With increasing global competition and rapid technological advancements, sharia businesses face the challenge of achieving sustainability while maintaining a competitive advantage in accordance with Islamic principles. This study aims to examine how the application of strategic management in sharia businesses can support sustainability and market differentiation based on ethical values. The research method used in this study is a literature review, analyzing various academic sources related to business strategy, sustainability, and Islamic economic principles. The findings indicate that effective strategic management, when properly implemented through the processes of formulation, execution, and evaluation, can help business practitioners adapt to changes in both the internal and external environments. In sharia businesses, strategies should be rooted in values such as honesty, trustworthiness, and social responsibility. These values not only serve as moral guidelines but can also enhance customer loyalty and provide a competitive edge. Furthermore, the adoption of digital technology and promotional strategies aligned with Islamic values has been shown to broaden market reach and improve operational efficiency. SWOT analysis is also employed as a tool to inform relevant and strategic decision-making. Therefore, the application of strategic management in accordance with Islamic values can effectively create businesses that are not only competitive but also sustainable and beneficial to society.

This think around focuses to essentially and comprehensively see at the concept of citizenship from the focuses of see of sacrosanct law and Islamic law. Citizenship may be a legal status that characterizes the rights and commitments of an individual interior a state. Inside the setting of sacrosanct law, citizenship is controlled through constitutions and citizenship laws that incorporate distinctive perspectives such as the benchmarks of citizenship (ius soli, ius sanguinis), human rights, and conscious commitments. Sacrosanct law besides considers the measures of vote based framework, value, and adjust in choosing citizenship status. On the other hand, from the point of see of Islamic law, the concept of citizenship isn't because it were seen from a legal-formal point but in addition incorporates moral and ethical estimations. Islamic law gives heading on the commitments and rights of individuals as parcel of the ummah (the Muslim community), based on Shariah measures such as value ('adl), open welfare (maslahah), and the confirmation of fundamental human rights. Besides, Islamic law considers the rights of non-Muslims interior an Islamic state setting through the concept of "ahl al-dhimmah" (guaranteed people) and the benchmarks of minority rights security. This examine grasps a essential and comparative examination approach to evaluate the resemblances and contrasts between these two perspectives. The revelations illustrate that in show disdain toward of foremost contrasts in their philosophical and methodological bases, both secured law and Islamic law share common goals, to be particular the confirmation of human rights and social value. In any case, contrasts inside the interpretation of these concepts can impact the execution of citizenship approaches in several countries. The think approximately additionally highlights the challenges and openings in coordination Islamic law benchmarks into the framework of display day sacrosanct law, particularly in Muslim-majority countries. At final, the examine proposes the require for more genuinely interest talk to realize a concordant agreeable vitality between secured law and Islamic law in controlling citizenship sensibly and comprehensively.