This research discusses the role of environmental law in preventing environmental damage and pollution with a case study of illegal shrimp farmers in the Karimunjawa National Park Area. The Karimun Jawa National Park area is an ecosystem that is rich in biodiversity and has vital ecological functions. However, illegal shrimp farming activities in this area have caused significant environmental damage, including decreased water quality and damage to mangrove habitats.This research uses a normative juridical approach to analyze applicable environmental legal regulations and policies as well as the effectiveness of law enforcement in preventing and dealing with the activities of illegal shrimp farmers. The research results show that although there are clear regulations regarding environmental protection, implementation and enforcement of the law are still weak. Lack of coordination between institutions, minimal human resources, and technical obstacles in the field are the main inhibiting factors in enforcing environmental law. This research recommends increasing law enforcement capacity, increasing coordination between institutions, and strengthening local community participation in environmental protection efforts in the Karimunjawa National Park Area. With these steps, it is hoped that environmental damage and pollution due to illegal activities can be minimized.

The rise of online gambling, which is mostly carried out by lower middle class people, can have a negative impact on the economic development of Indonesia. One of the direct negative impacts of online gambling on the country's economy is that online gambling can reduce state income. This is because the government does not receive taxes from illegal online gambling activities. Apart from that, online gambling can also cause economic losses for society. This legal research aims to find out the factors and how the law is enforced against online gambling players. The type of legal research carried out in this research is normative legal research, namely where law is conceptualized as what is written in statutory regulations (law in the books). ) or law is conceptualized as a rule or norm which is a benchmark for human behavior that is considered appropriate. Based on the research results, it is understood that the factors that cause a person to commit a criminal act of online gambling are influenced by two factors, namely internal and external factors. Internal factors come from within the perpetrator while external factors come from outside the perpetrator, such as the perpetrator's social environment.

This writing is titled “Enforcement Of Environmental Law Through Civil Law Aspects” that aims to know and understand how the environment through the law enforcement aspects of civil law. In this paper the authors use the method of normative research. The results of the analysis are obtained, is that the law enforcement aspects of the environment through civil law can be done through the courts and the line outside the court.

This article aims to analyze the legal certainty of Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU related to the implementation of the duties, authorities, and responsibilities of bankruptcy supervisory judges in supervising the management and execution of bankruptcy property in the Surabaya Commercial Court. The research method used in this article is empirical juridical with case approach. The writing of this article first reviewed previous research related to the role and authority of supervisory judges in the Commercial Court, but in each article only describes the contents of the provisions of Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU related to the role and authority of bankruptcy law supervisory judges, and then this article analyzes the legal certainty of the enforcement of the authority and responsibility of the supervisory judge in the Surabaya Commercial Court on charges of having received bribes from PT Sky Camping Indonesia (SCI) as a curator in the bankruptcy process. The results of this article show that the legal certainty of Law No. 37 of 2004 on Insolvency and PKPU related to the authority and responsibility of supervisory judges, in practice in the field is not fully operational. The supervisory judge does not carry out his duties and authority to oversee the management and release of bankruptcy property because it has received bribes from PT SCI as a curator so that the supervisory judge determines the verdict of the debtor's bankruptcy assets to non-bankruptcy.Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa kepastian hukum Undang-Undang No. 37 tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU terkait pelaksanaan tugas, kewenangan, dan tanggung jawab Hakim Pengawas kepailitan dalam mengawasi pengurusan dan pemberesan harta pailit di Pengadilan Niaga Surabaya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam artikel ini adalah yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Penelitian artikel ini terlebih dahulu mereview penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya terkait peran dan wewenang Hakim Pengawas di Pengadilan Niaga, namun pada masing-masing artikel tersebut hanya memaparkan isi ketentuan Undang-Undang No. 37 tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU terkait peran dan wewenang Hakim Pengawas hukum kepailitan, selanjutnya artikel ini menganalisa kepastian hukum pelaksaan Undang-Undang No. 37 tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU terkait wewenang dan tanggung jawab Hakim Pengawas di Pengadilan Niaga Surabaya atas dakwaan telah menerima suap dari PT Sky Camping Indonesia (SCI) sebagai Kurator dalam proses kepailitan. Hasil artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa kepastian hukum Undang-Undang No. 37 tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU terkait wewenang dan tanggung jawab Hakim Pengawas, dalam praktiknya di lapangan tidak sepenuhnya berjalan. Hakim Pengawas menyalahgunakan tugas dan wewenangnya untuk mengawasi pengurusan dan pemberesan harta pailit dikarenakan telah menerima suap dari PT SCI sebagai Kurator supaya Hakim Pengawas menetapkan putusan aset pailit debitur menjadi non pailit.