These studies aim to determine which rules apply to the criminal act of currency counterfeiting. According to this perspective, a unique regulation governing the flow and counterfeiting of rupee currency is necessary for the development and strengthening of the financial sector. Standard research methodology based on statutory regulations is the methodology used. To answer legal problems, this approach uses research methods that examine and analyze the law as a basis. This can be in the form of criteria, rules, principles, theories and other literature. The results of the study show that legal regulations are in place to deal with currency counterfeiting, the weaknesses lie in a lack of understanding and tools to detect them and a lack of coordination between society and related institutions as well as a weak understanding of the law in society.
 
 

The resolution of land disputes through the judicial process is a step taken when non-litigation settlement efforts fail. This process involves a series of legal procedures aimed at enforcing land rights, including proof of ownership and other related rights. This article aims to analyze the procedures, challenges, and effectiveness of land dispute resolution in court. Using a normative-empirical approach, this study finds that although the judicial system provides a clear mechanism, there are several obstacles, such as lengthy legal processes, high costs, and the complexity of proving ownership, which can delay dispute resolution. In this regard, it is important for the parties involved to understand the applicable legal procedures and utilize alternative dispute resolution methods that can expedite land dispute resolution, such as mediation and arbitration. This study also recommends improvements in the judicial system and more efficient approaches to handling land disputes in the future.

Analyzing the Legal Considerations of the Panel of Judges in deciding a divorce lawsuit caused by domestic disputes, by examining the legal reasons used as the basis for decision making. Identifying factors that influence the judge's decision, both objective and subjective, such as evidence presented, reconciliation efforts, and social or psychological impacts on married couples and children. This research uses a normative research method, which is a research method that focuses on the analysis of applicable legal norms, both in statutory regulations and court practice. This research aims to analyze the legal considerations of the panel of judges in deciding divorce lawsuits caused by domestic disputes, by referring to relevant legal regulations and court decisions. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that the panel of judges' legal considerations regarding divorce lawsuits caused by domestic disputes are very complex and involve various legal, social and psychological factors. Limitations in Analyzing Psychological and Social Factors: Judges' considerations often involve deep psychological factors related to family dynamics, but these factors are difficult to analyze objectively by relying solely on legal documents and court decisions. This research has the potential to make a significant contribution to improving family law practice in Indonesia, improving existing legal processes, and having a positive impact on individuals and communities involved in divorce