enforcement. This study uses a normative method with a conceptual approach supported by the analysis of the hierarchy theory of legal norms and development law. The results of the study show that although Pancasila has been recognized as a grundnorm in the legal hierarchy, its implementation in legislation and legal policies still often faces obstacles, so a more responsive and inclusive legal system reform based on Pancasila values is needed.

Criminal provisions in a statutory regulation are certain doses or remedies as a means of achieving the formulated goals. The purpose of this article is to examine and analyze the inconsistency of the material content of the criminal provisions against the formulation of the objectives of legal certainty in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 3 of 2020 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining. The research method uses a normative juridical method. Secondary data in the form of primary legal data on laws and regulations related to the criminal provisions of the Minerba Law is elaborated so that the adequacy of the content of the criminal provisions is able to test the clarity of the objectives of legal certainty.
The results found that there were inconsistencies in criminal provisions as a means of achieving goals in the formulation of guaranteeing legal certainty. The application of Article 162 of the Mineral and Coal Law is subjective and tends to criminalize members of the community around mineral and coal mining. This fact proves that the objective of legal certainty is objective, ambiguous with subjective criminal means. The main article of criminal provisions in the Minerba Law is Article 158 which is systematically constructed with Article 35. Basically, the criminal provisions are used as the legal regime for licensing in the strategies and techniques of government control and control in the mineral and coal sector.

International bilateral agreements in the form of investment have an important role and significance in promoting development growth and economic progress. Through such agreements, the host country has the opportunity to attract foreign investors to operate and invest in various sectors in its territory. As a result, the home country can freely invest in various industrial sectors in the host country. The home country and the host country conclude an agreement in the form of international bilateral agreements called "investment promotion and protection agreements" or bilateral investment treaties/BITs. One such agreement is the international bilateral agreement between Indonesia and Singapore on industrial promotion and protection signed in 2018 and effective in 2021, which will be discussed in this journal.

Group companies grow and develop and many group companies cannot be controlled so that they can result in monopolies. The monopoly will occur in networks or business relationships owned by group companies. This relationship can be understood as a legal entity that has a relationship within the grub company.
This research method uses normative research, where normative legal research is research by collecting secondary data that is in accordance with the problem to be studied and then processed.
The results of this study explain that the responbility of the holding company to its subsidiaries in group companies is a legal relationship related to the parent and subsidiary companyes. This legal relationship after the merger, the parent company has the authority as the majority shareholder of the subsidiary. Therefore the parent company will control the operation of the subsidiary. The parent and subsidiary companies have different articles of a of association are a positive law where if the articles of association are violated it will result in the cancellation of the transaction. If the subsidiary is sued and the subsidiary violates the law, the party who is aggrieved will be sued, namely the subsidiary because based on the law, the subsidiary has its own responbilities in running the company.

Keresahan masyarakat dan tingkat kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap pengelolaan keuangan pemerintah akibat banyak sekali oknum pemerintah yang melakukan tindak korupsi. Namun ada beberapa hal yang harus diperhatikan dalam upaya optimalisasi kasus korupsi di Indonesia yaitu dengan memanfaatkan perkembangan teknologi yang ada dan berkembang pesat saat ini. Kehadiran sebuah teknologi tersebut membantu pemerintah dalam upaya mengurangi angka korupsi terhadap pengelolaan keuangan di Indonesia. Kehadiran Blockchain Open Ladger System memberikan sebuah solusi untuk pengelolaan keuangan dalam rangka mengurangi angka korupsi di Indonesia. Penulisan artikel ini mengacu kepada uraian permasalahan diatas dengan menerapkan dan memanfaatkan perkembangan teknologi yang ada dalam era society 5.0. Metode yang digunakan yaitu literature review yang bersumber kepada penelitian terdahulu. Hasil dari pembahasan ini menunjukan bahwa Blockchain Open Ladger System merupakan sistem yang bergerak dalam proses transparansi pengelolaan keuangan. Dalam sistem ini masyarakat dapat mengetahui dengan jelas arah perputaran anggaran keuangan negara yang berjalan sehingga apabila terjadi penyelewengan atau ketidaksesuaian akan dapat langsung terdeteksi pelaku atau permasalahannya.
 

The bill governs the administration of liability-rights. The rights of the liquefied are not divided unless promised in the document the rights are given. If a lien was applied to a certain land right, then it could be agreed upon in the corresponding document of the lien grant, that the payment of secured debts could be made in installments of the same amount as the price of liens. It is part of the title of the load that will be separated from the rights of the load, so the rights of the load in turn weigh only the remainder of the load to secure the rest of the debt. Land rights that can be encumbered with a mortgage are property rights, commercial property rights, and building rights. In addition to the land rights, the land rights of the state that, according to the prevailing regulations of legislation, must be registered and depending on the property that can be deducted, can also be the property rights.

The management of oil and gas (Migas) in Indonesian energy law has witnessed a shift towards national control, including provisions in the 1945 Constitution that establish natural resources as state wealth. Law No. 22/2001 regulates various technical, economic, environmental, and community participation aspects of the oil and gas sector. Decisions by the Constitutional Court (MK) have clarified the state's ownership of Migas resources in accordance with the constitution. Renewable energy is crucial for Indonesia's sustainable development, with collaboration between the government and the private sector aimed at increasing the penetration of renewable energy, overcoming financial barriers, and protecting the environment. The MK's decision regarding Law No. 22/2001 supports state sovereignty, the interests of the people, and the goals of preserving natural resources and sustainable development. The key issue at hand is the nature of oil and gas management in Indonesian energy law and whether the legal considerations in the Constitutional Court's decision No. 36/PUU-X/2012 align with Indonesian energy law. The research method employed in this study is a normative juridical approach, also referred to as doctrinal research, which involves the examination of legal documents and literature. Through this research, Indonesia aims to fulfill its commitment to reducing environmental impact and dependence on fossil fuels through renewable energy sources.

The recognition of electronic evidence as evidence that can be submitted to court and recognized as valid evidence has been carried out since 1977 through the Company Documents Law which stipulates that microfilm containing recorded documents of a company can be submitted as evidence in court if it arises in the future. lawsuit. According to the Company Documents Law, electronic document evidence is part of documentary evidence, whereas the Corruption Law clearly explains that electronic information and electronic documents are an extension of documentary evidence. Because electronic mail in the form of electronic information or electronic documents has been recognized as one of the valid pieces of evidence in special crimes outside the Criminal Code, in line with the legal evidence in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code which is a new type of evidence, it is hoped that investigators, public prosecutors, advisors The law and judges have an understanding of this electronic evidence. In examining criminal cases, it is hoped that the judge will impose a sentence based on two valid pieces of evidence and the judge will be convinced that the defendant is guilty of committing a criminal act, then the judge must impose the maximum sentence according to the prosecutor's demands, so that the defendant will be deterred and the public's sense of justice will be fulfilled.
 

Every person experiences disagreements, conflicts, issues, and confrontations in their lifetime. Nobody wants to get into a disagreement with someone else. Each business actor, particularly in economic activities, should always be prepared for the possibility of disagreements that may arise at any point in the future. Here, the business actor will select the form of dispute resolution that best fits their requirements. This study employed a normative juridical research methodology that combines a doctrinal and statutory regulation approach. This study concludes that arbitration is a non-litigation dispute settlement mechanism. With its many benefits, arbitration plays a big part in settling business conflicts.