The study aims to identify factors affecting the success of construction projects and develop effective mitigation strategies using the House of Risk (HOR) approach. The qualitative method used in the study is observation, observation, analysis, and discussion of team members. The Risk Assessment (Agen Risiko) is identified and directed on HOR-1, based on Aggregate Risk Potential (ARP), and HOR-2, focuses on the implementation of mitigation measures. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of the HOR approach in mitigating and reducing risks in construction projects, providing practical guidance to increase risk management and evaluating the effectiveness of mitigation strategies.

The road paving and ditch construction project in Balun Ijuk Village, particularly from Sahpire Boarding House Lane to Jerambah Gantung Road, aims to enhance transportation infrastructure to support mobility for local residents and students of Bangka Belitung University. This study employs a quantitative method with a financial feasibility analysis approach. Findings indicate that the total project cost is IDR 988,153,778 with an implementation duration of 2 months and 3 weeks. The financial analysis yields a Net Present Value (NPV) of IDR 481,705,602.62 (15%) and IDR 326,419,561.97 (20%), an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 18%, a Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) of 1.48, and a Payback Period (PP) of 2 years and 7 months. Based on these results, the project is deemed economically viable with significant positive impacts on the community, including improved accessibility, reduced flooding risks via effective ditches, and enhanced connectivity and local economic activities. Additionally, the project implementation is expected to create temporary job opportunities and support sustainable infrastructure development in the region.

Democracy has faced various challenges over thousands of years, particularly concerning transitions that depend on social and political factors. The role of intelligence in democratic transitions is crucial but can be used to maintain power undemocratically. In Indonesia, post-reform, democracy has not been fully consolidated. The repressiveness of law enforcement and legal bias towards political elites are major factors in the decline of democracy. This research employs a normative legal research method with a prescriptive nature, aiming to analyze the intelligence's involvement in the democratic transition process in Indonesia. The research approach encompasses analytical, historical, comparative, and philosophical dimensions. Primary legal materials such as legislation regulations are utilized as data sources, alongside secondary legal materials like books and journals. Data collection techniques utilize the PRISMA method, and data analysis is conducted deductively using the same method. The findings of this research indicate that the cycle of democratic transition influences both the democratic system and intelligence activities. Subsequently, a case study in Indonesia examines complex intelligence issues, attributable to regime changes and inconsistent political policies. Hence, a comparative study with Brazil, which is institutionally more complex and structured, is deemed necessary.