The purpose is to find out the impact of the implementation of mediation and the factors that affect the success of mediation in divorce cases in Religious Courts. Mediation is a form of case settlement through Alternative Dispute Resolution. The urgency of research to resolve disputes in the divorce process in Religious Courts and help build better relationships after divorce. Using normative and empirical research types. The results of the study show that the impact of mediation on divorce is to reduce the accumulation of cases in Court, increase the satisfaction of the parties, increase time/cost efficiency, minimize conflicts, maintain privacy, encourage agreements, and build positive relationships after divorce. Factors that affect the success of divorce mediation in the Religious Court are the commitment of both parties, the competence of the mediator, support from the Court, emotional and psychological factors, and the involvement and support of third parties. In conclusion, mediation has a significant positive impact on the settlement of divorce cases in the Religious Court so mediation is an effective method and its implementation needs to be continuously improved in the Religious Court. The findings show that mediation reduces the divorce rate by increasing communication between husband and wife and resolving problems through dialogue.

The aim of this research is to discuss the implementation of land acquisition for the public interest in terms of the construction of a public cemetery in Sipatana District and the mechanism for providing compensation. This research uses empirical legal methods, by presenting data based on field facts which are then analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The research results show that there are problems in acquiring land as the location for the TPU in question. This is marked by the sale and purchase of land to the government by other parties, who are still the family of the land owner, Mr Yamin Tolinggi. What this means is that the seller of the land is not the actual owner but just a nephew who happens to live at that location. Apart from that, the actual owner demands payment from the land, which is then confirmed by evidence and ownership rights based on court decisions. Disposal of land is a last resort and must obtain approval from the party entitled to the land, however, the land release was in error, where the government incorrectly provided compensation or payment to parties who were not actually the owners of the land. The mechanism for providing compensation for land acquisition by the government for the construction of TPU in Sipatana District is carried out by the Gorontalo Province and Gorontalo City governments on land covering an area of ??27,766 m2 or around 2.7 hectares. However, land acquisition payments made by both the provincial and Gorontalo city governments were given to those who were not actually entitled to them. The total compensation for land acquisition was IDR 3.5 billion, but the entire amount was given to other parties. Therefore, the real owner then sued over his approximately 7,186 meter land and won in court, and in the end the Gorontalo provincial government awarded compensation of Rp. 750 million (seven hundred and fifty million rupiah) to land owners, through the 2023 APBD budget.

The aim of this research is to address the role of the KUA in overcoming unregistered marriages (Nikah Siri) in Kota Tengah District, Gotontalo City and the factors that hinder the role of the KUA itself in unregistered marriages (Nikah Siri). This type of research is Normative Empirical research using a qualitative descriptive approach, analyzing information and interpreting qualitative data.          The research results show that the role and efforts of the KUA have not been effective in dealing with unregistered marriages (Nikah Siri) even though they have implemented a government program, namely the marriage guidance program (Binwin), which provides pre-marital guidance and the formation of sakinah families in order to build superior human resources and reduce the divorce rate. by providing counseling about marriage registration and sakinah families to prospective couples who are about to get married and also by conducting outreach to the wider community. The factors that hinder the KUA in preventing unregistered marriages for couples who are not legally married in Kota Tengah District are caused by 2 factors, namely, internal factors, namely the lack of competent human resources who can provide socialization to the community, and the lack of adequate facilities and other factors. Other external factors include indifferent attitudes, non-compliance with the law, and low legal awareness in society. Therefore, we must work together with agencies such as the KUA in building character and also informing millennials about the impacts of having a relationship before marriage so that there is no such thing as an unregistered marriage. 

This research aims to find out an overview of fisheries profit sharing in the Huyula Tradition in the Paguat Coastal Area, based on the title raised in this research. This research uses a type of normative legal research. The process of collecting data from the objects studied in this research is using library research. The data obtained by this research uses a normative analysis method, namely by interpreting and discussing research material based on law, legal norms, legal theories and doctrines related to the main problem. The results of this research show that the Juridical Review of Fishery Profit Sharing in the Huyula Tradition on the Paguat Coast, namely in the Bongoime Village community, Huyula values are applied by the community in various aspects of life. Huyula values are manifested in various activities, for example in community service for environmental cleanup rural areas, building village roads, death, cleaning local irrigation canals and agricultural activities. Community service activities for the public interest, in coordination with the local government without distinguishing between social status, community service activities are usually referred to as "Hulunga" activities by the community as well as factors that influence profit sharing problems, namely economic factors, catch factors, entanglement factors. debt, education factor, legal knowledge factor and age factor.

The aim of this activity is to provide an understanding of the fair distribution of inheritance in cases of fighting over inheritance rights using several types of settlement methods. To give people an understanding that the position of a will is very important in Indonesia and even if it is not carried out according to existing procedures then the will is not legally valid. This type of research is normative-empirical legal research. According to Abdulkadir Muhammad, what is meant by normative-empirical legal research (applied law research) is research that uses normative-empirical legal case studies in the form of legal behavioral products. The results of the research obtained regarding the granting of wills that did not comply with procedures were that there were conflicting norms due to the public's lack of understanding of the regulations for granting valid wills. In conclusion, the legal status of wills will be very well maintained if the community is able to apply the legal procedures that the law has established because everything we do will definitely be directly related to the law, as we know as citizens of Indonesia, we are a country that upholds the law. justice for human rights, in its application laws are made to provide legal certainty to the community, it only remains for the community itself to be able to implement it or not, because if seen from a civil law perspective, everything that is done by humans is not in accordance with the law. existing then the action can be null and void by law.

This research aims to find out and analyze whether the judge's dissenting opinion in case No.0687/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Gtlo regarding the cancellation of this grant provides justice for the parties. The method used in this research is normative juridical with a statutory approach (statute aproach) and a case approach (case aoprouch). The results of this research show that dissenting opinions provide justice for the parties because having a dissenting opinion provides something that is really needed by the parties where the parties feel that their arguments are heard and considered and not set aside by the panel of judges.