This study aims to analyze the regulation of residence permit services for foreign citizens after the stipulation of the regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights number 22 of 2023 concerning visas and residence permits. This research is a normative research supported by field research and literature research using primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials collected using documentation techniques or literature studies and processed and analyzed in a qualitative descriptive manner. The results of the study show that (1) Synchronization of foreigner residence permit arrangements between Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration, Government Regulation Number 31 of 2013 concerning Implementation Regulations of Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration and  Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 22 of 2023 concerning Visas and Residence Permits It is important to create legal certainty and the effectiveness of the implementation of rules (2) Factors that cause Foreign Citizens to exceed the limit of Residence Permit in Indonesia, namely Legal Awareness Factors and Legal Compliance Factors.

The problems in this study are: 1. How far is the effectiveness of the implementation of the East Sumba Regency Government's Regional Apparatus Asset Report rules?; and 2. What are the factors that hinder the effectiveness of the implementation of the East Sumba Regency Government's Regional Apparatus Asset Report rules? The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the effectiveness of the application of the rules of the East Sumba Regency Government Regional Apparatus Asset Report. To determine and describe the factors that hinder the effectiveness of the application of the East Sumba Regency Government Regional Apparatus asset report rules. The type of research used by this researcher is empirical juridical method and the data is analyzed descriptively qualitative where the focus of the research is data collection of mandatory LHKPN, LHKPN Verification, and Legal Sanctions, as well as inhibiting factors, namely research whose data is directly obtained from the research location of 10 resource persons. The results of this study indicate that both the level of reporting and verification of LHKPN is not as expected, and the legal sanctions used are still considered weak. The inhibiting factors include legal factors that are considered less assertive related to LHKPN, less strict law enforcement against officials, inadequate facilities and infrastructure factors, and legal awareness factors of officials who are considered less responsible. It is recommended that state organizing officials immediately report their assets to the KPK and there is a need to improve regulations related to legal sanctions. Legal factors need to be improved in addition to the completeness of the rules and legal sanctions, law enforcement factors need strict action against Mandatory Reporters, facilities and infrastructure factors require the availability of adequate wifi facilities and provide competency training to employees related to the LHKPN filling process, as well as legal awareness factors to be more committed in carrying out their duties and responsibilities.