This research discusses the criminal act of money laundering through crypto assets and the form of criminal liability for crypto assets as an object of money laundering in Indonesia. Crypto assets function as an investment not for currency as a means of payment, but crypto assets are legally designated as digital commodity objects in the form of assets. Crypto assets have the threat of being misused as a new mode of money laundering to hide and disguise the proceeds of criminal acts. This research is structured with a statutory approach, concept approach and case approach with data collection based on literature and secondary materials.The results of the discussion of this research show that legitimate crypto assets as digital commodities can turn into illegitimate or illegal crypto assets as a result of the object of the means of criminal acts of money laundering. Money laundering through crypto assets that fulfill the elements of the criminal act of money laundering has criminal liability. The perpetrators of money laundering through crypto assets can be reached and held accountable according to the money laundering article violated in Law Number 8 Year 2010.

Health is a human right and is an element of welfare because health is a community need and must be realized. One of the health supports is medicine, the function of medicine is prevention, healing, recovery, health improvement, and contraception, for humans. Based on its function and the dangerous consequences of drug consumption, its manufacture and distribution must be under the supervision of the Food and Drug Monitoring Agency, by Presidential Regulation Number 80 of 2017 concerning the Food and Drug Monitoring Agency.Under his supe rvision, illegal drugs remain widespread and consumed in inappropriate doses by the public, including hard drugs and narcotics. As a result of dependence, many drug traffickers are caught and repeat the same actions (recidivists). Drug recidivism is regulated in Law Number 5 of 2009 concerning Narcotics Article 144 paragraph (1). However, the distribution of narcotics continues to occur. From the results of this research, the author found that BPOM's efforts as a supervisory body need to be increased, not only collaborating between agencies but also inviting the community, this is also to realize Chapter XIII concerning Community Participation, Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Also, apply the most severe sanctions to create a deterrent effect so that there is no repetition of criminal acts of narcotics trafficking.
 
 

This research discusses the defamation that has been committed by Haris Azhar (HA) and Fatiah Maulidyianti (FM) who in one of their YouTube video uploads entitled 'There is a Lord Luhut Behind the Economic-OPS Military Relations of Intan Jaya!!! General BIN Also There!! NgeHAMtam' has defamed and caused false suspicion against Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan. It is known that HA and FM called Luhut 'lord'. Luhut also said that material losses do not need to be calculated, but morally, accusing me of being a criminal and being called a 'lord' is very detrimental to him and his family. This research will also discuss the defamation by Haris and Fatiah when viewed from the Criminal Code (KUHP), and Law Number 11 of 2008 which has been amended by Law Number 19 of 2016. This research uses normative / dogmatic juridical research methods. This research uses primary legal materials and secondary legal materials as the legal basis for completing this research. This research also uses the Statue Approach (approach through legislation), Conceptual Approach (conceptual approach), and Case Approach (case approach). In the results of this study, it can be concluded that the actions of HA and FM can be categorized as defamation because they have fulfilled the elements of Article 311 of the Criminal Code on slander and Article 318 of the Criminal Code on false suspicion. The advice in the form of legal opinion is that the prosecutor should be able to provide charges to HA and FM related to Article 311 of the Criminal Code on slander and Article 318 on false pretenses because this can later become the basis for the Judge's decision following the prosecutor's indictment.