This research aims to understand and analyze the implementation of a Regional Regulation related to the Organization of Child Protection in Karanganyar Regency and the factors that hinder the Organization of Child Protection in Karanganyar Regency. The type of research used is empirical research. The nature of this research is descriptive with an approach based on data obtained from a source or focused interview and a legislative approach or statute approach. The type of data used includes primary and secondary legal materials. The data collection techniques used in this research include surveys through document study methods, interviews, and observations. Primary data is collected by studying related legislation and regulations as legal materials and conducting observations and interviews with sources as research objects, while secondary data is collected through literature studies of scientific books, law journals, theses, dissertations, legal articles, and legal materials relevant to this legal research.  The results of the research show that the implementation of a Regional Regulation related to the Organization of Child Protection serves as legal protection that acts as a guarantee to provide justice and legal certainty for children, especially in protecting children's rights. The obstacles in the Organization of Child Protection in Karanganyar Regency are due to the handling being based on community reports and the lack of education, understanding, and knowledge of the community regarding Karanganyar Regency Regional Regulation Number 4 of 2021 on the Organization of Child Protection, which is caused by limited funds for its implementation.
 

This study aims to analyze the similarities and differences in the position and authority of the Judicial Commission in Indonesia, Argentina, Mexico and Brazil and analyze the challenges faced by the Indonesian Judicial Commission to optimize its duties and authorities. This study is a normative legal study with a comparative approach. The types of materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The legal material collection technique used is document study or literature study. The data analysis technique uses the siligism method with a deductive thinking pattern. The results of the study are that the Judicial Commissions of Indonesia, Argentina, Mexico and Brazil have similarities related to the basic regulations regarding the Judicial Commission institution which are both regulated in the constitution and the composition of membership consisting of partisans. The differences between institutions similar to the Judicial Commission are related to authority, number of members and term of office. The challenges faced by the Judicial Commission are the limited authority held by the institution, and the overlapping authority between the Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court related to supervision.