This research aims to analyze the revision of the Constitutional Court Law (UU MK) which has the potential to cripple the independence of judges and perpetuate authoritarian power in Indonesia. The research method used is critical analysis with a qualitative approach, which involves analysis of legal documents and related literature. This research reveals that the revision of the Constitutional Court Law could have a significant impact on the democratic system in Indonesia, with the risk of weakening the basic principles of the rule of law, separation of powers, and protection of citizens' constitutional rights. It is hoped that the research results will provide a comprehensive picture of the risks and impacts of the revision of the Constitutional Court Law and provide recommendations for strengthening the independence of the Constitutional Court and supporting the democratic system in Indonesia.

This research uses empirical legal methods to examine the integrity and credibility of the 2024 election organizers in Indonesia. Data was collected from various sources, including MK decisions, DKPP, election observer reports, academic publications, and related news. Data analysis was carried out to identify patterns, trends and implications for the integrity and credibility of election organizers, as well as evaluate the implementation of the General Principles of Good Government (AUPB) in organizing elections. The main objective of this research is to update the electoral system in Indonesia and ensure that elections are of quality, integrity and reliability. The research approach focuses on collecting empirical data from concrete cases during the 2024 Election and in-depth analysis of this data to identify emerging patterns and trends. Data analysis aims to evaluate the influence of political intervention, conflicts of interest, and compliance with legal rules and decisions on the integrity and credibility of election organizers. The results of the research will be compiled in a report that includes in-depth analysis of concrete cases, policy recommendations to improve the integrity and credibility of election organizers, as well as suggestions for improving the implementation of AUPB in the 2024 Election. This research is expected to provide a better understanding of the challenges and opportunities to ensure the integrity and credibility of election organizers in Indonesia, as well as providing concrete steps to improve the implementation of AUPB principles in the election context.

Technological developments ultimately require judicial bodies in various countries, including Indonesia to adopt the use of technology. Because the administration of Indonesian justice is based on the principle of simple, fast, and low cost. Utilization of information technology in the judicial process can increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the performance of the judiciary, so that it can answer the public's sense of justice. Because the main problems that are often faced in our judiciary are the slow handling of cases, the difficulty of accessing cases and the integrity of the judicial administration apparatus. This article is intended to examine how to regulate the use of technology in the judiciary, and how it impacts on access to justice. This article concludes, Electronic court proceedings need to be regulated in the law itself or accommodated in the current procedural law. Because the mission of adaptation and harmonization of various legal developments is very necessary. In addition, the government must also pay more attention to the readiness of courts in Indonesia to carry out using technology. For example, providing direction for building or upgrading electronic facilities for trials, both in courts and correctional facilities, as well as recruiting and providing IT human resources. So that by using technology can run effectively and efficiently.