This study aims to examine the regulatory framework concerning Government Employees with Work Agreements (PPPK), particularly in Functional Expert Positions in Indonesia and to identify how the policy implementation of PPPK in Functional Expert Positions is carried out at the Constitutional Court. The research employs an empirical method with a qualitative approach. The types of data used include both primary and secondary data: primary data was obtained through field interviews, while secondary data consists of documents, information, books, and facts sourced from official records and legislation. The findings of this study indicate that the implementation of policies related to Functional Expert Positions at the Constitutional Court still faces regulatory inconsistencies, especially in the selection mechanism, which does not fully adhere to the established rules. Additionally, competency development for PPPK employees is not supported by systematic planning, which risks creating skill gaps. This situation may lead to uncertainty in career progression and reflects that the management of PPPK still encounters several fundamental challenges in its implementation.
 

This legal research aims to investigate how absentee land regulations are implemented in relation to agricultural land ownership in Temanggung Regency. The main objective is, first, to understand how absentee land regulations are implemented in relation to agricultural land ownership in Temanggung Regency. Second, to identify the factors that cause absentee ownership and control of land in Temanggung Regency. This research is a type of empirical juridical legal research that is descriptive in nature. This research method uses primary data obtained through direct interviews with the Temanggung Land Office and people who own absentee land. The research results show that absentee ownership and control of land still occurs in Temanggung Regency due to less than optimal implementation of the authority of the Temanggung Land Office. This condition occurs because there are buying and selling transactions outside official mechanisms and a lack of clear records by the Temanggung Regency Land Office regarding land inheritance. Several factors that cause the emergence of absentee land control and ownership in Temanggung Regency include legal aspects, law enforcement, community participation, infrastructure and culture.

This study aims to compare the regulation of cosmetic distribution between the Food and Drug Administration (BPOM) in Indonesia and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States. The comparative method is carried out by analyzing regulations, registration procedures, security requirements, post-marketing supervision, and the role of each institution in maintaining the safety of cosmetic products. The research results show that although BPOM and FDA have the same goal of protecting consumers and ensuring the safety of cosmetic products, there are significant differences in their regulatory approaches and registration procedures. BPOM tends to adopt a more formal, qualified approach with strict requirements for registration of cosmetic products, while FDA uses a more flexible approach with more responsibility devolving to manufacturers to ensure compliance with approvals. The two agencies also have differences in post-marketing oversight. Indonesia's BPOM tends to be more active in conducting regular product testing on the market, while the United States FDA relies more on consumer and manufacturer reports to identify unsafe products. However, both face similar challenges in dealing with the rapid development of the cosmetics industry and product innovation. Continuous efforts are needed to improve regulation and supervision to ensure that cosmetic products in circulation are safe for consumers around the world.