This study's goal is to ascertain the connection between liquidity ratio (CR), asset management (TATO), capital structure (DAR) and firm size on financial performance, The  property & real estate firms that were listed between 2019 and 2023 on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The study's sample, which was 52 companies in a period of (5) periods with a total of 260 data. The multiple regression analysis is used in this study method with the type of panel data with the Random Effect Model (REM) method. According to the study's findings that asset management has a favorably and significantly effect on financial performance, capital structure has a negatively and significantly effect on financial performance, but liquidity ratio and firm size have no effect on financial performance.

This research investigates the key factors influencing companies registered on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) that is experiencing financial distress between the years 2021 to 2023. In this study, 353 data points were selected from the target population using purposive sampling. Three key financial ratios were utilized as indicators of financial distress: Profitability can be measured by Return on Assets (ROA), while the Current Ratio (CR) is used to measure liquidity. Meanwhile, The Logarithm of Natural to Total Assets (LnTA) is a metric for evaluating a company’s size.  Multiple regression analysis is performed utilizing SmartPLS 4.0 software to analyze the connection between these factors and the probability of experiencing financial distress. The findings indicate a significant negative association between liquidity (CR) and company size (LnTA) with financial distress. In contrast, profitability (ROA) demonstrates an insignificant negative correlation with financial distress. This study contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing financial distress in Indonesia consumer cyclical companies employs signaling theory to interpret the relationships discovered.

This study investigates the impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) on firm value, with Green Innovation (GI) as a moderating variable. The research is based on secondary data from manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2021 to 2023, analyzed using path analysis with a moderated regression approach in SPSS. The findings reveal that ESG has a significant but negative impact on firm value, suggesting that ESG investments may be perceived as cost burdens in the short term. Meanwhile, EMA does not have a significant effect on firm value, indicating that its role in firm valuation remains unclear. The moderating role of GI does not significantly strengthen the relationship between ESG and firm value, while the interaction between EMA and GI negatively affects firm value,implying that green innovation strategies may introduce additional financial burdens. These findings highlight the complexity of sustainability investments and emphasize the need for a balanced approach to ESG and EMA implementation to optimize long-term firm value. The study contributes to legitimacy and stakeholder theories by demonstrating how sustainability strategies can influence financial outcomes. It provides practical insights for businesses to develop more effective ESG disclosure and EMA implementation strategies that align with investor expectations and long-term firm sustainability