The aim of this research is to find out whether behavioral accounting has an effect on employee performance at KSP Kopdit Pintu Air Rotat. The data used in this research uses primary data where primary data collection is carried out by distributing questionnaires to employees of KSP Kopdit Pintu Air Rotat. The sampling technique used in this research is probability sampling using the Simple Random Sampling Technique method, namely sampling is carried out randomly without paying attention to strata in the population so that the number of samples obtained in this research is 43 employees of the Main Branch of KSP Kopdit Pintu Air Rotat. The data collection process was carried out by distributing questionnaires to respondents. Where the research instrument uses a Likert scale. The data analysis method uses simple linear regression analysis with the help of the SPSS program. The results of this research show that behavioral accounting variables have a significant effect on employee performance at KSP Kopdit Pintu Air Rotat. This can be seen from the results of the partial test (t test) with a significant value of 0.001 ? 0.005. The results of this research are also supported by the results of descriptive analysis of variables, the average score of the behavioral accounting variable is 83.13%, while the average score of the employee performance variable is 79.41%.

Research This study aims to determine the application of accountability accounting as a tool for production cost control and performance appraisal at UPT. production cost control and performance appraisal at Sikka Innovation Center. innovation center. In the application of responsibility accounting there are several indicators, namely, organizational structure, budget, separation of controllable and uncontrollable costs, account code classification, account reporting, and performance appraisal at UPT. controlled and uncontrolled, account code classification, accountability report. accountability report. Implementation of accountability accounting as a performance appraisal tool There are several indicators, namely, identification of the center of responsibility center, standards are set as benchmarks for manager performance on certain responsibility center, manager performance is measured by comparing the budget and realization between budget and realization, managers are individually rewarded or punished by higher management. or punishment from higher management.  This research uses a qualitative descriptive method. Techniques data collection techniques using literature study, observation, interviews, and documentation. documentation. The data analysis technique is done by comparing the existing theories that already exist with the data obtained from the case study.  The research results obtained from the application of accountability accounting as a means of controlling production costs and performance appraisal has not been effective because the and performance appraisal has not been effective because there is no separation between controlled and uncontrolled costs. controlled and uncontrolled costs.