This research is normative legal research that uses a normative judicial approach. The research results show that: (1) There are differences of opinion between judges, e-commers and notaries. regarding the strength of proof of a signature on an electronic document in proving civil procedural law in Indonesia. Judges and e-commers are of the opinion that electronic documents that have been signed with an electronic signature have the same evidentiary power as authentic deeds made by authorized officials, after the issuance of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. Meanwhile, the notary is of the opinion that an electronic document signed with an electronic signature only has the power of proof under the hand, because it does not meet the requirements as an authentic deed, that is, it does not appear before an authorized official; and (2) Settlement of disputes resulting from non-fulfillment of the agreement can be resolved using a court or an institution outside the court, but e-comers generally use institutions outside the court because it is considered easier and faster to resolve and the costs are cheaper.The use of an electronic signature on an electronic document can guarantee the security of an electronic information message, which uses a public network, because electronic signatures are created based on asymmetric cryptography technology. From this research, there are differences of opinion regarding the evidentiary power of electronic documents signed with electronic signatures that are used as evidence in trials. The use of an electronic signature on an electronic document can guarantee the security of an electronic information message, which uses a public network, because electronic signatures are created based on asymmetric cryptography technology. From this research, there are differences of opinion regarding the evidentiary power of electronic documents signed with electronic signatures that are used as evidence in trials. Furthermore, electronic signatures need to be certified so that they have evidentiary power such as authentic deeds and there is no need to carry out digital forensic tests in the evidentiary process at trial.
 
 

This research aims to explain the influence of brand awareness and brand image on repurchase interest at Warmindo, Kediri City. The data analysis technique used by researchers in this research uses statistical tests through validity tests, reliability tests, classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression tests, t tests, F tests with SPSS version 16.0 tools. The methods used in this research are questionnaires, interviews and observation. The sampling technique in this research used a saturated sample technique, with a total of 100 respondents. Based on the research results obtained by researchers from the multiple linear regression equation Y = -1,786 + 0.613X1 + 0.795X2. The results of the analysis carried out, the research results show that the brand awareness variable has a significant effect on repurchase interest with evidence that Sig t 0.000 < 0.05, the brand image variable has a significant effect on repurchase interest with evidence that Sig t 0.000 > 0.05, the variable discipline has a significant effect on repurchase interest with evidence of Sig t 0.000 < 0.05, and the results of brand awareness and brand image simultaneously have a significant effect on repurchase interest with evidence of Sig t 0.000 < 0.05. The results of the analysis value R2 = 0.949 or 94.9%.

Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu menguji pengaruh Good Corporate Governance terhadap Profitabilitas baik secara parsial maupun secara simultan pada Perusahaan Perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2014-2020. Teknik pengambilan sampel dalam penelitian ini yaitu teknik Purposive Sampling (penentuan sampel dengan kriteria tertentu) dengan jenis penelitian Kuantitatif  Asosiatif. Jumlah sampel dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 35 laporan keuangan perusahaan perbankan. pengolahan data pada penelitian ini menggunakan Uji Asumsi Klasik, Regresi Linier Berganda, Koefisien Determinasi (R2), Uji t dan Uji F. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa variabel Komite Audit, Dewan Direksi, Komisaris Independen dan Kepemilikan Institusional berpengaruh terhadap Return on Equity secara parsial. Komite Audit, Dewan Direksi, Komisaris Independen dan Kepemilikan Institusional berpengaruh terhadap Return on Equity secara simultan. Perusahaan perbankan sebaiknya lebih mengoptimalkan aspek sistem Good Corporate Governance dalam pengelolaan perusahaan sehingga kinerja perusahaan akan meningkat dan tingkat kepercayaan investor lebih meningkat dalam berinvestasi karena pengolahan perusahaan yang baik.
 
Kata kunci: Dewan Direksi, Kepemilikan Institusional, Komisaris Independen, Komite Audit, Return on Equity (ROE).