The DI/TII social movement, which began on August 7, 1949, emerged as a result of socio-political tensions, particularly resistance to the Reorganization and Rationalization (Rera) policy. This movement aimed to establish an Islamic state in Indonesia and arose as a reaction to government policies perceived as inconsistent with Islamic principles. Discontent among former TNI soldiers and local militias due to the Rera policy fueled the movement, with many of these disillusioned individuals joining DI/TII. On February 10–11, 1948, Sekarmadji Maridjan Kartosuwiryo and Raden Oni organized a conference of Islamic leaders, during which the idea of forming the Islamic State of Indonesia (Negara Islam Indonesia, NII) was introduced. Kartosuwiryo declared himself the Grand Imam of the Islamic State of Indonesia. The widespread and massive expansion of this movement increasingly disrupted society, as it involved acts of extortion and armed resistance, creating unrest and opposition among the population. In response, the Indonesian government adopted a responsive legal approach, reflected in measures such as the enactment of the Emergency Law of 1949 and the re-adoption of the 1945 Constitution, which included restrictions in Article 28J(2). Various efforts were undertaken to address the situation, including the deployment of military operations to suppress the rebellion and restore stability.

This research aims to examine how the Papuan conflict from the perspective of emergency constitutional law. The perspective of emergency constitutional law in this study discusses more about the development of the Papuan case from time to time. We all know that the conflict in Papua has yet to be resolved. The role of the TNI and Police in maintaining defense and security in Papua makes its own attention not only in the national arena but also in the international arena. The method of data collection is carried out by means of literacy studies and laws and regulations and conducting qualitative descriptive data analysis to find out how the Papuan conflict from the perspective of emergency constitutional law. Both internal and external threats due to the desire of the Papuan people to separate themselves from Indonesia.
 

Technological developments ultimately require judicial bodies in various countries, including Indonesia to adopt the use of technology. Because the administration of Indonesian justice is based on the principle of simple, fast, and low cost. Utilization of information technology in the judicial process can increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the performance of the judiciary, so that it can answer the public's sense of justice. Because the main problems that are often faced in our judiciary are the slow handling of cases, the difficulty of accessing cases and the integrity of the judicial administration apparatus. This article is intended to examine how to regulate the use of technology in the judiciary, and how it impacts on access to justice. This article concludes, Electronic court proceedings need to be regulated in the law itself or accommodated in the current procedural law. Because the mission of adaptation and harmonization of various legal developments is very necessary. In addition, the government must also pay more attention to the readiness of courts in Indonesia to carry out using technology. For example, providing direction for building or upgrading electronic facilities for trials, both in courts and correctional facilities, as well as recruiting and providing IT human resources. So that by using technology can run effectively and efficiently.

This research aims to analyze the revision of the Constitutional Court Law (UU MK) which has the potential to cripple the independence of judges and perpetuate authoritarian power in Indonesia. The research method used is critical analysis with a qualitative approach, which involves analysis of legal documents and related literature. This research reveals that the revision of the Constitutional Court Law could have a significant impact on the democratic system in Indonesia, with the risk of weakening the basic principles of the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of citizens' constitutional rights. It is hoped that the research results will provide a comprehensive picture of the risks and impacts of the revision of the Constitutional Court Law and provide recommendations for strengthening the independence of the Constitutional Court and supporting the democratic system in Indonesia.