This research aims to increase UMKM opportunities in Mojopilang Village. In this increasingly modern and sophisticated era, technology, especially social media, is growing rapidly and making things easier for its users. This is very profitable for looking for business opportunities, one of which is affiliate. This research uses an outreach method which includes training on how to create an affiliate account, mentoring to ensure that the training carried out can be applied, correct make-up procedures to maximize affiliate content, as well as evaluation in the form of questions and answers. This activity was carried out on December 13 2024, involving village communities, especially women and Mayjen Sungkono University students. Initial observation results show that several people in Mojopilang Village have the mindset that if they want to open a business, they must spend capital and have very little knowledge about affiliates. Through this outreach about affiliate make up, it is hoped that the village community, especially women, will understand and be interested in doing affiliate work, especially in the field of make up. The results of this evaluation can be seen from the enthusiasm of the socialization participants who were excited about the material presented and some of them even wanted to try becoming affiliates.

The purpose of this research is to investigate the legal framework allowing the finance minister to enforce a court decision that approves a good faith third-party objection request, as well as to explore the legal implications and recourse if the finance minister fails to implement the court decision. This study is prompted by Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2022, which elaborates on Article 19 of Law No. 31 of 1999. The significance of this research lies in providing legal certainty regarding the enforcement of court decisions granting good faith third-party objection requests. The research employs the normative legal research method and offers a new perspective by examining the implementation phase of objection application settlements. The findings indicate the Perma No. 2 of 2022 cannot be enforced without a regulation as a legal basis for the finance minister to govern the procedures for executing court decisions granting objections. Furthermore, the prohibition of state property confiscation leaves good faith third parties without legal protection, as there is no certainty about the legal consequences should the finance minister fail to implement the stipulation or court decision granting the objection of the good faith third party, and there are no available remedies for the Good Faith Third Party. Such Perma can not be effectively enforced without technical regulation on the procedure to execute the court verdict. Hence, it is recommended that the ministry of Finance needs to issue regulations concerning the execution of court verdicts providing legal certainty and protection for good faith third parties.

This study analyzes the employee performance assessment system at the Malang Regency Transportation Office, based on observations and interviews with several employees. Performance assessments are carried out annually with quarterly evaluations by the head of the sub-division. Evaluations include employee performance, financial administration, and staffing. The assessment process involves several stages: Annual Work Plan (RKT), Performance Agreement, Employee Performance Targets (SKP), and the use of the "SIAP KERJA" Application. The RKT is prepared as an elaboration of the Agency's strategy and facilitates program evaluation. A Performance Agreement is a commitment document between leaders and subordinates related to the implementation of tasks with performance indicators. SKP includes targets that must be achieved in a certain period, measured based on quantity, quality, time, and cost. The results of this assessment are then summarized in the "SIAP KERJA" Application, which experiences technical problems such as frequent errors or maintenance. The suggested solution is to fill in daily activities regularly. This performance assessment aims to improve the integrity, accountability, transparency, and performance of the apparatus, as well as be the basis for evaluation, awards, and sanctions to employees.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis ketidaktepatan putusan pengadilan perkara PT. AJS dengan terdakwa Benny Tjoktosaputro sebagai tindak pidana korupsi. Fokus kajian diarahkan kepada fakta hukum yang dinyatakan terbukti dalam pertimbangan hukum hakim terkait unsur delik dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1) Undang-undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Riset ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menjadikan putusan pengadilan sebagai bahan hukum primer. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbuatan terdakwa dalam perkara a quo lebih tepat dikategorikan sebagai tindak pidana pasar modal. Perampasan harta benda yang sebagian besar kepunyaan anak usaha PT. Hanson International Tbk dan harta benda terdakwa yang diperoleh sebelum keterlibatannya dalam perkara tersebut juga tidak tepat dan melanggar hak asasi manusia. Penetapan kerugian keuangan negara sebesar Rp. 12.157.000.000.000 juga tidak dapat dipertanggungjawabkan.  The purpose of this study is to examine the inaccuracy of the court's verdict in the case of PT. AJS vs. defendant Benny Tjoktosaputro is a corruption case. The study's focus is on the legal facts established by the judge's legal consideration of the offense promulgated in Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Law on the Eradication of Corruption. By making court judgments as of the primary source of law, this research is doctrinal legal research. The findings revealed that the defendant's acts should have been classified as a capital market offense.  Confiscation of property, most of which belongs to subsidiaries of PT. Hanson International Limited, as well as the defendant's property, acquired before his involvement in the case, is also unethical and in violation of human rights. The determination of IDR12,157,000,000,000 as state financial losses is also unreliable.  

Upaya kriminalisasi yang dilakukan melalui proses legislasi, tidak hanya sekedar membatasi perilaku tetapi juga memberi ancaman hukuman bagi pelanggarnya. Mengingat urgensi kriminalisasi adalah pembatasan hak, maka legislatif dalam merumuskan suatu perbuatan sebagai tindak pidana harus mengacu pada prinsip-prinsip pembatasan hak asasi manusia. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis diskursus teoretik tentang kriminalisasi berbasis hak asasi manusia dalam undang-undang bidang lingkungan hidup. Sebagai penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa proses penetapan suatu perbuatan sebagai tindak pidana oleh negara harus sesuai dengan batas kemampuan hukum pidana. Kriminalisasi merupakan tindakan kekuasaan negara yang paling mengganggu terhadap kebebasan perilaku sosial masyarakat. Rumusan kriminalisasi dalam undang-undang bidang lingkungan hidup telah merefleksikan prinsip tujuan yang sah dalam hukum, tetapi belum sepenuhnya mencerminkan prinsip pembatasan berdasarkan kebutuhan masyarakat yang demokratis. Kajian ini berkaitan dengan prinsip proporsionalitas dan ultimum remidium dalam hukum pidana. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan agar kriminalisasi undang-undang bidang lingkungan hidup perlu mengakomodasi prinsip pembatasan hak asasi manusia.

This paper is aimed at analyzing the concepts and parameters to determine an act as a bribery and gratuity in the Anti-Corruption Law and court cases.  This involved the application of the doctrinal legal research to understand these differences. The results of this study showed that bribery requires a meeting of mind between the bribe givers and bribe recipients which is not found in gratuity. The reporting mechanism and the reversal burden of proof do not apply to bribery while Operation Catching Hand does not apply to gratuity due to its inability to satisfy the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. Criminal sanctions are also imposed on both the giver and the recipient of a bribe while the act of a giver in gratuity is not considered as a criminal offense. The study also found that the court failed to apply these essential differences.