This study aims to describe and analyze: The Implementation of Regional Regulation 19 of 2022 concerning the Authority of the Civil Service Police Unit in the Control of Street Vendors in Situbondo Regency. 2. The obstacles faced and what solutions have been carried out by the Civil Police in Controlling Street Vendors in Situbondo Regency. The research is a qualitative descriptive analysis. The data analysis technique uses a technique developed by McNabb (2002), namely Grouping the data according to key constructs, identifying bases for interpretation, developing generalizations from the data, Testing Alternative interpretations and Forming and/or refining generalizable theory from case study. The results of the study show that the Pamong Praja Police Unit in controlling Street Vendors in Situbondo Regency Based on article 19 of 2022 article 2 has been running in accordance with its duties and functions. In regulating street vendors, four policy implementation models are Communication Factors, Disposition Resources or Attitudes and Bureaucratic Structures.  The obstacles faced include human resource factors, both in terms of communication skills and approaches, as well as the number of members. The solutions carried out include Improving the Quality and Quantity of Human Resources at Satpol PP. By conducting an intensive coaching program to improve the competence and expertise of Satpol PP members in collaborating with the community to create community security and increase the number of Satpol PP members who are tasked with controlling street vendors. Improve socialization programs to the community and improve themselves by taking a persuasive approach and acting elegantly by not prioritizing arrogance as a security apparatus.

The easy generation as the successor to the future generation of the nation has an important and urgent role on its shoulders. One of the roles that must be shared by the nation's generation, especially millennials, is how they are able and have a character that is in accordance with the noble values ??of Pancasila, especially in law enforcement and anti-corruption behavior. It is important to know that corruption is a problem in Indonesia that has not yet been resolved and there tends to be an increase in cases from the previous year. This indicates that the regeneration of the Indonesian nation is on the verge of failure in forming the character of an anti-corruption generation of the nation. By actively and massively applying and implementing Pancasila values, it is hoped that this anti-corruption attitude will be able to grow. In this article, the normative research type is used to analyze the above issues which are the focus of the research. The results of the research show that the existence of Pancasila as a way of life for the younger generation of the Indonesian nation is not working effectively, so concrete efforts are needed to instill these values, one of which is education and the formation of the Pancasila character, both through formal/educational and non-formal institutions.
 

The claim formulation made by the plaintiff is used as a reference for a case or dispute in a court. A lawsuit that does not comply with the requirements of the procedural law will be declared that the lawsuit cannot be accepted or in other terms niet ontvankelijke verklaard (NO) in the final decision by the judge. There are various reasons for the dropping of the niet ontvankelijke verklaard, one of which is because the lawsuit that was made was not perfect, in the sense that the lawsuit was vague (obscuur libel). Obscuur libel means a claim whose contents are unclear so that it is said to be neither clear nor dark in the formulation of the claim. This research uses a normative juridical method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This research contains an analysis of a decision which states that the lawsuit contains elements of obcur libel so it is declared unacceptable. Judges need to dig deeper into jurisprudence to analyze a lawsuit so that it produces the right decision.AbstrakFormulasi gugatan yang dibuat oleh penggugat digunakan sebagai acuan dari suatu perkara atau sengketa disebuah pengadilan. Gugatan yang tidak sesuai syarat dalam hukum acara akan dinyatakan bahwa gugatan tersebut tidak dapat diterima atau istilah lainnya niet ontvankelijke verklaard (NO) pada putusan akhir oleh hakim. Alasan dari penjatuhan niet ontvankelijke verklaard sendiri terdapat berbagai penyebab salah satunya dikarenakan gugatan yang dibuat tidak sempurna, dalam artian gugatan tersebut kabur (obscuur libel). Obscuur libel memiliki arti gugatan yang isinya tidak jelas sehingga dikatakan tidak terang atau gelap dalam formulasi gugatannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan penekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Penelitian ini berisi analisis suatu putusan yang menyatakan bahwa gugatan mengandung unsur obcuur libel sehingga dinyatakan tidak dapat diterima. Hakim perlu menggali lebih dalam mengenai suatu yurisprudensi untuk menggali dapat menganalisis suatu gugatan sehingga menghasilkan putusan yang tepat.

E-Court is a court instrument in seeking legal certainty so that cases can be resolved quickly. The scope of E-court includes online case registration (e-filling), online estimation of case costs (e-skum), online payment of downpayment (e-payment), online summons of parties (e-summons) and online hearings (e-litigation) by sending court documents (Replik, Duplik, Conclusion, Answer). The focus that will be discussed in this scientific work includes first, how to read the judge’s decision via E-court. Second, how to apply the principle of hearings open to the public via E-court. To facilitate understanding in this research, researchers used a Normative Juridical research method with a Legislative approach. The data colletion technique carried out by the researcher was by identifying and analyzing statutory regulations, namely PERMA Number 1 Of 2019. The results of the research carried out by the researcher can be concluded that first, the application of the principle of open to the public hearings is appropriate and reflects the applicable statutory regulations. And will still be implemented, but with several restrictions on the number of court visitors and the distance between visitors. Second, regarding the reading of the judge’s decision via e-court, it is legally considered to have been attended by the parties and carried out in a trial open to the public. And has legal force and legal consequences.