This research studies consumer protection against the dangers of using mercury skincare for health, so that consumers, especially women, can be more careful in choosing and using skincare. Mercury is an ingredient that is often added to skincare ingredients that function to produce white facial skin quickly. Mercury can flow through the blood throughout the body which can cause death. However, many consumers among women are more easily tempted to use mercury-based skincare because they see instant results. Skincare made from mercury is strictly prohibited from use because of its content which can cause damage to organs and nerves of the body by a substance such as chemicals and cause abnormalities in the functioning of the health system. The purpose of this study is to analyse consumer protection against cases of skincare products containing mercury such as the case of lightening cream and night cream brand MH.  
 

Notaries have a crucial role in making the deed of establishment of a limited liability company which is the basis for the existence of a legal entity. However, in practice, deeds containing false data are often found, causing legal problems related to the liability of the parties involved. This research aims to analyse the application of the piercing the corporate veil doctrine to limited liability companies established with false data as well as the notary's responsibility in such cases. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results show that the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil can be applied when there is evidence of abuse of the legal entity, so that the responsibility shifts to the owner or management. In addition, notaries who are negligent or intentionally allow forgery can be held civil, administrative, and criminal liabilities. Therefore, notaries must apply the precautionary principle in making deeds to avoid legal consequences.

The rapid development of digital technology has encouraged the emergence of crypto assets as a new investment instrument in Indonesia. Along with the increasing popularity of digital assets, the government responded by imposing tax policies in the form of Value Added Tax (VAT) and Income Tax (PPh) on every crypto transaction. This study aims to analyze the suitability of the tax imposition with the basic principles of tax law, as well as to examine its impact on the growth of the digital asset industry in Indonesia. The method used in this research is a literature study with a descriptive qualitative approach sourced from regulations, scientific journals, official reports, and international comparative studies. The results of the study show that the imposition of VAT on crypto transactions is not fully in line with the principles of fairness, legal certainty, and efficiency in taxation. In addition, the disproportionately high tax burden has a negative impact on investor interest, encourages offshore transactions, and slows down innovation in the domestic blockchain industry. Therefore, policy reformulation is needed, such as the application of capital gains tax and the provision of fiscal incentives, so that tax regulations can support the sustainable growth of the national digital economy.