The Identity Status of Children in Indonesia is contained in Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 2 of 2016 concerning Child Identity Cards article 1 paragraph (7) which reads: Child Identity Card, hereinafter abbreviated to KIA, is the child's official identity as proof of being a child who is less than 17 years old. and unmarried issued by the Regency/City Population and Civil Registration Service. The research method used is qualitative descriptive. The sampling technique used in this research is the Purposive Sampling method with 6 samples. Data collection techniques use observation, interviews and documentation. The data analysis technique uses qualitative analysis.The results of this research show that the implementation of Article 2 of the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 2 of 2016 concerning Children's Identity Cards in the Bandar Lampung City Population and Civil Registration Service can be declared implemented as seen from the implementation of the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 2 of 2016 concerning Children's Identity Cards in article 2 which explains the purpose of child identity cards so that the number of children who have Child Identity Cards from 2016 to 2024 is 309,758 children and in issuing child identity cards, the Population and Civil Registration Service has carried out its duties based on its authority and obligations and in Siya's view >Sah Tanfiz|iyah Syari'iyyah has been implemented in the community through a pick-up and drop-off program carried out by the Bandar Lampung City Population and Civil Registration Service which is in accordance with a leader (ulil amri) who must be responsible for the mandate that has been given and conveyed and carried out with the community according to tabligh characteristics and with Surah An-Nisa Verse 58.
 
 

Judicial reviews on the presidential and vice-presidential nomination threshold in Article 222 of Law No. 7/2017 on General Elections have been repeatedly rejected by the Constitutional Court. It has become a public debate and is seen as contrary to academic reasoning because it is not in line with the logic of democracy. Rules that are considered detrimental to the community and political parties in the election of the head of state. Accordingly, the study of fiqh siyasah clarifies the prerequisites for the election system and the selection of the imam (caliph). The purpose of this study is to find out how the legal considerations by the Constitutional Court rejected the judicial review in Article 222 and to find out what the views of Islamic jurisprudence are on the presidential and vice-presidential nomination threshold rules in general elections. The author of this work employs normative legal research methodologies in addressing relevant research, drawing on legislation, journal articles, books, and other sources. This study concludes by using 4 decisions that were rejected by the constitutional court, namely in decisions 53/puu-xv/2017, 49/puu-xvi/2018, 54/puu-xvi/2018 and decision number 73/puu-xx/2022. The considerations of the court stated that the decision related to the presidential threshold was constitutional and still applicable. That the article being tested is considered contrary to the constitution, especially Article 6A of the 1945 Constitution with the argument that the petitioners cannot change the Constitutional Court's stance on all decisions.  Meanwhile, in the view of fiqh siyasah does not recognize how the provisions of the vote threshold for the election of an imam.