This study aims to investigate the role of legal socialization at Vocational High School (SMK) Taman Siswa Kisaran in preventing online gambling practices among adolescents, as well as to understand the legal implications that adolescents may face when involved in such activities. The research method employed is a qualitative approach, gathering data through interviews with teaching staff, students, and legal experts, along with observation of the legal socialization activities conducted at the school. The findings indicate that SMK Taman Siswa Kisaran has implemented various legal socialization activities, including workshops, seminars, and extracurricular activities, to enhance students' understanding of the legal consequences of online gambling. However, challenges in the implementation of legal socialization were identified, such as resource constraints and lack of support from relevant parties. Potential legal repercussions for adolescents include criminal penalties, fines, and long-term consequences related to criminal records. Therefore, this study highlights the importance of the school's role in disseminating information about the laws related to online gambling to adolescents, emphasizing the need for greater support from the school, government, and other relevant institutions to enhance prevention efforts. The implications of this research include the development of more effective legal socialization strategies and the necessity for collaborative efforts among various stakeholders to address the issue of online gambling among adolescents. Thus, this study underscores the urgency and relevance of prevention efforts against online gambling practices among adolescents through legal socialization approaches in the educational environment.

The purpose of the study was to examine the regulation of the application of assimilation during the Covid-19 period in prisons in order to reduce the level of spread of Covid-19 in prisons. The Indonesian government through the Ministry of Law and Human Rights adopted a policy of releasing convicts to break the chain of Covid-19. This research is important to do to find out the policy for the release of prisoners in terms of breaking the Covid-19 chain which in this case is the authority of the Indonesian Government through the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. This study uses empirical legal research methods that contain data in the field directly at the Class II B Correctional Institution Tanjungbalai Asahan. This research has a focus of study, namely providing assimilation during the Covid-19 period. Government policies through the Ministry of Law and Human Rights in implementing assimilation in Correctional Institutions during Covid-19     and the effect of implementing assimilation on crime rates. Based on the results of this study, it is known that the release is carried out through an assimilation and integration process in the form of parole, leave before release, and prisoners whose 2/3 of their sentences fall from April 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. The release of adult and child prisoners to break the chain the spread of Covid-19     The Tanjungbalai Asahan District Prosecutor's Office has provided assimilation of 36 (thirty-six) inmates from the Class II B Penitentiary of Tanjungbalai Asahan. Providing assimilation does not have a significant impact on crime rates. Tujuan penelitian untuk menganalisis regulasi penerapan asimilasi pada masa Covid-19 di lembaga pemasyarakatan guna mengurangi tingkat penyebaran Covid-19 di lembaga pemasyarakatan. Pemerintah Indonesia melalui Kementerian Hukum dan HAM mengambil kebijakan pembebasan narapidana untuk memutus mata rantai Covid-19. Penelitian ini penting dilakukan untuk mengetahui kebijakan pembebasan narapidana dalam hal untuk memutus mata rantai Covid-19 yang dalam hal ini merupakan wewenang Pemerintah Indonesia melalui Kementrian Hukum dan HAM. Penelitian ini mengunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris yang memuat data dilapangan secara langsung di Lembaga Permasyarakatan Kelas II B Tanjungbalai Asahan. Penelitian ini memiliki fokus kajian yaitu pemberian asimilisasi pada masa Covid-19. Kebijakan Pemerintah melalui Kementerian Hukum dan HAM dalam menerapkan asmilisasi di Lembaga Permasyarakatan pada Covid-19 dan pengaruh penerapan asimilasi terhadap tingkat kejahatan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini diketahui bahwa pembebasan dilakukan melalui proses asimilasi dan integrasi berupa pembebasan cuti bersyarat, cuti menjelang bebas, dan narapidana yang 2/3 masa hukumannya jatuh pada tanggal 1 April 2020 hingga 31 Desember 2020. Pembebasan narapidana dewasa dan anak untuk memutus mata rantai penyebaran Covid-19. Pembebasan dilakukan melalui proses asimilasi dan integrasi berupa pembebasan cuti bersyarat, cuti menjelang bebas, dan narapidana yang 2/3 masa hukumannya jatuh pada tanggal 1 April 2020 hingga 31 Desember 2020. Pembebasan narapidana dewasa dan anak untuk memutus mata rantai penyebaran.Pemberian asimilasi tidak memberikan dampak yang signifikan terhadap tingkat kejahatan. 

The examine target to decide the role of the prosecutor in the implementation of diversion so that you can encourage the realization of a diversion settlement a good way to decrease the negative effect on youngsters if the case is going to court. The public prosecutor is obligated to make diversion efforts with the aid of summuning and/or supplying case resolution thru diversion to the kid and/or discern/father or morher as well as the sufferer or baby of the victim and/or parent/father or mother. Because of this, the role of the public prosecutor in sporting out diversion is not best limited to releasing responsibilities, but should be greater active to inpire the conclusion of a diversion agreement. This research is essential so that the implementation of diversion is prioritized within the settlement of kids instances by way of the general public prosecutor. This take a look at uses emperical juridical research strategies. This research has novel fee because it discusses in particular about the role of prosecutors in imposing diversion within the area. Based at the effects of the observe, it could be seen that the position of the prosecutor in the implementation of diversion is as a facilitator by way of seeking to reconcile the victim, in addition to the victims circle of relatives, in opposition to crook acts committed with the aid of   youngsters.  Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peran jaksa dalam pelaksanaan diversi guna upaya mendorong terwujudnya kesepakatan diversi sehingga bisa meminimalisir akibat kurang baik pada anak apabila perkaranya hingga ke pengadilan. Penuntut umum harus melaksanakan upaya diversi dengan memanggil dan/ ataupun menawarkan penyelesaian kasus lewat diversi kepada anak dan/ ataupun orang tua/ wali dan korban ataupun anak korban dan/ ataupun orang tua/ wali. Jaksa Penuntut umum dalam melakukan diversi tidak cuma sebatas membebaskan kewajiban saja, tetapi wajib lebih aktif dalam mendorong terwujudnya kesepakatan diversi. Penelitian ini penting dilakukan supaya pelaksanaan diversi diutamakan pada penyelesaian permasalahan anak oleh jaksa penuntut umum. Penelitian ini menggunakan tata cara penelitian yuridis empiris. Penelitian ini mempunyai nilai kebaharuan sebab mangulas secara khusus mengenai peran jaksa dalam penerapan diversi. Berdasarkan pada penelitian yang dilakukan hingga dapat diketahui bahwa peran jaksa dalam penerapan diversi menjadi fasilitator dengan berupaya mendamaikan anak/ orangtua/ wali dengan korban/ orangtua/ wali atas perbuatan pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak.